阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基
一个语句为真,当且仅当事物如它所说的那样——“雪是白的”为真,当且仅当雪是白的——而这一点对形式语言可以被精确地定义。
定位
波兰裔美国逻辑学家:首次为形式语言给出了严格的真理定义(“雪是白的”为真,当且仅当雪是白的)和逻辑后承的定义;模型论的奠基者。
核心思想
- 真理的语义观
- 约定 T
- 对象语言与元语言
- 模型论
老师: 扬·卢卡西维茨, 斯坦尼斯瓦夫·莱斯涅夫斯基, 塔德乌什·科塔尔宾斯基
影响
受影响于 4
亚里士多德
受其影响
Tarski presented his semantic definition of truth as a precise form of Aristotle’s formula ‘to say of what is that it is … is true’ (1944). A. Tarski, “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944); Aristotle, Metaphysics IV (Γ); SEP “Tarski’s Truth Definitions”
依据: AI 草稿
亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年
扬·卢卡西维茨 师从
师从 ✓
Tarski took Łukasiewicz’s courses in logic in Warsaw (1918–24); the two later published ‘Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül’ (1930) together. Teacher and later collaborator, not supervisor. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; J. Łukasiewicz & A. Tarski, “Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül” (1930)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
扬·卢卡西维茨 › 1878–1956
塔德乌什·科塔尔宾斯基 师从
师从
Tarski studied in Warsaw from 1918 to 1924, taking courses with Kotarbiński among others; he dedicated his collected papers Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (1956) ‘to his teacher Tadeusz Kotarbiński’. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (1956), dedication
依据: AI 草稿
塔德乌什·科塔尔宾斯基 › 1886–1981
斯坦尼斯瓦夫·莱斯涅夫斯基 师从
师从
Tarski took his doctorate in Warsaw in 1924 under Leśniewski’s supervision, with a thesis on the primitive term of logistic. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; A. B. Feferman & S. Feferman, Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic (2004)
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
斯坦尼斯瓦夫·莱斯涅夫斯基 › 1886–1939
影响了 3
鲁道夫·卡尔纳普
影响了 ✓
After talks with Tarski from 1930, Carnap adopted Tarski’s semantic concept of truth and turned from logical syntax to semantics (Introduction to Semantics, 1942). R. Carnap, Introduction to Semantics (1942); “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (1963); SEP “Rudolf Carnap”; SEP “Tarski’s Truth Definitions”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
鲁道夫·卡尔纳普 › 1891–1970
卡尔·波普尔
影响了
Popper credited Tarski, who explained his theory to him in Vienna (1935), with rehabilitating correspondence truth, and built on it his notion of verisimilitude (Conjectures and Refutations, 1963). K. R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations (1963); Objective Knowledge (1972); Unended Quest (1976); SEP “Karl Popper”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
卡尔·波普尔 › 1902–1994
唐纳德·戴维森
影响了 ✓
Davidson turned Tarski’s Convention T around: a theory that yields a T-sentence for every sentence of a language serves as a theory of meaning (‘Truth and Meaning’, 1967). D. Davidson, “Truth and Meaning”, Synthese 17 (1967); A. Tarski, “Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych” (1933; German 1935); SEP “Donald Davidson”
唐纳德·戴维森 › 1917–2003
批评
受批评于 1
索尔·克里普克
受其批评
Kripke judged Tarski’s language hierarchy unfit for natural language and built, via fixed points, a language containing its own truth predicate (‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, 1975). S. Kripke, “Outline of a Theory of Truth”, Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 690–716
依据: AI 草稿
索尔·克里普克 › 1940–2022
作品
- 1933形式化语言中的真理概念
在更丰富的元语言中给出的形式语言的真理定义——以及证明没有任何这样的语言能够定义它自己的真理。
- 1944真理的语义学概念
对他的理论的通俗陈述:“雪是白的”为真,当且仅当雪是白的——亚里士多德古典真理观的一种精确形式。
立场
Tarski’s monograph on truth (Polish 1933, German 1935) asked how the word “true” can be used without falling into paradoxes such as the liar. His answer distinguishes an object language from the metalanguage in which we talk about it. A definition of truth for the object language is adequate if it entails, for every sentence, an instance of “Convention T”: “snow is white” is true if and only if snow is white. For formal languages he gave such a definition, built up through the notion of satisfaction, and proved that no sufficiently rich language can define its own truth predicate. The Semantic Conception of Truth (1944) presented this as a precise form of Aristotle’s classical conception. In 1936 he defined logical consequence: a conclusion follows if every interpretation that makes the premises true makes it true. These definitions founded model theory, which he developed at Berkeley, along with decision procedures for elementary algebra and geometry. Carnap’s turn from syntax to semantics followed his meetings with Tarski, Popper credited him with rehabilitating the correspondence theory of truth, and Davidson built a theory of meaning on Convention T. Kripke’s theory of truth of 1975 was designed to avoid Tarski’s hierarchy of languages.
生平与背景
Alfred Tarski was born Alfred Tajtelbaum in Warsaw in 1901 into an assimilated Jewish family. In 1923 he and his brother changed their name to Tarski, and he became a Roman Catholic. He took his doctorate under Stanisław Leśniewski in 1924, the year of the Banach–Tarski paradox, and belonged to the Lwów–Warsaw school of logic. He never obtained a chair in Poland – antisemitism is thought to have played a part – and taught for years at a Warsaw secondary school alongside his university lectures. In August 1939 he travelled to a congress for the Unity of Science at Harvard and was cut off by the outbreak of war. His wife and children survived in Poland and joined him in 1946; his parents and his brother did not survive the war. From 1942 he taught at Berkeley, where he built a leading centre of logic. He died in Berkeley in 1983.
其他主要作品
- The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages (Polish 1933, German 1935)
- On the Concept of Logical Consequence (1936)
- Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences (1936)
- The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics (1944)
- A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry (1948)
- Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (collected papers, 1956)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的