AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Karol Marks

1818–1883

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Według Marksa warunki ekonomiczne kształtują idee i politykę, historię napędza walka klas, a kapitalizm wyzyskuje robotników i trzeba go przezwyciężyć.

Umiejscowienie

Socjalizm, anarchizm, marksizm i teoria krytyczna · Europa Zachodnia · Społeczeństwo i historia, Polityka i prawo, Metafizyka

Historia jest historią walk klasowych: krytyka ekonomii politycznej i kapitału.

Kluczowe idee

  • Materializm historyczny
  • Alienacja
  • Wartość dodatkowa
  • Walka klas

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 7

  • Arystoteles

    pod wpływem

    In Capital I (1867) Marx praised Aristotle’s analysis of the value form in exchange and traced its limit, missing labour as the substance of value, to Greek slavery. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the form of value; Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book V; SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.

  • Epikur

    pod wpływem

    Marx’s doctoral dissertation (1841) defended Epicurus’ swerve of the atoms against Democritus’ determinism, reading it as the principle of the freedom of self-consciousness. K. Marx, Differenz der demokritischen und epikureischen Naturphilosophie (dissertation, Jena 1841; printed 1902); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Epikur › 341–270 p.n.e.

  • Bernard Mandeville

    pod wpływem

    In Capital I (1867) Marx quoted the Fable of the Bees, calling Mandeville an upright man with a clear mind who saw that wealth rests on the labouring poor. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the general law of capitalist accumulation; B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Bernard Mandeville › 1670–1733

  • Adam Ferguson

    pod wpływem

    Marx cited Ferguson on the crippling effects of the division of labour (Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767) in Capital I (1867), calling him Smith’s teacher. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847); Das Kapital I (1867), on the division of labour in manufacture; A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Adam Ferguson › 1723–1816

  • Immanuel Kant

    pod wpływem

    In a letter to his father (1837) Marx described building a philosophy of law on the idealism of Kant and Fichte before he turned to Hegel. K. Marx, letter to Heinrich Marx, 10–11 November 1837 (MEW Ergänzungsband 1; MECW 1)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804

  • August Cieszkowski

    pod wpływem sporne

    Whether Marx read Cieszkowski’s Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838) is disputed; its ‘philosophy of the deed’ is usually traced to him through Moses Hess and the Young Hegelians. A. Cieszkowski, Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838); N. Lobkowicz, Theory and Practice (1967); D. McLellan, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (1969)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    August Cieszkowski › 1814–1894

  • Nikołaj Czernyszewski

    pod wpływem

    Marx praised Chernyshevsky’s critique of Mill (Capital, afterword 1873) and discussed his question whether Russia could reach socialism through the peasant commune (letter of 1877). K. Marx, Das Kapital I, afterword to the 2nd ed. (1873); letter to the editors of Otechestvennye Zapiski (1877, unsent); T. Shanin, Late Marx and the Russian Road (1983)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Nikołaj Czernyszewski › 1828–1889

Wpływ na 73

  • Fryderyk Engels

    wpływ na ✓

    After Marx’s death Engels edited Capital II (1885) and III (1894) from the manuscripts and credited the materialist conception of history mainly to Marx (Ludwig Feuerbach, 1886). F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach (1886); K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), III (ed. Engels, 1894); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Fryderyk Engels › 1820–1895

  • Jean-Paul Sartre

    wpływ na ✓

    In Search for a Method (1957) and Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960) Sartre called Marxism the philosophy of our time, seeking to ground it in individual praxis. J.-P. Sartre, Questions de méthode (1957); Critique de la raison dialectique I (1960); SEP “Jean-Paul Sartre”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Jean-Paul Sartre › 1905–1980

  • Claude Lévi-Strauss

    wpływ na

    Lévi-Strauss counted Marxism among his ‘three mistresses’ (1955) and called his work a contribution to the theory of superstructures, barely sketched by Marx (La pensée sauvage, 1962). C. Lévi-Strauss, Tristes tropiques (1955); La pensée sauvage (1962)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009

  • John Rawls

    wpływ na

    Rawls took up Marx’s objection that liberal rights are merely formal, answering with the fair value of political liberties and property-owning democracy (Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, 2001). J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001), § 52; Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (2007), lectures on Marx

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    John Rawls › 1921–2002

  • Jürgen Habermas

    wpływ na ✓

    Habermas set out to reconstruct historical materialism, separating the development of productive forces from that of normative structures (Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, 1976). J. Habermas, Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus (1976); Erkenntnis und Interesse (1968)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Jürgen Habermas › 1929–2026

  • Jacques Derrida

    wpływ na ✓

    Derrida claimed a certain spirit of Marx’s critique as an inheritance while reading Marx’s own wish to exorcise ghosts against him (Spectres de Marx, 1993). J. Derrida, Spectres de Marx (1993)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004

Pokaż wszystko (73)Pokaż mniej
  • Antonio Labriola

    wpływ na ✓

    Labriola’s In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895) read Marx’s historical materialism as a method for studying history through its mediations, not as a doctrine of economic laws. A. Labriola, In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895); Del materialismo storico (1896)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Antonio Labriola › 1843–1904

  • Ferdinand Tönnies

    wpływ na

    Tönnies drew his type of Gesellschaft partly from Marx’s Capital, as a society of exchange and commodity production, and later wrote Marx: Leben und Lehre (1921). F. Tönnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887); Marx. Leben und Lehre (1921)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Ferdinand Tönnies › 1855–1936

  • Gieorgij Plechanow

    wpływ na

    Plekhanov translated the Communist Manifesto into Russian (1882, with a preface by Marx and Engels) and applied Marx’s analysis to Russian capitalism against the Narodniks (Our Differences, 1885). K. Marx and F. Engels, Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, Russian tr. G. Plekhanov (1882); G. Plekhanov, Naši raznoglasija (1885); S. H. Baron, Plekhanov (1963)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gieorgij Plechanow › 1856–1918

  • Georg Simmel

    wpływ na

    Simmel wanted to build ‘a storey beneath historical materialism’, tracing economic forms themselves to psychological and metaphysical preconditions (Philosophie des Geldes, 1900, preface). G. Simmel, Philosophie des Geldes (1900), preface; D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (1984)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Georg Simmel › 1858–1918

  • Werner Sombart

    wpływ na

    Sombart’s early lectures on socialism and Modern Capitalism engage Marx closely, yet explain the origin of capitalism through a changed mentality rather than class relations. Deutsche Biographie, “Sombart, Werner” (F. Lenger, NDB 24, 2010)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Werner Sombart › 1863–1941

  • W.E.B. Du Bois

    wpływ na

    Du Bois used Marxist categories in Black Reconstruction (1935), reading the flight of the enslaved from plantations as a ‘general strike’ against slavery. W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America (1935); “Marxism and the Negro Problem”, The Crisis 40 (1933); SEP “W. E. B. Du Bois”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    W.E.B. Du Bois › 1868–1963

  • Aleksandra Kołłontaj

    wpływ na

    Following Marx’s class analysis, Kollontai held that working women’s emancipation required abolishing private property, not equal rights within bourgeois society (The Social Basis of the Woman Question, 1909). A. Kollontai, Social’nye osnovy ženskogo voprosa (1909); B. Evans Clements, Bolshevik Feminist: The Life of Aleksandra Kollontai (1979)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Aleksandra Kołłontaj › 1872–1952

  • Giovanni Gentile

    wpływ na

    In The Philosophy of Marx (1899) Gentile read Marx’s praxis in the Theses on Feuerbach as the unity of thinking and doing, later central to his actualism. G. Gentile, La filosofia di Marx (1899); H. S. Harris, The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile (1960)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Giovanni Gentile › 1875–1944

  • Otto Neurath

    wpływ na

    Neurath treated Marx’s historical materialism as a model of empirical, anti-metaphysical sociology (Empirische Soziologie, 1931) and argued for a planned economy calculated in kind (1919). O. Neurath, Durch die Kriegswirtschaft zur Naturalwirtschaft (1919); Empirische Soziologie (1931); SEP “Otto Neurath”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Otto Neurath › 1882–1945

  • György Lukács

    wpływ na

    Lukács built his theory of reification on Marx’s account of commodity fetishism, extending it to bureaucracy, law and thought (‘Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat’, 1923). G. Lukács, “Die Verdinglichung und das Bewußtsein des Proletariats”, in Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein (1923); SEP “Georg [György] Lukács”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    György Lukács › 1885–1971

  • Antonio Gramsci

    wpływ na ✓

    Gramsci read Marx’s 1859 Preface, by which people become conscious of social conflicts in ideological forms, as a basis for his theory of hegemony (prison notebooks, 1929–35). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere (1929–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Vorwort (1859)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Antonio Gramsci › 1891–1937

  • Walter Benjamin

    wpływ na ✓

    Benjamin read the Paris arcades through Marx’s commodity fetishism as phantasmagoria (‘Paris, the Capital of the Nineteenth Century’, 1935) and joined historical materialism with messianism (1940). W. Benjamin, “Paris, die Hauptstadt des XIX. Jahrhunderts” (exposé, 1935); “Über den Begriff der Geschichte” (1940); SEP “Walter Benjamin”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Walter Benjamin › 1892–1940

  • Karl Mannheim

    wpływ na

    Mannheim started from Marx’s thesis that thought is shaped by social being, widening the ‘total’ concept of ideology to all positions, including Marxism’s own (Ideologie und Utopie, 1929). K. Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie (1929); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (1859), preface; SEP “Ideology”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karl Mannheim › 1893–1947

  • José Carlos Mariátegui

    wpływ na

    Mariátegui applied Marx’s method to Peru, treating the ‘problem of the Indian’ as a problem of land, not of race or education (Siete ensayos, 1928). J. C. Mariátegui, Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana (1928), “El problema del indio”; Defensa del marxismo (1928–29)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    José Carlos Mariátegui › 1894–1930

  • Max Horkheimer

    wpływ na

    Horkheimer took Marx’s critique of political economy as the model of a ‘critical theory’ of society, as opposed to traditional theory (‘Traditional and Critical Theory’, 1937). M. Horkheimer, “Traditionelle und kritische Theorie”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6 (1937); SEP “Critical Theory”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Max Horkheimer › 1895–1973

  • Lew Wygotski

    wpływ na

    Vygotsky held that psychology needed its own ‘Capital’, a methodology built on Marx’s method rather than on quotations (Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa, written 1927, publ. 1982). L. S. Vygotsky, Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa (written 1927; publ. 1982), Eng. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology” (1997); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Lew Wygotski › 1896–1934

  • Norbert Elias

    wpływ na

    Elias valued Marx’s study of long-term social development but rejected the primacy of the economy, setting monopolies of violence and taxation beside it (Was ist Soziologie?, 1970). N. Elias, Was ist Soziologie? (1970); Über den Prozess der Zivilisation (1939), vol. II; S. Mennell, Norbert Elias: Civilization and the Human Self-Image (1989)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Norbert Elias › 1897–1990

  • Herbert Marcuse

    wpływ na

    Marcuse reviewed the newly printed Paris Manuscripts in 1932, reading them as a philosophical foundation of historical materialism centred on labour and alienation. H. Marcuse, “Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des Historischen Materialismus”, Die Gesellschaft 9 (1932); K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Herbert Marcuse › 1898–1979

  • Erich Fromm

    wpływ na ✓

    In Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), which printed the Paris Manuscripts in English, Fromm presented Marx as a humanist whose aim was to overcome alienation. E. Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), with the Paris Manuscripts tr. T. B. Bottomore

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Erich Fromm › 1900–1980

  • Theodor Adorno

    wpływ na ✓

    Adorno took up Marx’s analysis of commodity exchange and read the exchange principle, which makes unlike things equal, as the social model of identity thinking (Negative Dialectics, 1966). T. W. Adorno, Negative Dialektik (1966); SEP “Theodor W. Adorno”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Theodor Adorno › 1903–1969

  • Léopold Sédar Senghor

    wpływ na

    Senghor read the young Marx as a humanist and adapted his socialism to African communal traditions, rejecting class struggle and atheism (Nation et voie africaine du socialisme, 1961). L. S. Senghor, “Marxisme et humanisme”, La Revue socialiste 19 (1948); Nation et voie africaine du socialisme (1961)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Léopold Sédar Senghor › 1906–2001

  • Simone de Beauvoir

    wpływ na

    Beauvoir ended Le Deuxième Sexe (1949) with Marx’s sentence that the relation of man to woman is the immediate, natural, necessary relation of human to human (1844 Manuscripts). S. de Beauvoir, Le Deuxième Sexe II (1949), conclusion; K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (1844)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Simone de Beauvoir › 1908–1986

  • Kwame Nkrumah

    wpływ na

    Nkrumah adopted Marx’s class analysis late, arguing that African societies are divided by class and that an African bourgeoisie is allied with neocolonialism (Class Struggle in Africa, 1970). K. Nkrumah, Class Struggle in Africa (1970); Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (1965)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Kwame Nkrumah › 1909–1972

  • Aimé Césaire

    wpływ na

    Césaire tied colonialism to capitalist Europe in Marxist terms (Discours sur le colonialisme, 1950) but refused to subsume colonial questions under class (Lettre à Maurice Thorez, 1956). A. Césaire, Discours sur le colonialisme (1950); Lettre à Maurice Thorez (1956)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Aimé Césaire › 1913–2008

  • Roland Barthes

    wpływ na ✓

    Barthes based Mythologies (1957) on Marx’s critique of ideology: myth is depoliticised speech that turns the bourgeois order’s history into nature. R. Barthes, Mythologies (1957), “Le mythe, aujourd’hui”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Roland Barthes › 1915–1980

  • Claudia Jones

    wpływ na

    Claudia Jones analysed the “superexploitation” of Black women as workers, as Black people and as women in Marxist terms, as a member and theorist of the Communist Party. C. Jones, “An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman!”, Political Affairs (June 1949); C. Boyce Davies, Left of Karl Marx (2008)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Claudia Jones › 1915–1964

  • Charles Wright Mills

    wpływ na

    Mills used Marx’s class analysis but replaced ‘ruling class’ with ‘power elite’ to stress institutional power (The Power Elite, 1956), and presented Marx critically in The Marxists (1962). C. W. Mills, The Power Elite (1956); The Marxists (1962)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Charles Wright Mills › 1916–1962

  • Louis Althusser

    wpływ na ✓

    Althusser read Marx against humanist interpretations, claiming an ‘epistemological break’ around 1845 between the young Marx of alienation and the science of Capital (For Marx, 1965). L. Althusser, Pour Marx (1965); Lire le Capital (1965); SEP “Louis Althusser”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Louis Althusser › 1918–1990

  • Paulo Freire

    wpływ na

    Freire took from Marx praxis as the unity of reflection and action and cited his thesis that the educator must be educated (Pedagogia do oprimido, written 1968). P. Freire, Pedagogia do oprimido (written 1968); K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Paulo Freire › 1921–1997

  • Raymond Williams

    wpływ na

    Williams reworked Marx’s base and superstructure from the 1859 Preface, treating culture as material production rather than reflection (‘Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory’, 1973). R. Williams, “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory”, New Left Review I/82 (1973); Marxism and Literature (1977)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Raymond Williams › 1921–1988

  • Amílcar Cabral

    wpływ na

    Cabral reworked Marx’s theory of history: its motor is the productive forces, so peoples without classes are not outside history (‘The Weapon of Theory’, Havana, 1966). A. Cabral, “The Weapon of Theory”, address to the Tricontinental Conference, Havana (1966), in Revolution in Guinea (1969)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Amílcar Cabral › 1924–1973

  • Zygmunt Bauman

    wpływ na

    A Marxist sociologist in Warsaw, Bauman kept Marx’s critique of the present but read socialism as an ‘active utopia’, not a historical necessity (Socialism: The Active Utopia, 1976). Z. Bauman, Socialism: The Active Utopia (1976); K. Tester, The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman (2004); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Zygmunt Bauman › 1925–2017

  • Frantz Fanon

    wpływ na

    Fanon held that ‘Marxist analysis should always be slightly stretched’ in the colonies, where the peasantry, not the proletariat, is revolutionary (Les Damnés de la terre, 1961). F. Fanon, Les Damnés de la terre (1961); SEP “Frantz Fanon”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Frantz Fanon › 1925–1961

  • Dorothy E. Smith

    wpływ na

    Smith took from The German Ideology the method of beginning from actual people and their activities, treating knowledge as part of the ‘relations of ruling’ (1987, 1990). D. E. Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic (1987); The Conceptual Practices of Power (1990); K. Marx and F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (written 1845–46, printed 1932)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Dorothy E. Smith › 1926–2022

  • Karel Kosík

    wpływ na

    Kosík took Marx’s concept of praxis as the human being’s self-creation and read the fetishised everyday world as ‘pseudo-concrete’ (Dialectics of the Concrete, 1963). K. Kosík, Dialektika konkrétního (1963); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karel Kosík › 1926–2003

  • Gajo Petrović

    wpływ na

    Petrović read Marx, above all the early manuscripts, as a philosopher of praxis, free creative activity, against Stalinist dialectical materialism (Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century, 1967). G. Petrović, Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century (1967); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gajo Petrović › 1927–1993

  • Gustavo Gutiérrez

    wpływ na

    Gutiérrez used Marxist social analysis and dependency theory to read poverty as structural injustice, a use the Vatican criticised in 1984 (Teología de la liberación, 1971). G. Gutiérrez, Teología de la liberación: Perspectivas (1971); Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis nuntius (1984)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gustavo Gutiérrez › 1928–2024

  • Aníbal Quijano

    wpływ na

    Quijano started from Marxist dependency theory but held that Eurocentric historical materialism misses race as a basis of the colonial division of labour (‘Colonialidad del poder’, 2000). A. Quijano, “Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina”, in E. Lander (ed.), La colonialidad del saber (2000)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Aníbal Quijano › 1928–2018

  • Peter Berger

    wpływ na

    With Luckmann, Berger took over Marx’s dialectic of humans producing a world that confronts them as objective, and his concept of reification (The Social Construction of Reality, 1966). P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (1966); P. L. Berger and S. Pullberg, “Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness”, History and Theory 4 (1965)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Peter Berger › 1929–2017

  • Agnes Heller

    wpływ na

    In The Theory of Need in Marx (1974/76) Heller drew from Marx the concept of ‘radical needs’ that capitalism produces but cannot satisfy. A. Heller, La teoria dei bisogni in Marx (1974), Eng. tr. The Theory of Need in Marx (1976)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Agnes Heller › 1929–2019

  • Alasdair MacIntyre

    wpływ na

    MacIntyre began as a Marxist critic of liberal society (Marxism: An Interpretation, 1953) and kept Marx’s critique of capitalism after his turn to Aristotle (After Virtue, 1981). A. MacIntyre, Marxism: An Interpretation (1953); Marxism and Christianity (1968); After Virtue (1981); K. Knight (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader (1998)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Alasdair MacIntyre › 1929–2025

  • Pierre Bourdieu

    wpływ na ✓

    Bourdieu widened Marx’s concept of capital beyond economics to cultural, social and symbolic capital, whose unequal distribution and conversion structure social space (1983; ‘The Forms of Capital’, 1986). P. Bourdieu, “Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital” (1983); “The Forms of Capital” (1986); La Distinction (1979)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Pierre Bourdieu › 1930–2002

  • Li Zehou

    wpływ na

    Li Zehou took from Marx the primacy of material practice, above all making and using tools, as the ground of his anthropo-historical ontology (Pipan zhexue de pipan, 1979). Li Zehou, Pipan zhexue de pipan (1979); J. S. Rošker, Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy (2019)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Li Zehou › 1930–2021

  • Stuart Hall

    wpływ na ✓

    In a close reading of Marx’s 1857 Introduction (1974) Hall derived a non-reductive method of articulation; later he sought a ‘Marxism without guarantees’ (‘The Problem of Ideology’, 1983). S. Hall, “Marx’s Notes on Method: A ‘Reading’ of the ‘1857 Introduction’”, Working Papers in Cultural Studies 6 (1974); “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees” (1983)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Stuart Hall › 1932–2014

  • Antonio Negri

    wpływ na ✓

    In seminars at the École normale supérieure published as Marx beyond Marx (1979), Negri read the Grundrisse as a theory of the antagonistic subjectivity of living labour. A. Negri, Marx oltre Marx. Quaderno di lavoro sui Grundrisse (1979)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Antonio Negri › 1933–2023

  • Enrique Dussel

    wpływ na

    Dussel read Marx’s manuscripts closely, finding in living labour an exteriority to capital like the Other of liberation ethics (La producción teórica de Marx, 1985). E. Dussel, La producción teórica de Marx (1985); Hacia un Marx desconocido (1988); El último Marx (1990)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Enrique Dussel › 1934–2023

  • Sandra Harding

    wpływ na

    Harding modelled the feminist standpoint on Marx’s analysis of how a social position, that of labour, enables knowledge hidden from the ruling class (Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?, 1991). S. Harding, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives (1991); The Science Question in Feminism (1986); SEP “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Sandra Harding › 1935–2025

  • Anthony Giddens

    wpływ na

    Giddens kept Marx’s dictum that people make history, though not under conditions of their own choosing, but rejected his evolutionism (A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, 1981). A. Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (1981); The Constitution of Society (1984); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Anthony Giddens › ur. 1938

  • Arlie Russell Hochschild

    wpływ na

    Hochschild opened The Managed Heart (1983) with Marx’s child worker in Capital: as factory work estranged workers from their labour, emotional labour can estrange them from their feelings. A. R. Hochschild, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (1983); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Arlie Russell Hochschild › ur. 1940

  • Karatani Kōjin

    wpływ na

    Karatani read Marx’s value-form analysis as a transcritique of capital and later recast history as modes of exchange rather than of production (The Structure of World History, 2010). Karatani Kōjin, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2001; Eng. 2003); Sekaishi no kōzō (2010), tr. M. K. Bourdaghs, The Structure of World History (2014)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karatani Kōjin › ur. 1941

  • Silvia Federici

    wpływ na

    In Caliban and the Witch (2004) Federici took up Marx’s primitive accumulation and argued that it also required unpaid reproductive labour and control over women’s bodies. S. Federici, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation (2004); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Silvia Federici › ur. 1942

  • Walter Rodney

    wpływ na

    Rodney wrote How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972) from the standpoint of historical materialism, treating underdevelopment as part of the history of capitalist expansion. W. Rodney, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972); “Tanzanian Ujamaa and Scientific Socialism”, African Review 1/4 (1972)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Walter Rodney › 1942–1980

  • Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

    wpływ na

    Spivak read Marx’s distinction between political representation (vertreten) and portrayal (darstellen) in The Eighteenth Brumaire against Foucault and Deleuze (‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, 1988). G. C. Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988); “Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value”, Diacritics 15 (1985); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak › ur. 1942

  • Ulrich Beck

    wpływ na

    Beck set the risk society against Marx’s class society: where industrial modernity distributed wealth, reflexive modernity also distributes risks, and individualisation yields a ‘capitalism without classes’ (Risikogesellschaft, 1986). U. Beck, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (1986); “Jenseits von Stand und Klasse?” (1983)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Ulrich Beck › 1944–2015

  • Raewyn Connell

    wpływ na

    Connell began with Marxist class analysis of Australia’s ruling class and its cultural hegemony (Ruling Class, Ruling Culture, 1977), before extending structural analysis of power to gender. R. W. Connell, Ruling Class, Ruling Culture (1977); R. W. Connell and T. H. Irving, Class Structure in Australian History (1980); Gender and Power (1987)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Raewyn Connell › ur. 1944

  • Angela Davis

    wpływ na

    In Women, Race & Class (1981) Davis analysed slavery and domestic labour in Marxist terms, arguing that socialising housework could free working-class women. A. Y. Davis, Women, Race & Class (1981), “The Approaching Obsolescence of Housework: A Working-Class Perspective”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Angela Davis › ur. 1944

  • Donna Haraway

    wpływ na

    Haraway wrote her cyborg myth as an ironic politics ‘faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism’, recasting the analysis of labour for technoscience (‘A Cyborg Manifesto’, 1985). D. Haraway, “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s”, Socialist Review 80 (1985); Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (1991)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Donna Haraway › ur. 1944

  • Gøsta Esping-Andersen

    wpływ na

    Esping-Andersen took from Marx the commodification of labour power, which ties workers’ livelihood to the market, as what social rights can counteract (Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, 1990). G. Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gøsta Esping-Andersen › ur. 1947

  • Nancy Fraser

    wpływ na

    Fraser extended Marx’s move into the ‘hidden abode’ of production to capitalism’s background conditions: social reproduction, nature and political power (‘Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode’, 2014). N. Fraser, “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism”, New Left Review 86 (2014); Cannibal Capitalism (2022)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Nancy Fraser › ur. 1947

  • Saskia Sassen

    wpływ na

    Sassen asked whether advanced capitalism produces a systemic equivalent of Marx’s primitive accumulation, a ‘savage sorting’ that expels people, land and economies (2010; Expulsions, 2014). S. Sassen, “A Savage Sorting of Winners and Losers: Contemporary Versions of Primitive Accumulation”, Globalizations 7 (2010); Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy (2014)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Saskia Sassen › ur. 1947

  • Dipesh Chakrabarty

    wpływ na

    Chakrabarty took from Marx’s Grundrisse the history posited by capital (‘History 1’) and set against it pasts not belonging to capital’s life-process (‘History 2’) (Provincializing Europe, 2000). D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (2000); K. Marx, Grundrisse (1857–58; publ. 1939–41)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Dipesh Chakrabarty › ur. 1948

  • Slavoj Žižek

    wpływ na ✓

    Žižek read Marx’s formula ‘they do not know it, but they are doing it’ as locating ideology in practice, not belief (The Sublime Object of Ideology, 1989). S. Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the fetish character of the commodity

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Slavoj Žižek › ur. 1949

  • Charles W. Mills

    wpływ na

    Mills wrote his doctorate on ideology in Marx and Engels (1985) and adapted historical materialism to race as a system of domination (From Class to Race, 2003). C. W. Mills, From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism (2003); The Racial Contract (1997)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Charles W. Mills › 1951–2021

  • Sally Haslanger

    wpływ na

    Haslanger revived ideology critique in the tradition going back to Marx, treating ideology as networks of social meanings that make unjust practices seem natural (‘Culture and Critique’, 2017). S. Haslanger, “Culture and Critique”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 91 (2017); Resisting Reality (2012)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Sally Haslanger › ur. 1955

  • Hartmut Rosa

    wpływ na

    Rosa tied social acceleration to capitalism’s compulsion to grow and recast alienation as a mute, indifferent relation to the world (Alienation and Acceleration, 2010). H. Rosa, Beschleunigung (2005); Alienation and Acceleration (2010); Resonanz (2016); SEP “Alienation”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Hartmut Rosa › ur. 1965

  • Rahel Jaeggi

    wpływ na

    Jaeggi reconstructed the concept of alienation from Marx and others without an essentialist human nature, as a ‘relation of relationlessness’ (Entfremdung, 2005). R. Jaeggi, Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (2005); SEP “Alienation”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Rahel Jaeggi › ur. 1966

  • Glen Sean Coulthard

    wpływ na

    Coulthard reworked Marx’s primitive accumulation in a place-based way: in settler colonies the decisive relation is the ongoing dispossession of land, not the making of wage labour (2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on so-called primitive accumulation

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Glen Sean Coulthard › ur. 1974

Krytyka

Krytyka ze strony 27

  • Max Weber wpływ na

    wpływ na

    Weber generalised Marx’s separation of workers from the means of production to administration, the army and science, as a mark of bureaucratic modernity (‘Politik als Beruf’, 1919). M. Weber, “Politik als Beruf” (1919); “Wissenschaft als Beruf” (1919); Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1921–22); SEP “Max Weber”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytyka ze strony

    Weber’s Protestant Ethic (1904–05) countered a one-sided materialist reading of history without substituting a spiritualist one, and he warned that socialism would deepen bureaucracy (1918). M. Weber, Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (1904–05), conclusion; “Der Sozialismus” (lecture, Vienna 1918)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Max Weber › 1864–1920

  • Róża Luksemburg wpływ na

    wpływ na

    In Social Reform or Revolution? (1899) Luxemburg defended Marx’s account of capitalism’s contradictions against Bernstein’s revisionism, arguing that reforms cannot abolish wage labour. R. Luxemburg, Sozialreform oder Revolution? (1899); E. Bernstein, Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus (1899)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    krytyka ze strony

    Luxemburg argued that Marx’s schemes of expanded reproduction in Capital II assume a closed capitalist economy, whereas accumulation depends on non-capitalist markets (The Accumulation of Capital, 1913). R. Luxemburg, Die Akkumulation des Kapitals (1913), sections I and III

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Róża Luksemburg › 1871–1919

  • Jean-François Lyotard wpływ na

    wpływ na

    In Socialisme ou Barbarie Lyotard analysed the Algerian war in Marxist terms of class and colonial exploitation (1956–63; La guerre des Algériens, 1989), before breaking with Marxism. J.-F. Lyotard, La guerre des Algériens. Écrits 1956–1963 (1989); Pérégrinations (1988); SEP “Jean François Lyotard”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    krytyka ze strony

    Lyotard broke with Marxism in Libidinal Economy (1974) and later counted the narrative of proletarian emancipation among the grand narratives that have lost credibility (The Postmodern Condition, 1979). J.-F. Lyotard, Économie libidinale (1974); La condition postmoderne (1979)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Jean-François Lyotard › 1924–1998

  • Jean Baudrillard wpływ na

    wpływ na ✓

    Baudrillard extended Marx’s analysis of the commodity to consumption, adding sign value to use and exchange value (Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe, 1972). J. Baudrillard, La société de consommation (1970); Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe (1972); SEP “Jean Baudrillard”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    krytyka ze strony

    In The Mirror of Production (1973) Baudrillard argued that Marx’s critique remains within the productivist logic of the political economy it criticises, as its mirror image. J. Baudrillard, Le miroir de la production (1973)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Jean Baudrillard › 1929–2007

  • Ali Szari’ati wpływ na

    wpływ na

    Shariati borrowed Marxist class analysis and the concept of alienation to recast Shiism as a revolutionary ideology of the oppressed, while rejecting Marxist materialism. E. Abrahamian, “Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution”, MERIP Reports 102 (1982); A. Rahnema, An Islamic Utopian (1998)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytyka ze strony

    Shariati criticised Marxism as a materialism that reduces the human being to economics, while taking up its language of class struggle for a revolutionary Shiism. ʿAlī Sharīʿatī, Marxism and Other Western Fallacies, tr. R. Campbell, 1980; E. Abrahamian, ‘Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution’, MERIP Reports 102, 1982

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Ali Szari’ati › 1933–1977

  • Catharine MacKinnon wpływ na

    wpływ na

    MacKinnon modelled feminist method on Marxism, treating consciousness raising as to feminism what dialectical materialism is to Marxism (Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, 1989). C. A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989); “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytyka ze strony

    MacKinnon held that Marxism misses sexual domination: ‘sexuality is to feminism what work is to marxism’ (‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State’, Signs, 1982). C. A. MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982), 515–544; Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Catharine MacKinnon › ur. 1946

Pokaż wszystko (27)Pokaż mniej
  • Michaił Bakunin

    krytyka ze strony

    Bakunin warned that Marx’s workers’ state and ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ would produce a new privileged minority of former workers ruling over the masses (Statism and Anarchy, 1873). M. Bakunin, Gosudarstvennost’ i anarkhiya (Statism and Anarchy, 1873); K. Marx, Conspectus of Bakunin’s Statism and Anarchy (1874–75; MECW 24)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Michaił Bakunin › 1814–1876

  • Piotr Kropotkin

    krytyka ze strony

    Kropotkin rejected the collectivist wage system of labour cheques favoured by Marxist socialists, demanding distribution according to needs (The Conquest of Bread, 1892, ch. 13). P. Kropotkin, La conquête du pain (1892), ch. 13 “Le salariat collectiviste”; Modern Science and Anarchism (1901/1913)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Piotr Kropotkin › 1842–1921

  • Vilfredo Pareto

    krytyka ze strony

    Pareto rejected Marx’s labour theory of value and recast class struggle as a perpetual circulation of elites, which no revolution ends (Les systèmes socialistes, 1902–03). V. Pareto, Les systèmes socialistes (1902–03); Trattato di sociologia generale (1916)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Vilfredo Pareto › 1848–1923

  • José Martí

    krytyka ze strony

    Reporting on the New York memorial meeting for Marx (La Nación, 1883), Martí honoured him for taking the side of the weak but objected that one does better who points to the harm and teaches a gentle remedy than one who sets people against each other. J. Martí, letter from New York of 29 March 1883, La Nación (Buenos Aires), May 1883; Obras completas IX

    Źródło: szkic AI

    José Martí › 1853–1895

  • Benedetto Croce

    krytyka ze strony

    Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Benedetto Croce › 1866–1952

  • Nikołaj Bierdiajew

    krytyka ze strony

    Berdyaev, once a Marxist, came to see Marxism as a secular religion subordinating the person to the collective (The Origin of Russian Communism, 1937). N. Berdyaev, The Origin of Russian Communism (1937)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Nikołaj Bierdiajew › 1874–1948

  • Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar

    krytyka ze strony

    In “Buddha or Karl Marx” (written 1956) Ambedkar accepted Marx’s critique of exploitation but rejected violence and the dictatorship of the proletariat: the Buddha’s way of persuasion and moral change, he argued, reaches the same goal more lastingly. B. R. Ambedkar, “Buddha or Karl Marx” (1956), in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, vol. 3 (1987)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar › 1891–1956

  • Karl Popper

    krytyka ze strony

    Popper argued that Marx’s historicism claims to predict history; when its prophecies failed, they were reinterpreted, making the theory immune to criticism (The Open Society, 1945). K. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), vol. 2; Conjectures and Refutations (1963), ch. 1; The Poverty of Historicism (1957)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karl Popper › 1902–1994

  • Muhammad Husajn Tabataba’i

    krytyka ze strony

    In The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism (from 1953) Tabatabai answered the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels, as the Tudeh party spread it in Iran, with a realist theory of knowledge. M. Ḥ. Ṭabāṭabāʾī and M. Muṭahharī, Uṣūl-i falsafa va ravish-i riʾālīsm (1953–85); Nasr 2006

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Muhammad Husajn Tabataba’i › 1904–1981

  • Hannah Arendt

    krytyka ze strony

    Arendt objected that Marx blurred the distinction between labour and work and, defining man as animal laborans, lost sight of action (The Human Condition, 1958, ch. III). H. Arendt, The Human Condition (1958), ch. III “Labor”; “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought” (1953, publ. 2002)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Hannah Arendt › 1906–1975

  • Fausto Reinaga

    krytyka ze strony

    After his Marxist phase Reinaga rejected Marxism as a European doctrine: the Indians are an oppressed people, not a class, and must liberate themselves (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); Tesis india (1971); Á. García Linera, “El desencuentro de dos razones revolucionarias. Indianismo y marxismo”, Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 3 (2007)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Fausto Reinaga › 1906–1994

  • Isaiah Berlin

    krytyka ze strony

    Berlin rejected the historical determinism he found in Marx, which dissolves individual choice and responsibility into impersonal historical forces (‘Historical Inevitability’, 1954). I. Berlin, Historical Inevitability (Auguste Comte Memorial Lecture, 1954); Karl Marx: His Life and Environment (1939)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Isaiah Berlin › 1909–1997

  • Simone Weil

    krytyka ze strony

    Weil called Marx’s faith in productive forces a myth: oppression stems from how labour is organised (Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale, 1934). S. Weil, Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale (1934; publ. in Oppression et liberté, 1955); SEP “Simone Weil”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Simone Weil › 1909–1943

  • Albert Camus

    krytyka ze strony

    In The Rebel (1951) Camus read Marx as a prophet of the end of history whose messianism, in his heirs, justified sacrificing living people to a promised future. A. Camus, L’Homme révolté (1951), Part III, “La prophétie bourgeoise”, “La prophétie révolutionnaire”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Albert Camus › 1913–1960

  • Cornelius Castoriadis

    krytyka ze strony

    Castoriadis concluded that Marx’s economic determinism and primacy of productive forces cannot grasp social creation, so the theory had become an ideology (Imaginary Institution of Society, 1975, I). C. Castoriadis, “Marxisme et théorie révolutionnaire”, Socialisme ou Barbarie 36–40 (1964–65); L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975), part I

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Cornelius Castoriadis › 1922–1997

  • Julius Nyerere

    krytyka ze strony

    In “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962) Nyerere rejected, without naming Marx, a “doctrinaire socialism” built on “a philosophy of inevitable conflict between man and man”: African socialism grows from the traditional extended family, not from class war. J. K. Nyerere, “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962), in Freedom and Unity (1967)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Julius Nyerere › 1922–1999

  • Michel Foucault

    krytyka ze strony

    Foucault held that Marxism exists in nineteenth-century thought ‘like a fish in water’ and makes no radical break with political economy (The Order of Things, 1966). M. Foucault, Les mots et les choses (1966), ch. 8, section on Ricardo

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Michel Foucault › 1926–1984

  • Leszek Kołakowski

    krytyka ze strony

    Kołakowski argued that Marx’s Promethean dream of a perfectly unified society made Stalinism a possible, though not inevitable, interpretation of his thought (Main Currents of Marxism, 1976–78). L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism (1976–78; Engl. 1978); “The Marxist Roots of Stalinism”, in R. C. Tucker (ed.), Stalinism (1977)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Leszek Kołakowski › 1927–2009

  • Martin Luther King Jr.

    krytyka ze strony

    King rejected Marx’s materialist view of history, the ethical relativism and the totalitarianism he saw in communism, while sharing Marx’s concern for social justice (Stride Toward Freedom, 1958). M. L. King Jr., Stride Toward Freedom (1958), ch. 6 “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Martin Luther King Jr. › 1929–1968

  • Carla Lonzi

    krytyka ze strony

    Lonzi objected that Marxism promises women’s liberation only as a by-product of the class struggle, leaving the oppression of women by men untouched (Sputiamo su Hegel, 1970). C. Lonzi, Sputiamo su Hegel (Scritti di Rivolta Femminile, 1970); Manifesto di Rivolta Femminile (1970)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Carla Lonzi › 1931–1982

  • Kwasi Wiredu

    krytyka ze strony

    In Philosophy and an African Culture (1980) Wiredu devoted two chapters to Marxism, criticising its accounts of truth, ideology and morality and arguing that features of Marxist philosophy help explain the authoritarianism of Marxist regimes. K. Wiredu, Philosophy and an African Culture (1980); D. Ude, Journal of Pan African Studies 12:5 (2018)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Kwasi Wiredu › 1931–2022

Krytykuje 8

  • Adam Smith pod wpływem

    pod wpływem

    Marx worked through Smith on wages, profit and rent in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844) and later built on his labour theory of value in Capital (1867). K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); Das Kapital I (1867); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    krytykuje

    Marx credited Smith’s labour theory of value but criticised his ‘dogma’ that commodity prices resolve into wages, profit and rent, ignoring constant capital (Capital II, 1885, ch. 19). K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), ch. 19; Theorien über den Mehrwert I (1862–63), ch. 3

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Adam Smith › 1723–1790

  • Edmund Burke

    krytykuje

    Marx called Burke a paid ‘sycophant’ of the English oligarchy and an ‘out-and-out vulgar bourgeois’ for whom the laws of commerce were laws of God (Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), ch. 24.6 (Engl. ed. ch. 31), note on E. Burke, Thoughts and Details on Scarcity (1795)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Edmund Burke › 1729–1797

  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel pod wpływem

    pod wpływem ✓

    In the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844, printed 1932) Marx credited Hegel’s Phenomenology with grasping the self-creation of humanity as a process and labour as its essence. K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932), “Kritik der Hegelschen Dialektik und Philosophie überhaupt”; SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    krytykuje

    Marx held that Hegel mystifies the dialectic by making the Idea the subject of reality; it ‘stands on its head’ and must be inverted (Capital, afterword 1873). K. Marx, Kritik des Hegelschen Staatsrechts (1843); Das Kapital I, Nachwort zur zweiten Auflage (1873); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831

  • Auguste Comte

    krytykuje

    Marx found Comte’s positivism ‘miserable compared to Hegel’ and mocked Comte’s school for making the lords of capital an eternal necessity (letter to Engels, 1866; Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, letter to F. Engels, 7 July 1866 (MEW 31); Das Kapital I (1867), chapter on co-operation, note on Comte

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Auguste Comte › 1798–1857

  • Ludwig Feuerbach pod wpływem

    pod wpływem ✓

    Marx turned Feuerbach’s inversion of subject and predicate against Hegel’s theory of the state (1843) and adopted his ‘species-being’ in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844). K. Marx, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie (written 1843, printed 1927); Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    krytykuje

    Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach (1845) objected that Feuerbach grasps reality only as an object of contemplation, not as practice, and abstracts human essence from social relations. K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845; publ. by Engels 1888), Theses I and VI; SEP “Karl Marx”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Ludwig Feuerbach › 1804–1872

  • Pierre Joseph Proudhon pod wpływem

    pod wpływem

    In The Holy Family (1845) Marx praised Proudhon’s What Is Property? (1840) for making private property itself the object of a critical examination of political economy. K. Marx and F. Engels, Die heilige Familie (1845); P.-J. Proudhon, Qu’est-ce que la propriété? (1840)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    krytykuje

    In The Poverty of Philosophy (1847) Marx objected that Proudhon treats economic categories as eternal ideas, whereas they express historical, transitory relations of production. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847), ch. 2, first observation

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Pierre Joseph Proudhon › 1809–1865

Pokaż wszystko (8)Pokaż mniej
  • Giuseppe Mazzini

    krytykuje

    Marx dismissed the Italian draft statutes for the International as ‘evidently a concoction of Mazzini’s’ and rewrote them with the Inaugural Address (to Engels, 4 Nov. 1864). K. Marx to F. Engels, 4 Nov. 1864 (MECW 42); Inaugural Address and Provisional Rules of the International Working Men’s Association (1864)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Giuseppe Mazzini › 1805–1872

  • Max Stirner

    krytykuje

    In ‘Saint Max’, the longest part of The German Ideology (1845–46), Marx and Engels mocked Stirner’s Unique One as a petty-bourgeois abstraction from real social relations. K. Marx & F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (1845–46; publ. 1932), vol. I, part III “Sankt Max”; SEP “Max Stirner”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Max Stirner › 1806–1856

Dzieła

  • Praca wyalienowana – z krytyką dialektyki Hegla; napisane w 1844 roku, opublikowane po raz pierwszy w 1932.

  • Filozofowie tylko różnie interpretowali świat; chodzi o to, by go zmienić – zanotowane w 1845 roku, opublikowane przez Engelsa w 1888.

  • Widmo krąży po Europie.

  • Towar, wartość dodatkowa, akumulacja – prawa ruchu społeczeństwa kapitalistycznego.

Stanowisko

Marx turned Hegel’s dialectic “from its head onto its feet”: history is driven not by the spirit but by material production and the conflicts it generates. Every society rests on an economic base – forces and relations of production – on which law, politics and ideology are built. Under capitalism workers sell their labour power; the surplus value they produce beyond their wage becomes profit, and their work becomes alien to them. Class struggle, crises and concentration of capital would, he argued, eventually lead to a classless society. His famous thesis: philosophers have only interpreted the world; the point is to change it. His work shaped politics and the social sciences far beyond Marxism.

Życie i kontekst

Born in Trier, Marx studied law and philosophy in Bonn and Berlin, joined the Young Hegelians and edited a liberal newspaper until it was banned. In Paris he began his lifelong partnership with Engels. After the revolutions of 1848 he lived in London in exile, often in poverty, studying economics in the British Museum and helping lead the First International.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts (written 1844, published 1932)
  • Theses on Feuerbach (1845)
  • The German Ideology, with Engels (written 1845–46, published 1932)
  • The Communist Manifesto, with Engels (1848)
  • Capital, vol. 1 (1867)

Pojawia się w

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd