伊本·泰米叶
希腊逻辑并没有给健全的人类理性已经知道的东西增添什么,而正确理解的理性绝不会与启示相矛盾——所以衡量标准是《古兰经》和先知的榜样,而不是哲学家。
定位
大马士革的罕百里派学者,死于该城堡垒的狱中:在《驳逻辑学家》中,他主张亚里士多德式的定义和三段论并不为知识增添什么,并以经典和健全的理性之名,反对伊本·西那、伊本·阿拉比和阿什阿里派神学家。
核心思想
- 驳逻辑学家
- 健全的理性与真实的启示永不冲突
- 共相只存在于心灵之中
- 对伊本·阿拉比和阿什阿里派的批判
批评
批评了 6
亚里士多德
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya attacked Aristotelian logic: definitions cannot capture essences, and the syllogism yields no knowledge not available otherwise (al-Radd ala al-mantiqiyyin). Ibn Taymiyya, al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn; W. Hallaq, Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek Logicians, 1993
依据: AI 草稿
亚里士多德 › 公元前384—前322年
阿什阿里
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya criticised Asharite kalam for reinterpreting God’s revealed attributes and for resting faith on the proof from atoms and accidents (Dar taarud al-aql wa-l-naql). Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
依据: AI 草稿
阿什阿里 › 约874–936年
伊本·西那(阿维森纳)
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya rejected Avicenna’s God as a Necessary Existent without attributes and the Avicennan logic on which the philosophers built (Dar taarud; al-Radd ala al-mantiqiyyin). Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql; al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037
伊本·哈兹姆
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya wrote a critique of Ibn Hazm’s Ranks of Consensus, disputing many of the points on which Ibn Hazm had claimed that the scholars agreed. Ibn Taymiyya, Naqd Marātib al-ijmāʿ, printed with Ibn Ḥazm, Marātib al-ijmāʿ (Cairo 1938)
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·哈兹姆 › 994–1064
法赫尔丁·拉齐
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya wrote Dar taarud against al-Razi’s ‘universal rule’ that reason prevails when it conflicts with revelation, arguing that sound reason and revelation never conflict. Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql I; Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Asās al-taqdīs; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
依据: AI 草稿
法赫尔丁·拉齐 › 约1150–1210年
伊本·阿拉比
批评了
Ibn Taymiyya condemned Ibn Arabi’s Fusus al-hikam for identifying the existence of creatures with God’s existence, a view he attacked as ‘unity of existence’ (wahdat al-wujud). Ibn Taymiyya, Majmūʿ al-fatāwā II; A. Knysh, Ibn ʿArabi in the Later Islamic Tradition, 1999
依据: AI 草稿
伊本·阿拉比 › 1165–1240
作品
定义无法把握本质,共相只存在于心中,而三段论不提供没有它也无法得到的知识。
反对法赫尔丁·拉齐的主张——当理性似乎与经文相矛盾时,理性必须占上风:正确理解的话,健全的理性与真实的启示从不冲突。
立场
Ibn Taymiyya wrote as a jurist and theologian, but much of his work is a sustained argument with philosophy and kalam. In The Refutation of the Logicians, begun in Alexandria and completed in Damascus, he argued that Aristotelian logic is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge. Definitions cannot capture the essence of a thing, because the line between essential and accidental properties is drawn arbitrarily; we know things by acquaintance and by distinguishing them from others. Universals exist only in the mind, and outside it there are only particular things. A syllogism only makes explicit what its premises already contain, and its conclusions are no more certain than those of analogy. In his longest philosophical work, Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revelation, he rejected Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s “universal rule” that where reason and scripture seem to conflict, reason must prevail and scripture be interpreted figuratively. Sound reason and authentic revelation, he argued, cannot conflict, and much of what passes for reason in philosophy and kalam is mistaken. On these grounds he criticised Avicenna’s God, from whom the world emanates by necessity; the Asharite view that God’s attributes are timeless and involve no acts in time; and Ibn Arabi’s doctrine of being, which in his view erased the distinction between creator and creation. Some recent scholars, among them Wael Hallaq, Yahya Michot, Jon Hoover and Carl Sharif El-Tobgui, read him as a serious critic of philosophy on rational grounds; others see him above all as a traditionalist. His later reception, from Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in the eighteenth century to modern Salafi and militant groups, is contested.
生平与背景
Taqi al-Din Ahmad ibn Taymiyya was born in 1263 in Harran in upper Mesopotamia into a family of Hanbali scholars. In 1269 the family fled the Mongols to Damascus, then ruled by the Mamluk sultans of Cairo, where his father taught. He succeeded his father as a teacher in 1284 and became known as a jurist and preacher involved in public affairs. He issued fatwas calling for war against the Ilkhanid Mongols, although they had converted to Islam, and took part in the resistance to their invasions of Syria between 1299 and 1303. His theological creeds brought him into conflict with Asharite scholars and with Sufi groups. He was imprisoned in Cairo in 1306–07 and again in 1308–09, then held under house arrest in Alexandria for eight months. Back in Damascus he was jailed for some months over his rulings on divorce oaths and, from 1326, for condemning journeys to the tombs of prophets and saints. He died in prison in the citadel of Damascus in September 1328. His pupils included the theologian Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the historian Ibn Kathir.
其他主要作品
- Exposing the Deception of the Jahmiyya (Bayan talbis al-Jahmiyya, 1306–07)
- Governance according to God’s Law (al-Siyasa al-sharʿiyya, c. 1310)
- The Way of the Prophet’s Sunna (Minhaj al-sunna, against Twelver Shiʿism)
- Collected Fatwas (Majmuʿ al-fatawa, 37 vols., printed 1961–67)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的