AgoraLa place ouverte de la pensée

Edmund Husserl

1859–1938

Première approchesimplification délibérée – le portrait en dit plus

Mettre de côté les présupposés sur l’existence du monde et décrire exactement comment les choses apparaissent à la conscience – c’est par là que la philosophie doit commencer.

Repères

Phénoménologie et herméneutique · Europe de l’Est · Épistémologie, Esprit et conscience, Logique

Fondateur de la phénoménologie : « Retour aux choses mêmes ! » La mise entre parenthèses du monde (épochè) révèle les structures de la conscience.

Idées clés

  • Intentionnalité
  • Épochè
  • Monde de la vie

Maîtres: Wilhelm Wundt, Franz Brentano

Élèves: Hajime Tanabe, Martin Heidegger, Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz, Edith Stein, Roman Ingarden, Herbert Marcuse, Hans Jonas, Emmanuel Levinas, Jan Patočka

Ouvrir dans la carte stellaire

Influence

Influences reçues de 10

  • Siddhartha Gautama (le Bouddha)

    influencé par

    Husserl praised K. E. Neumann’s translation of the Buddha’s discourses in a short text of 1925; in the manuscript “Socrates – Buddha” (1926) he read the Buddha’s path as a transcendental turn akin to the phenomenological epoché. E. Husserl, “Über die Reden Gotamo Buddhos” (1925), Hua XXVII, pp. 125–126; “Sokrates – Buddha” (1926), ed. S. Luft, Husserl Studies 26 (2010)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Siddhartha Gautama (le Bouddha) › v. 480–400 av. J.-C. · daté conventionnellement 563–483 av. J.-C.

  • Augustin d’Hippone

    influencé par

    Husserl opened his lectures on inner time-consciousness (1905; ed. Heidegger, 1928) with Augustine’s Confessions XI and closed the Cartesian Meditations (1931) with his ‘in te redi’. E. Husserl, Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins (ed. M. Heidegger, 1928); Méditations cartésiennes (1931); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Augustin d’Hippone › 354–430

  • René Descartes

    influencé par

    In the Cartesian Meditations (1931) Husserl radicalised Descartes’s way to the ego cogito into transcendental phenomenology, rejecting the ego as a thinking substance. E. Husserl, Méditations cartésiennes (1931); Cartesianische Meditationen (1950); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: aussi dans InPhO · InPhO

    René Descartes › 1596–1650

  • Emmanuel Kant

    influencé par ✓

    Husserl took up Kant’s transcendental question (Ideas I, 1913) but faulted his constructions not drawn from intuition (‘Kant und die Idee der Transzendentalphilosophie’, 1924; Krisis, 1936). E. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie I (1913); “Kant und die Idee der Transzendentalphilosophie” (1924; publ. 1956); Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften (1936); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Emmanuel Kant › 1724–1804

  • Bernard Bolzano

    influencé par ✓

    Husserl took from Bolzano’s Wissenschaftslehre (1837) the propositions and truths in themselves, ideal unities independent of thinking, for his critique of psychologism (Prolegomena, 1900). E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen I: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik (1900); B. Bolzano, Wissenschaftslehre (1837); SEP “Bernard Bolzano”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    Bernard Bolzano › 1781–1848

  • Franz Brentano élève de

    élève de ✓

    After his doctorate in mathematics, Husserl attended Brentano’s lectures in Vienna from 1884 to 1886, which decided him for philosophy; Brentano recommended him to his pupil Carl Stumpf in Halle, where Husserl habilitated (1887). SEP “Edmund Husserl”; E. Husserl, “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano”, in O. Kraus, Franz Brentano (1919)

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    Franz Brentano › 1838–1917

Tout afficher (10)Afficher moins
  • Hermann Lotze

    influencé par

    Husserl took up Lotze’s early opposition to psychologism and his separation of validity from mental acts. SEP “Hermann Lotze” (D. Sullivan), §§4.2–4.3

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Hermann Lotze › 1817–1881

  • Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk

    influencé par

    Masaryk, whom Husserl met in Leipzig (1876), advised him to study with Brentano in Vienna (1884–86) and influenced his turn to Christianity (baptism 1886). K. Schuhmann, Husserl-Chronik (1977); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk › 1850–1937

  • Christian von Ehrenfels

    influencé par

    In Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891) Husserl related his ‘figural moments’, the unitary character of sensory groups, to Ehrenfels’s Gestalt qualities, published the year before (1890). E. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik (1891); C. von Ehrenfels, “Über Gestaltqualitäten”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1890); SEP “Christian von Ehrenfels”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Christian von Ehrenfels › 1859–1932

  • Kazimierz Twardowski

    influencé par

    Husserl answered Twardowski’s distinction of content and object (1894) in the manuscript ‘Intentionale Gegenstände’ (1894; publ. 1979), rejecting immanent objects, a step toward the Logical Investigations (1900–01). K. Twardowski, Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen (1894); E. Husserl, “Intentionale Gegenstände” (1894; publ. 1979); SEP “Kazimierz Twardowski”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Kazimierz Twardowski › 1866–1938

A influencé 27

  • Rudolf Carnap

    a influencé ✓

    Carnap grounded intuitive space on Husserl’s eidetic intuition (Wesensschau) in his dissertation (Der Raum, 1922) and attended Husserl’s seminars in Freiburg (1924–25). R. Carnap, Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre (1922); SEP “Rudolf Carnap”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Rudolf Carnap › 1891–1970

  • Hans-Georg Gadamer

    a influencé ✓

    Gadamer took over Husserl’s concepts of horizon and lifeworld, grounding understanding in a world always already shared rather than in a constituting consciousness (Truth and Method, 1960). H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (1960); E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften (1936; 1954); SEP “Hans-Georg Gadamer”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Hans-Georg Gadamer › 1900–2002

  • Jean-Paul Sartre

    a influencé ✓

    After studying Husserl in Berlin (1933–34), Sartre adopted intentionality but rejected the transcendental ego as superfluous in The Transcendence of the Ego (1936–37). J.-P. Sartre, La Transcendance de l’Ego (1936–37); “Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl: l’intentionnalité” (1939); SEP “Jean-Paul Sartre”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Jean-Paul Sartre › 1905–1980

  • Emmanuel Levinas a enseigné à

    a enseigné à

    Levinas spent 1928–29 in Freiburg to study with Husserl, wrote the first French book on his phenomenology (La théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, 1930) and co-translated the Cartesian Meditations (1931). SEP “Emmanuel Levinas”

    Attestation: aussi dans InPhO · InPhO

    Emmanuel Levinas › 1906–1995

  • Simone de Beauvoir

    a influencé

    S. Heinämaa reads The Second Sex (1949) as a phenomenological work in Husserl’s sense, describing woman’s lived body and experience rather than explaining them causally. S. Heinämaa, Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir (2003); S. de Beauvoir, Le Deuxième Sexe (1949)

    Attestation: aussi dans InPhO · InPhO

    Simone de Beauvoir › 1908–1986

  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty

    a influencé ✓

    Merleau-Ponty took up Husserl’s themes of lifeworld and lived body, studied in the Louvain archives (1939), and concluded that the reduction is never complete (Phenomenology of Perception, 1945). M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (1945), preface; “Le philosophe et son ombre” (1959), in Signes (1960); H. L. Van Breda, “Merleau-Ponty et les Archives-Husserl à Louvain” (1962); SEP “Maurice Merleau-Ponty”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Maurice Merleau-Ponty › 1908–1961

Tout afficher (27)Afficher moins
  • Max Scheler

    a influencé ✓

    Scheler, who met Husserl in 1901, applied the phenomenological intuition of essences to values in a material ethics of value (Der Formalismus in der Ethik, 1913–16). M. Scheler, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik (1913–16), in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung; SEP “Max Scheler”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Max Scheler › 1874–1928

  • José Ortega y Gasset

    a influencé

    Ortega took up Husserl’s phenomenology in 1913 (‘On the Concept of Sensation’) but soon moved beyond it to a philosophy of life (Meditations on Quixote, 1914). J. Ortega y Gasset, “Sobre el concepto de sensación” (1913); Meditaciones del Quijote (1914); SEP “José Ortega y Gasset”

    Attestation: aussi dans InPhO · InPhO

    José Ortega y Gasset › 1883–1955

  • Hajime Tanabe a enseigné à

    a enseigné à

    Tanabe studied with Husserl in Freiburg in 1922–23, after a stay with Riehl in Berlin; there he also met the young Heidegger and Oskar Becker. SEP “The Kyoto School” (B. W. Davis); J. W. Heisig, Philosophers of Nothingness (2001)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Hajime Tanabe › 1885–1962

  • Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz a enseigné à

    a enseigné à

    After his doctorate Ajdukiewicz spent the academic year 1913/14 in Göttingen, attending Husserl’s lectures in philosophy (and Hilbert’s in mathematics); a short period of study, not a lasting teaching relation. Archiwum PAN, inventory III-141 (Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz); Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań, biographical sketch of K. Ajdukiewicz

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz › 1890–1963

  • Edith Stein a enseigné à

    a enseigné à ✓

    Stein studied with Husserl in Göttingen from 1913, took her doctorate under him in Freiburg in 1916 with a thesis on empathy and was his first paid assistant from October 1916 to February 1918, transcribing and editing his manuscripts. SEP “Edith Stein”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Edith Stein › 1891–1942

  • Herbert Marcuse a enseigné à

    a enseigné à

    In his second period in Freiburg (1928–32) Marcuse studied with Husserl as well as with Heidegger, though Heidegger was his main teacher; he had already taken his doctorate there in 1922, in German literature. SEP “Herbert Marcuse”; D. Kellner, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism (1984)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Herbert Marcuse › 1898–1979

  • Xavier Zubiri

    a influencé

    Zubiri’s dissertation, Ensayo de una teoría fenomenológica del juicio (1923), developed Husserl’s theory of judgement; he later heard Husserl in Freiburg (1928–30). X. Zubiri, Ensayo de una teoría fenomenológica del juicio (1923); Sobre la esencia (1962)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Xavier Zubiri › 1898–1983

  • Alfred Schütz

    a influencé

    Schutz used Husserl’s constitutive phenomenology to clarify Weber’s ‘subjective meaning’, describing how meaning is built up in consciousness and how we understand others; Husserl admired the book (1932). A. Schütz, Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt (1932); SEP “Alfred Schutz”; SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Alfred Schütz › 1899–1959

  • José Gaos

    a influencé

    Gaos took his doctorate on Husserl’s critique of psychologism and translated the Logical Investigations with Manuel García Morente (Investigaciones lógicas, 1929). E. Husserl, Investigaciones lógicas, trans. M. García Morente and J. Gaos (1929); J. Gaos, La crítica del psicologismo en Husserl (doctoral thesis)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    José Gaos › 1900–1969

  • Gilbert Ryle

    a influencé

    Ryle studied Husserl’s Logical Investigations in the 1920s, lectured on Brentano, Meinong and Husserl, and read phenomenology as a form of conceptual analysis (‘Phenomenology’, 1932). G. Ryle, “Phenomenology”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 11 (1932); “Autobiographical”, in O. P. Wood and G. Pitcher (eds.), Ryle (1970); SEP “Gilbert Ryle”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Gilbert Ryle › 1900–1976

  • Hans Jonas a enseigné à

    a enseigné à ✓

    Jonas began his studies in Freiburg in 1921, where he attended Husserl’s seminars and met the young Heidegger; a short period before his years with Heidegger in Marburg. H. Jonas, Erinnerungen (2003)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Hans Jonas › 1903–1993

  • Kurt Gödel

    a influencé

    Gödel studied Husserl from 1959 and proposed phenomenology as a method for clarifying the meaning of mathematical concepts and intuition (draft, 1961; publ. 1995). K. Gödel, “The Modern Development of the Foundations of Mathematics in the Light of Philosophy” (1961), in Collected Works III (1995); SEP “Kurt Gödel”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Kurt Gödel › 1906–1978

  • Jan Patočka a enseigné à

    a enseigné à ✓

    Patočka met Husserl at his Paris lectures in 1929 and studied with him in Freiburg in 1933. E. Kohák, Jan Patočka: Philosophy and Selected Writings (1989), introduction

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Jan Patočka › 1907–1977

  • Paul Ricœur

    a influencé

    As a prisoner of war Ricœur translated Husserl’s Ideas I (publ. 1950) and set out his philosophy as a phenomenology of the will (Le volontaire et l’involontaire, 1950). E. Husserl, Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie, trans. P. Ricœur (1950); P. Ricœur, Philosophie de la volonté I: Le volontaire et l’involontaire (1950); SEP “Paul Ricoeur”

    Attestation: aussi dans InPhO · InPhO

    Paul Ricœur › 1913–2005

  • Harold Garfinkel

    a influencé

    Garfinkel drew on Husserl’s natural attitude, also via Schutz and Gurwitsch, to ask how members produce the taken-for-granted order of everyday life (Studies in Ethnomethodology, 1967). H. Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967); The Perception of the Other (diss., Harvard, 1952); J. Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1984); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Harold Garfinkel › 1917–2011

  • Thomas Luckmann

    a influencé ✓

    Luckmann continued Husserl’s analysis of the life-world in completing Schutz’s Structures of the Life-World (1975, 1984) and treated phenomenology as a ‘protosociology’ underlying social science. A. Schütz and T. Luckmann, Strukturen der Lebenswelt (1975, 1984); T. Luckmann, “Philosophie, Sozialwissenschaft und Alltagsleben” (1973); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    Thomas Luckmann › 1927–2016

  • Niklas Luhmann

    a influencé ✓

    Luhmann took Husserl’s analysis of meaning, an actual given against a horizon of possibilities, as the basic concept of his systems theory (‘Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie’, 1971). N. Luhmann, “Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie”, in J. Habermas and N. Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie (1971); Soziale Systeme (1984); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    Niklas Luhmann › 1927–1998

  • J. N. Mohanty

    a influencé

    Mohanty defended Husserl’s theory of meaning – meanings as ideal entities intended by consciousness, not psychological events – in Edmund Husserl’s Theory of Meaning (1964). J. N. Mohanty, Edmund Husserl’s Theory of Meaning (1964); The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl (2008)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    J. N. Mohanty › 1928–2023

  • Hassan Hanafi

    a influencé

    Hanafi read Husserl in Paris and in his thesis (1966) applied phenomenology to Islamic legal theory (usul al-fiqh), reading it as a method of understanding grounded in consciousness. H. Hanafi, Les Méthodes d’exégèse: essai sur la science des fondements de la compréhension, ilm usul al-fiqh (thesis, Paris, 1966); L’Exégèse de la phénoménologie

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Hassan Hanafi › 1935–2021

  • Paulin Hountondji

    a influencé

    Hountondji, whose doctorate treated Husserl’s idea of science (1970), drew on it in demanding that philosophy be explicit critical enquiry, not a collective worldview (1976). P. J. Hountondji, Sur la « philosophie africaine » (1976); The Struggle for Meaning: Reflections on Philosophy, Culture, and Democracy in Africa (1997; Eng. 2002)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Paulin Hountondji › 1942–2024

  • Lewis Gordon

    a influencé

    Gordon’s Fanon and the Crisis of European Man (1995) takes up Husserl’s diagnosis of a crisis of the European sciences and of European humanity and reads Fanon as a philosopher of the human sciences who exposes that crisis from the standpoint of the colonised. L. R. Gordon, Fanon and the Crisis of European Man: An Essay on Philosophy and the Human Sciences (1995); E. Husserl, Vienna lecture (1935) and Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften (1936)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Lewis Gordon › né(e) en 1962

Critique

Critiques reçues de 6

  • Gottlob Frege influencé par

    influencé par contesté ✓

    Husserl discussed Frege’s Grundlagen in Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891); whether Frege’s critical review (1894) prompted his turn against psychologism in the Logical Investigations (1900–01) is disputed. G. Frege, review of E. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103 (1894); D. Føllesdal, Husserl und Frege (1958); J. N. Mohanty, Husserl and Frege (1982); SEP “Edmund Husserl”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    critiqué par

    In his 1894 review of Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891) Frege charged it with psychologism, confusing subjective presentations with objective concepts and numbers. G. Frege, review of E. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik I, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103 (1894), 313–332

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Gottlob Frege › 1848–1925

  • Léon Chestov

    critiqué par

    In ‘Memento mori’ (1917), Shestov attacked Husserl’s ideal of philosophy as rigorous science, objecting that his self-evident truths of reason silence the questions of human existence. L. Shestov, “Memento mori” (1917), in Potestas clavium (1923); “In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl” (1938)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Léon Chestov › 1866–1938

  • Martin Heidegger a enseigné à

    a enseigné à ✓

    Heidegger had habilitated under Rickert, but after Husserl came to Freiburg in 1916 he worked closely with him and was his assistant from 1919 to 1923, holding seminars with him; Husserl backed his call to Marburg and his succession to the Freiburg chair (1928). SEP “Martin Heidegger”; T. Kisiel, The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time (1993)

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    critiqué par

    Heidegger objected that Husserl never asks about the being of the intentional, of consciousness itself, and turned to Dasein instead (Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, 1925, §§ 10–13). M. Heidegger, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (lectures 1925; GA 20), §§ 10–13; SEP “Martin Heidegger”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Martin Heidegger › 1889–1976

  • Roman Ingarden a enseigné à

    a enseigné à

    With Twardowski’s support Ingarden went to Göttingen in 1912 to study with Husserl, followed him to Freiburg and took his doctorate there in 1918, with Husserl as director, on intuition and intellect in Bergson. SEP “Roman Ingarden”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    critiqué par

    Ingarden rejected the transcendental idealism of Husserl’s Ideas I (1913) and defended the independent existence of the real world (Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, 1947–48). R. Ingarden, Spór o istnienie świata (1947–48; German: Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, 1964–65); SEP “Roman Ingarden”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Roman Ingarden › 1893–1970

  • Theodor W. Adorno

    critiqué par

    In Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie (1956) Adorno read Husserl’s phenomenology as a last attempt at first philosophy, whose search for an absolute origin ends in idealism. T. W. Adorno, Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Studien über Husserl und die phänomenologischen Antinomien (1956), Introduction

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Theodor W. Adorno › 1903–1969

  • Jacques Derrida a influencé

    a influencé ✓

    Derrida began with Husserl: a thesis on genesis in his philosophy (1953–54; publ. 1990) and a translation with long introduction of The Origin of Geometry (1962). J. Derrida, Le problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl (written 1953–54; publ. 1990); E. Husserl, L’origine de la géométrie, trans. and intro. J. Derrida (1962); SEP “Jacques Derrida”

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    critiqué par

    In Voice and Phenomenon (1967) Derrida argued that Husserl’s theory of meaning rests on a metaphysics of presence, privileging the voice and the living present over the sign. J. Derrida, La voix et le phénomène (1967); Introduction to E. Husserl, L’origine de la géométrie (1962); SEP “Jacques Derrida”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004

Critiques adressées à 3

  • John Stuart Mill

    a critiqué

    In the Prolegomena to the Logical Investigations (1900) Husserl rejected Mill’s psychologism, which treats the laws of logic, including non-contradiction, as empirical generalisations about thinking. E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen I: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik (1900), chs. 3–5; SEP “Psychologism”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    John Stuart Mill › 1806–1873

  • Wilhelm Wundt élève de

    élève de ✓

    Husserl heard Wundt among his philosophy teachers in Leipzig in 1876–78. SEP “Edmund Husserl” (D. Zahavi), §1

    Attestation: aussi dans Wikidata · Wikidata

    a critiqué

    In the Logical Investigations Husserl charged Wundt’s logic with an extreme psychologism. SEP “Wilhelm Wundt” (A. Kim), §7.2 (Husserl 1901)

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Wilhelm Wundt › 1832–1920

  • Wilhelm Dilthey

    a critiqué

    Husserl’s ‘Philosophy as Rigorous Science’ (1911) attacked historicism and worldview philosophy as leading to sceptical relativism; Dilthey felt targeted, and the two exchanged letters. E. Husserl, “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft”, Logos 1 (1911); Dilthey–Husserl correspondence, June–July 1911; SEP “Wilhelm Dilthey”

    Attestation: brouillon IA

    Wilhelm Dilthey › 1833–1911

Œuvres

Position

Husserl fonda la phénoménologie comme science rigoureuse de l’expérience : « retour aux choses mêmes ». Au lieu de spéculer sur ce qui se trouve derrière les apparences, la philosophie doit décrire comment les choses se montrent à la conscience. Pour ce faire, il pratiquait l’épochè – la suspension de notre croyance naturelle en l’existence du monde – afin d’étudier les actes intentionnels par lesquels le sens se constitue. Contre le psychologisme, il défendit l’indépendance de la logique à l’égard de la psychologie empirique. Dans son œuvre tardive, il décrivit le monde de la vie, le monde préscientifique de l’expérience quotidienne que les sciences mathématisées ont oublié. Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas et bien d’autres sont partis de sa méthode.

Vie et contexte

Né en Moravie, Husserl étudia d’abord les mathématiques, avant que les cours de Brentano à Vienne ne le gagnent à la philosophie. Il enseigna à Halle, à Göttingen et, à partir de 1916, à Fribourg, où Heidegger lui succéda. Sous les nazis, en tant que converti d’origine juive, il fut exclu de la vie universitaire. Après sa mort, ses vastes manuscrits furent sauvés à Louvain, en Belgique.

Apparaît dans

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

État en novembre 2026 · Sources · Améliorer cette page · Comment Agora est faite

Ouvrir dans la carte stellaire