Agora思想的公共广场

布拉班特的西格尔

约1240–1284年

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

哲学家应当阐明亚里士多德主张什么、他的理由蕴含什么,即使这偏离了西格尔所宣称的信仰——而与阿威罗伊一起来读,它们指向一个为所有人类共有的理智。

定位

中世纪与经院哲学 · 西欧 · 形而上学, 心灵与意识, 宗教

巴黎的文学院教师,他跟随阿威罗伊阅读亚里士多德,直至主张全人类只有一个理智;阿奎那1270年写文反对他,而1270年和1277年的巴黎谴责针对的正是与他类似的学说。

核心思想

  • 全人类只有一个理智(早期著作)
  • 报告哲学家们的主张,而不裁定真理
  • 世界的永恒性作为哲学命题
  • 哲学陈述自然理性所得出的结论;真理在于信仰

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 亚里士多德

    受其影响 ✓

    Siger expounded Aristotle literally as a Paris arts master, reporting what the Philosopher held even where it conflicted with faith, as on the world’s eternity. Siger of Brabant, De aeternitate mundi; Quaestiones in tertium De anima; SEP “Siger of Brabant”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年

  • 伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊)

    受其影响 ✓

    Siger followed Averroes in reading Aristotle as teaching a single intellect shared by all humans (Questions on De anima III, late 1260s) and later qualified this view. Siger of Brabant, Quaestiones in tertium De anima; De anima intellectiva (c. 1273); SEP “Siger of Brabant”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊) › 1126–1198

批评

批评了 1

  • 托马斯·阿奎那

    批评了

    Siger of Brabant replied to Aquinas’ attack on the single intellect, granting points while still doubting that Aristotle could be read otherwise (De anima intellectiva, c. 1273). Siger of Brabant, De anima intellectiva (c. 1273); SEP “Siger of Brabant”

    依据: AI 草稿

    托马斯·阿奎那 › 约1225–1274年

作品

立场

As an arts master Siger’s task was to explain Aristotle, and he took the task literally. In his Questions on the third book of On the Soul, probably from the late 1260s, he followed Averroes in holding that Aristotle taught a single intellect, separate from bodies and shared by all humans, which thinks in each person by means of that person’s images. Aquinas’ On the Unity of the Intellect against the Averroists (1270) was almost certainly aimed at this teaching, and it accused its defenders of saying that by reason they concluded one thing while holding the opposite by faith. Siger also treated the eternity of the world, the necessity of what the heavens cause and similar theses as conclusions of philosophy. In On the Intellective Soul, written in reply to Aquinas, he presented the question as still doubtful and declared that in doubt he held to faith, which is above all reason; in later works, such as his questions on the Book of Causes, he came closer to Aquinas. The charge that he taught a “double truth”, that something can be true in philosophy and false in faith, goes back to the prologue of the 1277 condemnation. Most historians think it does not fit his own statements, in which philosophy reports what Aristotle and the philosophers held while truth lies with faith; whether this was sincere or a protective formula is still debated. The condemnation of 1277 shaped Paris teaching for decades. Pierre Duhem’s thesis that it opened the way for modern science, by insisting that God can do what Aristotle declared impossible, is now treated with caution.

生平与背景

Siger was born around 1240 in the duchy of Brabant. By the mid-1260s he was a master in the arts faculty at Paris, teaching Aristotle’s philosophy. In 1266 the papal legate Simon of Brion threatened him with sanctions after disturbances between the “nations” of the faculty, and in the early 1270s he led a minority party in a disputed election of the rector that was settled only in 1275. On 10 December 1270 Bishop Étienne Tempier of Paris condemned thirteen propositions, among them the unity of the intellect and the eternity of the world. In November 1276 the inquisitor of France, Simon du Val, summoned Siger and two other masters, who had by then left the kingdom. On 7 March 1277 Tempier condemned 219 propositions taught in the arts faculty – some of them close to positions of Aquinas, who had died in 1274; eleven days later Archbishop Robert Kilwardby condemned thirty propositions at Oxford. According to the traditional account Siger went to the papal court in Italy and died at Orvieto before November 1284, stabbed by a secretary who had lost his mind; this account rests on late and indirect evidence and has recently been questioned. Dante placed him in the heaven of the Sun, introduced by Aquinas, his former opponent (Paradiso X 133–138).

其他主要作品

  • Questions on the Third Book of On the Soul (c. 1269)
  • On the Eternity of the World (early 1270s)
  • Questions on the Metaphysics (1270s)
  • On the Necessity and Contingency of Causes
  • Questions on the Book of Causes (mid-1270s)

出现在

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开