龙树
没有任何事物具有固定的、独立的自性——一切都只在与其他事物的关系中存在,就连这种空本身也不是一个东西。
定位
中观学派:一切事物都没有自性,是空(shunyata)的——连空本身也是空。
核心思想
- 空性(shunyata)
- 二谛
- 四句(四重否定)
影响
受影响于 1
乔达摩·悉达多(佛陀)
受其影响
Nagarjuna’s Root Verses on the Middle Way open by praising the Buddha for teaching dependent origination, which Nagarjuna reads as the emptiness of intrinsic nature. Nagarjuna, Mulamadhyamakakarika, tr. J. L. Garfield, The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (1995); SEP “Nagarjuna”
依据: AI 草稿
乔达摩·悉达多(佛陀) › 约公元前480—前400年年 · 通行断代 公元前563—前483年
影响了 14
世亲
影响了
Vasubandhu’s Yogacara reinterprets the Mahayana emptiness taught by Nagarjuna through the doctrine of three natures; whether Vasubandhu drew on Nagarjuna’s own works is uncertain. Vasubandhu, Trisvabhavanirdesa; SEP “Vasubandhu”
依据: AI 草稿
世亲 › 约350–430年
慧能
影响了
The Platform Sutra ascribed to Huineng counts Nagarjuna among the Indian patriarchs and teaches the middle way by pairing opposites so that neither side is clung to. Platform Sutra (Dunhuang version), tr. P. Yampolsky, The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch (1967)
依据: AI 草稿
慧能 › 相传 638–713
法藏
影响了
Fazang commented on the Twelve Gate Treatise ascribed to Nagarjuna and, in his five-teaching scheme, ranked emptiness teaching as elementary Mahayana below Huayan’s perfect teaching. Fazang, Shiermen lun zongzhi yiji; Huayan wujiao zhang; F. H. Cook, Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra (1977)
依据: AI 草稿
法藏 › 643–712
道元
影响了
In the fascicle ‘Buddha-nature’ (Busshō) of the Shōbōgenzō Dōgen discusses Nagarjuna, fourteenth Indian ancestor of the Zen lineage, whose body appeared as the round moon of Buddha-nature. Dōgen, Shōbōgenzō, Busshō; SEP “Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy”
依据: AI 草稿
道元 › 1200–1253
卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯
影响了
Jaspers devoted a chapter of The Great Philosophers (1957) to Nagarjuna, alongside Laozi among the metaphysicians whose thinking springs from the origin. K. Jaspers, Die großen Philosophen I (1957), “Aus dem Ursprung denkende Metaphysiker”
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯 › 1883–1969
显示全部 (14)收起
智顗
影响了
From Nagarjuna’s verse equating dependent arising with emptiness, provisional designation and the middle way Zhiyi developed the threefold truth (Mohe zhiguan, 594). Zhiyi, Mohe zhiguan (594); Nagarjuna, Mulamadhyamakakarika, Chinese tr. Kumarajiva (Zhonglun); SEP “Tiantai Buddhism”
依据: AI 草稿
智顗 › 538–597
元晓
影响了
In his commentary on the Awakening of Faith Wonhyo held that Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka negates without affirming, Yogacara affirms without negating, and the Awakening of Faith does both. Wonhyo, Daeseung gisillon so; Daeseung gisillon byeolgi; A. C. Muller (ed.), Wonhyo: Selected Works (Collected Works of Korean Buddhism 1, 2012)
依据: AI 草稿
元晓 › 617–686
寂天
影响了
The wisdom chapter of Shantideva’s Guide to the Bodhisattva’s Way of Life (Bodhicaryavatara) defends Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka against Yogacara and other schools. Santideva, Bodhicaryavatara, tr. K. Crosby & A. Skilton (1995)
依据: AI 草稿
寂天 › 约685–763年
寂护
影响了
Shantarakshita’s Ornament of the Middle Way argues with Nagarjuna that nothing has intrinsic nature, since nothing is truly one or many, while accepting Yogacara conventionally. Santaraksita, Madhyamakalamkara, tr. J. Blumenthal, The Ornament of the Middle Way (2004); SEP “Śāntarakṣita”
依据: AI 草稿
寂护 › 约725–788年
空海
影响了
Kūkai counted Nagarjuna as third patriarch of esoteric Buddhism, who by legend received it in an iron stupa in South India (Record of the Transmission, 821). Kūkai, Himitsu mandara kyō fuhōden (821); R. Abé, The Weaving of Mantra: Kūkai and the Construction of Esoteric Buddhist Discourse (1999)
依据: AI 草稿
空海 › 774–835
阿底峡
影响了
Atisha placed Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka view of emptiness at the summit of the path and taught it in Tibet, in the reading of Chandrakirti. Atisha, Bodhipathapradipa, tr. R. Sherburne, A Lamp for the Path and Commentary (1983); Satyadvayavatara, tr. C. Lindtner (1981)
依据: AI 草稿
阿底峡 › 约982–1054年
亲鸾
影响了
Shinran honoured Nagarjuna as first of seven Pure Land masters and took from the ‘Chapter on Easy Practice’ ascribed to him the easy path of calling Amida’s name. Shinran, Kyōgyōshinshō, Shōshinge; D. Hirota et al. (tr.), The Collected Works of Shinran (1997)
依据: AI 草稿
亲鸾 › 1173–1263
宗喀巴
影响了
Tsongkhapa commented on Nagarjuna’s Root Verses in Ocean of Reasoning and insisted that emptiness negates intrinsic nature, not the conventional existence of things. Tsongkhapa, Ocean of Reasoning, tr. Geshe Ngawang Samten & J. L. Garfield (2006)
依据: AI 草稿
宗喀巴 › 1357–1419
批评
受批评于 1
商羯罗
受其批评
Shankara dismissed the Madhyamaka doctrine that everything is empty as contradicted by every means of knowledge and not worth detailed refutation (Brahmasutrabhashya II.2.31). Śaṅkara, Brahmasūtrabhāṣya II.2.31
依据: AI 草稿
商羯罗 › 约700–750年 · 通行断代 788–820
批评了 1
足目·乔达摩
批评了 存在争议
Nagarjuna asked what establishes the Nyaya means of knowledge themselves (Vigrahavyavartani 31–51); whether he knew the Nyaya-sutra in its present form is disputed. Nāgārjuna, Vigrahavyāvartanī 31–51, tr. J. Westerhoff, The Dispeller of Disputes, 2010; F. Tola & C. Dragonetti, Nāgārjuna’s Refutation of Logic, 1995
依据: AI 草稿
足目·乔达摩 › 约120–190年
作品
以辩证方式驳斥一切自性——空性即中道。
立场
Nagarjuna radicalised the Buddha’s teaching of dependent origination. If everything arises in dependence on other things, then nothing has svabhava – intrinsic, independent existence. All things are therefore “empty” (shunyata). Emptiness is not nothingness but the very fact of dependence, and emptiness itself is empty too. With sharp dialectical arguments he showed that every attempt to establish things as truly existing – causes, motion, a self – collapses into contradiction. He distinguished conventional from ultimate truth and taught that nirvana and samsara are not ultimately different. His thought is foundational for Tibetan, Chinese and Japanese Buddhism, Zen included.
生平与背景
Nagarjuna was an Indian Buddhist monk and philosopher who probably lived in the second century CE in southern India. Many legends grew up around his name, and later tradition attributed numerous works to him. He is revered as the founder of the Madhyamaka, the “school of the middle”, and in Tibetan and East Asian Buddhism as a “second Buddha”.
其他主要作品
- The Dispeller of Disputes (Vigrahavyāvartanī, c. 200 CE)
- Precious Garland (Ratnāvalī, c. 200 CE)
出现在
- 旅程 ‘亚洲与欧洲的对话’ · 第 3 站,共 11 站
- 旅程 ‘印度思想的诸条道路’ · 第 5 站,共 9 站
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的