Karl Marx
For Marx, economic conditions shape ideas and politics, history is driven by class struggle, and capitalism exploits workers and must be overcome.
Placement
History is the history of class struggles: a critique of political economy and of capital.
Key ideas
- Historical materialism
- Alienation
- Surplus value
- Class struggle
Influence
Influenced by 7
Aristotle
influenced by
In Capital I (1867) Marx praised Aristotle’s analysis of the value form in exchange and traced its limit, missing labour as the substance of value, to Greek slavery. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the form of value; Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book V; SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: AI draft
Aristotle › 384–322 BCE
Epicurus
influenced by
Marx’s doctoral dissertation (1841) defended Epicurus’ swerve of the atoms against Democritus’ determinism, reading it as the principle of the freedom of self-consciousness. K. Marx, Differenz der demokritischen und epikureischen Naturphilosophie (dissertation, Jena 1841; printed 1902); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Epicurus › 341–270 BCE
Bernard Mandeville
influenced by
In Capital I (1867) Marx quoted the Fable of the Bees, calling Mandeville an upright man with a clear mind who saw that wealth rests on the labouring poor. K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the general law of capitalist accumulation; B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)
Evidence: AI draft
Bernard Mandeville › 1670–1733
Adam Ferguson
influenced by
Marx cited Ferguson on the crippling effects of the division of labour (Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767) in Capital I (1867), calling him Smith’s teacher. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847); Das Kapital I (1867), on the division of labour in manufacture; A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767)
Evidence: AI draft
Adam Ferguson › 1723–1816
Immanuel Kant
influenced by
In a letter to his father (1837) Marx described building a philosophy of law on the idealism of Kant and Fichte before he turned to Hegel. K. Marx, letter to Heinrich Marx, 10–11 November 1837 (MEW Ergänzungsband 1; MECW 1)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804
August Cieszkowski
influenced by disputed
Whether Marx read Cieszkowski’s Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838) is disputed; its ‘philosophy of the deed’ is usually traced to him through Moses Hess and the Young Hegelians. A. Cieszkowski, Prolegomena zur Historiosophie (1838); N. Lobkowicz, Theory and Practice (1967); D. McLellan, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (1969)
Evidence: AI draft
August Cieszkowski › 1814–1894
Nikolai Chernyshevsky
influenced by
Marx praised Chernyshevsky’s critique of Mill (Capital, afterword 1873) and discussed his question whether Russia could reach socialism through the peasant commune (letter of 1877). K. Marx, Das Kapital I, afterword to the 2nd ed. (1873); letter to the editors of Otechestvennye Zapiski (1877, unsent); T. Shanin, Late Marx and the Russian Road (1983)
Evidence: AI draft
Nikolai Chernyshevsky › 1828–1889
Influenced 73
Friedrich Engels
influenced ✓
After Marx’s death Engels edited Capital II (1885) and III (1894) from the manuscripts and credited the materialist conception of history mainly to Marx (Ludwig Feuerbach, 1886). F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach (1886); K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), III (ed. Engels, 1894); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Friedrich Engels › 1820–1895
Jean-Paul Sartre
influenced ✓
In Search for a Method (1957) and Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960) Sartre called Marxism the philosophy of our time, seeking to ground it in individual praxis. J.-P. Sartre, Questions de méthode (1957); Critique de la raison dialectique I (1960); SEP “Jean-Paul Sartre”
Jean-Paul Sartre › 1905–1980
Claude Lévi-Strauss
influenced
Lévi-Strauss counted Marxism among his ‘three mistresses’ (1955) and called his work a contribution to the theory of superstructures, barely sketched by Marx (La pensée sauvage, 1962). C. Lévi-Strauss, Tristes tropiques (1955); La pensée sauvage (1962)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009
John Rawls
influenced
Rawls took up Marx’s objection that liberal rights are merely formal, answering with the fair value of political liberties and property-owning democracy (Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, 2001). J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001), § 52; Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (2007), lectures on Marx
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
John Rawls › 1921–2002
Jürgen Habermas
influenced ✓
Habermas set out to reconstruct historical materialism, separating the development of productive forces from that of normative structures (Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, 1976). J. Habermas, Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus (1976); Erkenntnis und Interesse (1968)
Jürgen Habermas › 1929–2026
Jacques Derrida
influenced ✓
Derrida claimed a certain spirit of Marx’s critique as an inheritance while reading Marx’s own wish to exorcise ghosts against him (Spectres de Marx, 1993). J. Derrida, Spectres de Marx (1993)
Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004
Show all (73)Show fewer
Antonio Labriola
influenced ✓
Labriola’s In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895) read Marx’s historical materialism as a method for studying history through its mediations, not as a doctrine of economic laws. A. Labriola, In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895); Del materialismo storico (1896)
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Antonio Labriola › 1843–1904
Ferdinand Tönnies
influenced
Tönnies drew his type of Gesellschaft partly from Marx’s Capital, as a society of exchange and commodity production, and later wrote Marx: Leben und Lehre (1921). F. Tönnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887); Marx. Leben und Lehre (1921)
Evidence: AI draft
Ferdinand Tönnies › 1855–1936
Georgi Plekhanov
influenced
Plekhanov translated the Communist Manifesto into Russian (1882, with a preface by Marx and Engels) and applied Marx’s analysis to Russian capitalism against the Narodniks (Our Differences, 1885). K. Marx and F. Engels, Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, Russian tr. G. Plekhanov (1882); G. Plekhanov, Naši raznoglasija (1885); S. H. Baron, Plekhanov (1963)
Evidence: AI draft
Georgi Plekhanov › 1856–1918
Georg Simmel
influenced
Simmel wanted to build ‘a storey beneath historical materialism’, tracing economic forms themselves to psychological and metaphysical preconditions (Philosophie des Geldes, 1900, preface). G. Simmel, Philosophie des Geldes (1900), preface; D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (1984)
Evidence: AI draft
Georg Simmel › 1858–1918
Werner Sombart
influenced
Sombart’s early lectures on socialism and Modern Capitalism engage Marx closely, yet explain the origin of capitalism through a changed mentality rather than class relations. Deutsche Biographie, “Sombart, Werner” (F. Lenger, NDB 24, 2010)
Evidence: AI draft
Werner Sombart › 1863–1941
W. E. B. Du Bois
influenced
Du Bois used Marxist categories in Black Reconstruction (1935), reading the flight of the enslaved from plantations as a ‘general strike’ against slavery. W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America (1935); “Marxism and the Negro Problem”, The Crisis 40 (1933); SEP “W. E. B. Du Bois”
Evidence: AI draft
W. E. B. Du Bois › 1868–1963
Alexandra Kollontai
influenced
Following Marx’s class analysis, Kollontai held that working women’s emancipation required abolishing private property, not equal rights within bourgeois society (The Social Basis of the Woman Question, 1909). A. Kollontai, Social’nye osnovy ženskogo voprosa (1909); B. Evans Clements, Bolshevik Feminist: The Life of Aleksandra Kollontai (1979)
Evidence: AI draft
Alexandra Kollontai › 1872–1952
Giovanni Gentile
influenced
In The Philosophy of Marx (1899) Gentile read Marx’s praxis in the Theses on Feuerbach as the unity of thinking and doing, later central to his actualism. G. Gentile, La filosofia di Marx (1899); H. S. Harris, The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile (1960)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Giovanni Gentile › 1875–1944
Otto Neurath
influenced
Neurath treated Marx’s historical materialism as a model of empirical, anti-metaphysical sociology (Empirische Soziologie, 1931) and argued for a planned economy calculated in kind (1919). O. Neurath, Durch die Kriegswirtschaft zur Naturalwirtschaft (1919); Empirische Soziologie (1931); SEP “Otto Neurath”
Evidence: AI draft
Otto Neurath › 1882–1945
Georg Lukács
influenced
Lukács built his theory of reification on Marx’s account of commodity fetishism, extending it to bureaucracy, law and thought (‘Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat’, 1923). G. Lukács, “Die Verdinglichung und das Bewußtsein des Proletariats”, in Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein (1923); SEP “Georg [György] Lukács”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Georg Lukács › 1885–1971
Antonio Gramsci
influenced ✓
Gramsci read Marx’s 1859 Preface, by which people become conscious of social conflicts in ideological forms, as a basis for his theory of hegemony (prison notebooks, 1929–35). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere (1929–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Vorwort (1859)
Antonio Gramsci › 1891–1937
Walter Benjamin
influenced ✓
Benjamin read the Paris arcades through Marx’s commodity fetishism as phantasmagoria (‘Paris, the Capital of the Nineteenth Century’, 1935) and joined historical materialism with messianism (1940). W. Benjamin, “Paris, die Hauptstadt des XIX. Jahrhunderts” (exposé, 1935); “Über den Begriff der Geschichte” (1940); SEP “Walter Benjamin”
Walter Benjamin › 1892–1940
Karl Mannheim
influenced
Mannheim started from Marx’s thesis that thought is shaped by social being, widening the ‘total’ concept of ideology to all positions, including Marxism’s own (Ideologie und Utopie, 1929). K. Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie (1929); K. Marx, Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (1859), preface; SEP “Ideology”
Evidence: AI draft
Karl Mannheim › 1893–1947
José Carlos Mariátegui
influenced
Mariátegui applied Marx’s method to Peru, treating the ‘problem of the Indian’ as a problem of land, not of race or education (Siete ensayos, 1928). J. C. Mariátegui, Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana (1928), “El problema del indio”; Defensa del marxismo (1928–29)
Evidence: AI draft
José Carlos Mariátegui › 1894–1930
Max Horkheimer
influenced
Horkheimer took Marx’s critique of political economy as the model of a ‘critical theory’ of society, as opposed to traditional theory (‘Traditional and Critical Theory’, 1937). M. Horkheimer, “Traditionelle und kritische Theorie”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6 (1937); SEP “Critical Theory”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Max Horkheimer › 1895–1973
Lev Vygotsky
influenced
Vygotsky held that psychology needed its own ‘Capital’, a methodology built on Marx’s method rather than on quotations (Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa, written 1927, publ. 1982). L. S. Vygotsky, Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa (written 1927; publ. 1982), Eng. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology” (1997); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
Evidence: AI draft
Lev Vygotsky › 1896–1934
Norbert Elias
influenced
Elias valued Marx’s study of long-term social development but rejected the primacy of the economy, setting monopolies of violence and taxation beside it (Was ist Soziologie?, 1970). N. Elias, Was ist Soziologie? (1970); Über den Prozess der Zivilisation (1939), vol. II; S. Mennell, Norbert Elias: Civilization and the Human Self-Image (1989)
Evidence: AI draft
Norbert Elias › 1897–1990
Herbert Marcuse
influenced
Marcuse reviewed the newly printed Paris Manuscripts in 1932, reading them as a philosophical foundation of historical materialism centred on labour and alienation. H. Marcuse, “Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des Historischen Materialismus”, Die Gesellschaft 9 (1932); K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Herbert Marcuse › 1898–1979
Erich Fromm
influenced ✓
In Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), which printed the Paris Manuscripts in English, Fromm presented Marx as a humanist whose aim was to overcome alienation. E. Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man (1961), with the Paris Manuscripts tr. T. B. Bottomore
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Erich Fromm › 1900–1980
Theodor W. Adorno
influenced ✓
Adorno took up Marx’s analysis of commodity exchange and read the exchange principle, which makes unlike things equal, as the social model of identity thinking (Negative Dialectics, 1966). T. W. Adorno, Negative Dialektik (1966); SEP “Theodor W. Adorno”
Theodor W. Adorno › 1903–1969
Léopold Sédar Senghor
influenced
Senghor read the young Marx as a humanist and adapted his socialism to African communal traditions, rejecting class struggle and atheism (Nation et voie africaine du socialisme, 1961). L. S. Senghor, “Marxisme et humanisme”, La Revue socialiste 19 (1948); Nation et voie africaine du socialisme (1961)
Evidence: AI draft
Léopold Sédar Senghor › 1906–2001
Simone de Beauvoir
influenced
Beauvoir ended Le Deuxième Sexe (1949) with Marx’s sentence that the relation of man to woman is the immediate, natural, necessary relation of human to human (1844 Manuscripts). S. de Beauvoir, Le Deuxième Sexe II (1949), conclusion; K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (1844)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Simone de Beauvoir › 1908–1986
Kwame Nkrumah
influenced
Nkrumah adopted Marx’s class analysis late, arguing that African societies are divided by class and that an African bourgeoisie is allied with neocolonialism (Class Struggle in Africa, 1970). K. Nkrumah, Class Struggle in Africa (1970); Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (1965)
Evidence: AI draft
Kwame Nkrumah › 1909–1972
Aimé Césaire
influenced
Césaire tied colonialism to capitalist Europe in Marxist terms (Discours sur le colonialisme, 1950) but refused to subsume colonial questions under class (Lettre à Maurice Thorez, 1956). A. Césaire, Discours sur le colonialisme (1950); Lettre à Maurice Thorez (1956)
Evidence: AI draft
Aimé Césaire › 1913–2008
Roland Barthes
influenced ✓
Barthes based Mythologies (1957) on Marx’s critique of ideology: myth is depoliticised speech that turns the bourgeois order’s history into nature. R. Barthes, Mythologies (1957), “Le mythe, aujourd’hui”
Roland Barthes › 1915–1980
Claudia Jones
influenced
Claudia Jones analysed the “superexploitation” of Black women as workers, as Black people and as women in Marxist terms, as a member and theorist of the Communist Party. C. Jones, “An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman!”, Political Affairs (June 1949); C. Boyce Davies, Left of Karl Marx (2008)
Evidence: AI draft
Claudia Jones › 1915–1964
C. Wright Mills
influenced
Mills used Marx’s class analysis but replaced ‘ruling class’ with ‘power elite’ to stress institutional power (The Power Elite, 1956), and presented Marx critically in The Marxists (1962). C. W. Mills, The Power Elite (1956); The Marxists (1962)
Evidence: AI draft
C. Wright Mills › 1916–1962
Louis Althusser
influenced ✓
Althusser read Marx against humanist interpretations, claiming an ‘epistemological break’ around 1845 between the young Marx of alienation and the science of Capital (For Marx, 1965). L. Althusser, Pour Marx (1965); Lire le Capital (1965); SEP “Louis Althusser”
Louis Althusser › 1918–1990
Paulo Freire
influenced
Freire took from Marx praxis as the unity of reflection and action and cited his thesis that the educator must be educated (Pedagogia do oprimido, written 1968). P. Freire, Pedagogia do oprimido (written 1968); K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845)
Evidence: AI draft
Paulo Freire › 1921–1997
Raymond Williams
influenced
Williams reworked Marx’s base and superstructure from the 1859 Preface, treating culture as material production rather than reflection (‘Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory’, 1973). R. Williams, “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory”, New Left Review I/82 (1973); Marxism and Literature (1977)
Evidence: AI draft
Raymond Williams › 1921–1988
Amílcar Cabral
influenced
Cabral reworked Marx’s theory of history: its motor is the productive forces, so peoples without classes are not outside history (‘The Weapon of Theory’, Havana, 1966). A. Cabral, “The Weapon of Theory”, address to the Tricontinental Conference, Havana (1966), in Revolution in Guinea (1969)
Evidence: AI draft
Amílcar Cabral › 1924–1973
Zygmunt Bauman
influenced
A Marxist sociologist in Warsaw, Bauman kept Marx’s critique of the present but read socialism as an ‘active utopia’, not a historical necessity (Socialism: The Active Utopia, 1976). Z. Bauman, Socialism: The Active Utopia (1976); K. Tester, The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman (2004); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: AI draft
Zygmunt Bauman › 1925–2017
Frantz Fanon
influenced
Fanon held that ‘Marxist analysis should always be slightly stretched’ in the colonies, where the peasantry, not the proletariat, is revolutionary (Les Damnés de la terre, 1961). F. Fanon, Les Damnés de la terre (1961); SEP “Frantz Fanon”
Evidence: AI draft
Frantz Fanon › 1925–1961
Dorothy E. Smith
influenced
Smith took from The German Ideology the method of beginning from actual people and their activities, treating knowledge as part of the ‘relations of ruling’ (1987, 1990). D. E. Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic (1987); The Conceptual Practices of Power (1990); K. Marx and F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (written 1845–46, printed 1932)
Evidence: AI draft
Dorothy E. Smith › 1926–2022
Karel Kosík
influenced
Kosík took Marx’s concept of praxis as the human being’s self-creation and read the fetishised everyday world as ‘pseudo-concrete’ (Dialectics of the Concrete, 1963). K. Kosík, Dialektika konkrétního (1963); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)
Evidence: AI draft
Karel Kosík › 1926–2003
Gajo Petrović
influenced
Petrović read Marx, above all the early manuscripts, as a philosopher of praxis, free creative activity, against Stalinist dialectical materialism (Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century, 1967). G. Petrović, Marx in the Mid-Twentieth Century (1967); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism III (1978)
Evidence: AI draft
Gajo Petrović › 1927–1993
Gustavo Gutiérrez
influenced
Gutiérrez used Marxist social analysis and dependency theory to read poverty as structural injustice, a use the Vatican criticised in 1984 (Teología de la liberación, 1971). G. Gutiérrez, Teología de la liberación: Perspectivas (1971); Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis nuntius (1984)
Evidence: AI draft
Gustavo Gutiérrez › 1928–2024
Aníbal Quijano
influenced
Quijano started from Marxist dependency theory but held that Eurocentric historical materialism misses race as a basis of the colonial division of labour (‘Colonialidad del poder’, 2000). A. Quijano, “Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina”, in E. Lander (ed.), La colonialidad del saber (2000)
Evidence: AI draft
Aníbal Quijano › 1928–2018
Peter L. Berger
influenced
With Luckmann, Berger took over Marx’s dialectic of humans producing a world that confronts them as objective, and his concept of reification (The Social Construction of Reality, 1966). P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (1966); P. L. Berger and S. Pullberg, “Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness”, History and Theory 4 (1965)
Evidence: AI draft
Peter L. Berger › 1929–2017
Agnes Heller
influenced
In The Theory of Need in Marx (1974/76) Heller drew from Marx the concept of ‘radical needs’ that capitalism produces but cannot satisfy. A. Heller, La teoria dei bisogni in Marx (1974), Eng. tr. The Theory of Need in Marx (1976)
Evidence: AI draft
Agnes Heller › 1929–2019
Alasdair MacIntyre
influenced
MacIntyre began as a Marxist critic of liberal society (Marxism: An Interpretation, 1953) and kept Marx’s critique of capitalism after his turn to Aristotle (After Virtue, 1981). A. MacIntyre, Marxism: An Interpretation (1953); Marxism and Christianity (1968); After Virtue (1981); K. Knight (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader (1998)
Evidence: AI draft
Alasdair MacIntyre › 1929–2025
Pierre Bourdieu
influenced ✓
Bourdieu widened Marx’s concept of capital beyond economics to cultural, social and symbolic capital, whose unequal distribution and conversion structure social space (1983; ‘The Forms of Capital’, 1986). P. Bourdieu, “Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital” (1983); “The Forms of Capital” (1986); La Distinction (1979)
Pierre Bourdieu › 1930–2002
Li Zehou
influenced
Li Zehou took from Marx the primacy of material practice, above all making and using tools, as the ground of his anthropo-historical ontology (Pipan zhexue de pipan, 1979). Li Zehou, Pipan zhexue de pipan (1979); J. S. Rošker, Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy (2019)
Evidence: AI draft
Li Zehou › 1930–2021
Stuart Hall
influenced ✓
In a close reading of Marx’s 1857 Introduction (1974) Hall derived a non-reductive method of articulation; later he sought a ‘Marxism without guarantees’ (‘The Problem of Ideology’, 1983). S. Hall, “Marx’s Notes on Method: A ‘Reading’ of the ‘1857 Introduction’”, Working Papers in Cultural Studies 6 (1974); “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees” (1983)
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Stuart Hall › 1932–2014
Antonio Negri
influenced ✓
In seminars at the École normale supérieure published as Marx beyond Marx (1979), Negri read the Grundrisse as a theory of the antagonistic subjectivity of living labour. A. Negri, Marx oltre Marx. Quaderno di lavoro sui Grundrisse (1979)
Antonio Negri › 1933–2023
Enrique Dussel
influenced
Dussel read Marx’s manuscripts closely, finding in living labour an exteriority to capital like the Other of liberation ethics (La producción teórica de Marx, 1985). E. Dussel, La producción teórica de Marx (1985); Hacia un Marx desconocido (1988); El último Marx (1990)
Evidence: AI draft
Enrique Dussel › 1934–2023
Sandra Harding
influenced
Harding modelled the feminist standpoint on Marx’s analysis of how a social position, that of labour, enables knowledge hidden from the ruling class (Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?, 1991). S. Harding, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives (1991); The Science Question in Feminism (1986); SEP “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”
Evidence: AI draft
Sandra Harding › 1935–2025
Anthony Giddens
influenced
Giddens kept Marx’s dictum that people make history, though not under conditions of their own choosing, but rejected his evolutionism (A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, 1981). A. Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (1981); The Constitution of Society (1984); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)
Evidence: AI draft
Anthony Giddens › b. 1938
Arlie Russell Hochschild
influenced
Hochschild opened The Managed Heart (1983) with Marx’s child worker in Capital: as factory work estranged workers from their labour, emotional labour can estrange them from their feelings. A. R. Hochschild, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (1983); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)
Evidence: AI draft
Arlie Russell Hochschild › b. 1940
Karatani Kōjin
influenced
Karatani read Marx’s value-form analysis as a transcritique of capital and later recast history as modes of exchange rather than of production (The Structure of World History, 2010). Karatani Kōjin, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2001; Eng. 2003); Sekaishi no kōzō (2010), tr. M. K. Bourdaghs, The Structure of World History (2014)
Evidence: AI draft
Karatani Kōjin › b. 1941
Silvia Federici
influenced
In Caliban and the Witch (2004) Federici took up Marx’s primitive accumulation and argued that it also required unpaid reproductive labour and control over women’s bodies. S. Federici, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation (2004); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867)
Evidence: AI draft
Silvia Federici › b. 1942
Walter Rodney
influenced
Rodney wrote How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972) from the standpoint of historical materialism, treating underdevelopment as part of the history of capitalist expansion. W. Rodney, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972); “Tanzanian Ujamaa and Scientific Socialism”, African Review 1/4 (1972)
Evidence: AI draft
Walter Rodney › 1942–1980
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
influenced
Spivak read Marx’s distinction between political representation (vertreten) and portrayal (darstellen) in The Eighteenth Brumaire against Foucault and Deleuze (‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, 1988). G. C. Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988); “Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value”, Diacritics 15 (1985); K. Marx, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte (1852)
Evidence: AI draft
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak › b. 1942
Ulrich Beck
influenced
Beck set the risk society against Marx’s class society: where industrial modernity distributed wealth, reflexive modernity also distributes risks, and individualisation yields a ‘capitalism without classes’ (Risikogesellschaft, 1986). U. Beck, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (1986); “Jenseits von Stand und Klasse?” (1983)
Evidence: AI draft
Ulrich Beck › 1944–2015
Raewyn Connell
influenced
Connell began with Marxist class analysis of Australia’s ruling class and its cultural hegemony (Ruling Class, Ruling Culture, 1977), before extending structural analysis of power to gender. R. W. Connell, Ruling Class, Ruling Culture (1977); R. W. Connell and T. H. Irving, Class Structure in Australian History (1980); Gender and Power (1987)
Evidence: AI draft
Raewyn Connell › b. 1944
Angela Davis
influenced
In Women, Race & Class (1981) Davis analysed slavery and domestic labour in Marxist terms, arguing that socialising housework could free working-class women. A. Y. Davis, Women, Race & Class (1981), “The Approaching Obsolescence of Housework: A Working-Class Perspective”
Evidence: AI draft
Angela Davis › b. 1944
Donna Haraway
influenced
Haraway wrote her cyborg myth as an ironic politics ‘faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism’, recasting the analysis of labour for technoscience (‘A Cyborg Manifesto’, 1985). D. Haraway, “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s”, Socialist Review 80 (1985); Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (1991)
Evidence: AI draft
Donna Haraway › b. 1944
Gøsta Esping-Andersen
influenced
Esping-Andersen took from Marx the commodification of labour power, which ties workers’ livelihood to the market, as what social rights can counteract (Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, 1990). G. Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: AI draft
Gøsta Esping-Andersen › b. 1947
Nancy Fraser
influenced
Fraser extended Marx’s move into the ‘hidden abode’ of production to capitalism’s background conditions: social reproduction, nature and political power (‘Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode’, 2014). N. Fraser, “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism”, New Left Review 86 (2014); Cannibal Capitalism (2022)
Evidence: AI draft
Nancy Fraser › b. 1947
Saskia Sassen
influenced
Sassen asked whether advanced capitalism produces a systemic equivalent of Marx’s primitive accumulation, a ‘savage sorting’ that expels people, land and economies (2010; Expulsions, 2014). S. Sassen, “A Savage Sorting of Winners and Losers: Contemporary Versions of Primitive Accumulation”, Globalizations 7 (2010); Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy (2014)
Evidence: AI draft
Saskia Sassen › b. 1947
Dipesh Chakrabarty
influenced
Chakrabarty took from Marx’s Grundrisse the history posited by capital (‘History 1’) and set against it pasts not belonging to capital’s life-process (‘History 2’) (Provincializing Europe, 2000). D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (2000); K. Marx, Grundrisse (1857–58; publ. 1939–41)
Evidence: AI draft
Dipesh Chakrabarty › b. 1948
Slavoj Žižek
influenced ✓
Žižek read Marx’s formula ‘they do not know it, but they are doing it’ as locating ideology in practice, not belief (The Sublime Object of Ideology, 1989). S. Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on the fetish character of the commodity
Slavoj Žižek › b. 1949
Charles W. Mills
influenced
Mills wrote his doctorate on ideology in Marx and Engels (1985) and adapted historical materialism to race as a system of domination (From Class to Race, 2003). C. W. Mills, From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism (2003); The Racial Contract (1997)
Evidence: AI draft
Charles W. Mills › 1951–2021
Sally Haslanger
influenced
Haslanger revived ideology critique in the tradition going back to Marx, treating ideology as networks of social meanings that make unjust practices seem natural (‘Culture and Critique’, 2017). S. Haslanger, “Culture and Critique”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 91 (2017); Resisting Reality (2012)
Evidence: AI draft
Sally Haslanger › b. 1955
Hartmut Rosa
influenced
Rosa tied social acceleration to capitalism’s compulsion to grow and recast alienation as a mute, indifferent relation to the world (Alienation and Acceleration, 2010). H. Rosa, Beschleunigung (2005); Alienation and Acceleration (2010); Resonanz (2016); SEP “Alienation”
Evidence: AI draft
Hartmut Rosa › b. 1965
Rahel Jaeggi
influenced
Jaeggi reconstructed the concept of alienation from Marx and others without an essentialist human nature, as a ‘relation of relationlessness’ (Entfremdung, 2005). R. Jaeggi, Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (2005); SEP “Alienation”
Evidence: AI draft
Rahel Jaeggi › b. 1966
Glen Sean Coulthard
influenced
Coulthard reworked Marx’s primitive accumulation in a place-based way: in settler colonies the decisive relation is the ongoing dispossession of land, not the making of wage labour (2014). G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014); K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), on so-called primitive accumulation
Evidence: AI draft
Glen Sean Coulthard › b. 1974
Criticism
Criticized by 27
Max Weber influenced
influenced
Weber generalised Marx’s separation of workers from the means of production to administration, the army and science, as a mark of bureaucratic modernity (‘Politik als Beruf’, 1919). M. Weber, “Politik als Beruf” (1919); “Wissenschaft als Beruf” (1919); Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1921–22); SEP “Max Weber”
Evidence: AI draft
criticised by
Weber’s Protestant Ethic (1904–05) countered a one-sided materialist reading of history without substituting a spiritualist one, and he warned that socialism would deepen bureaucracy (1918). M. Weber, Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (1904–05), conclusion; “Der Sozialismus” (lecture, Vienna 1918)
Evidence: AI draft
Max Weber › 1864–1920
Rosa Luxemburg influenced
influenced
In Social Reform or Revolution? (1899) Luxemburg defended Marx’s account of capitalism’s contradictions against Bernstein’s revisionism, arguing that reforms cannot abolish wage labour. R. Luxemburg, Sozialreform oder Revolution? (1899); E. Bernstein, Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus (1899)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
criticised by
Luxemburg argued that Marx’s schemes of expanded reproduction in Capital II assume a closed capitalist economy, whereas accumulation depends on non-capitalist markets (The Accumulation of Capital, 1913). R. Luxemburg, Die Akkumulation des Kapitals (1913), sections I and III
Evidence: AI draft
Rosa Luxemburg › 1871–1919
Jean-François Lyotard influenced
influenced
In Socialisme ou Barbarie Lyotard analysed the Algerian war in Marxist terms of class and colonial exploitation (1956–63; La guerre des Algériens, 1989), before breaking with Marxism. J.-F. Lyotard, La guerre des Algériens. Écrits 1956–1963 (1989); Pérégrinations (1988); SEP “Jean François Lyotard”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
criticised by
Lyotard broke with Marxism in Libidinal Economy (1974) and later counted the narrative of proletarian emancipation among the grand narratives that have lost credibility (The Postmodern Condition, 1979). J.-F. Lyotard, Économie libidinale (1974); La condition postmoderne (1979)
Evidence: AI draft
Jean-François Lyotard › 1924–1998
Jean Baudrillard influenced
influenced ✓
Baudrillard extended Marx’s analysis of the commodity to consumption, adding sign value to use and exchange value (Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe, 1972). J. Baudrillard, La société de consommation (1970); Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe (1972); SEP “Jean Baudrillard”
criticised by
In The Mirror of Production (1973) Baudrillard argued that Marx’s critique remains within the productivist logic of the political economy it criticises, as its mirror image. J. Baudrillard, Le miroir de la production (1973)
Evidence: AI draft
Jean Baudrillard › 1929–2007
Ali Shariati influenced
influenced
Shariati borrowed Marxist class analysis and the concept of alienation to recast Shiism as a revolutionary ideology of the oppressed, while rejecting Marxist materialism. E. Abrahamian, “Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution”, MERIP Reports 102 (1982); A. Rahnema, An Islamic Utopian (1998)
Evidence: AI draft
criticised by
Shariati criticised Marxism as a materialism that reduces the human being to economics, while taking up its language of class struggle for a revolutionary Shiism. ʿAlī Sharīʿatī, Marxism and Other Western Fallacies, tr. R. Campbell, 1980; E. Abrahamian, ‘Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution’, MERIP Reports 102, 1982
Evidence: AI draft
Ali Shariati › 1933–1977
Catharine A. MacKinnon influenced
influenced
MacKinnon modelled feminist method on Marxism, treating consciousness raising as to feminism what dialectical materialism is to Marxism (Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, 1989). C. A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989); “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982)
Evidence: AI draft
criticised by
MacKinnon held that Marxism misses sexual domination: ‘sexuality is to feminism what work is to marxism’ (‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State’, Signs, 1982). C. A. MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs 7 (1982), 515–544; Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989)
Evidence: AI draft
Catharine A. MacKinnon › b. 1946
Show all (27)Show fewer
Mikhail Bakunin
criticised by
Bakunin warned that Marx’s workers’ state and ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ would produce a new privileged minority of former workers ruling over the masses (Statism and Anarchy, 1873). M. Bakunin, Gosudarstvennost’ i anarkhiya (Statism and Anarchy, 1873); K. Marx, Conspectus of Bakunin’s Statism and Anarchy (1874–75; MECW 24)
Evidence: AI draft
Mikhail Bakunin › 1814–1876
Peter Kropotkin
criticised by
Kropotkin rejected the collectivist wage system of labour cheques favoured by Marxist socialists, demanding distribution according to needs (The Conquest of Bread, 1892, ch. 13). P. Kropotkin, La conquête du pain (1892), ch. 13 “Le salariat collectiviste”; Modern Science and Anarchism (1901/1913)
Evidence: AI draft
Peter Kropotkin › 1842–1921
Vilfredo Pareto
criticised by
Pareto rejected Marx’s labour theory of value and recast class struggle as a perpetual circulation of elites, which no revolution ends (Les systèmes socialistes, 1902–03). V. Pareto, Les systèmes socialistes (1902–03); Trattato di sociologia generale (1916)
Evidence: AI draft
Vilfredo Pareto › 1848–1923
José Martí
criticised by
Reporting on the New York memorial meeting for Marx (La Nación, 1883), Martí honoured him for taking the side of the weak but objected that one does better who points to the harm and teaches a gentle remedy than one who sets people against each other. J. Martí, letter from New York of 29 March 1883, La Nación (Buenos Aires), May 1883; Obras completas IX
Evidence: AI draft
José Martí › 1853–1895
Benedetto Croce
criticised by
Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1
Evidence: AI draft
Benedetto Croce › 1866–1952
Nikolai Berdyaev
criticised by
Berdyaev, once a Marxist, came to see Marxism as a secular religion subordinating the person to the collective (The Origin of Russian Communism, 1937). N. Berdyaev, The Origin of Russian Communism (1937)
Evidence: AI draft
Nikolai Berdyaev › 1874–1948
B. R. Ambedkar
criticised by
In “Buddha or Karl Marx” (written 1956) Ambedkar accepted Marx’s critique of exploitation but rejected violence and the dictatorship of the proletariat: the Buddha’s way of persuasion and moral change, he argued, reaches the same goal more lastingly. B. R. Ambedkar, “Buddha or Karl Marx” (1956), in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, vol. 3 (1987)
Evidence: AI draft
B. R. Ambedkar › 1891–1956
Karl Popper
criticised by
Popper argued that Marx’s historicism claims to predict history; when its prophecies failed, they were reinterpreted, making the theory immune to criticism (The Open Society, 1945). K. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), vol. 2; Conjectures and Refutations (1963), ch. 1; The Poverty of Historicism (1957)
Evidence: AI draft
Karl Popper › 1902–1994
Muhammad Husayn Tabatabai
criticised by
In The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism (from 1953) Tabatabai answered the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels, as the Tudeh party spread it in Iran, with a realist theory of knowledge. M. Ḥ. Ṭabāṭabāʾī and M. Muṭahharī, Uṣūl-i falsafa va ravish-i riʾālīsm (1953–85); Nasr 2006
Evidence: AI draft
Muhammad Husayn Tabatabai › 1904–1981
Hannah Arendt
criticised by
Arendt objected that Marx blurred the distinction between labour and work and, defining man as animal laborans, lost sight of action (The Human Condition, 1958, ch. III). H. Arendt, The Human Condition (1958), ch. III “Labor”; “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought” (1953, publ. 2002)
Evidence: AI draft
Hannah Arendt › 1906–1975
Fausto Reinaga
criticised by
After his Marxist phase Reinaga rejected Marxism as a European doctrine: the Indians are an oppressed people, not a class, and must liberate themselves (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); Tesis india (1971); Á. García Linera, “El desencuentro de dos razones revolucionarias. Indianismo y marxismo”, Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 3 (2007)
Evidence: AI draft
Fausto Reinaga › 1906–1994
Isaiah Berlin
criticised by
Berlin rejected the historical determinism he found in Marx, which dissolves individual choice and responsibility into impersonal historical forces (‘Historical Inevitability’, 1954). I. Berlin, Historical Inevitability (Auguste Comte Memorial Lecture, 1954); Karl Marx: His Life and Environment (1939)
Evidence: AI draft
Isaiah Berlin › 1909–1997
Simone Weil
criticised by
Weil called Marx’s faith in productive forces a myth: oppression stems from how labour is organised (Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale, 1934). S. Weil, Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale (1934; publ. in Oppression et liberté, 1955); SEP “Simone Weil”
Evidence: AI draft
Simone Weil › 1909–1943
Albert Camus
criticised by
In The Rebel (1951) Camus read Marx as a prophet of the end of history whose messianism, in his heirs, justified sacrificing living people to a promised future. A. Camus, L’Homme révolté (1951), Part III, “La prophétie bourgeoise”, “La prophétie révolutionnaire”
Evidence: AI draft
Albert Camus › 1913–1960
Cornelius Castoriadis
criticised by
Castoriadis concluded that Marx’s economic determinism and primacy of productive forces cannot grasp social creation, so the theory had become an ideology (Imaginary Institution of Society, 1975, I). C. Castoriadis, “Marxisme et théorie révolutionnaire”, Socialisme ou Barbarie 36–40 (1964–65); L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975), part I
Evidence: AI draft
Cornelius Castoriadis › 1922–1997
Julius Nyerere
criticised by
In “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962) Nyerere rejected, without naming Marx, a “doctrinaire socialism” built on “a philosophy of inevitable conflict between man and man”: African socialism grows from the traditional extended family, not from class war. J. K. Nyerere, “Ujamaa – The Basis of African Socialism” (1962), in Freedom and Unity (1967)
Evidence: AI draft
Julius Nyerere › 1922–1999
Michel Foucault
criticised by
Foucault held that Marxism exists in nineteenth-century thought ‘like a fish in water’ and makes no radical break with political economy (The Order of Things, 1966). M. Foucault, Les mots et les choses (1966), ch. 8, section on Ricardo
Evidence: AI draft
Michel Foucault › 1926–1984
Leszek Kołakowski
criticised by
Kołakowski argued that Marx’s Promethean dream of a perfectly unified society made Stalinism a possible, though not inevitable, interpretation of his thought (Main Currents of Marxism, 1976–78). L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism (1976–78; Engl. 1978); “The Marxist Roots of Stalinism”, in R. C. Tucker (ed.), Stalinism (1977)
Evidence: AI draft
Leszek Kołakowski › 1927–2009
Martin Luther King Jr.
criticised by
King rejected Marx’s materialist view of history, the ethical relativism and the totalitarianism he saw in communism, while sharing Marx’s concern for social justice (Stride Toward Freedom, 1958). M. L. King Jr., Stride Toward Freedom (1958), ch. 6 “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence”
Evidence: AI draft
Martin Luther King Jr. › 1929–1968
Carla Lonzi
criticised by
Lonzi objected that Marxism promises women’s liberation only as a by-product of the class struggle, leaving the oppression of women by men untouched (Sputiamo su Hegel, 1970). C. Lonzi, Sputiamo su Hegel (Scritti di Rivolta Femminile, 1970); Manifesto di Rivolta Femminile (1970)
Evidence: AI draft
Carla Lonzi › 1931–1982
Kwasi Wiredu
criticised by
In Philosophy and an African Culture (1980) Wiredu devoted two chapters to Marxism, criticising its accounts of truth, ideology and morality and arguing that features of Marxist philosophy help explain the authoritarianism of Marxist regimes. K. Wiredu, Philosophy and an African Culture (1980); D. Ude, Journal of Pan African Studies 12:5 (2018)
Evidence: AI draft
Kwasi Wiredu › 1931–2022
Criticizes 8
Adam Smith influenced by
influenced by
Marx worked through Smith on wages, profit and rent in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844) and later built on his labour theory of value in Capital (1867). K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); Das Kapital I (1867); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
criticised
Marx credited Smith’s labour theory of value but criticised his ‘dogma’ that commodity prices resolve into wages, profit and rent, ignoring constant capital (Capital II, 1885, ch. 19). K. Marx, Das Kapital II (ed. Engels, 1885), ch. 19; Theorien über den Mehrwert I (1862–63), ch. 3
Evidence: AI draft
Adam Smith › 1723–1790
Edmund Burke
criticised
Marx called Burke a paid ‘sycophant’ of the English oligarchy and an ‘out-and-out vulgar bourgeois’ for whom the laws of commerce were laws of God (Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, Das Kapital I (1867), ch. 24.6 (Engl. ed. ch. 31), note on E. Burke, Thoughts and Details on Scarcity (1795)
Evidence: AI draft
Edmund Burke › 1729–1797
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel influenced by
influenced by ✓
In the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844, printed 1932) Marx credited Hegel’s Phenomenology with grasping the self-creation of humanity as a process and labour as its essence. K. Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932), “Kritik der Hegelschen Dialektik und Philosophie überhaupt”; SEP “Karl Marx”
criticised
Marx held that Hegel mystifies the dialectic by making the Idea the subject of reality; it ‘stands on its head’ and must be inverted (Capital, afterword 1873). K. Marx, Kritik des Hegelschen Staatsrechts (1843); Das Kapital I, Nachwort zur zweiten Auflage (1873); SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: AI draft
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831
Auguste Comte
criticised
Marx found Comte’s positivism ‘miserable compared to Hegel’ and mocked Comte’s school for making the lords of capital an eternal necessity (letter to Engels, 1866; Capital I, 1867). K. Marx, letter to F. Engels, 7 July 1866 (MEW 31); Das Kapital I (1867), chapter on co-operation, note on Comte
Evidence: AI draft
Auguste Comte › 1798–1857
Ludwig Feuerbach influenced by
influenced by ✓
Marx turned Feuerbach’s inversion of subject and predicate against Hegel’s theory of the state (1843) and adopted his ‘species-being’ in the Paris Manuscripts (written 1844). K. Marx, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie (written 1843, printed 1927); Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (written 1844, printed 1932); SEP “Karl Marx”
criticised
Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach (1845) objected that Feuerbach grasps reality only as an object of contemplation, not as practice, and abstracts human essence from social relations. K. Marx, Thesen über Feuerbach (1845; publ. by Engels 1888), Theses I and VI; SEP “Karl Marx”
Evidence: AI draft
Ludwig Feuerbach › 1804–1872
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon influenced by
influenced by
In The Holy Family (1845) Marx praised Proudhon’s What Is Property? (1840) for making private property itself the object of a critical examination of political economy. K. Marx and F. Engels, Die heilige Familie (1845); P.-J. Proudhon, Qu’est-ce que la propriété? (1840)
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
criticised
In The Poverty of Philosophy (1847) Marx objected that Proudhon treats economic categories as eternal ideas, whereas they express historical, transitory relations of production. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847), ch. 2, first observation
Evidence: AI draft
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon › 1809–1865
Show all (8)Show fewer
Giuseppe Mazzini
criticised
Marx dismissed the Italian draft statutes for the International as ‘evidently a concoction of Mazzini’s’ and rewrote them with the Inaugural Address (to Engels, 4 Nov. 1864). K. Marx to F. Engels, 4 Nov. 1864 (MECW 42); Inaugural Address and Provisional Rules of the International Working Men’s Association (1864)
Evidence: AI draft
Giuseppe Mazzini › 1805–1872
Max Stirner
criticised
In ‘Saint Max’, the longest part of The German Ideology (1845–46), Marx and Engels mocked Stirner’s Unique One as a petty-bourgeois abstraction from real social relations. K. Marx & F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie (1845–46; publ. 1932), vol. I, part III “Sankt Max”; SEP “Max Stirner”
Evidence: AI draft
Max Stirner › 1806–1856
Works
Alienated labor – with a critique of Hegel's dialectic; written in 1844, first published in 1932.
The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it – noted down in 1845, published by Engels in 1888.
A spectre is haunting Europe.
- 1867Capital
Commodity, surplus value, accumulation – the laws of motion of capitalist society.
Position
Marx turned Hegel’s dialectic “from its head onto its feet”: history is driven not by the spirit but by material production and the conflicts it generates. Every society rests on an economic base – forces and relations of production – on which law, politics and ideology are built. Under capitalism workers sell their labour power; the surplus value they produce beyond their wage becomes profit, and their work becomes alien to them. Class struggle, crises and concentration of capital would, he argued, eventually lead to a classless society. His famous thesis: philosophers have only interpreted the world; the point is to change it. His work shaped politics and the social sciences far beyond Marxism.
Life & context
Born in Trier, Marx studied law and philosophy in Bonn and Berlin, joined the Young Hegelians and edited a liberal newspaper until it was banned. In Paris he began his lifelong partnership with Engels. After the revolutions of 1848 he lived in London in exile, often in poverty, studying economics in the British Museum and helping lead the First International.
Further main works
- Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts (written 1844, published 1932)
- The German Ideology, with Engels (written 1845–46, published 1932)
Appears in
- Journey ‘Hegel’s Heirs’ · Stop 4 of 10
- Journey ‘How Sociology Emerged from Philosophy’ · Stop 11 of 12
- Journey ‘How Society Became Thinkable’ · Stop 4 of 12
As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made