Jeremy Bentham
The right action is the one that brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number – and pleasure and pain can be measured and compared.
Placement
Founder of classical utilitarianism: the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the measure of law and morality.
Key ideas
- Principle of utility
- Hedonic calculus
- Panopticon
Students: John Stuart Mill
Influence
Influenced by 2
David Hume
influenced by
On reading Hume’s Treatise, Bentham felt ‘as if scales had fallen’ from his eyes: utility was the test of virtue (A Fragment on Government, 1776). J. Bentham, A Fragment on Government (1776); D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Book III (1740); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
David Hume › 1711–1776
Cesare Beccaria
influenced by
Bentham took up Beccaria’s formula of ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’ and his case for proportionate punishment (Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1789). C. Beccaria, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764); J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); H. L. A. Hart, “Bentham and Beccaria”, in Essays on Bentham (1982)
Evidence: AI draft
Cesare Beccaria › 1738–1794
Influenced 4
John Stuart Mill taught
taught ✓
Mill was taught by his father James Mill, not by Bentham, but grew up in Bentham’s circle; he called his reading of Bentham’s Traités de législation (ed. Dumont) in 1821–22 an epoch in his life and in 1825–27 edited Bentham’s Rationale of Judicial Evidence. A mentorship rather than formal teaching. J. S. Mill, Autobiography (1873), chs. 3–4
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
John Stuart Mill › 1806–1873
Henry Sidgwick
influenced
Sidgwick took Bentham’s utilitarianism, with its impartial count of everyone’s happiness, as one of the three methods he examined in The Methods of Ethics (1874). H. Sidgwick, The Methods of Ethics (1874); Outlines of the History of Ethics (1886); SEP “Henry Sidgwick”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Henry Sidgwick › 1838–1900
Liang Qichao
influenced
In 1902 Liang introduced Bentham’s utilitarianism to Chinese readers in Xinmin congbao (“The Doctrine of Bentham, Master of Utilitarianism”), reworking it rather than simply adopting it. Liang Qichao, “Leli zhuyi taidou Bianqin zhi xueshuo”, Xinmin congbao (1902)
Evidence: AI draft
Liang Qichao › 1873–1929
Peter Singer
influenced
Singer made Bentham’s question ‘Can they suffer?’ and the maxim, ascribed to Bentham, that each counts for one the basis of equal consideration for animals (Animal Liberation, 1975). P. Singer, Animal Liberation (1975); J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”; SEP “The Moral Status of Animals”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Peter Singer › b. 1946
Criticism
Criticized by 3
Herbert Spencer
criticised by
Spencer objected that Bentham’s greatest-happiness principle gives no guidance, since happiness is undefinable, and put the law of equal freedom in its place (Social Statics, 1851). H. Spencer, Social Statics (1851), Introduction (“The Doctrine of Expediency”), ch. 4
Evidence: AI draft
Herbert Spencer › 1820–1903
John Rawls
criticised by
Rawls objected that Bentham’s classical utilitarianism applies one person’s principle of choice to society and ‘does not take seriously the distinction between persons’ (A Theory of Justice, 1971). J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971), §§ 5–6, 30
Evidence: AI draft
John Rawls › 1921–2002
Bernard Williams
criticised by
Williams argued that utilitarianism as founded by Bentham sums welfare impersonally and leaves no room for agents’ own projects and integrity (Utilitarianism: For and Against, 1973). B. Williams, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, in J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (1973); Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985), ch. 5
Evidence: AI draft
Bernard Williams › 1929–2003
Criticizes 1
John Locke influenced by
influenced by
Building on the empiricist psychology of Locke and Hume, Bentham took pleasure and pain as the ultimate motives and measures of action (Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1789). J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789); J. Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1689); IEP “Jeremy Bentham”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
criticised
Bentham dismissed the original contract as a fiction (against Blackstone, 1776) and natural rights as ‘nonsense upon stilts’ (against the French Declaration), both central to Locke. J. Bentham, A Fragment on Government (1776), ch. I §§36–48; Nonsense upon Stilts (written c. 1795); SEP “Jeremy Bentham”
Evidence: AI draft
John Locke › 1632–1704
Works
Pain and pleasure as sovereign masters – the principle of utility.
- 1791Panopticon
Design for a prison in which everyone could be watched at any time.
Position
Bentham held that nature has placed mankind under two masters, pain and pleasure. The principle of utility follows: actions and laws are right insofar as they produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Pleasures and pains can in principle be measured by intensity, duration, certainty and other dimensions, in a “felicific calculus”. On this basis Bentham criticised traditional law, called natural rights “nonsense upon stilts” and advocated reforms of the penal system, democracy, legal codification and animal welfare. His design for the Panopticon prison later became a symbol of surveillance through Foucault. He founded classical utilitarianism, refined by his pupil John Stuart Mill.
Life & context
Born in London in 1748, Bentham entered Oxford at twelve and trained as a lawyer but never practised; he devoted his life to reforming law and institutions. Financially independent, he wrote enormous quantities of manuscripts and gathered reformers such as James Mill around him. His ideas shaped the spirit of University College London, where his preserved body is still displayed. He died in 1832.
Further main works
- A Fragment on Government (1776)
- Constitutional Code (1830)
Appears in
- Journey ‘What Is Just?’ · Stop 6 of 10
- Debate ‘Animals and Factory Farming’
- Debate ‘Rights for Animals?’
- Debate ‘Animal Experiments’
As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made