جيرمي بنثام
الفعل الصحيح هو الذي يحقق أكبر سعادة لأكبر عدد – ويمكن قياس اللذة والألم ومقارنتهما.
التموضع
مؤسس النفعية الكلاسيكية: أكبر قدر من السعادة لأكبر عدد هو مقياس القانون والأخلاق.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- مبدأ المنفعة
- حساب اللذة
- البانوبتيكون
التلاميذ: جون ستيوارت مل
التأثير
تأثّر بـ 2
ديفيد هيوم
تأثّر بـ
On reading Hume’s Treatise, Bentham felt ‘as if scales had fallen’ from his eyes: utility was the test of virtue (A Fragment on Government, 1776). J. Bentham, A Fragment on Government (1776); D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Book III (1740); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
ديفيد هيوم › 1711–1776
سيزاري بيكاريا
تأثّر بـ
Bentham took up Beccaria’s formula of ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’ and his case for proportionate punishment (Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1789). C. Beccaria, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764); J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); H. L. A. Hart, “Bentham and Beccaria”, in Essays on Bentham (1982)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
سيزاري بيكاريا › 1738–1794
أثّر في 4
جون ستيوارت مل علّم
علّم ✓
Mill was taught by his father James Mill, not by Bentham, but grew up in Bentham’s circle; he called his reading of Bentham’s Traités de législation (ed. Dumont) in 1821–22 an epoch in his life and in 1825–27 edited Bentham’s Rationale of Judicial Evidence. A mentorship rather than formal teaching. J. S. Mill, Autobiography (1873), chs. 3–4
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في Wikidata · Wikidata
جون ستيوارت مل › 1806–1873
هنري سيدجويك
أثّر في
Sidgwick took Bentham’s utilitarianism, with its impartial count of everyone’s happiness, as one of the three methods he examined in The Methods of Ethics (1874). H. Sidgwick, The Methods of Ethics (1874); Outlines of the History of Ethics (1886); SEP “Henry Sidgwick”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
هنري سيدجويك › 1838–1900
ليانغ تشي تشاو
أثّر في
In 1902 Liang introduced Bentham’s utilitarianism to Chinese readers in Xinmin congbao (“The Doctrine of Bentham, Master of Utilitarianism”), reworking it rather than simply adopting it. Liang Qichao, “Leli zhuyi taidou Bianqin zhi xueshuo”, Xinmin congbao (1902)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
ليانغ تشي تشاو › 1873–1929
بيتر سنجر
أثّر في
Singer made Bentham’s question ‘Can they suffer?’ and the maxim, ascribed to Bentham, that each counts for one the basis of equal consideration for animals (Animal Liberation, 1975). P. Singer, Animal Liberation (1975); J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”; SEP “The Moral Status of Animals”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
بيتر سنجر › وُلد 1946
النقد
انتقده 3
هربرت سبنسر
انتقده
Spencer objected that Bentham’s greatest-happiness principle gives no guidance, since happiness is undefinable, and put the law of equal freedom in its place (Social Statics, 1851). H. Spencer, Social Statics (1851), Introduction (“The Doctrine of Expediency”), ch. 4
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
هربرت سبنسر › 1820–1903
جون رولز
انتقده
Rawls objected that Bentham’s classical utilitarianism applies one person’s principle of choice to society and ‘does not take seriously the distinction between persons’ (A Theory of Justice, 1971). J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971), §§ 5–6, 30
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
جون رولز › 1921–2002
بيرنارد وليمز
انتقده
Williams argued that utilitarianism as founded by Bentham sums welfare impersonally and leaves no room for agents’ own projects and integrity (Utilitarianism: For and Against, 1973). B. Williams, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, in J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (1973); Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985), ch. 5
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
بيرنارد وليمز › 1929–2003
ينتقد 1
جون لوك تأثّر بـ
تأثّر بـ
Building on the empiricist psychology of Locke and Hume, Bentham took pleasure and pain as the ultimate motives and measures of action (Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1789). J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); J. Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1689); IEP “Jeremy Bentham”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
انتقد
Bentham dismissed the original contract as a fiction (against Blackstone, 1776) and natural rights as ‘nonsense upon stilts’ (against the French Declaration), both central to Locke. J. Bentham, A Fragment on Government (1776), ch. I §§36–48; Nonsense upon Stilts (written c. 1795); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
جون لوك › 1632–1704
الأعمال
الألم واللذة سيدان مطلقان – مبدأ المنفعة.
- 1791البانوبتيكون
تصميم سجن يمكن فيه مراقبة كل فرد في أي وقت.
الموقف
Bentham held that nature has placed mankind under two masters, pain and pleasure. The principle of utility follows: actions and laws are right insofar as they produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Pleasures and pains can in principle be measured by intensity, duration, certainty and other dimensions, in a “felicific calculus”. On this basis Bentham criticised traditional law, called natural rights “nonsense upon stilts” and advocated reforms of the penal system, democracy, legal codification and animal welfare. His design for the Panopticon prison later became a symbol of surveillance through Foucault. He founded classical utilitarianism, refined by his pupil John Stuart Mill.
الحياة والسياق
Born in London in 1748, Bentham entered Oxford at twelve and trained as a lawyer but never practised; he devoted his life to reforming law and institutions. Financially independent, he wrote enormous quantities of manuscripts and gathered reformers such as James Mill around him. His ideas shaped the spirit of University College London, where his preserved body is still displayed. He died in 1832.
أعمال رئيسة أخرى
- A Fragment on Government (1776)
- An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789)
- Panopticon (1791)
- Constitutional Code (1830)
يرد في
- رحلة «ما العادل؟» · المحطة 6 من 10
- نقاش «الحيوانات والتربية الصناعية»
- نقاش «حقوق للحيوانات؟»
- نقاش «التجارب على الحيوانات»
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora