Agora思想的公共广场

伯纳德·曼德维尔

1670–1733

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

商业社会恰恰依靠道德家所谴责的激情——骄傲、虚荣、嫉妒、对奢侈的喜爱——而繁荣;美德在很大程度上是精明的政治家的发明,他们奉承骄傲以驯服自爱;一个真正变得诚实而节俭的国家将失去它的贸易和力量。

定位

经验主义、启蒙运动与自由主义 · 西欧 · 伦理学, 社会与历史, 政治与法

生于荷兰、在伦敦行医的医生:在《蜜蜂的寓言》中,一个繁荣的蜂巢依靠虚荣、奢侈和贪婪而生存,一旦变得诚实就衰落了;私人的恶德经政治家巧妙引导会产生公共的利益,而美德本身源于被奉承的骄傲。

核心思想

  • 私人恶德,公共利益
  • 骄傲与美德的起源
  • 奢侈与繁荣
  • 非设计的社会秩序

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 1

  • 皮埃尔·培尔

    受其影响

    Mandeville took from Bayle’s Various Thoughts on the Comet (1682) the view that people act from passions, not professed principles, which underlies The Fable of the Bees (1714). P. Bayle, Pensées diverses sur la comète (1682); B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees, ed. F. B. Kaye (1924), introduction; SEP “Bernard Mandeville”

    依据: AI 草稿

    皮埃尔·培尔 › 1647–1706

影响了 2

  • 大卫·休谟

    影响了

    Introducing the Treatise (1739), Hume named Mandeville, with Locke, Shaftesbury, Hutcheson and Butler, among those who began to put the science of man on a new footing. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Introduction; SEP “Bernard Mandeville”

    依据: AI 草稿

    大卫·休谟 › 1711–1776

  • 卡尔·马克思

    影响了

    In Capital I (1867) Marx quoted the Fable of the Bees, calling Mandeville an upright man with a clear mind who saw that wealth rests on the labouring poor. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the general law of capitalist accumulation; B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

批评

受批评于 5

  • 乔治·贝克莱

    受其批评

    Berkeley’s Alciphron (1732, Dialogue II) attacked Mandeville’s thesis that private vices are public benefits, voiced by the free-thinker Lysicles; Mandeville replied in A Letter to Dion. G. Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher (1732), Dialogue II; B. Mandeville, A Letter to Dion (1732)

    依据: AI 草稿

    乔治·贝克莱 › 1685–1753

  • 弗朗西斯·哈奇森

    受其批评

    Hutcheson’s Inquiry (1725) defended Shaftesbury ‘against the Author of the Fable of the Bees’, arguing that a moral sense approves benevolence independently of self-interest. F. Hutcheson, An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725), title page and Treatise II; SEP “Francis Hutcheson”

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗朗西斯·哈奇森 › 1694–1746

  • 让-雅克·卢梭

    受其批评

    Rousseau granted Mandeville that pity is natural but objected that he missed that generosity, clemency and humanity all flow from it (Second Discourse, 1755). J.-J. Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine de l’inégalité (1755), Part I

    依据: AI 草稿

    让-雅克·卢梭 › 1712–1778

  • 亚当·斯密

    受其批评

    Smith called Mandeville’s system ‘wholly pernicious’: it treats every passion as vice and confuses the love of true praiseworthiness with vanity (Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1759, VII.ii.4). A. Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), VII.ii.4 (“Of licentious systems”)

    依据: AI 草稿

    亚当·斯密 › 1723–1790

  • 伊曼努尔·康德

    受其批评

    Kant listed Mandeville’s grounding of morality in the civil constitution among the material, heteronomous principles unfit to found moral law (Critique of Practical Reason, 1788, Ak. 5:40). I. Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788), §8, Remark II (AA V 40)

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊曼努尔·康德 › 1724–1804

作品

  • 1705年的一首寓言诗(《抱怨的蜂巢》),后来增补了散文评注和论文(1714年,1723年增订,1729年第二部):一个变得诚实的繁荣蜂巢失去了贸易、技艺和力量,因为商业依靠欲望、虚荣和奢侈而存在。

立场

Mandeville is on the map as the author of a provocative book of the Enlightenment and a forerunner of theories of unintended social order. “The Fable of the Bees” argues that commercial societies thrive on the very passions moralists condemn: pride, vanity, envy and the love of luxury create demand, employment and the arts, so that “private vices” become “public benefits” when “skilful politicians” channel them. In “An Enquiry into the Origin of Moral Virtue” he claimed that virtue was invented by lawgivers who flattered human pride to make people restrain their appetites. If virtue is defined strictly as self-denial, almost nothing in a flourishing society is virtuous – a rigorism whose ironic intent is still debated. His “Essay on Charity and Charity-Schools” (1723), which argued that educating the labouring poor would unfit them for hard work, caused a public scandal. The book provoked replies from Hutcheson, Berkeley, William Law and many others; Adam Smith called it a “licentious system” but took up much of its analysis of commerce, Kant counted Mandeville among the heteronomous moralists, and Marx quoted him with respect. Twentieth-century economists such as Hayek and Keynes rediscovered him as an early theorist of spontaneous order and of demand.

生平与背景

Bernard Mandeville was born in Rotterdam in November 1670 (baptised on 20 November) into a family of physicians and civic officials. He studied philosophy and medicine at Leiden, where he defended the Cartesian view that animals lack feeling in a disputation of 1689 and took his medical degree in 1691 with a thesis on digestion. His family was caught up in the Rotterdam tax riot of 1690, after which his father was banished from the city. In the 1690s Mandeville went to London, where he settled as a physician specialising in “hypochondriack and hysterick passions”, married in 1699 and wrote in English. His verse fable “The Grumbling Hive” (1705) grew into “The Fable of the Bees” (1714); the enlarged edition of 1723 was presented by the Grand Jury of Middlesex as a public nuisance. He died in Hackney on 21 January 1733.

其他主要作品

  • The Grumbling Hive: or, Knaves Turn’d Honest (1705)
  • A Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Passions (1711)
  • The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits (1714; enlarged 1723; Part II, 1729)
  • An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War (1732)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开