亚里士多德
在亚里士多德看来,知识始于对世界的仔细观察,万物都趋向某个目的,而美好的生活意味着践行德性——每一种德性都是过多与过少之间的中道,比如勇敢处于怯懦与鲁莽之间。
定位
几乎为所有知识领域建立了体系——逻辑学、物理学、形而上学、伦理学、政治学。形式在质料中实现自身。
核心思想
- 三段论
- 四因说
- 美德即中道
- 幸福(eudaimonia)
老师: 柏拉图
影响
受影响于 3
恩培多克勒
苏格拉底
受其影响 ✓
Aristotle credited Socrates with inductive arguments and universal definition, the starting point of the theory of Forms, but rejected his denial of weakness of will (Metaphysics; Nicomachean Ethics). Aristotle, Metaphysics XIII.4, 1078b27–30; I.6, 987b1–6; Nicomachean Ethics VII.2, 1145b21–27
苏格拉底 › 公元前470—前399年
德谟克利特
受其影响 ✓
Aristotle treated Democritus as the earlier physicist who argued most from nature, discussing his atoms and void at length while rejecting both (On Generation and Corruption I.2, I.8). Aristotle, On Generation and Corruption I.2, I.8; Physics IV.6–9; SEP “Democritus”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
德谟克利特 › 约公元前460—前370年年
影响了 60
伊本·西那(阿维森纳)
影响了 ✓
Avicenna’s Book of the Cure (al-Shifa) follows the order of Aristotle’s corpus from logic to metaphysics, but reworks it into a system of his own. Ibn Sina, al-Shifa; D. Gutas, Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition (1988; 2nd ed. 2014); SEP “Ibn Sina [Avicenna]”
伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037
托马斯·阿奎那
影响了 ✓
Aquinas made Aristotle’s philosophy of nature and the soul the framework of his theology and, chiefly in 1268–73, commented on a dozen of his works. Thomas Aquinas, Sentencia libri De anima; In Metaphysicam; Sententia libri Ethicorum; SEP “Thomas Aquinas”
托马斯·阿奎那 › 约1225–1274年
戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨
影响了 ✓
Leibniz rehabilitated Aristotle’s substantial forms against the mechanists in the Discourse on Metaphysics (1686) and later called his simple substances ‘entelechies’ (Monadology, 1714). G. W. Leibniz, Discours de métaphysique (1686); Monadologie (1714); SEP “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz”
戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨 › 1646–1716
亚当·斯密
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔
影响了 ✓
Hegel closed his Encyclopaedia (1830) with Aristotle’s account of the divine thought that thinks itself, quoted in Greek from Book Lambda of the Metaphysics. G. W. F. Hegel, Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften (1830), conclusion; Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Lambda; SEP “Hegel”
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831
马丁·海德格尔
影响了 ✓
Heidegger read Aristotle’s ethics and ontology phenomenologically in early lectures and the ‘Natorp report’ (1922, publ. 1989), groundwork for the analysis of Dasein in Being and Time (1927). M. Heidegger, “Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles (Anzeige der hermeneutischen Situation)” (1922; publ. 1989); Platon: Sophistes (lectures 1924–25; publ. 1992); Sein und Zeit (1927); SEP “Martin Heidegger”
马丁·海德格尔 › 1889–1976
显示全部 (60)收起
普罗提诺
影响了
Plotinus took over Aristotle’s self-thinking divine intellect as his second principle, Intellect, but set the One above it; Porphyry notes Aristotle’s Metaphysics is condensed in the Enneads. Porphyry, Life of Plotinus 14; Plotinus, Enneads V.3, VI.1–3; Aristotle, Metaphysics XII.9; SEP “Plotinus”
依据: AI 草稿
普罗提诺 › 204–270
波菲利
影响了
Porphyry wrote the Isagoge as an introduction to Aristotle’s Categories and held his logic compatible with Plato’s metaphysics, making Aristotle part of the Platonist curriculum. Porphyry, Isagoge; On Aristotle’s Categories (by question and answer); SEP “Porphyry”
依据: AI 草稿
波菲利 › 约234–305年
波爱修
影响了 ✓
Boethius planned to translate all of Aristotle, to comment on him and show his agreement with Plato; his logical translations became the basis of early medieval logic. Boethius, In Aristotelis Peri hermeneias, editio secunda II, prologue; SEP “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius”
波爱修 › 约477–524年
铿迪
影响了
Al-Kindi’s circle translated Aristotle’s Metaphysics, and his On First Philosophy took up its idea of a science of first causes while arguing against the world’s eternity. al-Kindi, On First Philosophy, tr. A. L. Ivry, Al-Kindi’s Metaphysics (1974); P. Adamson, Al-Kindi (2007); SEP “al-Kindi”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
铿迪 › 约801–873年
法拉比
影响了 ✓
Al-Farabi commented on Aristotle’s logical works, notably On Interpretation, and surveyed his whole corpus in The Philosophy of Aristotle; later tradition called him the ‘Second Teacher’. al-Farabi, Commentary on De interpretatione, tr. F. W. Zimmermann (1981); The Philosophy of Aristotle, tr. M. Mahdi, Alfarabi’s Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle (1962); SEP “al-Farabi”
法拉比 › 约872–950年
米斯卡瓦伊
影响了
Miskawayh built the Refinement of Character on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in Ishaq ibn Hunayn’s Arabic translation: virtue as a mean between two vices and happiness as the perfection of the rational soul. Miskawayh, Tahdhīb al-akhlāq; O. Leaman, “Ibn Miskawayh”, in S. H. Nasr and O. Leaman (eds.), History of Islamic Philosophy (1996)
依据: AI 草稿
米斯卡瓦伊 › 约932–1030年
伊本·哈兹姆
影响了
In the Approach to the Limits of Logic Ibn Hazm set out Aristotle’s logic, replacing the usual examples with examples from law and grammar, and defended it as useful for every science, the religious ones included. Ibn Ḥazm, al-Taqrīb li-ḥadd al-manṭiq; C. Adang, M. Fierro and S. Schmidtke (eds.), Ibn Hazm of Cordoba (2013)
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·哈兹姆 › 994–1064
伊本·巴哲(阿文巴塞)
影响了
Ibn Bajja commented on Aristotle’s Physics and On the Soul; his objection that motion in a void need not be instantaneous was reported and discussed by Averroes. E. A. Moody, “Galileo and Avempace”, Journal of the History of Ideas 12 (1951); SEP “Ibn Bajja [Avempace]”
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·巴哲(阿文巴塞) › 约1085–1138年
伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊)
影响了 ✓
Averroes commented on almost all of Aristotle’s works, in short, middle and long commentaries, seeking to recover Aristotle’s own doctrine from later Neoplatonic additions. SEP “Ibn Rushd [Averroes]”; H. A. Davidson, Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect (1992)
伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊) › 1126–1198
迈蒙尼德
影响了 ✓
Maimonides accepted Aristotle’s account of the sublunary world as demonstrated, but held his arguments for the world’s eternity to be inconclusive (Guide of the Perplexed, c. 1190). Maimonides, Guide of the Perplexed (c. 1190), tr. S. Pines (1963); SEP “Maimonides”
迈蒙尼德 › 1138–1204
大阿尔伯特
纳西尔丁·图西
影响了
Al-Tusi’s Persian logic, The Foundation of Acquisition (Asas al-iqtibas, 1244), treats the whole Aristotelian Organon, including rhetoric and poetics. Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Asas al-iqtibas (1244); Encyclopaedia Iranica “Asas al-eqtebas”
依据: AI 草稿
纳西尔丁·图西 › 1201–1274
罗吉尔·培根
影响了
Bacon was among the first masters to lecture on Aristotle’s natural philosophy and Metaphysics at Paris in the 1240s; his question commentaries from these years survive. Roger Bacon, Quaestiones supra libros Physicorum; Quaestiones supra Metaphysicam (Opera hactenus inedita); SEP “Roger Bacon”
依据: AI 草稿
罗吉尔·培根 › 约1219–1292年
布拉班特的西格尔
影响了 ✓
Siger expounded Aristotle literally as a Paris arts master, reporting what the Philosopher held even where it conflicted with faith, as on the world’s eternity. Siger of Brabant, De aeternitate mundi; Quaestiones in tertium De anima; SEP “Siger of Brabant”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
布拉班特的西格尔 › 约1240–1284年
约翰·邓斯·司各脱
影响了
Scotus took up Aristotle’s science of being as being and, siding with Avicenna, held that being is its subject and is said univocally of God and creatures. Duns Scotus, Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum I q. 1; Ordinatio I d. 3 p. 1 qq. 1–3; SEP “John Duns Scotus”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
约翰·邓斯·司各脱 › 约1266–1308年
帕多瓦的马西利乌斯
影响了
Marsilius built the first discourse of Defensor pacis (1324) on Aristotle’s Politics: the city exists for living and living well, and peace is like its health. Marsilius of Padua, Defensor pacis (1324), Discourse I; A. Gewirth, Marsilius of Padua and Medieval Political Philosophy (1951)
依据: AI 草稿
帕多瓦的马西利乌斯 › 约1275–1342年
奥卡姆的威廉
影响了 ✓
Ockham commented on Aristotle’s logic and Physics and read the categories as classes of terms, admitting only substances and qualities as distinct things (Summa logicae, c. 1323). William of Ockham, Expositio in libros Physicorum; Summa logicae I (c. 1323); SEP “William of Ockham”
奥卡姆的威廉 › 约1287–1347年
热尔松尼德斯(列维·本·格尔松)
影响了
Gersonides argued as a strict Aristotelian in method and psychology, yet departed from Aristotle in arguing that the world had a beginning (The Wars of the Lord, 1329). Gersonides, Milhamot ha-Shem (1329); SEP “Gersonides”
依据: AI 草稿
热尔松尼德斯(列维·本·格尔松) › 1288–1344
约翰·布里丹
影响了 ✓
As a Paris arts master Buridan expounded most of Aristotle’s works in question commentaries, revising him within his framework, as with impetus in place of air pushing projectiles. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum VIII q. 12; SEP “John Buridan”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
约翰·布里丹 › 约1300–1360年
伊本·赫勒敦
影响了
Ibn Khaldun opened his science of civilisation with the philosophers’ dictum that the human being is political by nature, explained by the need for cooperation (Muqaddima, 1377). Ibn Khaldun, al-Muqaddima (1377), tr. F. Rosenthal (1958); Aristotle, Politics
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·赫勒敦 › 1332–1406
克里斯蒂娜·德·皮桑
影响了
Christine drew on Aristotle’s Politics in Nicole Oresme’s French translation for Le Livre du corps de policie (1406–07), alongside John of Salisbury. Christine de Pizan, Le Livre du corps de policie, ed. A. J. Kennedy (1998); N. Oresme, Le Livre de Politiques d’Aristote (1370s); S. Lefèvre, ‘Christine de Pizan et l’Aristote oresmien’, in proceedings of the 3rd International Christine de Pizan Colloquium (2000); K. L. Forhan, The Political Theory of Christine de Pizan (2002)
依据: AI 草稿
克里斯蒂娜·德·皮桑 › 约1364–1430年
彼得罗·彭波那齐
影响了
Pomponazzi asked what Aristotle’s philosophy, read on its own terms, says about the soul, and concluded that it cannot prove immortality (De immortalitate animae, 1516). P. Pomponazzi, Tractatus de immortalitate animae (1516); SEP “Pietro Pomponazzi”
依据: AI 草稿
彼得罗·彭波那齐 › 1462–1525
乔瓦尼·皮科·德拉·米兰多拉
影响了
Pico held that Aristotle agrees with Plato in substance and argued this on being and the one in De ente et uno (1491). G. Pico della Mirandola, De ente et uno (1491); Conclusiones (1486); SEP “Giovanni Pico della Mirandola”
依据: AI 草稿
乔瓦尼·皮科·德拉·米兰多拉 › 1463–1494
弗朗西斯科·苏亚雷斯
影响了
Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations (1597) treat Aristotle’s metaphysics no longer as a commentary but by topics, with an index matching his questions to Aristotle’s books. F. Suárez, Disputationes metaphysicae (1597), with the Index locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis; SEP “Francisco Suárez”
依据: AI 草稿
弗朗西斯科·苏亚雷斯 › 1548–1617
胡果·格劳秀斯
影响了
Grotius placed Aristotle first among the philosophers and reworked his distributive and corrective justice into attributive and expletive justice (De jure belli ac pacis, 1625). H. Grotius, De jure belli ac pacis (1625), Prolegomena; I.1.8; IEP “Hugo Grotius”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
胡果·格劳秀斯 › 1583–1645
埃德蒙·柏克
影响了 ✓
Burke invoked Aristotle’s observation that a democracy has many points of resemblance with a tyranny against absolute democracy in revolutionary France (Reflections on the Revolution in France, 1790). E. Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790); Aristotle, Politics IV.4
埃德蒙·柏克 › 1729–1797
伯纳德·波尔查诺
影响了
Commentators trace Bolzano’s objective relation of ground and consequence (Abfolge) among truths to Aristotle’s demonstrative science; unlike Aristotle, he admitted infinite chains of grounds (Wissenschaftslehre, 1837). B. Bolzano, Wissenschaftslehre (1837); S. Roski, Bolzano’s Conception of Grounding (2017); SEP “Bernard Bolzano”
依据: AI 草稿
伯纳德·波尔查诺 › 1781–1848
卡尔·马克思
影响了
In Capital I (1867) Marx praised Aristotle’s analysis of the value form in exchange and traced its limit, missing labour as the substance of value, to Greek slavery. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the form of value; Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book V; SEP “Karl Marx”
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883
弗朗茨·布伦塔诺
影响了
Brentano began with Aristotle: his dissertation on the manifold senses of being (1862) and Die Psychologie des Aristoteles (1867) prepared his descriptive psychology of intentional acts. F. Brentano, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles (1862); Die Psychologie des Aristoteles (1867); SEP “Franz Brentano”
依据: AI 草稿
弗朗茨·布伦塔诺 › 1838–1917
查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士
影响了
Peirce took his term ‘abduction’ for inference to an explanatory hypothesis from Aristotle’s apagoge in the Prior Analytics, setting it beside deduction and induction. Aristotle, Prior Analytics; SEP “Abduction”; SEP “Charles Sanders Peirce”
依据: AI 草稿
查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士 › 1839–1914
扬·卢卡西维茨
影响了
Łukasiewicz questioned Aristotle’s principle of contradiction (1910), drew three-valued logic from his problem of future contingents (1920) and axiomatised the syllogistic (Aristotle’s Syllogistic, 1951). J. Łukasiewicz, O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa (1910); “O logice trójwartościowej”, Ruch Filozoficzny 5 (1920); Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic (1951); SEP “Jan Łukasiewicz”
依据: AI 草稿
扬·卢卡西维茨 › 1878–1956
卡尔·波兰尼
影响了
In ‘Aristotle Discovers the Economy’ (1957) Polanyi read Aristotle’s distinction between householding and money-making as a response to markets beginning to disembed the economy from society. K. Polanyi, “Aristotle Discovers the Economy”, in K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg and H. W. Pearson (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires (1957); Aristotle, Politics, Book I
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·波兰尼 › 1886–1964
汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔
影响了 ✓
Gadamer took Aristotle’s practical wisdom (phronesis) as the model of hermeneutic application: understanding, like ethical knowledge, applies the general to a concrete situation (Truth and Method, 1960). H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (1960), “Die hermeneutische Aktualität des Aristoteles”; Die Idee des Guten zwischen Plato und Aristoteles (1978); SEP “Hans-Georg Gadamer”
汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔 › 1900–2002
阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基
影响了
Tarski presented his semantic definition of truth as a precise form of Aristotle’s formula ‘to say of what is that it is … is true’ (1944). A. Tarski, “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944); Aristotle, Metaphysics IV (Γ); SEP “Tarski’s Truth Definitions”
依据: AI 草稿
阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基 › 1901–1983
J. L. 奥斯汀
影响了 ✓
Austin, trained as a classicist, read Aristotle closely and examined his concepts of the good and of happiness (‘Agathon and Eudaimonia in the Ethics of Aristotle’, publ. 1967). J. L. Austin, “Agathon and Eudaimonia in the Ethics of Aristotle”, in J. M. E. Moravcsik (ed.), Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays (1967); SEP “John Langshaw Austin”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
J. L. 奥斯汀 › 1911–1960
亚历克西斯·卡加梅
影响了
Kagame read the grammar of Kinyarwanda as yielding four categories of being, which he compared with Aristotle’s ten (La Philosophie bantu-rwandaise de l’être, 1956). A. Kagame, La Philosophie bantu-rwandaise de l’être (1956); La Philosophie bantu comparée (1976)
依据: AI 草稿
亚历克西斯·卡加梅 › 1912–1981
哈伊姆·佩雷尔曼
影响了
With Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, Perelman revived Aristotle’s dialectical and rhetorical reasoning as a ‘new rhetoric’ of argumentation about values (Traité de l’argumentation, 1958). C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique (1958)
依据: AI 草稿
哈伊姆·佩雷尔曼 › 1912–1984
G. E. M. 安斯康姆
影响了 ✓
Anscombe took Aristotle’s practical syllogism as a model of intentional action (Intention, 1957) and urged that ethics start from psychology and the virtues (‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, 1958). G. E. M. Anscombe, Intention (1957); “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy 33 (1958); SEP “Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
G. E. M. 安斯康姆 › 1919–2001
菲利帕·富特
影响了 ✓
Foot built on Aristotle’s link between virtue and the good of living things: human virtues are natural goodness relative to the human life form (Natural Goodness, 2001). P. Foot, Natural Goodness (2001); Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy (1978); SEP “Philippa Foot”
菲利帕·富特 › 1920–2010
阿拉斯戴尔·麦金泰尔
影响了
MacIntyre answered the choice ‘Nietzsche or Aristotle’ with Aristotle, recasting the virtues as excellences acquired within practices, narratives and traditions (After Virtue, 1981). A. MacIntyre, After Virtue (1981); SEP “Virtue Ethics”
依据: AI 草稿
阿拉斯戴尔·麦金泰尔 › 1929–2025
伯纳德·威廉斯
影响了
Williams began ethics with Socrates’ question how one should live and examined Aristotle’s attempt to ground ethics in human well-being (Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, 1985). B. Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985); Shame and Necessity (1993); SEP “Bernard Williams”
依据: AI 草稿
伯纳德·威廉斯 › 1929–2003
阿马蒂亚·森
影响了
Sen cited Aristotle’s remark that wealth is merely useful for the sake of something else and linked capabilities to Aristotelian functioning (Development as Freedom, 1999). A. Sen, Development as Freedom (1999); “Capability and Well-Being”, in M. C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life (1993); Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics I.5
依据: AI 草稿
阿马蒂亚·森 › 1933年生
夸梅·吉耶基
影响了
Gyekye, trained in Greek and Arabic philosophy, translated Ibn al-Tayyib’s commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge, the gateway to Aristotle’s logic (Arabic Logic, 1979). K. Gyekye (trans.), Arabic Logic: Ibn al-Tayyib’s Commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge (1979); An Essay on African Philosophical Thought (1987)
依据: AI 草稿
夸梅·吉耶基 › 1939–2019
乔治·阿甘本
影响了
Agamben took from Aristotle the potentiality not to be (adynamia; ‘Bartleby, o della contingenza’, 1993) and the contrast of life and good life opening Homo Sacer (1995). G. Agamben, “Bartleby, o della contingenza”, in G. Deleuze and G. Agamben, Bartleby. La formula della creazione (1993); Homo sacer (1995); Aristotle, Metaphysics; Politics; SEP “Aristotle”
依据: AI 草稿
乔治·阿甘本 › 1942年生
玛莎·努斯鲍姆
影响了 ✓
Nussbaum grounded her capabilities approach in Aristotle’s idea of human functioning (‘Nature, Function, and Capability’, 1988) and studied his ethics of fragile goods (The Fragility of Goodness, 1986). M. C. Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness (1986); “Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, suppl. vol. (1988)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
玛莎·努斯鲍姆 › 1947年生
克里斯蒂娜·科尔斯戈德
影响了
Korsgaard compared Aristotle and Kant on the source of value (1986) and drew on Aristotle’s view of action and form in arguing that agents constitute themselves (Self-Constitution, 2009). C. M. Korsgaard, “Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value”, Ethics 96 (1986); Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity (2009)
依据: AI 草稿
克里斯蒂娜·科尔斯戈德 › 1952年生
迈克尔·桑德尔
影响了
Sandel drew on Aristotle’s teleological reasoning – justice as allocating goods by their purpose – to question liberal neutrality (Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?, 2009). M. J. Sandel, Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? (2009); The Case against Perfection (2007)
依据: AI 草稿
迈克尔·桑德尔 › 1953年生
米兰达·弗里克
影响了
Fricker modelled testimonial and hermeneutical justice as Aristotelian virtues of the hearer, a trained, second-nature sensibility that corrects prejudice in judging credibility (Epistemic Injustice, 2007). M. Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (2007)
依据: AI 草稿
米兰达·弗里克 › 1966年生
香农·瓦勒
影响了
Vallor modelled her ‘technomoral wisdom’ on Aristotle’s practical wisdom and used virtue ethics as a frame for living well with emerging technologies (Technology and the Virtues, 2016). S. Vallor, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting (2016)
依据: AI 草稿
香农·瓦勒 › 同时代
批评
受批评于 26
约翰·菲洛波诺斯 影响了
影响了
Philoponus wrote commentaries on Aristotle’s Physics, On the Soul and logic and worked inside his framework while revising it, as with an impressed force for projectiles. Philoponus, In Physica; In De anima; In Analytica priora; SEP “John Philoponus”
依据: AI 草稿
受其批评
Philoponus attacked Aristotle’s eternal world and fifth element (Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World) and explained projectile motion by an impressed force instead of the air. Philoponus, Contra Aristotelem (fragments, ed. C. Wildberg, 1987); In Physica 639–642 Vitelli; SEP “John Philoponus”
依据: AI 草稿
约翰·菲洛波诺斯 › 约490–570年
巴托洛梅·德·拉斯·卡萨斯 影响了
影响了
At Valladolid (1550–51) Las Casas turned Aristotle against Sepúlveda, distinguishing kinds of barbarians to show that the Indigenous peoples were not natural slaves (Apologia, c. 1552). B. de las Casas, Apologia (c. 1552), trans. S. Poole, In Defense of the Indians (1974); L. Hanke, Aristotle and the American Indians (1959)
依据: AI 草稿
受其批评
Against Sepúlveda at Valladolid (1550–51) Las Casas denied that Aristotle’s natural slavery applied to the peoples of America, who were fully capable of reason; in an earlier dispute he had bidden Aristotle farewell in the name of Christian charity. B. de Las Casas, Apologia (c. 1552); Historia de las Indias, book III (on the dispute of 1519); L. Hanke, Aristotle and the American Indians (1959)
依据: AI 草稿
巴托洛梅·德·拉斯·卡萨斯 › 1484–1566
托马斯·霍布斯
受其批评
Hobbes wrote that scarcely anything is more absurd than Aristotle’s Metaphysics or more repugnant to government than his Politics, attacking ‘separated essences’ (Leviathan, 1651, ch. 46). T. Hobbes, Leviathan (1651), ch. 46
依据: AI 草稿
托马斯·霍布斯 › 1588–1679
勒内·笛卡尔
受其批评
Descartes rejected the scholastic-Aristotelian substantial forms and real qualities, explaining nature by extension and motion and banishing final causes from physics (letter to Regius, January 1642; Meditations IV). Descartes to Regius, Jan. 1642 (AT III 491–510); Meditationes IV (AT VII 55); Principia philosophiae IV §§198–203; SEP “Descartes’ Physics”
依据: AI 草稿
勒内·笛卡尔 › 1596–1650
约翰·洛克
受其批评
Locke denied that Aristotle’s syllogism is the instrument of reasoning: God did not leave it ‘to Aristotle to make them rational’ (An Essay concerning Human Understanding, 1689). J. Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1689), IV.xvii.4
依据: AI 草稿
约翰·洛克 › 1632–1704
约翰·斯图尔特·密尔
受其批评
Mill dismissed Aristotle’s categories as ‘a mere catalogue’ of everyday distinctions and held that the syllogism, taken as proof, begs the question (A System of Logic, 1843). J. S. Mill, A System of Logic (1843), book I, ch. 3; book II, ch. 3
依据: AI 草稿
约翰·斯图尔特·密尔 › 1806–1873
显示全部 (26)收起
萨阿迪亚·加昂
受其批评
Saadia argued against the eternity of the world with proofs of creation and denied that Aristotle’s ten categories apply to God (Book of Beliefs and Opinions I–II, 933). Saadia Gaon, Kitāb al-amānāt wa-l-iʿtiqādāt (933) I–II, tr. S. Rosenblatt, 1948
依据: AI 草稿
萨阿迪亚·加昂 › 882–942
比鲁尼
受其批评
In questions to Ibn Sina (c. 997) al-Biruni challenged Aristotle’s On the Heavens and Physics: why the heavens should be neither heavy nor light, why other worlds should be impossible, and why there could be no vacuum. al-Bīrūnī and Ibn Sīnā, al-Asʾila wa-l-ajwiba, ed. S. H. Nasr and M. Mohaghegh (1972); tr. R. Berjak and M. Iqbal, Islam & Science (2003–06)
依据: AI 草稿
比鲁尼 › 973–1048
安萨里
受其批评
Al-Ghazali judged that Aristotle’s metaphysics, as transmitted by al-Farabi and Avicenna, contains unbelief, while accepting his logic as neutral (al-Munqidh min al-dalal, c. 1108). al-Ghazālī, al-Munqidh min al-ḍalāl, tr. R. J. McCarthy, Freedom and Fulfillment, 1980
依据: AI 草稿
安萨里 › 1058–1111
犹大·哈列维
受其批评
Judah Halevi’s Kuzari sets the Aristotelian philosopher’s God, who knows nothing of individuals, against the God of revelation and history (Kuzari I.1–25, V.14). Judah Halevi, Kuzari (c. 1140) I.1–25, V.14; Y. Silman, Philosopher and Prophet, 1995
依据: AI 草稿
犹大·哈列维 › 约1075–1141年
苏赫拉瓦迪
受其批评
Suhrawardi rejected the Peripatetic theory of definition by genus and differentia and their categories, grounding knowledge in illumination and presence (Hikmat al-ishraq, 1186). Suhrawardī, Ḥikmat al-ishrāq (1186), tr. J. Walbridge & H. Ziai, 1999; SEP “Suhrawardi”
依据: AI 草稿
苏赫拉瓦迪 › 1154–1191
波那文图拉
受其批评
Bonaventure blamed Aristotle for rejecting Plato’s exemplary ideas, from which errors such as the world’s eternity and the denial of providence follow (Collationes in Hexaemeron VI, 1273). Bonaventure, Collationes in Hexaemeron VI.2–5 (1273); In II Sententiarum d. 1 p. 1 a. 1 q. 2
依据: AI 草稿
波那文图拉 › 约1221–1274年
伊本·泰米叶
受其批评
Ibn Taymiyya attacked Aristotelian logic: definitions cannot capture essences, and the syllogism yields no knowledge not available otherwise (al-Radd ala al-mantiqiyyin). Ibn Taymiyya, al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn; W. Hallaq, Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek Logicians, 1993
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·泰米叶 › 1263–1328
哈斯代·克雷斯卡斯
受其批评
Crescas criticised Aristotle’s physics as Maimonides had summarised it, defending the possibility of an actual infinite, of void and of many worlds (Or Adonai I.2, 1410). Ḥasdai Crescas, Or Adonai (1410) I.2; H. A. Wolfson, Crescas’ Critique of Aristotle, 1929
依据: AI 草稿
哈斯代·克雷斯卡斯 › 约1340–1411年
格弥斯托士·卜列东
受其批评
Plethon argued in Florence in 1439 that Aristotle falls short of Plato, faulting him on God as creator, the Forms and the immortal soul (De differentiis). G. Gemistos Plethon, De differentiis (1439); C. M. Woodhouse, George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes, 1986
依据: AI 草稿
格弥斯托士·卜列东 › 约1355–1452年
洛伦佐·瓦拉
受其批评
Valla reduced Aristotle’s ten categories to three – substance, quality, action – and measured scholastic terms against classical Latin usage (Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, c. 1439). L. Valla, Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie (c. 1439) I; SEP “Lorenzo Valla”
依据: AI 草稿
洛伦佐·瓦拉 › 约1407–1457年
贝尔纳迪诺·特莱西奥
受其批评
Telesio replaced Aristotle’s form and matter with heat, cold and passive matter, studying nature ‘according to its own principles’ rather than by authority (De rerum natura, 1565). B. Telesio, De rerum natura iuxta propria principia (1565; 1586); SEP “Bernardino Telesio”
依据: AI 草稿
贝尔纳迪诺·特莱西奥 › 1509–1588
乔尔丹诺·布鲁诺
受其批评
Bruno attacked Aristotle’s finite, geocentric cosmos, arguing for an infinite universe with innumerable worlds (De l’infinito, universo e mondi, 1584; Camoeracensis Acrotismus, 1588). G. Bruno, De l’infinito, universo e mondi (1584); Camoeracensis Acrotismus (1588); SEP “Giordano Bruno”
依据: AI 草稿
乔尔丹诺·布鲁诺 › 1548–1600
弗朗西斯科·桑切斯
受其批评
Sanches attacked the Aristotelian ideal of science as demonstration from definitions and causes, concluding that nothing can be known with certainty (Quod nihil scitur, 1581). F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581), ed. E. Limbrick & D. F. S. Thomson, 1988
依据: AI 草稿
弗朗西斯科·桑切斯 › 1551–1623
弗朗西斯·培根
受其批评
Bacon charged that Aristotle had corrupted natural philosophy with his dialectic, and set against the syllogism a method of gradual induction (Novum Organum, 1620, I.63). F. Bacon, Novum Organum (1620), I.11–14, I.54, I.63; SEP “Francis Bacon”
依据: AI 草稿
弗朗西斯·培根 › 1561–1626
伽利略·伽利莱
受其批评
Galileo argued against Aristotle’s physics – that heavier bodies fall faster and the heavens cannot change – in the Dialogue (1632) and Two New Sciences (1638). Galileo, Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi (1632), Day 1; Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche (1638), Day 1; SEP “Galileo Galilei”
依据: AI 草稿
伽利略·伽利莱 › 1564–1642
托马索·康帕内拉
受其批评
Campanella defended Telesio’s philosophy of nature against the Aristotelians, grounding knowledge in the senses rather than in Aristotle’s authority (Philosophia sensibus demonstrata, 1591). T. Campanella, Philosophia sensibus demonstrata (1591); SEP “Tommaso Campanella”
依据: AI 草稿
托马索·康帕内拉 › 1568–1639
皮埃尔·伽桑狄
受其批评
In his Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624) Gassendi attacked Aristotelian logic and physics as taught in the schools, later setting Epicurean atomism against them. P. Gassendi, Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624); Syntagma philosophicum (1658); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
依据: AI 草稿
皮埃尔·伽桑狄 › 1592–1655
孟德斯鸠
受其批评
Montesquieu faulted Aristotle for classifying monarchies not by the form of the constitution but by accidents such as the prince’s virtues or vices (De l’esprit des lois, 1748). Montesquieu, De l’esprit des lois (1748), XI.9 (“De la manière de penser d’Aristote”)
依据: AI 草稿
孟德斯鸠 › 1689–1755
哈维尔·苏比里
受其批评
Zubiri rejected Aristotle’s conception of essence as the correlate of definition and of reality as substance, conceiving essence as the physical structure of things (Sobre la esencia, 1962). X. Zubiri, Sobre la esencia (1962); Inteligencia sentiente (1980)
依据: AI 草稿
哈维尔·苏比里 › 1898–1983
卡尔·波普尔
受其批评
Popper attacked Aristotle’s ‘methodological essentialism’, the search for definitions of essences, as a root of Hegelian historicism (The Open Society and Its Enemies, 1945). K. R. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 2 (1945), ch. 11 (“The Aristotelian Roots of Hegelianism”)
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·波普尔 › 1902–1994
批评了 3
赫拉克利特
批评了
Aristotle objected to the claim, ascribed by some to Heraclitus, that the same thing is and is not: the principle of non-contradiction makes it unbelievable (Metaphysics IV). Aristotle, Metaphysics IV.3, 1005b23–26; IV.7, 1012a24–26; SEP “Heraclitus”
依据: AI 草稿
赫拉克利特 › 约公元前535—前475年年
巴门尼德
批评了
Aristotle objected that Parmenides’ argument for a single unchanging being fails because ‘being’ is said in many ways (Physics I.2–3). Aristotle, Physics I.2–3, 184b–187a; Metaphysics I.5, 986b
依据: AI 草稿
巴门尼德 › 约公元前515—前450年年
柏拉图 师从
师从 ✓
Attested by Aristotle himself, who counts himself among the Platonists (‘we’, Metaphysics I.9, 990b9–17; ‘friends of ours’, Nicomachean Ethics I.6, 1096a11–17); his twenty years in the Academy are reported by later biographers (Diogenes Laertius 5.9). Aristotle, Metaphysics I.9, 990b9–17; Nicomachean Ethics I.6, 1096a11–17; Diogenes Laertius 5.9
批评了
Aristotle criticised Plato’s separate Forms for explaining neither change nor knowledge – ‘empty words and poetic metaphors’ – and rejected a single Form of the Good. Aristotle, Metaphysics I.9, 990b–991b; Nicomachean Ethics I.6, 1096a11–1097a14; SEP “Aristotle’s Metaphysics”
依据: AI 草稿
柏拉图 › 公元前428—前348年
作品
立场
Aristotle brought Plato’s Forms down to earth: form exists not in a separate realm but in individual things, as the structure that makes matter into this horse or this house. To explain anything, one asks for four causes – matter, form, moving cause and purpose. Nature is goal-directed; living things strive to realise their potential. In ethics, the goal of life is eudaimonia, flourishing through the exercise of the virtues, each a mean between two extremes. He founded formal logic, systematised biology, politics and poetics, and for medieval thinkers in Islam and Christianity he was simply “the Philosopher”. His Politics also defended “natural slavery” and held that a woman’s capacity to deliberate “lacks authority” – views later used to justify colonial enslavement (Sepúlveda) and long contested.
生平与背景
Aristotle was born in Stagira in northern Greece, the son of a physician at the Macedonian court. He studied for twenty years at Plato’s Academy, later tutored the young Alexander the Great and in 335 BCE founded his own school in Athens, the Lyceum. After Alexander’s death he left Athens and died a year later in Chalcis.
其他主要作品
- Organon (c. 350 BCE)
- Physics (c. 350 BCE)
- Metaphysics (c. 340 BCE)
- Nicomachean Ethics (c. 340 BCE)
- Politics (c. 335 BCE)
出现在
- 旅程 ‘从神话到逻各斯’ · 第 8 站,共 8 站
- 旅程 ‘亚里士多德的旅程’ · 第 1 站,共 9 站
- 旅程 ‘什么是正义?’ · 第 2 站,共 10 站
- 旅程 ‘意识之谜’ · 第 3 站,共 10 站
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的