弗里德里希·阿道夫·特兰德伦堡
特兰德伦堡认为，运动是思维与存在共有的根本事实，他用亚里士多德式的逻辑否定黑格尔关于辩证法是绝对方法的主张。
定位
柏林的哲学家和亚里士多德研究者，他以亚里士多德式的运动逻辑反对黑格尔的辩证法；布伦塔诺和狄尔泰的老师，也是弗雷格在《概念文字》中引用的那篇莱布尼茨论文的作者。
核心思想
- 对黑格尔辩证法的批判
- 运动作为思维与存在的共同基础
影响
影响了 3
威廉·狄尔泰 教过
教过
In Berlin Dilthey came under the influence of Trendelenburg and Boeckh, both pupils of Schleiermacher. SEP “Wilhelm Dilthey” (R. Makkreel), §1.2
依据: AI 草稿
威廉·狄尔泰 › 1833–1911
弗朗茨·布伦塔诺 教过
教过 ✓
Brentano studied Aristotle with Trendelenburg in Berlin. SEP “Franz Brentano” (W. Huemer), §1
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
弗朗茨·布伦塔诺 › 1838–1917
戈特洛布·弗雷格
影响了
In the preface to the Begriffsschrift Frege refers to Trendelenburg’s essay on Leibniz’s plan for a universal characteristic when he presents his concept-script as a step toward Leibniz’s ideal. Frege, Begriffsschrift (1879), preface and note 2, in van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel (1967), p. 6; cf. SEP “Gottlob Frege” §2.1
依据: AI 草稿
戈特洛布·弗雷格 › 1848–1925
批评
相互批评 1
库诺·费舍 ⇄ 相互
批评了
Trendelenburg attacked Fischer’s reading of Kant’s doctrine of space in Kuno Fischer and His Kant (1869). Wikipedia, “Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg” (read); Britannica and Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries report the same dispute
依据: AI 草稿
受其批评
Fischer answered Trendelenburg in 1870 with the Anti-Trendelenburg. Wikipedia, “Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg” (read)
依据: AI 草稿
库诺·费舍 › 1824–1907
批评了 1
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔
批评了
Trendelenburg’s Logical Investigations (1840) and The Logical Question in Hegel’s System (1843) contested Hegel’s claim to an absolute method. Wikipedia, “Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg” (read); Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Trendelenburg” (not accessible)
依据: AI 草稿
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831
作品
- 1836亚里士多德逻辑学要素
特兰德伦堡的亚里士多德逻辑拉丁文教科书（1836年）：选录亚里士多德的文本并加以说明，为教学而写。
- 1840逻辑研究
特兰德伦堡1840年的主要著作，批判黑格尔关于绝对方法的主张；他认为运动是存在与思维共有的根本事实，并发展出一种亚里士多德式的观念论。
立场
Trendelenburg is on the map as the Berlin philosopher who revived Aristotle against Hegel. He called his position a modern Aristotelianism and a kind of Aristotelian idealism: motion is the fundamental fact common to being and thought, and the ultimate explanation of the universe lies in the category of end, which he defended against purely mechanical views. His Logical Investigations (1840) and The Logical Question in Hegel’s System (1843) contested Hegel’s claim to an absolute method and helped the reaction against Hegel. In Berlin Brentano studied Aristotle with him, Dilthey came under his influence together with Boeckh, and Friedrich Paulsen took his doctorate with him. In the preface of the Begriffsschrift (1879) Frege refers to his essay on Leibniz’s plan for a universal characteristic when he presents his concept-script as a step toward Leibniz’s ideal. From 1865 Trendelenburg disputed with Kuno Fischer over Kant’s doctrine of space.
生平与背景
Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg was born on 30 November 1802 in Eutin. He studied in Kiel, Leipzig and Berlin and took his doctorate in Berlin in 1826 with a dissertation on Plato’s doctrine of ideas and numbers as shown by Aristotle. After seven years as a private tutor he became associate professor in Berlin in 1833 and full professor a few years later; he taught there for nearly forty years and died in Berlin on 24 January 1872.
其他主要作品
- Elements of Aristotelian Logic (Elementa logices Aristotelicae, 1836)
- Logical Investigations (Logische Untersuchungen, 1840)
- The Logical Question in Hegel’s System (Die logische Frage in Hegels System, 1843)
- History of the Doctrine of Categories (Geschichte der Kategorienlehre, 1846)
- Natural Law on the Ground of Ethics (Das Naturrecht auf dem Grunde der Ethik, 1860)
- Kuno Fischer and His Kant (Kuno Fischer und sein Kant, 1869)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的