Antonio Labriola
Według Labrioli materializm historyczny nie jest kluczem, który wszystko wyjaśnia ekonomią, lecz metodą i filozofią praxis: historię trzeba rozumieć z warunków ludzkiej pracy i współpracy, przez które ludzie zmieniają swój świat i samych siebie.
Umiejscowienie
Filozof z Cassino, profesor w Rzymie, który do marksizmu doszedł późno i został jego pierwszym wielkim włoskim teoretykiem: materializm historyczny odczytywał nie jako determinizm ekonomiczny, lecz jako „filozofię praxis”, która wyjaśnia historię z warunków ludzkiej działalności.
Kluczowe idee
- Materializm historyczny jako teoria historii
- Filozofia praxis
- Przeciw determinizmowi ekonomicznemu
- Społeczeństwo jako złożona całość
Uczniowie: Benedetto Croce
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 2
Karol Marks
pod wpływem ✓
Labriola’s In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895) read Marx’s historical materialism as a method for studying history through its mediations, not as a doctrine of economic laws. A. Labriola, In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti (1895); Del materialismo storico (1896)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Karol Marks › 1818–1883
Fryderyk Engels
pod wpływem
Labriola turned from Herbart to historical materialism around 1890 and discussed its questions with Engels in a correspondence lasting until 1895. A. Labriola, correspondence with F. Engels (1890–95); L. Kołakowski, Main Currents of Marxism II (1978)
Źródło: szkic AI
Fryderyk Engels › 1820–1895
Wpływ na 2
Benedetto Croce uczeń/uczennica
uczeń/uczennica ✓
As a young man in Rome, living with his uncle Silvio Spaventa, Croce attended Labriola’s lectures on moral philosophy from 1884; in 1895 Labriola’s essays on historical materialism drew him into a study of Marx. B. Croce, Contributo alla critica di me stesso (written 1915)
Źródło: szkic AI
Benedetto Croce › 1866–1952
Antonio Gramsci
wpływ na ✓
Gramsci took up Labriola’s term ‘philosophy of praxis’ and his view that Marxism is a self-sufficient philosophy, independent of materialism and idealism (prison notebooks, 1929–35). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Notebook 11 (1932–33), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); A. Labriola, Discorrendo di socialismo e filosofia (1898)
Antonio Gramsci › 1891–1937
Dzieła
Eseje z lat 1895–96 przedstawiające materializm historyczny jako metodę badania złożonej struktury społeczeństw, a nie system przyczyn ekonomicznych.
Listy do Georges’a Sorela o filozofii marksizmu, w których Labriola mówi o „filozofii praxis” i odrzuca zarówno pozytywistyczne, jak i idealistyczne odczytania.
Stanowisko
Labriola is on the map as the founder of Italian Marxism and as a link between Engels’s generation and Gramsci. Against the positivist Marxism of the Second International, which saw history as the working of economic laws, he read historical materialism as a method: the economic structure explains a society only through the many mediations of law, the state, morality and ideas, and these have to be studied historically, case by case. Marxism is for him neither a materialist metaphysics nor an ethical idealism but a “philosophy of praxis”, in which thinking and doing, nature and history meet in human labour. Engels valued his work; Croce and Gentile developed their early studies of Marx in dialogue and in disagreement with him; Gramsci took up the term “philosophy of praxis” in the prison notebooks; and Leszek Kołakowski described his position as an attempt at an “open orthodoxy”. Labriola remained an isolated figure without a school or a party base, and his essays are occasional rather than systematic. In an interview of 1902 he took a favourable view of Italian colonialism in Africa and hoped for an Italian colonisation of Tripolitania, today part of Libya; Gramsci criticised these views sharply, together with a remark on the Papuans reported by Croce, and they belong to the critical assessment of his thought.
Życie i kontekst
Antonio Labriola was born on 2 July 1843 in San Germano, today Cassino, in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. From 1861 he studied in Naples, where he became a pupil of the Hegelian Bertrando Spaventa; an early essay defended Hegel against Eduard Zeller’s call for a return to Kant. After years as a schoolteacher and a study of Socrates (1871), he was appointed professor of moral philosophy and pedagogy at the University of Rome in 1874 and later also taught the philosophy of history there. In these years he followed Herbart’s ethics and psychology and was at first a moderate liberal in politics. From the late 1880s he turned to socialism, took part in the Roman workers’ movement and from 1890 corresponded with Friedrich Engels. Benedetto Croce, who had attended his lectures in Rome, saw to the printing of his first Marxist essay in 1895; further essays followed in 1896 and 1898, and French translations, one with a preface by Georges Sorel, brought them into the international debate. Labriola kept his distance from party discipline and criticised the reformist course of the Italian Socialist Party. He died in Rome on 12 February 1904.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- The Doctrine of Socrates according to Xenophon, Plato and Aristotle (La dottrina di Socrate secondo Senofonte, Platone ed Aristotele, 1871)
- In Memory of the Communist Manifesto (In memoria del Manifesto dei comunisti, 1895)
- Historical Materialism: A Preliminary Clarification (Del materialismo storico. Dilucidazione preliminare, 1896)
- Socialism and Philosophy (Discorrendo di socialismo e di filosofia, 1898)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora