Agora思想的公共广场

弗朗西斯科·桑切斯

1551–1623

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

没有什么是被完满认识的:事物无穷无尽且彼此关联,感官会欺骗,定义只解释名称;诚实的做法是承认我们的无知,并通过观察、经验和判断寻求可能的知识。

定位

文艺复兴与人文主义 · 南欧 · 认识论, 科学

医生和哲学家——他生于葡萄牙还是西班牙尚有争议——曾在波尔多、罗马和蒙彼利埃求学,后在图卢兹任教;他在《无物可知》(1581年)中论证,人无法通过原因完满地认识事物,并主张以观察和判断取而代之。

核心思想

  • 无物可知
  • 对亚里士多德式科学的批判
  • 感官与理性的界限
  • 观察与经验

在星图中打开

影响

影响了 1

  • 皮埃尔·培尔

    影响了

    Bayle gave Francisco Sanches an article in his Historical and Critical Dictionary (1697), calling the author of That Nothing Is Known (1581) a ‘great Pyrrhonist’. P. Bayle, Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697), “Sanchez”; F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581); SEP “Francisco Sanches”

    依据: AI 草稿

    皮埃尔·培尔 › 1647–1706

批评

批评了 1

  • 亚里士多德

    批评了

    Sanches attacked the Aristotelian ideal of science as demonstration from definitions and causes, concluding that nothing can be known with certainty (Quod nihil scitur, 1581). F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581), ed. E. Limbrick & D. F. S. Thomson, 1988

    依据: AI 草稿

    亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年

作品

  • 针对亚里士多德的科学理想,论证人的心智无法完满地认识事物的本性,并提出一种基于观察与判断的谦逊方法。

立场

Sanches is on the map as one of the main representatives of Renaissance scepticism, alongside Montaigne. In “That Nothing Is Known” he directed doubt not at faith or morals but at the claims of Aristotelian science. Knowledge in the full sense, grasping a thing through its causes, would require knowing everything, since all things are connected; but things are infinite and changing, the senses are coarse and deceptive, and the mind depends on them. Definitions only explain names, and syllogisms derive nothing that was not already assumed. What remains is a more modest knowledge based on careful observation and experience (experimentum) and on judgement (iudicium), as he practised it as a physician; a promised work on method never appeared. Bayle devoted an article to him in his Dictionary and called him a great Pyrrhonist. Richard Popkin’s history of scepticism placed him among the sources of the sceptical crisis to which, on Popkin’s account, Descartes responded. Whether Sanches was a Pyrrhonist or rather a mitigated sceptic who wanted to reform science is debated; his book appeared at almost the same time as Montaigne’s “Essays” (1580), but a connection between the two is not documented. Modern study of his work owes much to the edition and translation by Elaine Limbrick and Douglas Thomson (1988).

生平与背景

Francisco Sanches was born in 1551, in Braga in Portugal or, according to other sources, in Tui in Galicia; his origin has long been disputed. His family, New Christians of Jewish descent, moved to Bordeaux when he was a child, and he attended the Collège de Guyenne there. He studied medicine in Rome and then in Montpellier, where he took his doctorate in 1574. He settled in Toulouse and practised there as a physician, among other places at the Hôtel-Dieu Saint-Jacques. In 1585 he obtained a chair of philosophy at the University of Toulouse and in 1612 a chair of medicine. Besides “That Nothing Is Known” (Lyon 1581) he published a Latin poem on the comet of 1577 and a commentary on Aristotle’s treatise on divination in sleep. He died in Toulouse on 16 November 1623. His medical works appeared posthumously in Toulouse in 1636, and his philosophical treatises in Rotterdam in 1649.

其他主要作品

  • Poem on the Comet of 1577 (Carmen de cometa anni MDLXXVII, 1578)
  • That Nothing Is Known (Quod nihil scitur, 1581)
  • On Divination in Sleep, on Aristotle (De divinatione per somnum, ad Aristotelem, 1585)
  • Medical Works (Opera medica, 1636)
  • Philosophical Treatises (Tractatus philosophici, 1649)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开