安萨里
哲学家无法证明他们所主张的:因果之间没有必然联系,只有上帝在起作用——而确定性来自神秘体验。
定位
他在《哲学家的矛盾》中攻击哲学家——并通过怀疑走上了神秘主义之路。
核心思想
- 对因果性的批判
- 偶因论
- 怀疑的危机与对确定性的追寻
影响
受影响于 2
拉比娅·阿达维娅
受其影响
In the Book of Love of his Revival of the Religious Sciences al-Ghazali quoted and explained Rabia’s verses on the two kinds of love for God. al-Ghazali, Ihya ulum al-din, Kitab al-mahabba, tr. E. Ormsby, Love, Longing, Intimacy and Contentment (2011); M. Smith, Rabia the Mystic (1928)
依据: AI 草稿
拉比娅·阿达维娅 › 相传 约714–801年
阿什阿里
受其影响
Al-Ghazali wrote as a theologian of al-Ashari’s school: his Moderation in Belief (c. 1095) expounds Asharite doctrine, and his critique of necessary causation follows Asharite occasionalism. al-Ghazali, al-Iqtisad fi l-itiqad (c. 1095); Tahafut al-falasifa (1095); SEP “al-Ghazali”
依据: AI 草稿
阿什阿里 › 约874–936年
影响了 10
法赫尔丁·拉齐
影响了
Ibn Khaldun named Fakhr al-Din al-Razi as al-Ghazali’s successor in the new approach of the later theologians, which Razi carried further by engaging the philosophers’ arguments in detail. Ibn Khaldun, al-Muqaddima (1377), section on kalam, tr. F. Rosenthal (1958); F. Griffel, The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam (2021)
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
法赫尔丁·拉齐 › 约1150–1210年
伊本·阿拉比
影响了
Ibn Arabi took up al-Ghazali’s view that inspired unveiling (kashf) gives surer knowledge of God than rational reflection, refining how the two relate in the Meccan Revelations. Ibn Arabi, al-Futuhat al-makkiyya; W. C. Chittick, The Sufi Path of Knowledge (1989); SEP “Ibn Arabi”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
伊本·阿拉比 › 1165–1240
托马斯·阿奎那
影响了 ✓
Thomas, like Albert, used the Latin translation of al-Ghazali’s Doctrines of the Philosophers (Maqasid, by Gundissalinus) as a source on Arabic philosophy – taking “Algazel”, whose critical frame the translators had left out, for a follower of Avicenna. SEP “al-Ghazali” (F. Griffel), section on the Latin reception; al-Ghazali, Maqasid al-falasifa, Latin Summa theoricae philosophiae (12th c.)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
托马斯·阿奎那 › 约1225–1274年
拉蒙·柳利
影响了
Llull adapted the logic of al-Ghazali’s Intentions of the Philosophers in his Compendium logicae Algazelis and its Catalan verse version, the Lògica del Gatzell (c. 1271–72). R. Llull, Compendium logicae Algazelis; Lògica del Gatzell; A. Bonner, The Art and Logic of Ramon Llull (2007); SEP “Ramon Llull”
依据: AI 草稿
拉蒙·柳利 › 约1232–1316年
伊本·赫勒敦
影响了
Ibn Khaldun named al-Ghazali the first to write in the way of the later theologians and shared his doubts about the philosophers’ metaphysical proofs (Muqaddima, 1377). Ibn Khaldun, al-Muqaddima (1377), sections on kalam and on philosophy, tr. F. Rosenthal (1958)
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
伊本·赫勒敦 › 1332–1406
沙·瓦利乌拉
影响了
In the introduction to The Conclusive Argument from God Shah Waliullah named al-Ghazali with respect among the forerunners who had explained the reasons behind the revealed law. Shah Wali Allah, Hujjat Allah al-baligha, introduction, tr. M. K. Hermansen, The Conclusive Argument from God (1996)
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
沙·瓦利乌拉 › 1703–1762
显示全部 (10)收起
犹大·哈列维
影响了 存在争议
Halevi’s critique of the philosophers in the Kuzari (c. 1140) resembles al-Ghazali’s Incoherence of the Philosophers; whether he knew al-Ghazali’s works directly is disputed. Judah Halevi, Kuzari (c. 1140); D. H. Baneth, “Jehuda Hallewi und Gazali” (1924); SEP “Judah Halevi”
依据: AI 草稿
犹大·哈列维 › 约1075–1141年
伊本·图斐利
影响了
In the introduction to Hayy ibn Yaqzan Ibn Tufayl cited al-Ghazali’s mystical experience as a model, while noting that his popular and esoteric works contradict each other. Ibn Tufayl, Hayy ibn Yaqzan, introduction, tr. L. E. Goodman (1972); SEP “Ibn Tufayl”
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·图斐利 › 约1105–1185年
穆赫辛·费兹·卡尚尼
影响了
Fayd Kashani’s White Path (1636) is a Shiʿi recension of al-Ghazali’s Revival of the Religious Sciences that keeps its structure and most of its ethical teaching. Fayd Kashani, al-Maḥajja al-bayḍāʾ fī tahdhīb al-Iḥyāʾ, ed. A. A. Ghaffari (8 vols.); Aqa Buzurg Tihrani, al-Dharīʿa (for the date)
依据: AI 草稿
穆赫辛·费兹·卡尚尼 › 1598–1680
奥斯曼·丹·福迪奥
影响了
Usman dan Fodio echoed al-Ghazali’s Revival of the Religious Sciences in the title of his Ihya al-sunna, joining Sufi piety with a call to revive the Sunna. M. Hiskett, The Sword of Truth: The Life and Times of the Shehu Usuman dan Fodio (1973); al-Ghazali, Ihya ulum al-din
依据: AI 草稿
奥斯曼·丹·福迪奥 › 1754–1817
批评
受批评于 2
伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊)
受其批评
Averroes answered al-Ghazali’s Incoherence point by point: whoever denies natural causes denies the intellect, since knowledge is knowledge through causes (Tahafut al-tahafut, c. 1180). Ibn Rushd, Tahāfut al-tahāfut, 17th discussion, tr. S. van den Bergh, 1954
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊) › 1126–1198
法蒂玛·梅尔尼西
受其批评
Mernissi read al-Ghazali’s book on marriage in the Ihya as treating women’s sexuality as an active danger (fitna) that justified seclusion and segregation (Beyond the Veil, 1975). F. Mernissi, Beyond the Veil: Male–Female Dynamics in a Modern Muslim Society, 1975
依据: AI 草稿
法蒂玛·梅尔尼西 › 1940–2015
批评了 3
亚里士多德
批评了
Al-Ghazali judged that Aristotle’s metaphysics, as transmitted by al-Farabi and Avicenna, contains unbelief, while accepting his logic as neutral (al-Munqidh min al-dalal, c. 1108). al-Ghazālī, al-Munqidh min al-ḍalāl, tr. R. J. McCarthy, Freedom and Fulfillment, 1980
依据: AI 草稿
亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年
法拉比
批评了
Al-Ghazali named al-Farabi and Avicenna as the philosophers he meant to refute, condemning their eternal world, God’s knowing only universals and denial of bodily resurrection (Tahafut al-falasifa, 1095). al-Ghazālī, Tahāfut al-falāsifa (1095), introduction and conclusion; SEP “al-Ghazali”
依据: AI 草稿
法拉比 › 约872–950年
伊本·西那(阿维森纳) 受其影响
受其影响
Al-Ghazali summarised Avicenna’s philosophy in The Aims of the Philosophers and took over much of his logic and psychology, even while condemning three of his doctrines. al-Ghazali, Maqasid al-falasifa (c. 1094); F. Griffel, Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology (2009); SEP “al-Ghazali”
依据: AI 草稿
批评了
Al-Ghazali’s Incoherence of the Philosophers attacked Avicenna’s system on twenty points, among them the world’s eternity, emanation and the necessary link between cause and effect (1095). al-Ghazālī, Tahāfut al-falāsifa (1095), tr. M. Marmura, 2000; SEP “al-Ghazali”
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037
作品
立场
Al-Ghazali studied the philosophers thoroughly in order to refute them. In The Incoherence of the Philosophers he argued that Avicenna’s followers could not prove their key claims, and that three of them – the eternity of the world, God’s knowing particulars only in a universal way, and the denial of bodily resurrection – contradicted Islam. Famously he denied that fire necessarily burns cotton: what we call causes are only regular conjunctions created by God at each moment. In his autobiography he describes how doubt led him to the certainty of mystical experience. He secured a place for logic in Islamic theology and made Sufism respectable within Sunni Islam.
生平与背景
Born in 1058 in Tus in north-eastern Iran, al-Ghazali became the leading teacher at the Nizamiyya college in Baghdad. In 1095 a spiritual crisis made him give up his post; he lived for years as a wandering Sufi in Damascus, Jerusalem and Mecca. He later taught again briefly in Nishapur and died in his home town in 1111.
其他主要作品
- The Intentions of the Philosophers (c. 1094)
- The Incoherence of the Philosophers (1095)
- The Revival of the Religious Sciences (c. 1097)
- Deliverance from Error (c. 1108)
出现在
- 旅程 ‘亚里士多德的旅程’ · 第 5 站,共 9 站
- 旅程 ‘从巴格达到伊斯法罕’ · 第 4 站,共 9 站
- 争论 ‘安萨里与阿威罗伊:哲学能证明它所主张的东西吗?’
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的