Agora思想的公共广场

阿克塞尔·霍耐特

1949年生

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

人需要被他人承认才能成为自己,而社会斗争就产生于这种承认被拒绝的地方。

定位

社会主义、无政府主义、马克思主义与批判理论 · 西欧 · 社会与历史, 伦理学, 政治与法

为承认而斗争:社会冲突源于被拒绝的承认。

核心思想

  • 承认
  • 物化
  • 社会自由

老师: 尤尔根·哈贝马斯

学生: 赖纳·福斯特, 哈特穆特·罗萨, 拉埃尔·耶吉

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 6

  • 格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔

    受其影响 ✓

    Honneth reconstructed Hegel’s Jena model of a struggle for recognition (Kampf um Anerkennung, 1992), later reading the Philosophy of Right as a theory of social freedom (2011). A. Honneth, Kampf um Anerkennung (1992); Leiden an Unbestimmtheit (2001); Das Recht der Freiheit (2011); SEP “Recognition”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔 › 1770–1831

  • 乔治·赫伯特·米德

    受其影响 ✓

    Honneth read Mead’s social psychology as a naturalistic transformation of the young Hegel’s theory of recognition, grounding self-relation in the perspective of others (Kampf um Anerkennung, 1992). A. Honneth, Kampf um Anerkennung (1992); G. H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society (1934); SEP “Recognition”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    乔治·赫伯特·米德 › 1863–1931

  • 马克斯·霍克海默

    受其影响 ✓

    Honneth reconstructed Horkheimer’s early programme of an interdisciplinary social theory in Kritik der Macht (1985) and later directed the Institute for Social Research Horkheimer had led. A. Honneth, Kritik der Macht (1985); “Eine soziale Pathologie der Vernunft”, in Pathologien der Vernunft (2007)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    马克斯·霍克海默 › 1895–1973

  • 西奥多·W. 阿多诺

    受其影响 ✓

    In Kritik der Macht (1985) Honneth reconstructed Adorno’s critique of the domination of nature, finding a ‘sociological deficit’ that a theory of social action should remedy. A. Honneth, Kritik der Macht. Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie (1985); SEP “Critical Theory”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    西奥多·W. 阿多诺 › 1903–1969

  • 尤尔根·哈贝马斯 师从

    师从 ✓

    After a doctorate at the Free University of Berlin (1983), Honneth was Habermas’s assistant at the Department of Philosophy in Frankfurt from 1983 to 1989 and took his Habilitation there in 1990 with Kampf um Anerkennung (expanded edition 1992). Columbia University, Department of Philosophy, profile of A. Honneth; A. Honneth, Kampf um Anerkennung (1992)

    依据: AI 草稿

    尤尔根·哈贝马斯 › 1929–2026

  • 查尔斯·泰勒

    受其影响 ✓

    Honneth shared with Taylor’s ‘The Politics of Recognition’ (1992) the thesis that identity depends on recognition, but did not confine recognition to cultural identity (Redistribution or Recognition?, 2003). C. Taylor, “The Politics of Recognition” (1992); N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (2003); SEP “Recognition”

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    查尔斯·泰勒 › 1931年生

影响了 3

  • 赖纳·福斯特 教过

    教过

    Forst was Honneth’s assistant in Frankfurt when he took his Habilitation there in 2003 with Toleranz im Konflikt; his doctorate had been with Habermas. Normative Orders (Goethe University Frankfurt), notice on the Festschrift for R. Forst, 15 Aug. 2024

    依据: AI 草稿

    赖纳·福斯特 › 1964年生

  • 哈特穆特·罗萨 教过

    教过

    Rosa’s doctorate at the Humboldt University in Berlin (1997), a study of Charles Taylor’s political philosophy (Identität und kulturelle Praxis, 1998), was supervised by Herfried Münkler and Axel Honneth. H. Rosa, CV (Max-Weber-Kolleg, Universität Erfurt)

    依据: AI 草稿

    哈特穆特·罗萨 › 1965年生

  • 拉埃尔·耶吉 教过

    教过

    Jaeggi worked at Honneth’s chair of social philosophy in Frankfurt as research associate (1996–2001) and assistant (2003–09); she took her doctorate there in 2002 with the study of alienation that appeared in 2005 in a series edited by Honneth, and her Habilitation in 2009. R. Jaeggi, CV (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin); R. Jaeggi, Entfremdung (2005)

    依据: AI 草稿

    拉埃尔·耶吉 › 1966年生

批评

批评了 2

  • 米歇尔·福柯

    批评了

    Honneth argued that Foucault’s theory of power, built on strategic struggle alone, cannot explain how social orders become stable and drifts into systems theory (Kritik der Macht, 1985). A. Honneth, Kritik der Macht. Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie (1985)

    依据: AI 草稿

    米歇尔·福柯 › 1926–1984

  • 南希·弗雷泽

    批评了

    Against Fraser’s dualism of redistribution and recognition, Honneth argued that distributive conflicts are themselves struggles for recognition, so a single normative concept suffices (Redistribution or Recognition?, 2003). N. Fraser & A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (2003; German: Umverteilung oder Anerkennung?, 2003)

    依据: AI 草稿

    南希·弗雷泽 › 1947年生

作品

立场

Honneth placed the concept of recognition at the heart of social philosophy, drawing on the young Hegel and George Herbert Mead. Individuals can form an intact identity only if they are recognised by others in three forms: love in close relationships, legal respect as equal persons, and social esteem for their contributions. Experiences of disrespect – abuse, exclusion, humiliation – are therefore the moral driving force of social struggles. Later, in The Right of Freedom, he reconstructed modern institutions as realisations of “social freedom”, and he reinterpreted reification as a forgetting of recognition. His work connects Critical Theory with debates on justice and identity politics.

生平与背景

Born in 1949 in Essen, Honneth studied in Bonn, Bochum and Berlin and became Habermas’s assistant in Frankfurt. From 2001 to 2018 he directed the Institute for Social Research, the historic home of the Frankfurt School, and he has also taught at Columbia University in New York. He is regarded as the leading figure of the third generation of Critical Theory.

其他主要作品

  • Critique of Power (1985)
  • The Struggle for Recognition (1992)
  • Reification (2005)
  • Freedom’s Right (2011)
  • The Idea of Socialism (2015)

出现在

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开