AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Adam Ferguson

1723–1816

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Ludzie zawsze żyli w grupach, więc nigdy nie było stanu natury; instytucje są wynikiem ludzkiego działania, a nie ludzkiego zamysłu, a konflikt spaja społeczeństwa tak samo jak współpraca; handel i podział pracy mogą jednak podkopywać cnotę obywatelską.

Umiejscowienie

Empiryzm, oświecenie i liberalizm · Europa Północna · Społeczeństwo i historia, Polityka i prawo, Etyka

Szkocki filozof w Edynburgu: „An Essay on the History of Civil Society” (1767) badało ludzi zawsze w grupach, nigdy w stanie natury; instytucje powstają „z ludzkiego działania, a nie z ludzkiego zamysłu”, a podział pracy może osłabiać ducha publicznego.

Kluczowe idee

  • Społeczeństwo jako naturalny stan człowieka
  • Wyniki ludzkiego działania, a nie zamysłu
  • Podział pracy a cnota obywatelska
  • Konflikt i spójność społeczna

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 1

  • Monteskiusz

    pod wpływem ✓

    Ferguson’s Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767) builds on Montesquieu’s comparative politics; recalling Montesquieu, he was ‘at a loss’ why he should treat of human affairs. A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767), ed. F. Oz-Salzberger (1995)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Monteskiusz › 1689–1755

Wpływ na 2

  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

    wpływ na

    Hegel drew on Ferguson’s Institutes of Moral Philosophy, read in Garve’s translation, for his concept of civil society (Philosophy of Right, 1820), as N. Waszek showed. N. Waszek, The Scottish Enlightenment and Hegel’s Account of ‘Civil Society’ (1988); A. Ferguson, Grundsätze der Moralphilosophie, tr. C. Garve (1772); G. W. F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1820)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831

  • Karol Marks

    wpływ na

    Marx cited Ferguson on the crippling effects of the division of labour (Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767) in Capital I (1867), calling him Smith’s teacher. K. Marx, Misère de la philosophie (1847); Das Kapital I (1867), on the division of labour in manufacture; A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Karol Marks › 1818–1883

Krytyka

Krytyka ze strony 1

  • David Hume

    krytyka ze strony

    Hume judged the draft of Ferguson’s Essay on the History of Civil Society unfit for the public in style and reasoning (letter to Hugh Blair, 1766). D. Hume to H. Blair, 11 Feb. 1766, in The Letters of David Hume, ed. J. Y. T. Greig (1932), vol. II

    Źródło: szkic AI

    David Hume › 1711–1776

Krytykuje 1

  • Adam Smith

    krytykuje

    Ferguson disputed Smith’s preference for a standing army over a citizen militia (letter of 1776) and, in a manuscript dialogue, his grounding of moral approval in sympathy. Ferguson to Smith, 1776, in The Correspondence of Adam Smith (Glasgow Edition, 1977); A. Ferguson, “Of the Principle of Moral Estimation”, ed. E. C. Mossner, Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Adam Smith › 1723–1790

Dzieła

Stanowisko

Ferguson is on the map as a founder of social theory within the Scottish Enlightenment and a key figure in the prehistory of sociology. In “An Essay on the History of Civil Society” (1767) he insisted that human beings must be studied as they have always been found – in groups; there never was a solitary state of nature, and “if we are asked where the state of nature is to be found, we may answer: it is here”. Societies develop from “rude” to “polished” states through institutions that are “the result of human action, but not the execution of any human design” – a formula later central to theories of spontaneous order. Conflict between groups, he argued, strengthens cohesion within them. At the same time he warned of the costs of commercial progress: the division of labour makes workers skilled but narrow, and when citizens leave public affairs to specialists and their defence to standing armies, civic virtue decays and despotism threatens. Hume, his friend, judged the manuscript of the Essay harshly and advised against its publication; with Smith he had a long priority dispute over the division of labour, and he criticised Smith’s theory of sympathy. Marx quoted him on the crippling effects of the division of labour, and Hegel, who read his “Institutes” in Christian Garve’s German translation, drew on him for his concept of civil society. Some later writers have called him a “father of sociology”.

Życie i kontekst

Adam Ferguson was born on 20 June 1723 at Logierait in Perthshire, the son of a Presbyterian minister, in a region where Gaelic was spoken. He studied at St Andrews and Edinburgh and from 1745 to 1754 served as chaplain to the Black Watch, a Highland regiment. In 1757 he succeeded David Hume as keeper of the Advocates’ Library in Edinburgh. He became professor of natural philosophy at the University of Edinburgh in 1759 and of pneumatics and moral philosophy in 1764, a chair he held until 1785. He belonged to the circle of Hume, Adam Smith, William Robertson and Hugh Blair, and in 1778–79 he was secretary to the Carlisle Commission sent to negotiate with the American colonies. He died in St Andrews on 22 February 1816, at the age of 92.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • The History of the Progress and Termination of the Roman Republic (1783)
  • Principles of Moral and Political Science (1792)

Pojawia się w

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd