AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Fausto Reinaga

1906–1994

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Indianin z Boliwii nie jest chłopem, lecz członkiem skolonizowanego narodu; ani prawica, ani mestyzowska lewica nie mogą przynieść wyzwolenia – musi to być rewolucja indiańska, dokonana przez samych Indian.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofie ludów rdzennych · Ameryka Łacińska i Karaiby · Polityka i prawo, Społeczeństwo i historia, Metafizyka

Boliwijski pisarz i polityk z północnego Potosí, który po zerwaniu z komunistami założył Partię Indian Ajmara i Keczua (1962) i w „Rewolucji indiańskiej” (1970) dowodził, że Indianie Boliwii nie są „chłopami”, lecz skolonizowanym narodem, który musi się sam wyzwolić – tekst założycielski indianizmu.

Kluczowe idee

  • Indianizm zamiast indygenizmu
  • Indianin, nie chłop
  • Dwie Boliwie
  • Krytyka myśli zachodniej

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 1

  • Frantz Fanon

    pod wpływem

    In his Indianist writings from 1969–70 Reinaga drew on Fanon’s analysis of colonial racism and the colonised mind and applied it to the Andes (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); J. A. Lucero, “Fanon in the Andes: Fausto Reinaga, Indianismo, and the Black Atlantic”, International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 1 (2008)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Frantz Fanon › 1925–1961

Wpływ na 1

  • Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui

    wpływ na

    Rivera Cusicanqui, who in 1984 treated Reinaga’s indianismo as a minor strand of the Aymara movement, later called him a fundamental thinker of Aymara-Quechua renewal (La Jornada, 2015). S. Rivera Cusicanqui, Oprimidos pero no vencidos (1984); “Hambre de conocimiento indígena”, La Jornada (11 Apr. 2015), on her Hambre de huelga (2014)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui › ur. 1949

Krytyka

Krytykuje 1

  • Karol Marks

    krytykuje

    After his Marxist phase Reinaga rejected Marxism as a European doctrine: the Indians are an oppressed people, not a class, and must liberate themselves (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); Tesis india (1971); Á. García Linera, “El desencuentro de dos razones revolucionarias. Indianismo y marxismo”, Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 3 (2007)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karol Marks › 1818–1883

Dzieła

  • Manifest indianizmu: Boliwia jest podzielona na indiański i mestyzowsko-biały naród; rewolucja 1952 roku zamieniła Indian w „chłopów”, nie kończąc rządów kolonialnych, a ich wyzwolenie musi być dziełem samych Indian, bez kurateli lewicy ani prawicy.

Stanowisko

Reinaga is on the map as the founder of indianismo, the current of Andean thought that made the Indians themselves the subject of their liberation – unlike indigenismo, a policy for Indigenous peoples made by others. After the revolution of 1952 the Bolivian state had renamed the Aymara and Quechua “campesinos”, peasants, and integrated them through land reform and unions. Reinaga rejected the label: the Indian question is not a class question but that of a colonised nation, and in Bolivia an Indian nation lives under the rule of a mestizo-white one – there are “two Bolivias”. Liberation must therefore be the work of the Indians themselves, against the paternalism of the right and of the Marxist left alike. For this argument he drew on Frantz Fanon, whose analysis of colonial racism and of the colonised mind he applied to the Andes, while he rejected Marxism itself as a European doctrine; Álvaro García Linera later called the relation between indianismo and Marxism a “desencuentro”, a missed encounter, and described Reinaga as the most influential intellectual of indianismo in its formative period. His later works reject Western thought as a whole as a philosophy of violence and set an Andean wisdom against it; critics charge the opposition of Indian and Western with essentialism and with reversing racial categories rather than overcoming them, while others read it as a philosophy of Indian liberation. In 1984 Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui treated his party and ideas as a minor strand of the Aymara movement; later she called his thought seminal for her own and him a fundamental thinker of the Aymara and Quechua renaissance (as reported in La Jornada, 2015). How far the katarista manifestos of the 1970s took up his writings is debated.

Życie i kontekst

Fausto Reinaga, born José Félix Reinaga Chavarría on 27 March 1906 in San Pedro de Macha in the province of Chayanta in northern Potosí, came from an Indigenous family of the region and called himself, deliberately, an “indio”. He studied law at the Universidad Mayor de San Francisco Xavier in Sucre and qualified as a lawyer. In his early writings he combined Marxism with indigenismo; in 1957 he travelled to Leipzig and the Soviet Union, sent, according to different accounts, by the Communist Party of Bolivia or as part of a trade-union delegation. He then broke with the communists and on 15 November 1962 founded the Partido de Indios Aymaras y Keswas, later renamed Partido Indio de Bolivia. Scholars distinguish three phases in his work: an indigenist-Marxist phase until about 1960, an indianista phase in which he wrote “La revolución india” (1970) and “Tesis india” (1971), and from the mid-1970s an “amáutic” phase with works such as “La razón y el indio” (1978) and “La revolución amáutica” (1981), named after the amautas, the sages of the Inca empire. He died in La Paz on 19 August 1994.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • The Indian Revolution (La revolución india, 1970)
  • Indian Thesis (Tesis india, 1971)
  • Indian America and the West (América india y Occidente, 1974)
  • Reason and the Indian (La razón y el indio, 1978)
  • Amautic Thought (El pensamiento amáutico, 1978)
  • The Amautic Revolution (La revolución amáutica, 1981)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd