约翰·布里丹
词语和概念指称的是个别事物,而不是普遍实体;被投出的物体继续运动,是因为它获得了一种冲力,而这种冲力只会被阻力和重力耗尽。
定位
巴黎的文学院教师,从未转入神学:一位唯名论逻辑学家,其教科书在欧洲各地被阅读,他用施加的力(冲力,impetus)而不是周围的空气来解释被抛出物体的飞行。
核心思想
- 唯名论的逻辑与语义学(《逻辑大全》)
- 冲力
- 自指的悖论
- 意志可以推迟其选择(“布里丹之驴”是后来的名称)
影响
受影响于 2
亚里士多德
受其影响 ✓
As a Paris arts master Buridan expounded most of Aristotle’s works in question commentaries, revising him within his framework, as with impetus in place of air pushing projectiles. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum VIII q. 12; SEP “John Buridan”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年
约翰·菲洛波诺斯
受其影响 存在争议
Buridan’s impetus resembles Philoponus’ impressed force; since Philoponus’ Physics commentary was not available in Latin, a direct link is disputed, perhaps via Arabic authors. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum VIII q. 12; SEP “John Philoponus”; SEP “John Buridan”
依据: AI 草稿
约翰·菲洛波诺斯 › 约490–570年
影响了 1
伽利略·伽利莱
影响了 存在争议
Galileo’s early De motu (c. 1590) used an impressed force close to Buridan’s impetus; whether Paris impetus theory led to his mechanics, as Duhem claimed, is disputed. Galileo, De motu antiquiora (c. 1590); P. Duhem, Études sur Léonard de Vinci, vol. III (1913); SEP “John Buridan”; SEP “Galileo Galilei”
依据: AI 草稿
伽利略·伽利莱 › 1564–1642
批评
批评了 1
奥卡姆的威廉
批评了
Buridan shared Ockham’s nominalism but rejected his reduction of quantity to substance and quality, holding quantity to be a really distinct accident. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum I; J. Zupko, John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master, 2003
依据: AI 草稿
奥卡姆的威廉 › 约1287–1347年
作品
起初是对西班牙的彼得的逻辑教科书的注释,后改写成一部自成一格的唯名论逻辑,从词项和指代到证明与诡辩。
- 约1350年对亚里士多德《物理学》的问题
巴黎的《物理学》讲课的最终修订本:被抛出的物体靠给予它的冲力继续运动,只有阻力和重力才会将冲力消耗殆尽。
立场
Buridan’s logic is nominalist: only individual things exist, and general terms signify individuals by way of concepts in the mind. He set out this view in the Summulae de dialectica, a textbook that began as a commentary on Peter of Spain and became an independent work, and in treatises on consequences and on sophisms. He explained the truth of sentences through the theory of supposition – what terms stand for in a given sentence – and worked on paradoxes of self-reference such as “every proposition is false”. He could read Ockham’s Summa logicae but never names him, and on several points, such as the reality of quantity and Ockham’s account of motion, he argued against Ockhamist positions. In natural philosophy he is best known for the theory of impetus. A thrown body, he argued, does not move on because the air pushes it, as Aristotle had held, but because the thrower impresses on it an impetus, proportional to its speed and its quantity of matter, which would last indefinitely if the resistance of the air and the body’s gravity did not wear it down. He applied the idea to falling bodies and suggested that God might have given the heavenly spheres an impetus at creation, so that no angels were needed to move them. Similar ideas had been put forward by Philoponus and, in Arabic, by Avicenna; how they reached Paris is unclear. In his questions on the Nicomachean Ethics he argued that the will can defer its choice until the intellect has judged more fully. The ass starving between two equal bundles of hay does not occur in his works; it was probably attached to his name later, perhaps by critics. Albert of Saxony and Marsilius of Inghen carried his teaching to the new universities of Vienna and Heidelberg, and for two centuries his Summulae were read across Central Europe. Pierre Duhem saw him as a forerunner of Galileo; most historians now consider that an overstatement, since Buridan’s physics remained Aristotelian in its framework.
生平与背景
John Buridan was born around 1300 in or near Béthune in Picardy and studied in Paris, where he was a master of arts by the mid-1320s. Unlike most leading masters he never took a degree in theology and never joined a religious order; he spent some three decades as a secular cleric teaching logic and natural philosophy in the arts faculty. A papal letter of 1329 calls him a cleric of the diocese of Arras and master of arts. He was rector of the university in 1328 and again in 1340. In his second term he signed the faculty’s statute of 29 December 1340 against reading authors too literally; whether it was aimed at followers of Ockham, as older historians thought, is disputed. He is last documented in 1358, and in 1361 one of his benefices was given to someone else, so he had probably died by then. The story that he was thrown into the Seine in a sack for an affair with a queen, which François Villon put into verse, is a legend.
其他主要作品
- Treatise on Consequences (Tractatus de consequentiis)
- Questions on Aristotle’s Physics (several redactions)
- Questions on On the Heavens, On the Soul and the Metaphysics
- Questions on the Nicomachean Ethics
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的