AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Bernard Mandeville

1670–1733

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Społeczeństwa handlowe kwitną dzięki namiętnościom, które moraliści potępiają – pysze, próżności, zazdrości, upodobaniu do zbytku; cnota jest w dużej mierze wynalazkiem sprytnych polityków, którzy schlebiają pysze, by okiełznać miłość własną, a naród, który stałby się naprawdę uczciwy i oszczędny, straciłby handel i potęgę.

Umiejscowienie

Empiryzm, oświecenie i liberalizm · Europa Zachodnia · Etyka, Społeczeństwo i historia, Polityka i prawo

Holenderski z pochodzenia lekarz w Londynie: w „Bajce o pszczołach” kwitnący ul żyje z próżności, zbytku i chciwości, a upada, gdy staje się uczciwy; prywatne przywary, umiejętnie kierowane przez polityków, przynoszą publiczne korzyści, a sama cnota wyrosła z pochlebianej dumy.

Kluczowe idee

  • Prywatne przywary, publiczne korzyści
  • Duma i początek cnoty
  • Zbytek a dobrobyt
  • Ład społeczny bez planu

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 1

  • Pierre Bayle

    pod wpływem

    Mandeville took from Bayle’s Various Thoughts on the Comet (1682) the view that people act from passions, not professed principles, which underlies The Fable of the Bees (1714). P. Bayle, Pensées diverses sur la comète (1682); B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees, ed. F. B. Kaye (1924), introduction; SEP “Bernard Mandeville”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Pierre Bayle › 1647–1706

Wpływ na 2

  • David Hume

    wpływ na

    Introducing the Treatise (1739), Hume named Mandeville, with Locke, Shaftesbury, Hutcheson and Butler, among those who began to put the science of man on a new footing. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Introduction; SEP “Bernard Mandeville”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    David Hume › 1711–1776

  • Karol Marks

    wpływ na

    In Capital I (1867) Marx quoted the Fable of the Bees, calling Mandeville an upright man with a clear mind who saw that wealth rests on the labouring poor. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the general law of capitalist accumulation; B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karol Marks › 1818–1883

Krytyka

Krytyka ze strony 5

  • George Berkeley

    krytyka ze strony

    Berkeley’s Alciphron (1732, Dialogue II) attacked Mandeville’s thesis that private vices are public benefits, voiced by the free-thinker Lysicles; Mandeville replied in A Letter to Dion. G. Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher (1732), Dialogue II; B. Mandeville, A Letter to Dion (1732)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    George Berkeley › 1685–1753

  • Francis Hutcheson

    krytyka ze strony

    Hutcheson’s Inquiry (1725) defended Shaftesbury ‘against the Author of the Fable of the Bees’, arguing that a moral sense approves benevolence independently of self-interest. F. Hutcheson, An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725), title page and Treatise II; SEP “Francis Hutcheson”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Francis Hutcheson › 1694–1746

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    krytyka ze strony

    Rousseau granted Mandeville that pity is natural but objected that he missed that generosity, clemency and humanity all flow from it (Second Discourse, 1755). J.-J. Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine de l’inégalité (1755), Part I

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau › 1712–1778

  • Adam Smith

    krytyka ze strony

    Smith called Mandeville’s system ‘wholly pernicious’: it treats every passion as vice and confuses the love of true praiseworthiness with vanity (Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1759, VII.ii.4). A. Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), VII.ii.4 (“Of licentious systems”)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Adam Smith › 1723–1790

  • Immanuel Kant

    krytyka ze strony

    Kant listed Mandeville’s grounding of morality in the civil constitution among the material, heteronomous principles unfit to found moral law (Critique of Practical Reason, 1788, Ak. 5:40). I. Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788), §8, Remark II (AA V 40)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804

Dzieła

Stanowisko

Mandeville is on the map as the author of a provocative book of the Enlightenment and a forerunner of theories of unintended social order. “The Fable of the Bees” argues that commercial societies thrive on the very passions moralists condemn: pride, vanity, envy and the love of luxury create demand, employment and the arts, so that “private vices” become “public benefits” when “skilful politicians” channel them. In “An Enquiry into the Origin of Moral Virtue” he claimed that virtue was invented by lawgivers who flattered human pride to make people restrain their appetites. If virtue is defined strictly as self-denial, almost nothing in a flourishing society is virtuous – a rigorism whose ironic intent is still debated. His “Essay on Charity and Charity-Schools” (1723), which argued that educating the labouring poor would unfit them for hard work, caused a public scandal. The book provoked replies from Hutcheson, Berkeley, William Law and many others; Adam Smith called it a “licentious system” but took up much of its analysis of commerce, Kant counted Mandeville among the heteronomous moralists, and Marx quoted him with respect. Twentieth-century economists such as Hayek and Keynes rediscovered him as an early theorist of spontaneous order and of demand.

Życie i kontekst

Bernard Mandeville was born in Rotterdam in November 1670 (baptised on 20 November) into a family of physicians and civic officials. He studied philosophy and medicine at Leiden, where he defended the Cartesian view that animals lack feeling in a disputation of 1689 and took his medical degree in 1691 with a thesis on digestion. His family was caught up in the Rotterdam tax riot of 1690, after which his father was banished from the city. In the 1690s Mandeville went to London, where he settled as a physician specialising in “hypochondriack and hysterick passions”, married in 1699 and wrote in English. His verse fable “The Grumbling Hive” (1705) grew into “The Fable of the Bees” (1714); the enlarged edition of 1723 was presented by the Grand Jury of Middlesex as a public nuisance. He died in Hackney on 21 January 1733.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • The Grumbling Hive: or, Knaves Turn’d Honest (1705)
  • A Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Passions (1711)
  • The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits (1714; enlarged 1723; Part II, 1729)
  • An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War (1732)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd