丸山真男
战时的日本是一个人人服从、却无人负责的体系;民主需要把社会秩序看作人所创造、并且可以改变之物的公民。
定位
东京大学政治学家,他的论文《超国家主义的逻辑与心理》(1946年)把战时国家分析为一个无人承担责任的体系;在德川思想研究中,他把政治与道德的近代分离的开端追溯到荻生徂徕,成为日本战后民主思想的主要代言人之一。
核心思想
- 无责任的体系
- 荻生徂徕与政治同道德的分离
- “自然”与“作为”:两种社会秩序观
- 作为永久革命的民主
影响
受影响于 4
荻生徂徠
受其影响
Maruyama argued that Ogyū Sorai’s view of the Way as made by the sages, separating politics from private morality, began modern political thought in Japan (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
依据: AI 草稿
荻生徂徠 › 1666–1728
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔
受其影响
Maruyama took Hegel’s picture of China as an unhistorical, stagnant empire as his starting question, aiming to show that Tokugawa Japan developed modern thought from within (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), introduction; tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
依据: AI 草稿
格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831
马克斯·韦伯
受其影响
Maruyama drew on Weber’s types of rule and his theory of rationalisation in his essays on Japanese politics (Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics, 1956–57). Maruyama Masao, Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō (1956–57), tr. I. Morris, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (1963); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan (1996)
依据: AI 草稿
马克斯·韦伯 › 1864–1920
卡尔·曼海姆
受其影响
Maruyama used Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge (Ideology and Utopia) as a method for intellectual history, relating Tokugawa doctrines to the social positions that carried them (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan: Maruyama Masao and the Search for Autonomy (1996)
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·曼海姆 › 1893–1947
作品
- 1946超国家主义的逻辑与心理
1946年5月发表于《世界》杂志,使他一举成名:天皇制国家宣称掌握价值本身,由于每个人的权威都来自与天皇的距离,最终无人承担责任。
- 1952日本政治思想史研究
写于1940—1944年的论文:朱子学正统经由荻生徂徕和本居宣长的国学而瓦解;徂徕把社会秩序理解为人所制作之物。
立场
Maruyama’s essay on ultra-nationalism argued that the prewar Japanese state, unlike the modern European state, did not leave questions of value to the conscience of individuals but claimed to embody value itself in the emperor. Since everyone derived authority from their distance to the emperor, pressure from above was passed downwards – a “transfer of oppression” – and in the end no one regarded themselves as responsible; in a later essay he called this a “system of irresponsibility”. His studies of the Tokugawa period traced how Ogyū Sorai broke with the Zhu Xi orthodoxy: instead of seeing social order as part of nature (shizen), Sorai saw the Way as made by the sages (sakui), which opened the idea that order is a human construction and can be changed. Maruyama used Weber’s sociology and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, and he took Hegel’s picture of an unhistorical, stagnant China as a challenge to show that Japan had developed modern forms of thought from within. In “Japanese Thought” (1961) he described a culture of closed “octopus pots” in which ideas accumulate without being confronted. Later critics, including Yoshimoto Takaaki and postcolonial scholars, objected that he measured Japan against an idealised Europe; his defence of democracy as a “permanent revolution” remains a reference point.
生平与背景
Maruyama Masao was born on 22 March 1914 in Osaka, the son of the journalist Maruyama Kanji. As a high-school student in 1933 he was briefly detained by the police for attending a meeting of a left-wing study group. He studied law at Tokyo Imperial University and in 1937 became the assistant of the political philosopher Nanbara Shigeru; between 1940 and 1944 he wrote his essays on the political thought of the Tokugawa period. In 1944 he was drafted into the army and served in Korea and then in Hiroshima, where he experienced the atomic bombing on 6 August 1945. His essay “Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism”, published in May 1946, made him the leading intellectual of postwar democracy. He was professor at the University of Tokyo from 1950. In 1960 he took part in the protests against the renewal of the security treaty with the United States. During the student protests of 1968–69 his research office was occupied, and he left the university early in 1971. He then devoted himself to the history of Japanese thought and to studies of Fukuzawa Yukichi. He died in Tokyo on 15 August 1996.
其他主要作品
- Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1952)
- Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism (1946)
- Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō, 1956–57)
- Japanese Thought (Nihon no shisō, 1961)
- Reading Fukuzawa’s Outline of a Theory of Civilization (1986)
- Loyalty and Rebellion (Chūsei to hangyaku, 1992)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的