格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔

影响了

Following Hegel, Snellman held that freedom and personality are realised only in ethical community life, the state embodying a people’s national spirit (The Theory of the State, 1842). J. V. Snellman, Versuch einer speculativen Entwicklung der Idee der Persönlichkeit (1841); Läran om staten (1842)

依据: AI 草稿

教过 ✓

Stirner studied in Berlin from 1826 to 1828 and attended three of Hegel’s lecture series – on the philosophy of religion, the history of philosophy and the philosophy of subjective spirit. Lecture attendance, no closer contact is known. SEP “Max Stirner”; J. H. Mackay, Max Stirner. Sein Leben und sein Werk (1898)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了 ✓

Proudhon learned of Hegel in Paris from Marx, Bakunin and Karl Grün (1844–45) and built his System of Economic Contradictions (1846) on a dialectic of antinomies. P.-J. Proudhon, Système des contradictions économiques, ou Philosophie de la misère (1846); K. Marx, letter to J. B. Schweitzer (24 Jan. 1865); K. S. Vincent, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and the Rise of French Republican Socialism (1984)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了

Herzen called Hegel’s philosophy ‘the algebra of revolution’ and argued in Dilettantism in Science (1842–43) that scientific thought must pass over into action. A. Herzen, Diletantizm v nauke (1842–43); Byloe i dumy (My Past and Thoughts, 1852–68); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought (1979)

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了 ✓

In ‘The Reaction in Germany’ (1842) Bakunin turned Hegel’s dialectic into a philosophy of negation, ending: ‘the passion for destruction is a creative passion, too’. M. Bakunin (as Jules Elysard), “Die Reaction in Deutschland”, Deutsche Jahrbücher (1842); E. H. Carr, Michael Bakunin (1937)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了

Cieszkowski kept Hegel’s dialectic but extended it to the future: after thought, an epoch of the deed would realise philosophy in practice (Prolegomena to Historiosophy, 1838). A. von Cieszkowski, Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838); A. Liebich, Between Ideology and Utopia: The Politics and Philosophy of August Cieszkowski (1979)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了 ✓

Engels separated Hegel’s revolutionary method from his conservative system (Ludwig Feuerbach, 1886) and drew from the Logic the laws of dialectics set out in Dialectics of Nature. F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach (1886); Dialektik der Natur (written 1873–83, publ. 1925); Anti-Dühring (1878)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

影响了

In an essay for the sixtieth anniversary of Hegel’s death (Die Neue Zeit, 1891) Plekhanov claimed Hegel’s dialectic for materialism; he is credited with coining ‘dialectical materialism’ there. G. Plekhanov, “Zu Hegels sechzigstem Todestag”, Die Neue Zeit (1891); K voprosu o razvitii monističeskogo vzgljada na istoriju (1895)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Mead lectured on Hegel in Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century (1936); A. Honneth reads his social self as a naturalised version of Hegel’s recognition (1992). G. H. Mead, Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century (1936); A. Honneth, Kampf um Anerkennung (1992); SEP “George Herbert Mead”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了 ✓

In What Is Living and What Is Dead of Hegel’s Philosophy (1907) Croce limited the dialectic of opposites, adding a ‘nexus of distincts’ among the forms of spirit. B. Croce, Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel (1907); SEP “Benedetto Croce”

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

影响了 存在争议

Zamir traced Du Bois’s ‘double consciousness’ (The Souls of Black Folk, 1903) to Hegel’s Phenomenology; others derive it from psychology or Emerson, so the Hegel link is disputed. S. Zamir, Dark Voices: W. E. B. Du Bois and American Thought, 1888–1903 (1995); D. D. Bruce Jr., “W. E. B. Du Bois and the Idea of Double Consciousness”, American Literature 64 (1992); SEP “W. E. B. Du Bois”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Nishida measured his logic of place against Hegel’s dialectic in ‘Hegel’s Dialectic as Seen from My Standpoint’ (1931), later reworking it as the dialectic of absolutely contradictory self-identity. Nishida Kitarō, “Watakushi no tachiba kara mita Hēgeru no benshōhō” (1931), in Mu no jikakuteki gentei (1932); SEP “Nishida Kitarō”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了 ✓

In The Reform of Hegelian Dialectic (1913) Gentile moved the dialectic from Hegel’s concepts into the present act of thinking, which produces subject and object together. G. Gentile, La riforma della dialettica hegeliana (1913); H. S. Harris, The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile (1960)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

影响了

Lukács read Marx through Hegel’s categories of totality and subject–object identity in History and Class Consciousness (1923), later tracing Hegel’s economics in The Young Hegel (1948). G. Lukács, Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein (1923); Der junge Hegel. Über die Beziehungen von Dialektik und Ökonomie (written 1938, publ. 1948); SEP “Georg [György] Lukács”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

In Hegel’s Philosophy and Dialectic (1932) Tanabe took up Hegel’s dialectic and turned it into ‘absolute mediation’, which he set against Nishida’s place of nothingness. Tanabe Hajime, Hēgeru tetsugaku to benshōhō (1932); SEP “Tanabe Hajime”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了 ✓

Norberto Bobbio argued (1967) that Gramsci’s concept of civil society, placed in the superstructure, derives from Hegel rather than Marx; the reading is debated. N. Bobbio, “Gramsci e la concezione della società civile” (1967), in Gramsci e la cultura contemporanea (1969); J. Texier, “Gramsci, théoricien des superstructures” (1968)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了

In his inaugural lecture as director of the Institute for Social Research (1931) Horkheimer traced social philosophy back to Hegel’s objective spirit, to be renewed through interdisciplinary research. M. Horkheimer, “Die gegenwärtige Lage der Sozialphilosophie und die Aufgaben eines Instituts für Sozialforschung” (1931); SEP “Critical Theory”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Marcuse interpreted Hegel’s ontology of life (Hegels Ontologie, 1932) and in Reason and Revolution (1941) defended Hegel’s dialectic as critical thought against positivism and fascist readings. H. Marcuse, Hegels Ontologie und die Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit (1932); Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory (1941); SEP “Herbert Marcuse”

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了 ✓

Gadamer took Hegel’s concept of experience and his mediation of past and present as models for understanding, while rejecting absolute knowledge (Truth and Method, 1960; Hegels Dialektik, 1971). H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (1960); Hegels Dialektik. Fünf hermeneutische Studien (1971); SEP “Hans-Georg Gadamer”

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

影响了

Lacan, who attended Kojève’s Hegel seminar (1933–39), took from the master–slave dialectic that desire is the desire of the other and seeks recognition (‘Subversion du sujet’, 1960). J. Lacan, “Subversion du sujet et dialectique du désir dans l’inconscient freudien” (1960), in Écrits (1966); A. Kojève, Introduction à la lecture de Hegel (1947); SEP “Jacques Lacan”

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了

Beauvoir used Hegel’s master–slave dialectic in The Second Sex (1949), having set a line attributed to Hegel as the motto of She Came to Stay (1943). S. de Beauvoir, L’Invitée (1943); Le Deuxième Sexe (1949); SEP “Simone de Beauvoir”

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了

Merleau-Ponty found an existentialism in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and placed Hegel at the origin of Marxism, Nietzsche, phenomenology and psychoanalysis (‘L’existentialisme chez Hegel’, 1946). M. Merleau-Ponty, “L’existentialisme chez Hegel” (Les Temps modernes, 1946; Sens et non-sens, 1948)

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了

Nkrumah drew on Hegel’s dialectic, via Marx, for ‘philosophical consciencism’, a synthesis of traditional, Islamic and Euro-Christian elements of African society (Consciencism, 1964). K. Nkrumah, Consciencism: Philosophy and Ideology for Decolonization (1964; rev. 1970)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Tang Junyi’s Life, Existence and the Horizons of Mind (1977) orders nine horizons in a sequence recalling Hegel’s Phenomenology, but as mutually responsive rather than superseded stages. Tang Junyi, Shengming cunzai yu xinling jingjie (1977); IEP “Tang Junyi”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Maruyama took Hegel’s picture of China as an unhistorical, stagnant empire as his starting question, aiming to show that Tokugawa Japan developed modern thought from within (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), introduction; tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Freire drew on Hegel’s master–slave dialectic to argue that only the oppressed, by freeing themselves, can also free their oppressors (Pedagogia do oprimido, written 1968). P. Freire, Pedagogia do oprimido (written 1968); G. W. F. Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Lakatos named Hegel’s dialectic, beside Popper and Pólya, among the sources of his account of mathematics as growing through proofs and counterexamples (‘Proofs and Refutations’, 1963–64). I. Lakatos, “Proofs and Refutations”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (1963–64); Proofs and Refutations (ed. J. Worrall and E. Zahar, 1976); SEP “Imre Lakatos”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Fanon reread Hegel’s dialectic of lord and bondsman for the colonial situation, where the master wants work, not recognition, from the slave (Peau noire, masques blancs, 1952). F. Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs (1952), “Le Nègre et Hegel”; SEP “Frantz Fanon”

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

King, who studied Hegel in Boston, took from his dialectic that ‘growth comes through struggle’ and sought a synthesis of opposed positions (Stride Toward Freedom, 1958). M. L. King Jr., Stride Toward Freedom (1958), “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence”; C. Carson et al. (eds.), The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr., vol. II (1994)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Taylor read Hegel as joining Enlightenment autonomy with Romantic expressivism (Hegel, 1975) and drew on his theory of recognition for a politics of recognition (1992). C. Taylor, Hegel (1975); Hegel and Modern Society (1979); “The Politics of Recognition”, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition (1992)

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了

Kristeva reinterpreted Hegel’s negativity as the movement of the drives, which she called rejection and found at work in poetic language (La révolution du langage poétique, 1974). J. Kristeva, La révolution du langage poétique (1974)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

In “White Racism and Black Consciousness” (1971) Biko framed Black Consciousness with what he called “the Hegelian theory of dialectic materialism”: white racism is the thesis, a solid Black unity the antithesis, and a true humanity without racism the synthesis. S. Biko, “White Racism and Black Consciousness” (1971), in I Write What I Like (1978)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了 ✓

Honneth reconstructed Hegel’s Jena model of a struggle for recognition (Kampf um Anerkennung, 1992), later reading the Philosophy of Right as a theory of social freedom (2011). A. Honneth, Kampf um Anerkennung (1992); Leiden an Unbestimmtheit (2001); Das Recht der Freiheit (2011); SEP “Recognition”

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了 ✓

Žižek read Hegel through Lacan, treating negativity and contradiction as constitutive of the subject and of reality itself (Less Than Nothing, 2012). S. Žižek, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism (2012); Tarrying with the Negative (1993)

依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

影响了

Benhabib’s Critique, Norm, and Utopia (1986) began from Hegel’s critique of Kant and of natural right to reconstruct the normative foundations of critical theory. S. Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (1986)

依据: AI 草稿

影响了

Butler’s first book, Subjects of Desire (1987), traced Hegel’s desire for recognition through its French readers; Hegel’s unhappy consciousness returns in The Psychic Life of Power (1997). J. Butler, Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France (1987); The Psychic Life of Power (1997)

依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

影响了

Jaeggi took Hegel’s determinate negation as the model of an immanent critique that judges forms of life by their own crises and contradictions (Kritik von Lebensformen, 2014). R. Jaeggi, Kritik von Lebensformen (2014); G. W. F. Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807)

依据: AI 草稿