Agora思想的公共广场

伊曼努尔·康德

1724–1804

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

在康德看来,我们只能认识世界向我们显现的样子——而道德来自理性,而不是来自情感或奖赏。

定位

德国唯心主义及其后继者 · 东欧 · 认识论, 伦理学, 形而上学, 美学, 政治与法

哥白尼式革命:不是知识依照对象,而是对象依照我们的知识。

核心思想

  • 定言命令
  • 先验观念论
  • 先天综合判断
  • 启蒙就是人摆脱自己造成的不成熟状态

学生: 约翰·哥特弗里德·赫尔德

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 5

  • 艾萨克·牛顿

    受其影响 ✓

    Kant’s Universal Natural History (1755) explained the origin of the planetary system by Newtonian attraction plus a repulsive force, a question Newton had left to God. I. Kant, Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels (1755); SEP “Kant’s Philosophy of Science”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    艾萨克·牛顿 › 1643–1727

  • 弗朗西斯·哈奇森

    受其影响 ✓

    In the Prize Essay (1764) Kant saw in Hutcheson’s ‘moral feeling’ a promising start towards the first material principles of morality, before developing his ethics of reason. I. Kant, Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und der Moral (1764); SEP “Kant’s Moral Philosophy”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    弗朗西斯·哈奇森 › 1694–1746

  • 让-雅克·卢梭

    受其影响 ✓

    In his Remarks on the Observations (1764–65) Kant wrote that Rousseau had set him right: he learned to honour human beings, not only to prize knowledge. I. Kant, Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen” (1764–65); SEP “Kant’s Moral Philosophy”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    让-雅克·卢梭 › 1712–1778

  • 亚当·斯密

    受其影响

    Marcus Herz called Smith Kant’s ‘favourite’ (letter of 1771); S. Fleischacker traces echoes of the Theory of Moral Sentiments in Kant’s moral philosophy. M. Herz to I. Kant, 9 July 1771; S. Fleischacker, “Philosophy in Moral Practice: Kant and Adam Smith”, Kant-Studien (1991)

    依据: AI 草稿

    亚当·斯密 › 1723–1790

  • 埃德蒙·柏克

    受其影响

    Kant’s Critique of Judgement (1790) cited Burke’s Enquiry as the leading empirical, ‘physiological’ account of the sublime and the beautiful, which Kant sought to ground transcendentally. I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790), General Remark on the Exposition of Aesthetic Reflective Judgements; E. Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757; Ger. tr. 1773)

    依据: AI 草稿

    埃德蒙·柏克 › 1729–1797

影响了 56

  • 索伦·克尔凯郭尔

    影响了 ✓

    According to Ronald M. Green, Kierkegaard’s ethics and view of sin and grace answer Kant’s Religion, a debt he rarely named (Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt, 1992). R. M. Green, Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt (1992); I. Kant, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (1793)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    索伦·克尔凯郭尔 › 1813–1855

  • 卡尔·马克思

    影响了

    In a letter to his father (1837) Marx described building a philosophy of law on the idealism of Kant and Fichte before he turned to Hegel. K. Marx, letter to Heinrich Marx, 10–11 November 1837 (MEW Ergänzungsband 1; MECW 1)

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

  • 埃德蒙德·胡塞尔

    影响了 ✓

    Husserl took up Kant’s transcendental question (Ideas I, 1913) but faulted his constructions not drawn from intuition (‘Kant und die Idee der Transzendentalphilosophie’, 1924; Krisis, 1936). E. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie I (1913); “Kant und die Idee der Transzendentalphilosophie” (1924; publ. 1956); Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften (1936); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    埃德蒙德·胡塞尔 › 1859–1938

  • 马丁·海德格尔

    影响了 ✓

    Heidegger read the Critique of Pure Reason as grounding metaphysics in finite knowledge, rooted in the transcendental imagination (Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, 1929). M. Heidegger, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (1929); Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft (lectures 1927–28; publ. 1977); SEP “Martin Heidegger”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    马丁·海德格尔 › 1889–1976

  • 米歇尔·福柯

    影响了 ✓

    Foucault translated Kant’s Anthropology for his secondary thesis (1961) and later read ‘What is Enlightenment?’ as the start of a critical ontology of ourselves (‘What is Enlightenment?’, 1984). M. Foucault, Introduction à l’Anthropologie de Kant (1961; publ. 2008); I. Kant, Anthropologie du point de vue pragmatique, trans. M. Foucault (1964); M. Foucault, “What is Enlightenment?”, in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader (1984); SEP “Michel Foucault”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    米歇尔·福柯 › 1926–1984

  • 尤尔根·哈贝马斯

    影响了 ✓

    Habermas recast Kant’s categorical imperative as a principle of universalisation that norms must pass in real discourse among all those affected (Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, 1983). J. Habermas, “Diskursethik – Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm”, in Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln (1983); SEP “Jürgen Habermas”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    尤尔根·哈贝马斯 › 1929–2026

显示全部 (56)收起
  • 约翰·哥特利布·费希特

    影响了 ✓

    Fichte’s Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation (1792), published anonymously, was taken for Kant’s; his Wissenschaftslehre (1794) sought to derive Kant’s results from a single principle. J. G. Fichte, Versuch einer Critik aller Offenbarung (1792); Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (1794); SEP “Johann Gottlieb Fichte”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    约翰·哥特利布·费希特 › 1762–1814

  • 弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫

    影响了

    Schleiermacher’s early essays On the Highest Good (1789) and On Freedom (1790–92) worked through Kant’s ethics, rejecting its linking of virtue and happiness in the highest good. F. Schleiermacher, Über das höchste Gut (1789); Über die Freiheit (1790–92); SEP “Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher”

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫 › 1768–1834

  • 弗里德里希·荷尔德林

    影响了

    Hölderlin studied Kant from his Tübingen years and, writing to his brother (1799), called him ‘the Moses of our nation’, leading it out of Egyptian slackness. F. Hölderlin, letter to his brother Karl Gok, 1 Jan. 1799

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·荷尔德林 › 1770–1843

  • 弗里德里希·施莱格尔

    影响了

    In his Essay on the Concept of Republicanism (1796) Schlegel took up Kant’s Toward Perpetual Peace (1795) but argued, against Kant, that republicanism is necessarily democratic. F. Schlegel, Versuch über den Begriff des Republikanismus (1796); I. Kant, Zum ewigen Frieden (1795); SEP “Friedrich Schlegel”

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·施莱格尔 › 1772–1829

  • 弗里德里希·威廉·约瑟夫·谢林

    影响了 ✓

    In Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature (1797) Schelling took up Kant’s dynamic theory of matter as attractive and repulsive forces (Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, 1786). F. W. J. Schelling, Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur (1797); I. Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (1786); SEP “Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    弗里德里希·威廉·约瑟夫·谢林 › 1775–1854

  • 亚瑟·叔本华

    影响了 ✓

    Schopenhauer kept Kant’s distinction of appearance and thing in itself, calling the latter will, and appended a Critique of the Kantian Philosophy to his main work (1819). A. Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung (1819), appendix “Kritik der Kantischen Philosophie”; SEP “Arthur Schopenhauer”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    亚瑟·叔本华 › 1788–1860

  • 拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生

    影响了

    In ‘The Transcendentalist’ (1842) Emerson traced his movement’s name to Kant’s use of ‘transcendental’, a Kant he knew largely at second hand, through Coleridge and Carlyle. R. W. Emerson, “The Transcendentalist” (1842); SEP “Ralph Waldo Emerson”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生 › 1803–1882

  • 威廉·狄尔泰

    影响了 ✓

    Dilthey called his project a ‘critique of historical reason’, doing for the human sciences what Kant had done for natural science (Introduction to the Human Sciences, 1883). W. Dilthey, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (1883); SEP “Wilhelm Dilthey”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    威廉·狄尔泰 › 1833–1911

  • 亨利·西季威克

    影响了

    In The Methods of Ethics (1874) Sidgwick accepted Kant’s universalisability principle as a self-evident axiom of justice, holding that alone it cannot settle what we ought to do. H. Sidgwick, The Methods of Ethics (1874); “The Kantian Conception of Free Will”, Mind (1888); SEP “Henry Sidgwick”

    依据: AI 草稿

    亨利·西季威克 › 1838–1900

  • 查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士

    影响了

    Peirce studied the Critique of Pure Reason for years in his youth and took the name ‘pragmatism’ from Kant’s distinction between pragmatisch and praktisch (‘What Pragmatism Is’, 1905). C. S. Peirce, “What Pragmatism Is”, The Monist (1905); SEP “Charles Sanders Peirce”

    依据: AI 草稿

    查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士 › 1839–1914

  • 赫尔曼·科恩

    影响了 ✓

    In Kant’s Theory of Experience (1871) Cohen read the first Critique as a theory of the conditions of scientific knowledge, starting from the ‘fact’ of mathematical natural science. H. Cohen, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (1871; 2nd ed. 1885); SEP “Hermann Cohen”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    赫尔曼·科恩 › 1842–1918

  • 埃米尔·涂尔干

    影响了

    Durkheim gave Kant’s categories a social origin: time, space and causality derive from collective life, above all religion (Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, 1912). É. Durkheim, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (1912), introduction; S. Lukes, Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work (1973)

    依据: AI 草稿

    埃米尔·涂尔干 › 1858–1917

  • 格奥尔格·齐美尔

    影响了

    Simmel recast Kant’s ‘How is nature possible?’ as ‘How is society possible?’, answering with a priori forms through which individuals experience themselves as members of society (Soziologie, 1908). G. Simmel, Soziologie (1908), “Exkurs über das Problem: Wie ist Gesellschaft möglich?”; Kant. Sechzehn Vorlesungen (1904); D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (1984)

    依据: AI 草稿

    格奥尔格·齐美尔 › 1858–1918

  • 大卫·希尔伯特

    影响了 ✓

    Hilbert took Kant’s sentence on intuitions, concepts and ideas as motto of the Grundlagen der Geometrie (1899) and grounded finitism in Kant’s extra-logical content of mathematics (1926). D. Hilbert, Grundlagen der Geometrie (1899); “Über das Unendliche”, Mathematische Annalen 95 (1926); I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781/87); SEP “Hilbert’s Program”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    大卫·希尔伯特 › 1862–1943

  • 雅各布·冯·于克斯屈尔

    影响了

    Uexküll applied Kant’s thesis that the forms of perception belong to the subject to animals, each living in its own Umwelt (Theoretische Biologie, 1920). J. von Uexküll, Theoretische Biologie (1920); Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere (1909)

    依据: AI 草稿

    雅各布·冯·于克斯屈尔 › 1864–1944

  • 马克斯·韦伯

    影响了 存在争议

    Through Rickert’s neo-Kantianism Weber took over Kant’s gulf between is and ought: science cannot ground value judgements, and concepts select from an infinite reality (‘Objectivity’ essay, 1904). M. Weber, “Die ‚Objektivität‘ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis” (1904); SEP “Max Weber”; SEP “Neo-Kantianism”

    依据: AI 草稿

    马克斯·韦伯 › 1864–1920

  • 梁启超

    影响了

    Liang Qichao introduced Kant to Chinese readers via Japanese sources in an essay series of 1903–04, explaining Kant’s moral freedom through Buddhism and Wang Yangming’s innate knowing. Liang Qichao, “Jinshi diyi dazhe Kangde zhi xueshuo”, Xinmin congbao (1903–04); H. Chang, Liang Ch’i-ch’ao and Intellectual Transition in China (1971)

    依据: AI 草稿

    梁启超 › 1873–1929

  • 恩斯特·卡西尔

    影响了

    Cassirer, trained in Marburg Neo-Kantianism, widened Kant’s critique of reason into a critique of culture covering myth, language and science (Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, 1923–29). E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen I–III (1923–29); Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff (1910); Kants Leben und Lehre (1918); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    恩斯特·卡西尔 › 1874–1945

  • K. C. 巴塔恰里亚

    影响了

    K. C. Bhattacharya started from Kant’s limits of theoretical knowledge but argued in The Subject as Freedom (1930) that the subject is realised through progressive freedom from objectivity. K. C. Bhattacharya, The Subject as Freedom (1930); N. Bhushan & J. L. Garfield (eds.), Indian Philosophy in English (2011)

    依据: AI 草稿

    K. C. 巴塔恰里亚 › 1875–1949

  • 阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦

    影响了

    Einstein, who read Kant as a schoolboy, held that physical concepts are free creations, not abstracted from experience, but rejected their a priori status (‘Reply to Criticisms’, 1949). A. Einstein, “Reply to Criticisms”, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (1949); “Geometrie und Erfahrung” (1921); SEP “Einstein’s Philosophy of Science”

    依据: AI 草稿

    阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦 › 1879–1955

  • 卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯

    影响了 ✓

    Jaspers appended a study of Kant’s doctrine of ideas to his Psychology of Worldviews (1919) and took Kant’s limits of knowledge as the frame of his Philosophy (1932). K. Jaspers, Psychologie der Weltanschauungen (1919), appendix “Kants Ideenlehre”; Philosophie (1932); SEP “Karl Jaspers”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯 › 1883–1969

  • 鲁道夫·卡尔纳普

    影响了 ✓

    Carnap kept a Kantian synthetic a priori for the topological structure of intuitive space (Der Raum, 1922); Friedman reads the Aufbau (1928) as recasting neo-Kantian constitution. R. Carnap, Der Raum (1922); Der logische Aufbau der Welt (1928); M. Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism (1999); SEP “Rudolf Carnap”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    鲁道夫·卡尔纳普 › 1891–1970

  • 瓦尔特·本雅明

    影响了

    In ‘On the Programme of the Coming Philosophy’ (1918) Benjamin kept Kant’s system as the frame but demanded a higher concept of experience that includes religious experience. W. Benjamin, “Über das Programm der kommenden Philosophie” (written 1917–18, printed 1963); SEP “Walter Benjamin”

    依据: AI 草稿

    瓦尔特·本雅明 › 1892–1940

  • 卢奇安·布拉加

    影响了

    Blaga set unconscious ‘abyssal categories’ beside Kant’s categories of understanding (Horizon and Style, 1935) and engaged with Kant’s theory of knowledge in his Trilogy of Knowledge (1943). L. Blaga, Orizont și stil (1935); Trilogia cunoașterii (1943)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卢奇安·布拉加 › 1895–1961

  • 马克斯·霍克海默

    影响了

    Horkheimer took his doctorate (1922) and habilitation (1925) under Hans Cornelius with studies of Kant’s Critique of Judgement as the link between theoretical and practical philosophy. M. Horkheimer, Zur Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft (1922); Über Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft als Bindeglied zwischen theoretischer und praktischer Philosophie (1925)

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    马克斯·霍克海默 › 1895–1973

  • 让·皮亚杰

    影响了 ✓

    Piaget kept Kant’s necessary categories but held that they are constructed in development, not given, a position he described as a dynamic Kantianism (Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique, 1950). J. Piaget, Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique (1950); Sagesse et illusions de la philosophie (1965)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    让·皮亚杰 › 1896–1980

  • 卡尔·波普尔

    影响了

    Popper called demarcation ‘Kant’s problem’ and reinterpreted Kant’s claim that the intellect prescribes its laws to nature: we propose conjectures, which nature may defeat (Conjectures and Refutations, 1963). K. R. Popper, Logik der Forschung (1934); “Kant’s Critique and Cosmology” (1954), in Conjectures and Refutations (1963); SEP “Karl Popper”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    卡尔·波普尔 › 1902–1994

  • 西奥多·W. 阿多诺

    影响了 ✓

    Adorno lectured on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1959) and devoted the model on freedom in Negative Dialectics (1966) to a metacritique of Kant’s practical reason. T. W. Adorno, Kants „Kritik der reinen Vernunft“ (lectures 1959, publ. 1995); Negative Dialektik (1966), “Freiheit. Zur Metakritik der praktischen Vernunft”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    西奥多·W. 阿多诺 › 1903–1969

  • 汉斯·约纳斯

    影响了

    Jonas recast Kant’s imperative for technology: ‘act so that the effects of your action are compatible with the permanence of genuine human life’ (Das Prinzip Verantwortung, 1979). H. Jonas, Das Prinzip Verantwortung (1979)

    依据: AI 草稿

    汉斯·约纳斯 › 1903–1993

  • 让-保罗·萨特

    影响了

    Sartre agreed with Kant that freedom wills its own and others’ freedom, but held formal, universal principles too abstract to define action (L’existentialisme est un humanisme, 1946). J.-P. Sartre, L’existentialisme est un humanisme (lecture 1945, publ. 1946)

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    让-保罗·萨特 › 1905–1980

  • 汉娜·阿伦特

    影响了 ✓

    Arendt read Kant’s judgement of taste, with its ‘enlarged mentality’, as the model of political judgement (Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, given 1970, publ. 1982). H. Arendt, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. R. Beiner (1982); I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790); SEP “Hannah Arendt”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    汉娜·阿伦特 › 1906–1975

  • 诺伯托·博比奥

    影响了

    Bobbio studied Kant’s philosophy of law (1957) and took Kant’s ‘sign of history’ in the French Revolution as evidence of progress in rights (L’età dei diritti, 1990). N. Bobbio, Diritto e stato nel pensiero di Emanuele Kant (1957); L’età dei diritti (1990); I. Kant, Der Streit der Fakultäten (1798)

    依据: AI 草稿

    诺伯托·博比奥 › 1909–2004

  • 牟宗三

    影响了

    Mou Zongsan, who translated Kant’s three Critiques, kept Kant’s framework but argued that moral experience grants humans intellectual intuition (Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy, 1971). Mou Zongsan, Zhi de zhijue yu Zhongguo zhexue (1971); Xianxiang yu wu zishen (1975); IEP “Mou Zongsan”

    依据: AI 草稿

    牟宗三 › 1909–1995

  • 威尔弗里德·塞拉斯

    影响了

    Sellars took up Kant’s distinction between sensibility and understanding for his account of sensory and conceptual elements in perception (Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, 1968). W. Sellars, Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes (John Locke Lectures 1965–66; publ. 1968); SEP “Wilfrid Sellars”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    威尔弗里德·塞拉斯 › 1912–1989

  • R. M. 黑尔

    影响了

    Hare built his universal prescriptivism on Kant’s universalizability and argued that Kant’s test leads to utilitarian results (Freedom and Reason, 1963; ‘Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?’, 1993). R. M. Hare, Freedom and Reason (1963); Moral Thinking (1981); “Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?”, Utilitas 5 (1993); SEP “Richard Mervyn Hare”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    R. M. 黑尔 › 1919–2002

  • P. F. 斯特劳森

    影响了

    Strawson reconstructed the analytic core of Kant’s Critique – the conditions of any experience intelligible to us – while rejecting transcendental idealism (The Bounds of Sense, 1966). P. F. Strawson, The Bounds of Sense (1966); Individuals (1959); SEP “Peter Frederick Strawson”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    P. F. 斯特劳森 › 1919–2006

  • 约翰·罗尔斯

    影响了 ✓

    Rawls read the original position of justice as fairness as a procedural expression of Kant’s autonomy (A Theory of Justice, 1971; ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, 1980). J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971); “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”, Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980); SEP “John Rawls”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    约翰·罗尔斯 › 1921–2002

  • 让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔

    影响了

    Lyotard took from Kant the heterogeneity of the faculties and the sublime as presentation of the unpresentable (Le différend, 1983; Leçons sur l’Analytique du sublime, 1991). J.-F. Lyotard, Le différend (1983); L’enthousiasme. La critique kantienne de l’histoire (1986); Leçons sur l’Analytique du sublime (1991); SEP “Jean François Lyotard”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔 › 1924–1998

  • 吉尔·德勒兹

    影响了 ✓

    Deleuze read Kant’s doctrine of the faculties and their discordant accord in the sublime (La philosophie critique de Kant, 1963) and recast transcendental philosophy as ‘transcendental empiricism’ (1968). G. Deleuze, La philosophie critique de Kant (1963); “L’idée de genèse dans l’esthétique de Kant” (1963); Différence et répétition (1968); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    吉尔·德勒兹 › 1925–1995

  • 李泽厚

    影响了

    In Critique of Critical Philosophy (1979) Li Zehou read Kant’s a priori forms of knowledge and morality as products of collective practice, calling this process ‘sedimentation’. Li Zehou, Pipan zhexue de pipan: Kangde shuping (1979), Eng. A New Approach to Kant (2018); J. S. Rošker, Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy (2019)

    依据: AI 草稿

    李泽厚 › 1930–2021

  • 萨迪克·贾拉勒·阿兹姆

    影响了

    Al-Azm took his doctorate at Yale on Kant and wrote Kant’s Theory of Time (1967) and The Origins of Kant’s Arguments in the Antinomies (1972). S. J. al-Azm, Kant’s Theory of Time (1967); The Origins of Kant’s Arguments in the Antinomies (Oxford, 1972)

    依据: AI 草稿

    萨迪克·贾拉勒·阿兹姆 › 1934–2016

  • 罗伯特·诺齐克

    影响了

    Nozick grounded his side constraints in Kant’s principle that individuals are ends and not merely means, ruling out sacrificing some for others (Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 1974). R. Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974); SEP “Libertarianism”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    罗伯特·诺齐克 › 1938–2002

  • 柄谷行人

    影响了

    In Transcritique (2001) Karatani read Kant’s critique as a movement between perspectives, a ‘pronounced parallax’, and the realm of ends as a task for associations. Karatani Kōjin, Toransukuritīku (2001), tr. S. Kohso, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2003)

    依据: AI 草稿

    柄谷行人 › 1941年生

  • 奥诺拉·奥尼尔

    影响了

    O’Neill read Kant as a constructivist: moral principles are those all could adopt, not derived from a prior good (Constructions of Reason, 1989; Towards Justice and Virtue, 1996). O. O’Neill, Constructions of Reason (1989); Towards Justice and Virtue (1996)

    依据: AI 草稿

    奥诺拉·奥尼尔 › 1941年生

  • 斯拉沃热·齐泽克

    影响了 ✓

    Žižek read Kant’s paralogisms, in which the subject cannot know itself as a substance, as anticipating Lacan’s empty subject (Tarrying with the Negative, 1993). S. Žižek, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology (1993)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    斯拉沃热·齐泽克 › 1949年生

  • 赛拉·本哈比卜

    影响了

    Benhabib took Kant’s cosmopolitan right of hospitality as the starting point for her account of the rights of migrants and refugees (The Rights of Others, 2004). S. Benhabib, The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (2004); Another Cosmopolitanism (2006); I. Kant, Zum ewigen Frieden (1795)

    依据: AI 草稿

    赛拉·本哈比卜 › 1950年生

  • 克里斯蒂娜·科尔斯戈德

    影响了

    Korsgaard derived normativity from Kant’s reflective agent, who cannot act without some practical identity and so must value humanity itself (The Sources of Normativity, 1996). C. M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity (Tanner Lectures 1992; publ. 1996); Creating the Kingdom of Ends (1996)

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    克里斯蒂娜·科尔斯戈德 › 1952年生

  • 夸梅·安东尼·阿皮亚

    影响了

    Appiah counted Kant’s proposal of a league of nations (Perpetual Peace, 1795) among the Enlightenment sources of his cosmopolitanism of universal concern and respect for difference (Cosmopolitanism, 2006). K. A. Appiah, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers (2006); I. Kant, Zum ewigen Frieden (1795)

    依据: AI 草稿

    夸梅·安东尼·阿皮亚 › 1954年生

  • 卢恰诺·弗洛里迪

    影响了

    Floridi gave his constructionism a Kantian shape: things in themselves remain unknowable, and we know systems through models at chosen levels of abstraction (The Philosophy of Information, 2011). L. Floridi, “The Method of Levels of Abstraction”, Minds and Machines 18 (2008); The Philosophy of Information (2011)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卢恰诺·弗洛里迪 › 1964年生

  • 赖纳·福斯特

    影响了

    Forst grounded his theory of justice in a Kantian, reflexive ‘right to justification’ that each person holds as a moral agent (Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung, 2007). R. Forst, Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Elemente einer konstruktivistischen Theorie der Gerechtigkeit (2007)

    依据: AI 草稿

    赖纳·福斯特 › 1964年生

批评

受批评于 26

  • 约翰·哥特弗里德·赫尔德 教过

    教过 ✓

    Herder studied at Königsberg from 1762 to 1764 and attended Kant’s lectures, among them those on metaphysics and moral philosophy; Kant gave him special privileges, and Herder’s notes on the metaphysics and ethics lectures are printed in the Academy edition. SEP “Johann Gottfried von Herder”; Kant, Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie-Ausgabe), vols. 27–28 (Herder’s lecture notes)

    依据: AI 草稿

    受其批评

    Herder rejected dividing humanity into races, seeing only shades of one species (Ideas II, 1785), and in his Metacritique (1799) attacked Kant’s split of sensibility and understanding. J. G. Herder, Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit II (1785), book 7, ch. 1; Verstand und Erfahrung. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1799); SEP “Johann Gottfried von Herder”

    依据: AI 草稿

    约翰·哥特弗里德·赫尔德 › 1744–1803

  • 格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 影响了

    影响了 ✓

    Hegel took from Kant’s antinomies the insight that contradiction belongs to reason itself, and from the unity of apperception his concept of the concept (Science of Logic, 1812–16). G. W. F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik (1812–16), “Vom Begriff im Allgemeinen”; SEP “Hegel”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    受其批评

    Hegel likened Kant’s critique of knowledge to learning to swim before entering the water and called his moral law empty formalism (Encyclopaedia §10; Philosophy of Right §135). G. W. F. Hegel, Enzyklopädie (1830), §10; Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1820), §135; SEP “Hegel”

    依据: AI 草稿

    格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831

  • 恩斯特·马赫 影响了

    影响了

    Mach recalled that Kant’s Prolegomena, read at fifteen, made a ‘powerful, indelible impression’ and turned him to the critique of knowledge (Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen, 1886). E. Mach, Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen (1886); SEP “Ernst Mach”

    依据: AI 草稿

    受其批评

    Mach, who read Kant’s Prolegomena at fifteen, came to see the thing in itself as playing an ‘idle role’: the world consists of elements such as sensations (1886). E. Mach, Die Analyse der Empfindungen (1886), ch. I, note; SEP “Ernst Mach”

    依据: AI 草稿

    恩斯特·马赫 › 1838–1916

  • 弗里德里希·尼采

    受其批评

    Nietzsche mocked Kant’s synthetic a priori, possible ‘by virtue of a faculty’, and called the categorical imperative a danger to life (Beyond Good and Evil §11; Antichrist §11). F. Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse (1886), §11; Der Antichrist (1888), §11

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·尼采 › 1844–1900

  • 戈特洛布·弗雷格 影响了

    影响了

    Frege kept Kant’s view that geometry rests on a priori intuition and recast his analytic–synthetic distinction as concerning how a truth is justified (Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1884). G. Frege, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik (1884); SEP “Gottlob Frege”

    依据: AI 草稿

    受其批评

    Frege argued against Kant that arithmetic is analytic, not synthetic a priori, and that Kant underestimated analytic judgements; geometry he left to intuition (Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1884). G. Frege, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik (1884), §§ 5, 12–13, 88–90

    依据: AI 草稿

    戈特洛布·弗雷格 › 1848–1925

  • 汤姆·雷根 影响了

    影响了

    Regan extended Kant’s principle of respect – never to treat someone merely as a means – to all ‘subjects-of-a-life’ with inherent value (The Case for Animal Rights, 1983). T. Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (1983); SEP “The Moral Status of Animals”

    依据: AI 草稿

    受其批评

    Regan rejected Kant’s view that we have only indirect duties concerning animals: beings with inherent value are owed direct duties of respect (The Case for Animal Rights, 1983). T. Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (1983), ch. 5 (indirect duty views); I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics (Collins), “Of Duties towards Animals and Spirits”

    依据: AI 草稿

    汤姆·雷根 › 1938–2017

显示全部 (26)收起
  • 弗里德里希·海因里希·雅各比

    受其批评

    Jacobi objected that without the thing in itself one cannot enter Kant’s system, and with it one cannot remain inside (David Hume on Faith, 1787, appendix). F. H. Jacobi, David Hume über den Glauben (1787), appendix “Über den transzendentalen Idealismus”; SEP “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi”

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·海因里希·雅各比 › 1743–1819

  • 伯纳德·波尔查诺

    受其批评

    Bolzano rejected Kant’s grounding of mathematics in pure intuitions of space and time and sought proofs from concepts alone (Beyträge zu einer begründeteren Darstellung der Mathematik, 1810). B. Bolzano, Beyträge zu einer begründeteren Darstellung der Mathematik (1810), appendix “Über die Kantische Lehre von der Construction der Begriffe durch Anschauungen”; Wissenschaftslehre (1837); SEP “Bernard Bolzano”

    依据: AI 草稿

    伯纳德·波尔查诺 › 1781–1848

  • 安东尼奥·罗斯米尼

    受其批评

    Rosmini held against Kant that the a priori is not a set of subjective forms but the single, objective idea of being (Nuovo saggio sull’origine delle idee, 1830). A. Rosmini, Nuovo saggio sull’origine delle idee (1830)

    依据: AI 草稿

    安东尼奥·罗斯米尼 › 1797–1855

  • 约翰·斯图尔特·密尔

    受其批评

    Mill argued that when Kant derives actual duties from the categorical imperative he shows no contradiction, only consequences no one would choose (Utilitarianism, 1861, ch. 1). J. S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1861), ch. 1; ch. 5

    依据: AI 草稿

    约翰·斯图尔特·密尔 › 1806–1873

  • 弗里德里希·恩格斯

    受其批评

    Engels held that practice, experiment and industry refute Kant’s unknowable thing-in-itself: once chemistry produces alizarin, the thing-in-itself becomes a thing for us (Ludwig Feuerbach, 1886). F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie (1886), part II

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗里德里希·恩格斯 › 1820–1895

  • 亨利·柏格森

    受其批评

    Bergson objected that Kant took time for a homogeneous medium like space and so had to banish freedom to a timeless noumenal realm (Time and Free Will, 1889). H. Bergson, Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience (1889), Conclusion; SEP “Henri Bergson”

    依据: AI 草稿

    亨利·柏格森 › 1859–1941

  • 马克斯·舍勒

    受其批评

    Scheler rejected Kant’s formal ethics, holding that a priori values are given in feeling and ground a material ethics of value (Der Formalismus in der Ethik, 1913–16). M. Scheler, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik (1913–16); SEP “Max Scheler”

    依据: AI 草稿

    马克斯·舍勒 › 1874–1928

  • 格奥尔格·卢卡奇

    受其批评

    Lukács read Kant’s unknowable thing-in-itself and the split between form and content as antinomies of bourgeois thought rooted in reification (History and Class Consciousness, 1923). G. Lukács, Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein (1923), “Die Verdinglichung und das Bewußtsein des Proletariats”, part II

    依据: AI 草稿

    格奥尔格·卢卡奇 › 1885–1971

  • 汉斯·赖欣巴哈

    受其批评

    Reichenbach argued that relativity theory is incompatible with Kant’s synthetic a priori of Euclidean space, keeping only a revisable, constitutive a priori (Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis apriori, 1920). H. Reichenbach, Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis apriori (1920); SEP “Hans Reichenbach”

    依据: AI 草稿

    汉斯·赖欣巴哈 › 1891–1953

  • 诺贝特·埃利亚斯

    受其批评

    Elias rejected Kant’s timeless a priori categories, arguing that concepts such as time and causality are learned and developed socially over generations (Über die Zeit, 1984). N. Elias, Über die Zeit (1984); on his dissertation dispute with R. Hönigswald: Notizen zum Lebenslauf (1984)

    依据: AI 草稿

    诺贝特·埃利亚斯 › 1897–1990

  • 汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔

    受其批评

    Gadamer argued that Kant’s Critique of Judgement subjectivised aesthetics and so cut art off from the question of truth (Truth and Method, 1960). H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (1960), part I (“Die Subjektivierung der Ästhetik durch die Kantische Kritik”)

    依据: AI 草稿

    汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔 › 1900–2002

  • 莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂

    受其批评

    Merleau-Ponty objected that Kant’s reflective analysis makes the world the work of a constituting intellect and passes over perception lived through the body (Phénoménologie de la perception, 1945). M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (1945), preface and introduction (critique of ‘intellectualism’)

    依据: AI 草稿

    莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂 › 1908–1961

  • G. E. M. 安斯康姆

    受其批评

    Anscombe called Kant’s idea of legislating for oneself absurd and objected that universalisability is useless without a rule on relevant descriptions of an act (‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, 1958). G. E. M. Anscombe, “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy 33 (1958), 1–19

    依据: AI 草稿

    G. E. M. 安斯康姆 › 1919–2001

  • 阿拉斯戴尔·麦金泰尔

    受其批评

    MacIntyre argued that Kant’s attempt to ground morality in pure practical reason fails: universalisability lets through trivial and immoral maxims alike (After Virtue, 1981, chs. 4–5). A. MacIntyre, After Virtue (1981), chs. 4–5; A Short History of Ethics (1966)

    依据: AI 草稿

    阿拉斯戴尔·麦金泰尔 › 1929–2025

  • 伯纳德·威廉斯

    受其批评

    Williams objected that Kantian impartiality alienates agents from their attachments: a husband rescuing his wife on impartial grounds has ‘one thought too many’ (‘Persons, Character and Morality’, 1976). B. Williams, “Persons, Character and Morality” (1976), in Moral Luck (1981); Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985), ch. 10

    依据: AI 草稿

    伯纳德·威廉斯 › 1929–2003

  • 理查德·罗蒂

    受其批评

    Rorty held that Kant turned philosophy into a tribunal of pure reason and made epistemology the foundation of culture (Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 1979, ch. 3). R. Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Introduction, ch. 3

    依据: AI 草稿

    理查德·罗蒂 › 1931–2007

  • 瓦尔特·米尼奥罗

    受其批评

    In “The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis” (2000) Mignolo read Kant’s cosmopolitanism as a global design from the centre of colonial power and set against it a “critical cosmopolitanism” grounded in border thinking. W. D. Mignolo, “The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism”, Public Culture 12:3 (2000), 721–748

    依据: AI 草稿

    瓦尔特·米尼奥罗 › 1941年生

  • 布鲁诺·拉图尔

    受其批评

    Latour read Kant’s split between things in themselves and the knowing subject as the moderns’ model ‘purification’ separating nature from society (We Have Never Been Modern, 1991). B. Latour, Nous n’avons jamais été modernes (1991)

    依据: AI 草稿

    布鲁诺·拉图尔 › 1947–2022

  • 查尔斯·W. 米尔斯

    受其批评

    Mills argued that Kant’s theory of personhood, read together with his racial theory, in practice treated non-whites as ‘sub-persons’ (‘Kant’s Untermenschen’, 2005). C. W. Mills, “Kant’s Untermenschen”, in A. Valls (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy (2005); Black Rights/White Wrongs (2017)

    依据: AI 草稿

    查尔斯·W. 米尔斯 › 1951–2021

  • 迈克尔·桑德尔

    受其批评

    Sandel criticised the Kantian self prior to its ends, the basis of deontological liberalism, as an ‘unencumbered self’ (‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self’, 1984). M. J. Sandel, “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self”, Political Theory 12 (1984); Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982)

    依据: AI 草稿

    迈克尔·桑德尔 › 1953年生

批评了 15

  • 勒内·笛卡尔

    批评了

    Kant rejected Descartes’ inference from ‘I think’ to a simple thinking substance (Paralogisms) and argued that inner experience presupposes outer objects (Refutation of Idealism, B 274–279). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 341–405 / B 399–432 (Paralogisms); B 274–279 (Refutation of Idealism)

    依据: AI 草稿

    勒内·笛卡尔 › 1596–1650

  • 约翰·洛克

    批评了

    Kant objected that Locke derived the pure concepts of the understanding from experience, a ‘physiology’ of the understanding that cannot show their necessity (Critique of Pure Reason, 1781). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A ix; §§ 13–14 (B 118–119, B 127–128)

    依据: AI 草稿

    约翰·洛克 › 1632–1704

  • 巴鲁赫·斯宾诺莎

    批评了

    Kant objected that Spinoza’s single substance turns the purposive unity of nature into mere inherence and cannot explain purposiveness (Critique of the Power of Judgment, 1790). I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790), §§ 72–73; Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren? (1786)

    依据: AI 草稿

    巴鲁赫·斯宾诺莎 › 1632–1677

  • 戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨 受其影响

    受其影响 ✓

    Kant’s early works, such as the New Elucidation (1755), argued within Leibniz’s principles, and in 1790 he called the Critique ‘the genuine apology for Leibniz’. I. Kant, Principiorum primorum cognitionis metaphysicae nova dilucidatio (1755); Über eine Entdeckung, nach der alle neue Kritik der reinen Vernunft durch eine ältere entbehrlich gemacht werden soll (1790); SEP “Leibniz’s Influence on Kant”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    批评了

    Kant held that Leibniz ‘intellectualised the appearances’, taking sensibility for confused thought, and so misapplied the identity of indiscernibles (Critique of Pure Reason, A 263–264, A 271). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Amphiboly of the Concepts of Reflection, A 260–289 / B 316–346

    依据: AI 草稿

    戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨 › 1646–1716

  • 克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫 受其影响

    受其影响 ✓

    Kant learned metaphysics in the Wolffian school and taught from Baumgarten’s textbook; Wolff’s division into ontology, rational psychology, cosmology and theology structures the Critique of Pure Reason (1781). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781), Transcendental Dialectic; A. G. Baumgarten, Metaphysica (1739); SEP “Christian Wolff”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    批评了

    Kant praised Wolff as ‘the greatest of all dogmatic philosophers’ yet faulted his method for lacking a prior critique of reason’s capacity (Critique of Pure Reason, B xxxvi). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1787), B xxxvi–xxxvii; A 44 / B 61–62

    依据: AI 草稿

    克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫 › 1679–1754

  • 大卫·休谟 受其影响

    受其影响 ✓

    Kant generalised Hume’s question about cause and effect into the problem of how synthetic judgements a priori are possible (Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed. 1787, Introduction). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (2nd ed. 1787), Introduction; Prolegomena (1783); SEP “Kant and Hume on Causality”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    批评了

    Kant credited Hume with interrupting his dogmatic slumber but rejected deriving causality from habit, making it an a priori category (Prolegomena, 1783, Preface). I. Kant, Prolegomena (1783), Preface (AA IV 257–260); Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 19–20, B 127–128

    依据: AI 草稿

    大卫·休谟 › 1711–1776

显示全部 (15)收起
  • 老子

    批评了

    In “The End of All Things” (1794) Kant named “the monstrous system of Lao-kiun”, whose highest good is said to consist in nothingness, as an example of a mysticism in which the person dissolves into the deity. Kant, Das Ende aller Dinge (1794), AA 8:335

    依据: AI 草稿

    老子 › 传说人物

  • 胡果·格劳秀斯

    批评了

    Kant called Grotius, Pufendorf and Vattel ‘sorry comforters’: their law of nations has no binding force and is cited only to justify wars (Perpetual Peace, 1795). I. Kant, Zum ewigen Frieden (1795), Second Definitive Article (AA VIII 355)

    依据: AI 草稿

    胡果·格劳秀斯 › 1583–1645

  • 尼古拉·马勒伯朗士

    批评了

    Kant counted Malebranche’s continuing intuition of God among the deus ex machina answers to how concepts fit objects – ‘the greatest absurdity’ (letter to Marcus Herz, 1772). I. Kant, letter to Marcus Herz, 21 February 1772 (AA X 129–135)

    依据: AI 草稿

    尼古拉·马勒伯朗士 › 1638–1715

  • 伯纳德·曼德维尔

    批评了

    Kant listed Mandeville’s grounding of morality in the civil constitution among the material, heteronomous principles unfit to found moral law (Critique of Practical Reason, 1788, Ak. 5:40). I. Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788), §8, Remark II (AA V 40)

    依据: AI 草稿

    伯纳德·曼德维尔 › 1670–1733

  • 乔治·贝克莱

    批评了

    Kant set his transcendental idealism apart from Berkeley’s ‘dogmatic’ idealism, which he said degrades bodies to mere illusion (Critique of Pure Reason, 1787, B 71, B 274). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1787), B 69–71, B 274; Prolegomena (1783), Appendix; SEP “Kant’s Transcendental Idealism”

    依据: AI 草稿

    乔治·贝克莱 › 1685–1753

  • 伊曼纽尔·斯威登堡

    批评了

    Kant likened Swedenborg’s visions of spirits to the dreams of speculative metaphysics: both claim knowledge of a spirit world no experience can confirm (Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, 1766). I. Kant, Träume eines Geistersehers, erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik (1766)

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊曼纽尔·斯威登堡 › 1688–1772

  • 埃米莉·迪·夏特莱

    批评了

    In his first book (Living Forces, 1746/49) Kant discussed du Châtelet’s Leibnizian arguments for vis viva against Mairan and rejected parts of them. I. Kant, Gedanken von der wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kräfte (1746/49), §§ 44, 57, 111 (AA I 55–56, 67, 124); R. Hagengruber (ed.), Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton (2012)

    依据: AI 草稿

    埃米莉·迪·夏特莱 › 1706–1749

  • 摩西·门德尔松

    批评了

    Kant rejected Mendelssohn’s proof of the soul’s immortality in Phaedon (1767): a simple soul could still fade away by degrees of intensity (Critique of Pure Reason, B 413–415). I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1787), B 413–415 (“Refutation of Mendelssohn’s Proof of the Permanence of the Soul”); M. Mendelssohn, Phädon (1767)

    依据: AI 草稿

    摩西·门德尔松 › 1729–1786

  • 切萨雷·贝卡里亚

    批评了

    Kant rejected Beccaria’s argument against the death penalty: one is punished not for having willed the punishment but for willing a punishable act (Doctrine of Right, 1797). I. Kant, Metaphysik der Sitten, Rechtslehre (1797), §49 E (AA VI 334–335); C. Beccaria, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764), §28

    依据: AI 草稿

    切萨雷·贝卡里亚 › 1738–1794

作品

立场

Kant sought to settle the conflict between rationalism and empiricism by asking what reason can know at all. His “Copernican turn” holds that objects conform to our cognition: space and time are forms of our intuition, and categories such as causality are concepts of our understanding. We therefore know things only as they appear to us, never as they are in themselves, and metaphysics cannot prove God, freedom or immortality. In morality, practical reason gives itself the law: the categorical imperative bids us act only on maxims we could will as universal laws and to treat persons always as ends. Kant shaped all subsequent philosophy, from idealism to analytic thought. His writings on human “races” (1775, 1785) and his lectures on anthropology ranked white Europeans above other peoples and made disparaging claims about women; whether his later critique of colonialism in Perpetual Peace (1795) amounts to a revision is debated.

生平与背景

Born in Königsberg, East Prussia, in 1724, Kant grew up in a modest Pietist household and spent his entire life in and around his home city. After long years as a private lecturer he became professor of logic and metaphysics in 1770. Following a “silent decade” he published the Critique of Pure Reason in 1781, followed by a series of major works. He died in Königsberg in 1804.

其他主要作品

  • Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
  • Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)
  • Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
  • Critique of Judgment (1790)
  • Perpetual Peace (1795)

出现在

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开