AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Karatani Kōjin

ur. 1941

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Historię kształtuje mniej to, jak ludzie produkują, a bardziej to, jak wymieniają – dar, władza, rynek – a społeczeństwo ponad kapitałem, narodem i państwem przywróciłoby dar na wyższym poziomie.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofia wschodnioazjatycka · Azja Wschodnia · Polityka i prawo, Społeczeństwo i historia, Estetyka, Epistemologia

Krytyk literacki i filozof, który w „Origins of Modern Japanese Literature” (1980) pokazał, jak w epoce Meiji skonstruowano „krajobraz” i „wnętrze”, w „Transcritique” (2001) czytał Kanta i Marksa jednego przez drugiego, a w „The Structure of World History” (2010) opisał historię jako następstwo sposobów wymiany, a nie sposobów produkcji.

Kluczowe idee

  • Sposoby wymiany A–D
  • Kapitał–naród–państwo
  • Transkrytyka: Kant z Marksem
  • Odkrycie krajobrazu

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 3

  • Immanuel Kant

    pod wpływem

    In Transcritique (2001) Karatani read Kant’s critique as a movement between perspectives, a ‘pronounced parallax’, and the realm of ends as a task for associations. Karatani Kōjin, Toransukuritīku (2001), tr. S. Kohso, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2003)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804

  • Karol Marks

    pod wpływem

    Karatani read Marx’s value-form analysis as a transcritique of capital and later recast history as modes of exchange rather than of production (The Structure of World History, 2010). Karatani Kōjin, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2001; Eng. 2003); Sekaishi no kōzō (2010), tr. M. K. Bourdaghs, The Structure of World History (2014)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karol Marks › 1818–1883

  • Ludwig Wittgenstein

    pod wpływem

    In Exploration I (Tankyū I, 1986) Karatani took up Wittgenstein’s rule-following problem and recast communication as teaching or selling to an other who does not share one’s rules. Karatani Kōjin, Tankyū I (1986); Transcritique (2001; Eng. 2003)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Ludwig Wittgenstein › 1889–1951

Wpływ na 1

  • Slavoj Žižek

    wpływ na

    Žižek built The Parallax View (2006) on Karatani’s Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2003), taking over its notion of the “parallax” between irreducible perspectives. S. Žižek, The Parallax View (2006), Introduction; “The Parallax View”, New Left Review 25 (2004); K. Karatani, Transcritique (2003)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Slavoj Žižek › ur. 1949

Dzieła

Stanowisko

In “Origins of Modern Japanese Literature” (1980) Karatani argued that “landscape”, “interiority”, the confession and the “child” were not discovered by Meiji writers but produced by an inversion through which an inward-turned self began to see the world as landscape; once established, these forms appear natural and their origin is forgotten. In the 1980s he turned to formal systems and self-reference and, in “Exploration” (1986), to Wittgenstein’s problem of rule-following and the situation of teaching or selling to an other who does not share one’s rules. “Transcritique” (2001) reads Kant and Marx through each other: Kant’s critique is a movement between perspectives (a “pronounced parallax”), and Marx’s analysis of the value form is a transcendental critique of capital; the Kantian realm of ends becomes the task of associations of producers and consumers. “The Structure of World History” (2010) replaces modes of production with modes of exchange: reciprocity of the gift (A), plunder and redistribution by the state (B), commodity exchange (C), and a mode D that would restore reciprocity at a higher level beyond the interlocking knot of capital, nation and state. Critics have questioned whether mode D is more than a regulative idea; Karatani himself presents it as such, in Kant’s sense.

Życie i kontekst

Karatani Kōjin was born on 6 August 1941 in Amagasaki near Osaka. He studied economics at the University of Tokyo and then English literature; as a student he was active in the radical left during the protests of 1960 against the security treaty with the United States. In 1969 he won the Gunzō prize for criticism with an essay on Natsume Sōseki and became one of the best-known literary critics in Japan. He taught at Hosei University and later at Kinki University, and spent long periods as a visiting scholar at Yale, where he came into contact with Paul de Man, and at Columbia. With Asada Akira he edited the journal Hihyō kūkan (Critical Space) from 1991 to 2002. In 2000 he founded the New Associationist Movement, a short-lived network intended to put the ideas of “Transcritique” into practice. In 2022 he received the Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Origins of Modern Japanese Literature (1980)
  • Architecture as Metaphor (Inyu to shite no kenchiku, 1983)
  • Exploration I and II (Tankyū, 1986, 1989)
  • Isonomia and the Origins of Philosophy (Tetsugaku no kigen, 2012)
  • Power and Modes of Exchange (Chikara to kōkan yōshiki, 2022)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd