Karol Marks
Według Marksa warunki ekonomiczne kształtują idee i politykę, historię napędza walka klas, a kapitalizm wyzyskuje robotników i trzeba go przezwyciężyć.
Umiejscowienie
Historia jest historią walk klasowych: krytyka ekonomii politycznej i kapitału.
Kluczowe idee
- Materializm historyczny
- Alienacja
- Wartość dodatkowa
- Walka klas
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 7
Arystoteles
pod wpływem
In Capital I (1867) Marx praised Aristotle’s analysis of the value form in exchange and traced its limit, missing labour as the substance of value, to Greek slavery. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the form of value; Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book V; SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: szkic AI
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Epikur
pod wpływem
Marx’s doctoral dissertation (1841) defended Epicurus’ swerve of the atoms against Democritus’ determinism, reading it as the principle of the freedom of self-consciousness. K. Marx, Differenz der demokritischen und epikureischen Naturphilosophie (dissertation, Jena 1841; printed 1902); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Epikur › 341–270 p.n.e.
Bernard Mandeville
pod wpływem
In Capital I (1867) Marx quoted the Fable of the Bees, calling Mandeville an upright man with a clear mind who saw that wealth rests on the labouring poor. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the general law of capitalist accumulation; B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)
Źródło: szkic AI
Bernard Mandeville › 1670–1733
Adam Ferguson
pod wpływem
Marx cited Ferguson on the crippling effects of the division of labour (Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767) in Capital I (1867), calling him Smith’s teacher. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847); Das Kapital I (1867), on the division of labour in manufacture; A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767)
Źródło: szkic AI
Adam Ferguson › 1723–1816
Immanuel Kant
pod wpływem
In a letter to his father (1837) Marx described building a philosophy of law on the idealism of Kant and Fichte before he turned to Hegel. K. Marx, letter to Heinrich Marx, 10–11 November 1837 (MEW Ergänzungsband 1; MECW 1)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804
August Cieszkowski
pod wpływem sporne
Whether Marx read Cieszkowski’s Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838) is disputed; its ‘philosophy of the deed’ is usually traced to him through Moses Hess and the Young Hegelians. A. Cieszkowski, Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838); N. Lobkowicz, Theory and Practice (1967); D. McLellan, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (1969)
Źródło: szkic AI
August Cieszkowski › 1814–1894
Nikołaj Czernyszewski
pod wpływem
Marx praised Chernyshevsky’s critique of Mill (Capital, afterword 1873) and discussed his question whether Russia could reach socialism through the peasant commune (letter of 1877). K. Marx, Das Kapital I, afterword to the 2nd ed. (1873); letter to the editors of Otechestvennye Zapiski (1877, unsent); T. Shanin, Late Marx and the Russian Road (1983)
Źródło: szkic AI
Nikołaj Czernyszewski › 1828–1889
Wpływ na 73
Fryderyk Engels
wpływ na ✓
After Marx’s death Engels edited Capital II (1885) and III (1894) from the manuscripts and credited the materialist conception of history mainly to Marx (Ludwig Feuerbach, 1886). F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach (1886); K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), III (ed. Engels, 1894); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Fryderyk Engels › 1820–1895
Jean-Paul Sartre
wpływ na ✓
In Search for a Method (1957) and Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960) Sartre called Marxism the philosophy of our time, seeking to ground it in individual praxis. J.-P. Sartre, Questions de méthode (1957); Critique de la raison dialectique I (1960); SEP “Jean-Paul Sartre”
Jean-Paul Sartre › 1905–1980
Claude Lévi-Strauss
wpływ na
Lévi-Strauss counted Marxism among his ‘three mistresses’ (1955) and called his work a contribution to the theory of superstructures, barely sketched by Marx (La pensée sauvage, 1962). C. Lévi-Strauss, Tristes tropiques (1955); La pensée sauvage (1962)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009
John Rawls
wpływ na
Rawls took up Marx’s objection that liberal rights are merely formal, answering with the fair value of political liberties and property-owning democracy (Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, 2001). J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001), § 52; Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (2007), lectures on Marx
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
John Rawls › 1921–2002
Jürgen Habermas
wpływ na ✓
Habermas set out to reconstruct historical materialism, separating the development of productive forces from that of normative structures (Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, 1976). J. Habermas, Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus (1976); Erkenntnis und Interesse (1968)
Jürgen Habermas › 1929–2026
Jacques Derrida
wpływ na ✓
Derrida claimed a certain spirit of Marx’s critique as an inheritance while reading Marx’s own wish to exorcise ghosts against him (Spectres de Marx, 1993). J. Derrida, Spectres de Marx (1993)
Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004
Pokaż wszystko (73)Pokaż mniej
Antonio Labriola
wpływ na ✓
Labriola’s In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895) read Marx’s historical materialism as a method for studying history through its mediations, not as a doctrine of economic laws. A. Labriola, In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895); Del materialismo storico (1896)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Antonio Labriola › 1843–1904
Ferdinand Tönnies
wpływ na
Tönnies drew his type of Gesellschaft partly from Marx’s Capital, as a society of exchange and commodity production, and later wrote Marx: Leben und Lehre (1921). F. Tönnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887); Marx. Leben und Lehre (1921)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ferdinand Tönnies › 1855–1936
Gieorgij Plechanow
wpływ na
Plekhanov translated the Communist Manifesto into Russian (1882, with a preface by Marx and Engels) and applied Marx’s analysis to Russian capitalism against the Narodniks (Our Differences, 1885). K. Marx and F. Engels, Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, Russian tr. G. Plekhanov (1882); G. Plekhanov, Naši raznoglasija (1885); S. H. Baron, Plekhanov (1963)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gieorgij Plechanow › 1856–1918
Georg Simmel
wpływ na
Simmel wanted to build ‘a storey beneath historical materialism’, tracing economic forms themselves to psychological and metaphysical preconditions (Philosophie des Geldes, 1900, preface). G. Simmel, Philosophie des Geldes (1900), preface; D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (1984)
Źródło: szkic AI
Georg Simmel › 1858–1918
Werner Sombart
wpływ na
Sombart’s early lectures on socialism and Modern Capitalism engage Marx closely, yet explain the origin of capitalism through a changed mentality rather than class relations. Deutsche Biographie, “Sombart, Werner” (F. Lenger, NDB 24, 2010)
Źródło: szkic AI
Werner Sombart › 1863–1941
W.E.B. Du Bois
wpływ na
Du Bois used Marxist categories in Black Reconstruction (1935), reading the flight of the enslaved from plantations as a ‘general strike’ against slavery. W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America (1935); “Marxism and the Negro Problem”, The Crisis 40 (1933); SEP “W. E. B. Du Bois”
Źródło: szkic AI
W.E.B. Du Bois › 1868–1963
Aleksandra Kołłontaj
wpływ na
Following Marx’s class analysis, Kollontai held that working women’s emancipation required abolishing private property, not equal rights within bourgeois society (The Social Basis of the Woman Question, 1909). A. Kollontai, Social’nye osnovy ženskogo voprosa (1909); B. Evans Clements, Bolshevik Feminist: The Life of Aleksandra Kollontai (1979)
Źródło: szkic AI
Aleksandra Kołłontaj › 1872–1952
Giovanni Gentile
wpływ na
In The Philosophy of Marx (1899) Gentile read Marx’s praxis in the Theses on Feuerbach as the unity of thinking and doing, later central to his actualism. G. Gentile, La filosofia di Marx (1899); H. S. Harris, The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile (1960)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Giovanni Gentile › 1875–1944
Otto Neurath
wpływ na
Neurath treated Marx’s historical materialism as a model of empirical, anti-metaphysical sociology (Empirische Soziologie, 1931) and argued for a planned economy calculated in kind (1919). O. Neurath, Durch die Kriegswirtschaft zur Naturalwirtschaft (1919); Empirische Soziologie (1931); SEP “Otto Neurath”
Źródło: szkic AI
Otto Neurath › 1882–1945
György Lukács
wpływ na
Lukács built his theory of reification on Marx’s account of commodity fetishism, extending it to bureaucracy, law and thought (‘Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat’, 1923). G. Lukács, “Die Verdinglichung und das Bewußtsein des Proletariats”, in Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein (1923); SEP “Georg [György] Lukács”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
György Lukács › 1885–1971
Antonio Gramsci
wpływ na ✓
Gramsci read Marx’s 1859 Preface, by which people become conscious of social conflicts in ideological forms, as a basis for his theory of hegemony (prison notebooks, 1929–35). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere (1929–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Vorwort (1859)
Antonio Gramsci › 1891–1937
Walter Benjamin
wpływ na ✓
Benjamin read the Paris arcades through Marx’s commodity fetishism as phantasmagoria (‘Paris, the Capital of the Nineteenth Century’, 1935) and joined historical materialism with messianism (1940). W. Benjamin, “Paris, die Hauptstadt des XIX. Jahrhunderts” (exposé, 1935); “Über den Begriff der Geschichte” (1940); SEP “Walter Benjamin”
Walter Benjamin › 1892–1940
Karl Mannheim
wpływ na
Mannheim started from Marx’s thesis that thought is shaped by social being, widening the ‘total’ concept of ideology to all positions, including Marxism’s own (Ideologie und Utopie, 1929). K. Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie (1929); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (1859), preface; SEP “Ideology”
Źródło: szkic AI
Karl Mannheim › 1893–1947
José Carlos Mariátegui
wpływ na
Mariátegui applied Marx’s method to Peru, treating the ‘problem of the Indian’ as a problem of land, not of race or education (Siete ensayos, 1928). J. C. Mariátegui, Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana (1928), “El problema del indio”; Defensa del marxismo (1928–29)
Źródło: szkic AI
José Carlos Mariátegui › 1894–1930
Max Horkheimer
wpływ na
Horkheimer took Marx’s critique of political economy as the model of a ‘critical theory’ of society, as opposed to traditional theory (‘Traditional and Critical Theory’, 1937). M. Horkheimer, “Traditionelle und kritische Theorie”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6 (1937); SEP “Critical Theory”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Max Horkheimer › 1895–1973
Lew Wygotski
wpływ na
Vygotsky held that psychology needed its own ‘Capital’, a methodology built on Marx’s method rather than on quotations (Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa, written 1927, publ. 1982). L. S. Vygotsky, Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa (written 1927; publ. 1982), Eng. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology” (1997); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
Źródło: szkic AI
Lew Wygotski › 1896–1934
Norbert Elias
wpływ na
Elias valued Marx’s study of long-term social development but rejected the primacy of the economy, setting monopolies of violence and taxation beside it (Was ist Soziologie?, 1970). N. Elias, Was ist Soziologie? (1970); Über den Prozess der Zivilisation (1939), vol. II; S. Mennell, Norbert Elias: Civilization and the Human Self-Image (1989)
Źródło: szkic AI
Norbert Elias › 1897–1990
Herbert Marcuse
wpływ na
Marcuse reviewed the newly printed Paris Manuscripts in 1932, reading them as a philosophical foundation of historical materialism centred on labour and alienation. H. Marcuse, “Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des Historischen Materialismus”, Die Gesellschaft 9 (1932); K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Herbert Marcuse › 1898–1979
Erich Fromm
wpływ na ✓
In Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), which printed the Paris Manuscripts in English, Fromm presented Marx as a humanist whose aim was to overcome alienation. E. Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), with the Paris Manuscripts tr. T. B. Bottomore
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Erich Fromm › 1900–1980
Theodor Adorno
wpływ na ✓
Adorno took up Marx’s analysis of commodity exchange and read the exchange principle, which makes unlike things equal, as the social model of identity thinking (Negative Dialectics, 1966). T. W. Adorno, Negative Dialektik (1966); SEP “Theodor W. Adorno”
Theodor Adorno › 1903–1969
Léopold Sédar Senghor
wpływ na
Senghor read the young Marx as a humanist and adapted his socialism to African communal traditions, rejecting class struggle and atheism (Nation et voie africaine du socialisme, 1961). L. S. Senghor, “Marxisme et humanisme”, La Revue socialiste 19 (1948); Nation et voie africaine du socialisme (1961)
Źródło: szkic AI
Léopold Sédar Senghor › 1906–2001
Simone de Beauvoir
wpływ na
Beauvoir ended Le Deuxième Sexe (1949) with Marx’s sentence that the relation of man to woman is the immediate, natural, necessary relation of human to human (1844 Manuscripts). S. de Beauvoir, Le Deuxième Sexe II (1949), conclusion; K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (1844)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Simone de Beauvoir › 1908–1986
Kwame Nkrumah
wpływ na
Nkrumah adopted Marx’s class analysis late, arguing that African societies are divided by class and that an African bourgeoisie is allied with neocolonialism (Class Struggle in Africa, 1970). K. Nkrumah, Class Struggle in Africa (1970); Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (1965)
Źródło: szkic AI
Kwame Nkrumah › 1909–1972
Aimé Césaire
wpływ na
Césaire tied colonialism to capitalist Europe in Marxist terms (Discours sur le colonialisme, 1950) but refused to subsume colonial questions under class (Lettre à Maurice Thorez, 1956). A. Césaire, Discours sur le colonialisme (1950); Lettre à Maurice Thorez (1956)
Źródło: szkic AI
Aimé Césaire › 1913–2008
Roland Barthes
wpływ na ✓
Barthes based Mythologies (1957) on Marx’s critique of ideology: myth is depoliticised speech that turns the bourgeois order’s history into nature. R. Barthes, Mythologies (1957), “Le mythe, aujourd’hui”
Roland Barthes › 1915–1980
Claudia Jones
wpływ na
Claudia Jones analysed the “superexploitation” of Black women as workers, as Black people and as women in Marxist terms, as a member and theorist of the Communist Party. C. Jones, “An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman!”, Political Affairs (June 1949); C. Boyce Davies, Left of Karl Marx (2008)
Źródło: szkic AI
Claudia Jones › 1915–1964
Charles Wright Mills
wpływ na
Mills used Marx’s class analysis but replaced ‘ruling class’ with ‘power elite’ to stress institutional power (The Power Elite, 1956), and presented Marx critically in The Marxists (1962). C. W. Mills, The Power Elite (1956); The Marxists (1962)
Źródło: szkic AI
Charles Wright Mills › 1916–1962
Louis Althusser
wpływ na ✓
Althusser read Marx against humanist interpretations, claiming an ‘epistemological break’ around 1845 between the young Marx of alienation and the science of Capital (For Marx, 1965). L. Althusser, Pour Marx (1965); Lire le Capital (1965); SEP “Louis Althusser”
Louis Althusser › 1918–1990
Paulo Freire
wpływ na
Freire took from Marx praxis as the unity of reflection and action and cited his thesis that the educator must be educated (Pedagogia do oprimido, written 1968). P. Freire, Pedagogia do oprimido (written 1968); K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845)
Źródło: szkic AI
Paulo Freire › 1921–1997
Raymond Williams
wpływ na
Williams reworked Marx’s base and superstructure from the 1859 Preface, treating culture as material production rather than reflection (‘Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory’, 1973). R. Williams, “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory”, New Left Review I/82 (1973); Marxism and Literature (1977)
Źródło: szkic AI
Raymond Williams › 1921–1988
Amílcar Cabral
wpływ na
Cabral reworked Marx’s theory of history: its motor is the productive forces, so peoples without classes are not outside history (‘The Weapon of Theory’, Havana, 1966). A. Cabral, “The Weapon of Theory”, address to the Tricontinental Conference, Havana (1966), in Revolution in Guinea (1969)
Źródło: szkic AI
Amílcar Cabral › 1924–1973
Zygmunt Bauman
wpływ na
A Marxist sociologist in Warsaw, Bauman kept Marx’s critique of the present but read socialism as an ‘active utopia’, not a historical necessity (Socialism: The Active Utopia, 1976). Z. Bauman, Socialism: The Active Utopia (1976); K. Tester, The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman (2004); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: szkic AI
Zygmunt Bauman › 1925–2017
Frantz Fanon
wpływ na
Fanon held that ‘Marxist analysis should always be slightly stretched’ in the colonies, where the peasantry, not the proletariat, is revolutionary (Les Damnés de la terre, 1961). F. Fanon, Les Damnés de la terre (1961); SEP “Frantz Fanon”
Źródło: szkic AI
Frantz Fanon › 1925–1961
Dorothy E. Smith
wpływ na
Smith took from The German Ideology the method of beginning from actual people and their activities, treating knowledge as part of the ‘relations of ruling’ (1987, 1990). D. E. Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic (1987); The Conceptual Practices of Power (1990); K. Marx and F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (written 1845–46, printed 1932)
Źródło: szkic AI
Dorothy E. Smith › 1926–2022
Karel Kosík
wpływ na
Kosík took Marx’s concept of praxis as the human being’s self-creation and read the fetishised everyday world as ‘pseudo-concrete’ (Dialectics of the Concrete, 1963). K. Kosík, Dialektika konkrétního (1963); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)
Źródło: szkic AI
Karel Kosík › 1926–2003
Gajo Petrović
wpływ na
Petrović read Marx, above all the early manuscripts, as a philosopher of praxis, free creative activity, against Stalinist dialectical materialism (Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century, 1967). G. Petrović, Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century (1967); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gajo Petrović › 1927–1993
Gustavo Gutiérrez
wpływ na
Gutiérrez used Marxist social analysis and dependency theory to read poverty as structural injustice, a use the Vatican criticised in 1984 (Teología de la liberación, 1971). G. Gutiérrez, Teología de la liberación: Perspectivas (1971); Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis nuntius (1984)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gustavo Gutiérrez › 1928–2024
Aníbal Quijano
wpływ na
Quijano started from Marxist dependency theory but held that Eurocentric historical materialism misses race as a basis of the colonial division of labour (‘Colonialidad del poder’, 2000). A. Quijano, “Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina”, in E. Lander (ed.), La colonialidad del saber (2000)
Źródło: szkic AI
Aníbal Quijano › 1928–2018
Peter Berger
wpływ na
With Luckmann, Berger took over Marx’s dialectic of humans producing a world that confronts them as objective, and his concept of reification (The Social Construction of Reality, 1966). P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (1966); P. L. Berger and S. Pullberg, “Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness”, History and Theory 4 (1965)
Źródło: szkic AI
Peter Berger › 1929–2017
Agnes Heller
wpływ na
In The Theory of Need in Marx (1974/76) Heller drew from Marx the concept of ‘radical needs’ that capitalism produces but cannot satisfy. A. Heller, La teoria dei bisogni in Marx (1974), Eng. tr. The Theory of Need in Marx (1976)
Źródło: szkic AI
Agnes Heller › 1929–2019
Alasdair MacIntyre
wpływ na
MacIntyre began as a Marxist critic of liberal society (Marxism: An Interpretation, 1953) and kept Marx’s critique of capitalism after his turn to Aristotle (After Virtue, 1981). A. MacIntyre, Marxism: An Interpretation (1953); Marxism and Christianity (1968); After Virtue (1981); K. Knight (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader (1998)
Źródło: szkic AI
Alasdair MacIntyre › 1929–2025
Pierre Bourdieu
wpływ na ✓
Bourdieu widened Marx’s concept of capital beyond economics to cultural, social and symbolic capital, whose unequal distribution and conversion structure social space (1983; ‘The Forms of Capital’, 1986). P. Bourdieu, “Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital” (1983); “The Forms of Capital” (1986); La Distinction (1979)
Pierre Bourdieu › 1930–2002
Li Zehou
wpływ na
Li Zehou took from Marx the primacy of material practice, above all making and using tools, as the ground of his anthropo-historical ontology (Pipan zhexue de pipan, 1979). Li Zehou, Pipan zhexue de pipan (1979); J. S. Rošker, Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy (2019)
Źródło: szkic AI
Li Zehou › 1930–2021
Stuart Hall
wpływ na ✓
In a close reading of Marx’s 1857 Introduction (1974) Hall derived a non-reductive method of articulation; later he sought a ‘Marxism without guarantees’ (‘The Problem of Ideology’, 1983). S. Hall, “Marx’s Notes on Method: A ‘Reading’ of the ‘1857 Introduction’”, Working Papers in Cultural Studies 6 (1974); “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees” (1983)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Stuart Hall › 1932–2014
Antonio Negri
wpływ na ✓
In seminars at the École normale supérieure published as Marx beyond Marx (1979), Negri read the Grundrisse as a theory of the antagonistic subjectivity of living labour. A. Negri, Marx oltre Marx. Quaderno di lavoro sui Grundrisse (1979)
Antonio Negri › 1933–2023
Enrique Dussel
wpływ na
Dussel read Marx’s manuscripts closely, finding in living labour an exteriority to capital like the Other of liberation ethics (La producción teórica de Marx, 1985). E. Dussel, La producción teórica de Marx (1985); Hacia un Marx desconocido (1988); El último Marx (1990)
Źródło: szkic AI
Enrique Dussel › 1934–2023
Sandra Harding
wpływ na
Harding modelled the feminist standpoint on Marx’s analysis of how a social position, that of labour, enables knowledge hidden from the ruling class (Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?, 1991). S. Harding, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives (1991); The Science Question in Feminism (1986); SEP “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”
Źródło: szkic AI
Sandra Harding › 1935–2025
Anthony Giddens
wpływ na
Giddens kept Marx’s dictum that people make history, though not under conditions of their own choosing, but rejected his evolutionism (A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, 1981). A. Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (1981); The Constitution of Society (1984); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)
Źródło: szkic AI
Anthony Giddens › ur. 1938
Arlie Russell Hochschild
wpływ na
Hochschild opened The Managed Heart (1983) with Marx’s child worker in Capital: as factory work estranged workers from their labour, emotional labour can estrange them from their feelings. A. R. Hochschild, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (1983); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)
Źródło: szkic AI
Arlie Russell Hochschild › ur. 1940
Karatani Kōjin
wpływ na
Karatani read Marx’s value-form analysis as a transcritique of capital and later recast history as modes of exchange rather than of production (The Structure of World History, 2010). Karatani Kōjin, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2001; Eng. 2003); Sekaishi no kōzō (2010), tr. M. K. Bourdaghs, The Structure of World History (2014)
Źródło: szkic AI
Karatani Kōjin › ur. 1941
Silvia Federici
wpływ na
In Caliban and the Witch (2004) Federici took up Marx’s primitive accumulation and argued that it also required unpaid reproductive labour and control over women’s bodies. S. Federici, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation (2004); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)
Źródło: szkic AI
Silvia Federici › ur. 1942
Walter Rodney
wpływ na
Rodney wrote How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972) from the standpoint of historical materialism, treating underdevelopment as part of the history of capitalist expansion. W. Rodney, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972); “Tanzanian Ujamaa and Scientific Socialism”, African Review 1/4 (1972)
Źródło: szkic AI
Walter Rodney › 1942–1980
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
wpływ na
Spivak read Marx’s distinction between political representation (vertreten) and portrayal (darstellen) in The Eighteenth Brumaire against Foucault and Deleuze (‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, 1988). G. C. Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988); “Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value”, Diacritics 15 (1985); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak › ur. 1942
Ulrich Beck
wpływ na
Beck set the risk society against Marx’s class society: where industrial modernity distributed wealth, reflexive modernity also distributes risks, and individualisation yields a ‘capitalism without classes’ (Risikogesellschaft, 1986). U. Beck, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (1986); “Jenseits von Stand und Klasse?” (1983)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ulrich Beck › 1944–2015
Raewyn Connell
wpływ na
Connell began with Marxist class analysis of Australia’s ruling class and its cultural hegemony (Ruling Class, Ruling Culture, 1977), before extending structural analysis of power to gender. R. W. Connell, Ruling Class, Ruling Culture (1977); R. W. Connell and T. H. Irving, Class Structure in Australian History (1980); Gender and Power (1987)
Źródło: szkic AI
Raewyn Connell › ur. 1944
Angela Davis
wpływ na
In Women, Race & Class (1981) Davis analysed slavery and domestic labour in Marxist terms, arguing that socialising housework could free working-class women. A. Y. Davis, Women, Race & Class (1981), “The Approaching Obsolescence of Housework: A Working-Class Perspective”
Źródło: szkic AI
Angela Davis › ur. 1944
Donna Haraway
wpływ na
Haraway wrote her cyborg myth as an ironic politics ‘faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism’, recasting the analysis of labour for technoscience (‘A Cyborg Manifesto’, 1985). D. Haraway, “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s”, Socialist Review 80 (1985); Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (1991)
Źródło: szkic AI
Donna Haraway › ur. 1944
Gøsta Esping-Andersen
wpływ na
Esping-Andersen took from Marx the commodification of labour power, which ties workers’ livelihood to the market, as what social rights can counteract (Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, 1990). G. Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: szkic AI
Gøsta Esping-Andersen › ur. 1947
Nancy Fraser
wpływ na
Fraser extended Marx’s move into the ‘hidden abode’ of production to capitalism’s background conditions: social reproduction, nature and political power (‘Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode’, 2014). N. Fraser, “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism”, New Left Review 86 (2014); Cannibal Capitalism (2022)
Źródło: szkic AI
Nancy Fraser › ur. 1947
Saskia Sassen
wpływ na
Sassen asked whether advanced capitalism produces a systemic equivalent of Marx’s primitive accumulation, a ‘savage sorting’ that expels people, land and economies (2010; Expulsions, 2014). S. Sassen, “A Savage Sorting of Winners and Losers: Contemporary Versions of Primitive Accumulation”, Globalizations 7 (2010); Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy (2014)
Źródło: szkic AI
Saskia Sassen › ur. 1947
Dipesh Chakrabarty
wpływ na
Chakrabarty took from Marx’s Grundrisse the history posited by capital (‘History 1’) and set against it pasts not belonging to capital’s life-process (‘History 2’) (Provincializing Europe, 2000). D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (2000); K. Marx, Grundrisse (1857–58; publ. 1939–41)
Źródło: szkic AI
Dipesh Chakrabarty › ur. 1948
Slavoj Žižek
wpływ na ✓
Žižek read Marx’s formula ‘they do not know it, but they are doing it’ as locating ideology in practice, not belief (The Sublime Object of Ideology, 1989). S. Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the fetish character of the commodity
Slavoj Žižek › ur. 1949
Charles W. Mills
wpływ na
Mills wrote his doctorate on ideology in Marx and Engels (1985) and adapted historical materialism to race as a system of domination (From Class to Race, 2003). C. W. Mills, From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism (2003); The Racial Contract (1997)
Źródło: szkic AI
Charles W. Mills › 1951–2021
Sally Haslanger
wpływ na
Haslanger revived ideology critique in the tradition going back to Marx, treating ideology as networks of social meanings that make unjust practices seem natural (‘Culture and Critique’, 2017). S. Haslanger, “Culture and Critique”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 91 (2017); Resisting Reality (2012)
Źródło: szkic AI
Sally Haslanger › ur. 1955
Hartmut Rosa
wpływ na
Rosa tied social acceleration to capitalism’s compulsion to grow and recast alienation as a mute, indifferent relation to the world (Alienation and Acceleration, 2010). H. Rosa, Beschleunigung (2005); Alienation and Acceleration (2010); Resonanz (2016); SEP “Alienation”
Źródło: szkic AI
Hartmut Rosa › ur. 1965
Rahel Jaeggi
wpływ na
Jaeggi reconstructed the concept of alienation from Marx and others without an essentialist human nature, as a ‘relation of relationlessness’ (Entfremdung, 2005). R. Jaeggi, Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (2005); SEP “Alienation”
Źródło: szkic AI
Rahel Jaeggi › ur. 1966
Glen Sean Coulthard
wpływ na
Coulthard reworked Marx’s primitive accumulation in a place-based way: in settler colonies the decisive relation is the ongoing dispossession of land, not the making of wage labour (2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on so-called primitive accumulation
Źródło: szkic AI
Glen Sean Coulthard › ur. 1974
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 27
Max Weber wpływ na
wpływ na
Weber generalised Marx’s separation of workers from the means of production to administration, the army and science, as a mark of bureaucratic modernity (‘Politik als Beruf’, 1919). M. Weber, “Politik als Beruf” (1919); “Wissenschaft als Beruf” (1919); Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1921–22); SEP “Max Weber”
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
Weber’s Protestant Ethic (1904–05) countered a one-sided materialist reading of history without substituting a spiritualist one, and he warned that socialism would deepen bureaucracy (1918). M. Weber, Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (1904–05), conclusion; “Der Sozialismus” (lecture, Vienna 1918)
Źródło: szkic AI
Max Weber › 1864–1920
Róża Luksemburg wpływ na
wpływ na
In Social Reform or Revolution? (1899) Luxemburg defended Marx’s account of capitalism’s contradictions against Bernstein’s revisionism, arguing that reforms cannot abolish wage labour. R. Luxemburg, Sozialreform oder Revolution? (1899); E. Bernstein, Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus (1899)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
krytyka ze strony
Luxemburg argued that Marx’s schemes of expanded reproduction in Capital II assume a closed capitalist economy, whereas accumulation depends on non-capitalist markets (The Accumulation of Capital, 1913). R. Luxemburg, Die Akkumulation des Kapitals (1913), sections I and III
Źródło: szkic AI
Róża Luksemburg › 1871–1919
Jean-François Lyotard wpływ na
wpływ na
In Socialisme ou Barbarie Lyotard analysed the Algerian war in Marxist terms of class and colonial exploitation (1956–63; La guerre des Algériens, 1989), before breaking with Marxism. J.-F. Lyotard, La guerre des Algériens. Écrits 1956–1963 (1989); Pérégrinations (1988); SEP “Jean François Lyotard”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
krytyka ze strony
Lyotard broke with Marxism in Libidinal Economy (1974) and later counted the narrative of proletarian emancipation among the grand narratives that have lost credibility (The Postmodern Condition, 1979). J.-F. Lyotard, Économie libidinale (1974); La condition postmoderne (1979)
Źródło: szkic AI
Jean-François Lyotard › 1924–1998
Jean Baudrillard wpływ na
wpływ na ✓
Baudrillard extended Marx’s analysis of the commodity to consumption, adding sign value to use and exchange value (Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe, 1972). J. Baudrillard, La société de consommation (1970); Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe (1972); SEP “Jean Baudrillard”
krytyka ze strony
In The Mirror of Production (1973) Baudrillard argued that Marx’s critique remains within the productivist logic of the political economy it criticises, as its mirror image. J. Baudrillard, Le miroir de la production (1973)
Źródło: szkic AI
Jean Baudrillard › 1929–2007
Ali Szari’ati wpływ na
wpływ na
Shariati borrowed Marxist class analysis and the concept of alienation to recast Shiism as a revolutionary ideology of the oppressed, while rejecting Marxist materialism. E. Abrahamian, “Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution”, MERIP Reports 102 (1982); A. Rahnema, An Islamic Utopian (1998)
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
Shariati criticised Marxism as a materialism that reduces the human being to economics, while taking up its language of class struggle for a revolutionary Shiism. ʿAlī Sharīʿatī, Marxism and Other Western Fallacies, tr. R. Campbell, 1980; E. Abrahamian, ‘Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution’, MERIP Reports 102, 1982
Źródło: szkic AI
Ali Szari’ati › 1933–1977
Catharine MacKinnon wpływ na
wpływ na
MacKinnon modelled feminist method on Marxism, treating consciousness raising as to feminism what dialectical materialism is to Marxism (Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, 1989). C. A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989); “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982)
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
MacKinnon held that Marxism misses sexual domination: ‘sexuality is to feminism what work is to marxism’ (‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State’, Signs, 1982). C. A. MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982), 515–544; Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989)
Źródło: szkic AI
Catharine MacKinnon › ur. 1946
Pokaż wszystko (27)Pokaż mniej
Michaił Bakunin
krytyka ze strony
Bakunin warned that Marx’s workers’ state and ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ would produce a new privileged minority of former workers ruling over the masses (Statism and Anarchy, 1873). M. Bakunin, Gosudarstvennost’ i anarkhiya (Statism and Anarchy, 1873); K. Marx, Conspectus of Bakunin’s Statism and Anarchy (1874–75; MECW 24)
Źródło: szkic AI
Michaił Bakunin › 1814–1876
Piotr Kropotkin
krytyka ze strony
Kropotkin rejected the collectivist wage system of labour cheques favoured by Marxist socialists, demanding distribution according to needs (The Conquest of Bread, 1892, ch. 13). P. Kropotkin, La conquête du pain (1892), ch. 13 “Le salariat collectiviste”; Modern Science and Anarchism (1901/1913)
Źródło: szkic AI
Piotr Kropotkin › 1842–1921
Vilfredo Pareto
krytyka ze strony
Pareto rejected Marx’s labour theory of value and recast class struggle as a perpetual circulation of elites, which no revolution ends (Les systèmes socialistes, 1902–03). V. Pareto, Les systèmes socialistes (1902–03); Trattato di sociologia generale (1916)
Źródło: szkic AI
Vilfredo Pareto › 1848–1923
José Martí
krytyka ze strony
Reporting on the New York memorial meeting for Marx (La Nación, 1883), Martí honoured him for taking the side of the weak but objected that one does better who points to the harm and teaches a gentle remedy than one who sets people against each other. J. Martí, letter from New York of 29 March 1883, La Nación (Buenos Aires), May 1883; Obras completas IX
Źródło: szkic AI
José Martí › 1853–1895
Benedetto Croce
krytyka ze strony
Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1
Źródło: szkic AI
Benedetto Croce › 1866–1952
Nikołaj Bierdiajew
krytyka ze strony
Berdyaev, once a Marxist, came to see Marxism as a secular religion subordinating the person to the collective (The Origin of Russian Communism, 1937). N. Berdyaev, The Origin of Russian Communism (1937)
Źródło: szkic AI
Nikołaj Bierdiajew › 1874–1948
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar
krytyka ze strony
In “Buddha or Karl Marx” (written 1956) Ambedkar accepted Marx’s critique of exploitation but rejected violence and the dictatorship of the proletariat: the Buddha’s way of persuasion and moral change, he argued, reaches the same goal more lastingly. B. R. Ambedkar, “Buddha or Karl Marx” (1956), in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, vol. 3 (1987)
Źródło: szkic AI
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar › 1891–1956
Karl Popper
krytyka ze strony
Popper argued that Marx’s historicism claims to predict history; when its prophecies failed, they were reinterpreted, making the theory immune to criticism (The Open Society, 1945). K. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), vol. 2; Conjectures and Refutations (1963), ch. 1; The Poverty of Historicism (1957)
Źródło: szkic AI
Karl Popper › 1902–1994
Muhammad Husajn Tabataba’i
krytyka ze strony
In The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism (from 1953) Tabatabai answered the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels, as the Tudeh party spread it in Iran, with a realist theory of knowledge. M. Ḥ. Ṭabāṭabāʾī and M. Muṭahharī, Uṣūl-i falsafa va ravish-i riʾālīsm (1953–85); Nasr 2006
Źródło: szkic AI
Muhammad Husajn Tabataba’i › 1904–1981
Hannah Arendt
krytyka ze strony
Arendt objected that Marx blurred the distinction between labour and work and, defining man as animal laborans, lost sight of action (The Human Condition, 1958, ch. III). H. Arendt, The Human Condition (1958), ch. III “Labor”; “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought” (1953, publ. 2002)
Źródło: szkic AI
Hannah Arendt › 1906–1975
Fausto Reinaga
krytyka ze strony
After his Marxist phase Reinaga rejected Marxism as a European doctrine: the Indians are an oppressed people, not a class, and must liberate themselves (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); Tesis india (1971); Á. García Linera, “El desencuentro de dos razones revolucionarias. Indianismo y marxismo”, Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 3 (2007)
Źródło: szkic AI
Fausto Reinaga › 1906–1994
Isaiah Berlin
krytyka ze strony
Berlin rejected the historical determinism he found in Marx, which dissolves individual choice and responsibility into impersonal historical forces (‘Historical Inevitability’, 1954). I. Berlin, Historical Inevitability (Auguste Comte Memorial Lecture, 1954); Karl Marx: His Life and Environment (1939)
Źródło: szkic AI
Isaiah Berlin › 1909–1997
Simone Weil
krytyka ze strony
Weil called Marx’s faith in productive forces a myth: oppression stems from how labour is organised (Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale, 1934). S. Weil, Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale (1934; publ. in Oppression et liberté, 1955); SEP “Simone Weil”
Źródło: szkic AI
Simone Weil › 1909–1943
Albert Camus
krytyka ze strony
In The Rebel (1951) Camus read Marx as a prophet of the end of history whose messianism, in his heirs, justified sacrificing living people to a promised future. A. Camus, L’Homme révolté (1951), Part III, “La prophétie bourgeoise”, “La prophétie révolutionnaire”
Źródło: szkic AI
Albert Camus › 1913–1960
Cornelius Castoriadis
krytyka ze strony
Castoriadis concluded that Marx’s economic determinism and primacy of productive forces cannot grasp social creation, so the theory had become an ideology (Imaginary Institution of Society, 1975, I). C. Castoriadis, “Marxisme et théorie révolutionnaire”, Socialisme ou Barbarie 36–40 (1964–65); L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975), part I
Źródło: szkic AI
Cornelius Castoriadis › 1922–1997
Julius Nyerere
krytyka ze strony
In “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962) Nyerere rejected, without naming Marx, a “doctrinaire socialism” built on “a philosophy of inevitable conflict between man and man”: African socialism grows from the traditional extended family, not from class war. J. K. Nyerere, “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962), in Freedom and Unity (1967)
Źródło: szkic AI
Julius Nyerere › 1922–1999
Michel Foucault
krytyka ze strony
Foucault held that Marxism exists in nineteenth-century thought ‘like a fish in water’ and makes no radical break with political economy (The Order of Things, 1966). M. Foucault, Les mots et les choses (1966), ch. 8, section on Ricardo
Źródło: szkic AI
Michel Foucault › 1926–1984
Leszek Kołakowski
krytyka ze strony
Kołakowski argued that Marx’s Promethean dream of a perfectly unified society made Stalinism a possible, though not inevitable, interpretation of his thought (Main Currents of Marxism, 1976–78). L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism (1976–78; Engl. 1978); “The Marxist Roots of Stalinism”, in R. C. Tucker (ed.), Stalinism (1977)
Źródło: szkic AI
Leszek Kołakowski › 1927–2009
Martin Luther King Jr.
krytyka ze strony
King rejected Marx’s materialist view of history, the ethical relativism and the totalitarianism he saw in communism, while sharing Marx’s concern for social justice (Stride Toward Freedom, 1958). M. L. King Jr., Stride Toward Freedom (1958), ch. 6 “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence”
Źródło: szkic AI
Martin Luther King Jr. › 1929–1968
Carla Lonzi
krytyka ze strony
Lonzi objected that Marxism promises women’s liberation only as a by-product of the class struggle, leaving the oppression of women by men untouched (Sputiamo su Hegel, 1970). C. Lonzi, Sputiamo su Hegel (Scritti di Rivolta Femminile, 1970); Manifesto di Rivolta Femminile (1970)
Źródło: szkic AI
Carla Lonzi › 1931–1982
Kwasi Wiredu
krytyka ze strony
In Philosophy and an African Culture (1980) Wiredu devoted two chapters to Marxism, criticising its accounts of truth, ideology and morality and arguing that features of Marxist philosophy help explain the authoritarianism of Marxist regimes. K. Wiredu, Philosophy and an African Culture (1980); D. Ude, Journal of Pan African Studies 12:5 (2018)
Źródło: szkic AI
Kwasi Wiredu › 1931–2022
Krytykuje 8
Adam Smith pod wpływem
pod wpływem
Marx worked through Smith on wages, profit and rent in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844) and later built on his labour theory of value in Capital (1867). K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); Das Kapital I (1867); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
krytykuje
Marx credited Smith’s labour theory of value but criticised his ‘dogma’ that commodity prices resolve into wages, profit and rent, ignoring constant capital (Capital II, 1885, ch. 19). K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), ch. 19; Theorien über den Mehrwert I (1862–63), ch. 3
Źródło: szkic AI
Adam Smith › 1723–1790
Edmund Burke
krytykuje
Marx called Burke a paid ‘sycophant’ of the English oligarchy and an ‘out-and-out vulgar bourgeois’ for whom the laws of commerce were laws of God (Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), ch. 24.6 (Engl. ed. ch. 31), note on E. Burke, Thoughts and Details on Scarcity (1795)
Źródło: szkic AI
Edmund Burke › 1729–1797
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel pod wpływem
pod wpływem ✓
In the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844, printed 1932) Marx credited Hegel’s Phenomenology with grasping the self-creation of humanity as a process and labour as its essence. K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932), “Kritik der Hegelschen Dialektik und Philosophie überhaupt”; SEP “Karl Marx”
krytykuje
Marx held that Hegel mystifies the dialectic by making the Idea the subject of reality; it ‘stands on its head’ and must be inverted (Capital, afterword 1873). K. Marx, Kritik des Hegelschen Staatsrechts (1843); Das Kapital I, Nachwort zur zweiten Auflage (1873); SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: szkic AI
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831
Auguste Comte
krytykuje
Marx found Comte’s positivism ‘miserable compared to Hegel’ and mocked Comte’s school for making the lords of capital an eternal necessity (letter to Engels, 1866; Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, letter to F. Engels, 7 July 1866 (MEW 31); Das Kapital I (1867), chapter on co-operation, note on Comte
Źródło: szkic AI
Auguste Comte › 1798–1857
Ludwig Feuerbach pod wpływem
pod wpływem ✓
Marx turned Feuerbach’s inversion of subject and predicate against Hegel’s theory of the state (1843) and adopted his ‘species-being’ in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844). K. Marx, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie (written 1843, printed 1927); Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); SEP “Karl Marx”
krytykuje
Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach (1845) objected that Feuerbach grasps reality only as an object of contemplation, not as practice, and abstracts human essence from social relations. K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845; publ. by Engels 1888), Theses I and VI; SEP “Karl Marx”
Źródło: szkic AI
Ludwig Feuerbach › 1804–1872
Pierre Joseph Proudhon pod wpływem
pod wpływem
In The Holy Family (1845) Marx praised Proudhon’s What Is Property? (1840) for making private property itself the object of a critical examination of political economy. K. Marx and F. Engels, Die heilige Familie (1845); P.-J. Proudhon, Qu’est-ce que la propriété? (1840)
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
krytykuje
In The Poverty of Philosophy (1847) Marx objected that Proudhon treats economic categories as eternal ideas, whereas they express historical, transitory relations of production. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847), ch. 2, first observation
Źródło: szkic AI
Pierre Joseph Proudhon › 1809–1865
Pokaż wszystko (8)Pokaż mniej
Giuseppe Mazzini
krytykuje
Marx dismissed the Italian draft statutes for the International as ‘evidently a concoction of Mazzini’s’ and rewrote them with the Inaugural Address (to Engels, 4 Nov. 1864). K. Marx to F. Engels, 4 Nov. 1864 (MECW 42); Inaugural Address and Provisional Rules of the International Working Men’s Association (1864)
Źródło: szkic AI
Giuseppe Mazzini › 1805–1872
Max Stirner
krytykuje
In ‘Saint Max’, the longest part of The German Ideology (1845–46), Marx and Engels mocked Stirner’s Unique One as a petty-bourgeois abstraction from real social relations. K. Marx & F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (1845–46; publ. 1932), vol. I, part III “Sankt Max”; SEP “Max Stirner”
Źródło: szkic AI
Max Stirner › 1806–1856
Dzieła
Praca wyalienowana – z krytyką dialektyki Hegla; napisane w 1844 roku, opublikowane po raz pierwszy w 1932.
Filozofowie tylko różnie interpretowali świat; chodzi o to, by go zmienić – zanotowane w 1845 roku, opublikowane przez Engelsa w 1888.
Widmo krąży po Europie.
- 1867Kapitał
Towar, wartość dodatkowa, akumulacja – prawa ruchu społeczeństwa kapitalistycznego.
Stanowisko
Marx turned Hegel’s dialectic “from its head onto its feet”: history is driven not by the spirit but by material production and the conflicts it generates. Every society rests on an economic base – forces and relations of production – on which law, politics and ideology are built. Under capitalism workers sell their labour power; the surplus value they produce beyond their wage becomes profit, and their work becomes alien to them. Class struggle, crises and concentration of capital would, he argued, eventually lead to a classless society. His famous thesis: philosophers have only interpreted the world; the point is to change it. His work shaped politics and the social sciences far beyond Marxism.
Życie i kontekst
Born in Trier, Marx studied law and philosophy in Bonn and Berlin, joined the Young Hegelians and edited a liberal newspaper until it was banned. In Paris he began his lifelong partnership with Engels. After the revolutions of 1848 he lived in London in exile, often in poverty, studying economics in the British Museum and helping lead the First International.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts (written 1844, published 1932)
- Theses on Feuerbach (1845)
- The German Ideology, with Engels (written 1845–46, published 1932)
- The Communist Manifesto, with Engels (1848)
- Capital, vol. 1 (1867)
Pojawia się w
- Podróż „Spadkobiercy Hegla” · Przystanek 4 z 10
- Podróż „Jak socjologia wyłoniła się z filozofii” · Przystanek 11 z 12
- Podróż „Jak społeczeństwo stało się możliwe do pomyślenia” · Przystanek 4 z 12
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora