Agora思想的公共广场

贝内德托·克罗齐

1866–1952

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

实在就是精神,它有四种不同的形式——美、真、利、善;艺术是已经成为表现的直觉,一切真历史都是当代史,是自由的历史。

定位

德国唯心主义及其后继者 · 南欧 · 美学, 社会与历史, 政治与法, 形而上学

那不勒斯的哲学家、历史学家和批评家,他建立了包含四种形式——美、真、利、善——的“精神哲学”,把艺术界定为直觉与表现,并主张一切真历史都是当代史;他通过《批评》杂志在数十年间塑造了意大利文化。

核心思想

  • 艺术即直觉与表现
  • 精神的四种形式
  • 一切历史都是当代史
  • 作为自由史的历史

老师: 安东尼奥·拉布里奥拉

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 3

  • 詹巴蒂斯塔·维柯

    受其影响 ✓

    In The Philosophy of Giambattista Vico (1911) Croce made Vico a precursor of his historicism, having presented him in the Aesthetic (1902) as the discoverer of aesthetics. B. Croce, Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale (1902); La filosofia di Giambattista Vico (1911); SEP “Benedetto Croce”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    詹巴蒂斯塔·维柯 › 1668–1744

  • 格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔

    受其影响 ✓

    In What Is Living and What Is Dead of Hegel’s Philosophy (1907) Croce limited the dialectic of opposites, adding a ‘nexus of distincts’ among the forms of spirit. B. Croce, Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel (1907); SEP “Benedetto Croce”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831

  • 安东尼奥·拉布里奥拉 师从

    师从 ✓

    As a young man in Rome, living with his uncle Silvio Spaventa, Croce attended Labriola’s lectures on moral philosophy from 1884; in 1895 Labriola’s essays on historical materialism drew him into a study of Marx. B. Croce, Contributo alla critica di me stesso (written 1915)

    依据: AI 草稿

    安东尼奥·拉布里奥拉 › 1843–1904

影响了 2

  • 何塞·卡洛斯·马里亚特吉

    影响了

    In Defence of Marxism (1928–29, ch. IV and VI) Mariátegui invoked Croce’s essays on historical materialism – the link between Hegel and Marx merely psychological, socialism grounded in a historical conception – against readings of Marxism as determinism and as a doctrine without ethics. J. C. Mariátegui, Defensa del marxismo (1928–29; book 1934), ch. IV “La filosofía moderna y el marxismo” and VI “Ética y socialismo”

    依据: AI 草稿

    何塞·卡洛斯·马里亚特吉 › 1894–1930

  • 海登·怀特

    影响了

    White, who came to Croce in Rome, wrote ‘The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History’ (1963) and read him as a philosopher of history in Metahistory (1973). H. White, “The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History”, Journal of Modern History 35 (1963); Metahistory (1973); H. Paul, Hayden White: The Historical Imagination (2011)

    依据: AI 草稿

    海登·怀特 › 1928–2018

批评

受批评于 1

  • 安东尼奥·葛兰西 影响了

    影响了 ✓

    For Gramsci the philosophy of praxis had to do to Croce what Marx had done to Hegel, recasting Croce’s ethico-political history as a theory of hegemony (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Notebook 10 (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); letter to T. Schucht (1932)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    受其批评

    Gramsci called for an ‘Anti-Croce’: Croce’s ethico-political history is speculative and leaves out force and struggle, his Storia d’Europa (1932) starting only after 1815 (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Q. 10, part I (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975)

    依据: AI 草稿

    安东尼奥·葛兰西 › 1891–1937

批评了 3

  • 卡尔·马克思

    批评了

    Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

  • 约翰·杜威

    批评了

    Croce found Dewey’s Art as Experience (1934) so close to his own idealist aesthetics that he suspected borrowing; Dewey denied this (Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1948). B. Croce, “Intorno all’estetica del Dewey”, La Critica 38 (1940) 348–353; Eng. “On the Aesthetics of Dewey”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (1948) 203–207; SEP “Dewey’s Aesthetics”

    依据: AI 草稿

    约翰·杜威 › 1859–1952

  • 乔瓦尼·秦梯利

    批评了

    In the anti-fascist intellectuals’ counter-manifesto (1925) Croce rejected Gentile’s fascist manifesto, its confusion of politics with scholarship and its claim that fascism was a new faith. B. Croce, “Una risposta di scrittori, professori e pubblicisti italiani al manifesto degli intellettuali del fascismo”, Il Mondo, 1 May 1925; G. Gentile, Manifesto degli intellettuali fascisti (21 Apr. 1925)

    依据: AI 草稿

    乔瓦尼·秦梯利 › 1875–1944

作品

立场

Croce is on the map as the central figure of Italian neo-idealism and, for half a century, of Italian culture. His philosophy of spirit distinguishes two theoretical forms, intuition and concept, and two practical ones, economic and ethical will; against Hegel he held that these are “distinct” forms, related as degrees, not opposites to be overcome in a dialectical synthesis. The “Aesthetic” of 1902 defined art as intuition identical with expression, independent of concepts, utility and morality, and presented Vico as the discoverer of aesthetics; it influenced R. G. Collingwood and literary criticism in Italy and beyond, and in 1948 Croce argued that Dewey’s aesthetics rested on idealist premises, which Dewey denied. In his theory of history Croce held that all true history is contemporary history, the thought of the present about the past, and later presented liberty as the moral ideal of history. Gramsci devoted a notebook to an “Anti-Croce” and criticised the speculative and politically moderate traits of this historicism. Croce interpreted fascism as a moral illness and an interruption of Italy’s liberal history; Piero Gobetti had seen it instead as the “autobiography of the nation”, and later historians have debated how far Croce’s reading spared the liberal elites who had helped fascism to power.

生平与背景

Benedetto Croce was born on 25 February 1866 in Pescasseroli in the Abruzzi into a wealthy landowning family and grew up in Naples. In 1883 he lost his parents and his sister in the earthquake of Casamicciola on Ischia and was himself buried under the rubble for hours. He then lived in Rome with his uncle, the politician Silvio Spaventa, enrolled in law without taking a degree and attended Antonio Labriola’s lectures. Back in Naples from 1886, he lived as a private scholar on his own means and wrote first on the history and literature of Naples. In 1903 he founded the journal “La Critica”, in which Giovanni Gentile collaborated until 1922, and edited it until 1944. He became a senator in 1910 and was minister of public education in Giovanni Giolitti’s last government in 1920–21. In June 1924, after the murder of Giacomo Matteotti, he voted in the Senate for confidence in Mussolini’s government; on 1 May 1925 he published the manifesto of antifascist intellectuals in reply to Gentile and thereafter remained an opponent of the regime in Italy, watched by the police but tolerated. After 1943 he led the refounded Liberal Party, was a minister without portfolio in 1944 and sat in the Constituent Assembly. In 1946 he founded the Italian Institute for Historical Studies in Naples. He died in Naples on 20 November 1952.

其他主要作品

  • Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic (Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale, 1902)
  • What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel (Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel, 1907)
  • Logic as the Science of the Pure Concept (Logica come scienza del concetto puro, 1909)
  • Philosophy of the Practical (Filosofia della pratica. Economica ed etica, 1909)
  • Theory and History of Historiography (Teoria e storia della storiografia, 1917)
  • History as the Story of Liberty (La storia come pensiero e come azione, 1938)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开