Agora思想的公共广场

斯坦尼斯瓦夫·莱斯涅夫斯基

1886–1939

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

类可以理解为由其部分构成的整体,而不是抽象的集合;只要把“类”的这两种意义区分开来,罗素悖论就不会产生,逻辑也无需抽象对象。

定位

分析哲学 · 东欧 · 逻辑学, 形而上学

波兰逻辑学家,以三个自创的形式系统回应罗素悖论——原逻辑、本体论和部分论(关于部分与整体的理论),并坚持严格区分符号的使用与提及。

核心思想

  • 部分论(部分与整体)
  • 本体论与原逻辑
  • 唯名论
  • 使用与提及

老师: 卡齐米日·特瓦尔多夫斯基

学生: 阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 卡齐米日·特瓦尔多夫斯基 师从

    师从 ✓

    Leśniewski came to Lwów after studies in Germany, Switzerland and Russia, studied with Twardowski and took his doctorate under him in 1912 with a dissertation on the analysis of existential propositions. SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡齐米日·特瓦尔多夫斯基 › 1866–1938

  • 伯特兰·罗素

    受其影响

    Leśniewski traced Russell’s paradox to a confusion of distributive and collective classes and built mereology, a theory of collective classes, in response (Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości, 1916). S. Leśniewski, Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości I (1916); SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”; SEP “Mereology”

    依据: AI 草稿

    伯特兰·罗素 › 1872–1970

影响了 1

  • 阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基 教过

    教过

    Tarski took his doctorate in Warsaw in 1924 under Leśniewski’s supervision, with a thesis on the primitive term of logistic. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; A. B. Feferman & S. Feferman, Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic (2004)

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    阿尔弗雷德·塔斯基 › 1901–1983

作品

立场

Leśniewski wanted a logic free of the paradoxes and of what he regarded as the unclarities of “Principia Mathematica”. He built three systems on one another: protothetic, a propositional calculus with quantifiers over propositions and connectives; ontology, a calculus of names built on a single copula “is” (ε) that admits empty and general names; and mereology, a theory of collective classes in which a class is a whole made of its parts, not an abstract set. Russell’s paradox arises, he argued, because the distributive and the collective sense of “class” are confused. His nominalism admitted only concrete individuals, and he required that every formula be built by explicit rules, definitions included, and that using an expression be strictly distinguished from mentioning it. These standards shaped Tarski, whose analysis of the semantic paradoxes and of the concept of truth drew on them, and Kotarbiński’s reism. Mereology was developed further by Henry Leonard and Nelson Goodman (1940) and by Peter Simons (1987) and belongs today to the standard tools of formal ontology. His idiosyncratic notation, the few publications and the loss of his papers limited his reception.

生平与背景

Stanisław Leśniewski was born on 30 March 1886 in Serpukhov near Moscow, where his father, a Polish engineer, was working on the construction of a railway; he went to school in Irkutsk in Siberia. From 1904 he studied mathematics and philosophy at several universities in Germany and Switzerland, among them Leipzig, Zurich, Heidelberg and Munich, before moving to Lwów, where he took his doctorate under Kazimierz Twardowski in 1912 with a thesis on existential sentences. Łukasiewicz’s book on the principle of contradiction in Aristotle (1910) acquainted him with Russell’s paradox, which turned him from the philosophical analysis of language to the foundations of logic and mathematics. During the First World War he taught at Polish schools in Moscow, where his first account of mereology appeared in 1916. In 1919 he became professor of the philosophy of mathematics at the University of Warsaw, where he taught until his death; Alfred Tarski took his doctorate under him in 1924. From the 1920s Leśniewski supported the authoritarian rule of Józef Piłsudski, and from about 1930 his views took on an antisemitic tinge; a letter to Twardowski of 1935 voices it, together with a personal antipathy towards Tarski, whose candidacy for a chair in Lwów he had earlier supported (P. Simons, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). His systems were published only in part, above all in the series “On the Foundations of Mathematics” (1927–31). He died of cancer in Warsaw on 13 May 1939; most of his manuscripts were destroyed during the Warsaw Uprising of 1944.

其他主要作品

  • Contribution to the Analysis of Existential Propositions (Przyczynek do analizy zdań egzystencjalnych, 1911)
  • Foundations of the General Theory of Sets I (Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości I, 1916)
  • On the Foundations of Mathematics (O podstawach matematyki, 1927–31)
  • Outline of a New System of the Foundations of Mathematics (Grundzüge eines neuen Systems der Grundlagen der Mathematik, 1929)
  • On the Foundations of Ontology (Über die Grundlagen der Ontologie, 1930)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开