格伦·肖恩·库尔萨德
定居者国家所给予的承认并不会终结殖民主义,而是使被殖民者接受它的条款;自由始于以土地为基础的实践和关系,而这些是原住民自己维系的。
定位
黄刀德内第一民族出身的政治理论家,任教于不列颠哥伦比亚大学:在《红皮肤,白面具》(2014年)中,他与法农一道论证,国家对原住民身份的承认再生产着殖民统治,而抵抗必须从以土地为基础的实践出发——“扎根的规范性”。
核心思想
- 对承认政治的批判
- 定居殖民主义作为持续的剥夺
- 扎根的规范性
- 原住民的复兴
影响
受影响于 5
卡尔·马克思
受其影响
Coulthard reworked Marx’s primitive accumulation in a place-based way: in settler colonies the decisive relation is the ongoing dispossession of land, not the making of wage labour (2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on so-called primitive accumulation
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883
弗朗茨·法农
受其影响
Echoing Fanon’s title, Red Skin, White Masks (2014) uses his remark that the master wants ‘not recognition but work’ against recognition granted by the colonial state. G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014); F. Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs (1952)
依据: AI 草稿
弗朗茨·法农 › 1925–1961
小维因·德洛里亚
受其影响
Coulthard followed Vine Deloria Jr. in treating land as an ontological framework for understanding relationships, not merely a resource (Red Skin, White Masks, 2014; God Is Red, 1973). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition (2014); V. Deloria Jr., God Is Red (1973)
依据: AI 草稿
小维因·德洛里亚 › 1933–2005
泰阿亚克·阿尔弗雷德
受其影响
In Red Skin, White Masks (2014), with a foreword by Alfred, Coulthard drew on Peace, Power, Righteousness (1999) and Wasáse (2005) for tradition-based self-determination against liberalism and capitalism. G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014), foreword by T. Alfred; T. Alfred, Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto (1999); Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Action and Freedom (2005)
依据: AI 草稿
泰阿亚克·阿尔弗雷德 › 约1964年年生
莉安·贝塔萨莫萨克·辛普森 影响了
受其影响
In the conclusion of Red Skin, White Masks (2014), with its ‘five theses on Indigenous resurgence’, Coulthard builds on Simpson’s Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back (2011). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014), conclusion; L. B. Simpson, Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back (2011)
依据: AI 草稿
影响了
Simpson took up Coulthard’s ‘grounded normativity’, the ethics generated by land-based practices and knowledge, in As We Have Always Done (2017), after their joint article of 2016. L. B. Simpson, As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance (2017); G. S. Coulthard & L. B. Simpson, “Grounded Normativity / Place-Based Solidarity”, American Quarterly 68:2 (2016)
依据: AI 草稿
莉安·贝塔萨莫萨克·辛普森 › 1971年生
批评
受批评于 1
布赖恩·伯克哈特
受其批评
Burkhart objected that Coulthard traces the shift from land as relationship to land as property to state power alone, not to Western concepts of land (Transmotion, 2017). B. Burkhart, contribution to “Red Pens, White Paper: Wider Implications of Coulthard’s Call to Sovereignty”, Transmotion 3/2 (2017); G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014)
依据: AI 草稿
布赖恩·伯克哈特 › 同时代
批评了 3
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔
批评了
In Red Skin, White Masks (2014) Coulthard followed Fanon’s critique of Hegel’s master–slave parable: in colonial settings, recognition granted by the state reproduces domination instead of overcoming it. G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition (2014), ch. 1 and conclusion
依据: AI 草稿
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831
查尔斯·泰勒
批评了
Drawing on Fanon, Coulthard argued against Taylor’s ‘The Politics of Recognition’ (1992) that recognition granted by the settler state reproduces colonial rule (Red Skin, White Masks, 2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014), ch. 1; C. Taylor, “The Politics of Recognition”, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism (1992)
依据: AI 草稿
查尔斯·泰勒 › 1931年生
南希·弗雷泽
批评了
Coulthard applied his objection to the politics of recognition also to Nancy Fraser’s model: recognition granted within a settler-colonial order reproduces that order (Red Skin, White Masks, 2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition (2014); N. Fraser, “Rethinking Recognition”, New Left Review 3 (2000)
依据: AI 草稿
南希·弗雷泽 › 1947年生
作品
为什么被殖民者国家承认并不能使之去殖民化——以及为什么原住民的抵抗取材于作为关系体系的土地。
立场
Coulthard’s starting point is the turn in Canadian politics since the 1970s towards recognising Aboriginal rights, land claims and self-government, and its best-known philosophical defence, Charles Taylor’s essay “The Politics of Recognition” (1992). With Fanon, who observed that what the master wants from the slave is “not recognition but work”, he argues that recognition granted by a colonial state does not free the colonised; it leads them to identify with the terms on which they are recognised, and so reproduces the power it was supposed to transform. He applies the same objection to Nancy Fraser’s model of recognition. Against an orthodox reading of Marx he proposes a “place-based” version of primitive accumulation: in settler colonies the decisive relation is not the making of wage labourers but the ongoing dispossession of land. Following Vine Deloria’s contrast between spatial and temporal world views and the Dene struggles of the 1970s and 1980s, he describes “grounded normativity”, the ethical frameworks that come from land-based practices and knowledge, in which land is a system of reciprocal relations and obligations. Negotiated land claims, he argues, turned a struggle informed by land as relationship into a struggle for land as property. He defends Indigenous resentment against an official language of reconciliation, examines the gendered politics of self-government, and ends with theses on Indigenous resurgence drawn from Idle No More (2012–13). Brian Burkhart objected in 2017 that Coulthard locates the change from land as relationship to land as property only in the power of the state, not in Western concepts of land and being; reviewers have also noted that the argument is worked out mainly for Canada.
生平与背景
Glen Sean Coulthard was born in 1974 and is a member of the Yellowknives Dene First Nation in the Northwest Territories of Canada. He studied at the University of Victoria, first in its Indigenous Governance programme, and then in political science, where James Tully supervised his doctorate (2009). He teaches Indigenous studies and political science at the University of British Columbia. His article “Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the ‘Politics of Recognition’ in Canada” (2007) won the annual prize of the journal Contemporary Political Theory. He is a co-founder of Dechinta Centre for Research and Learning, a land-based university programme in the Northwest Territories, where he has spent part of each teaching year since 2015. Red Skin, White Masks (2014) received the C. B. Macpherson Prize of the Canadian Political Science Association and the Frantz Fanon Award of the Caribbean Philosophical Association.
其他主要作品
- “Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the ‘Politics of Recognition’ in Canada” (Contemporary Political Theory, 2007)
- Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition (2014)
- Introduction to George Manuel and Michael Posluns, The Fourth World: An Indian Reality (new edition, 2019)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的