Benedetto Croce
Reality is spirit in four distinct forms – the beautiful, the true, the useful and the good; art is intuition that is already expression, and all true history is contemporary history, the story of liberty.
Placement
Philosopher, historian and critic in Naples who built a “philosophy of spirit” in four forms – the beautiful, the true, the useful and the good –, defined art as intuition and expression, and held that all true history is contemporary history; through his journal “La Critica” he shaped Italian culture for decades.
Key ideas
- Art as intuition and expression
- Four forms of spirit
- All history is contemporary history
- History as the story of liberty
Teachers: Antonio Labriola
Influence
Influenced by 3
Giambattista Vico
influenced by ✓
In The Philosophy of Giambattista Vico (1911) Croce made Vico a precursor of his historicism, having presented him in the Aesthetic (1902) as the discoverer of aesthetics. B. Croce, Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale (1902); La filosofia di Giambattista Vico (1911); SEP “Benedetto Croce”
Giambattista Vico › 1668–1744
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
influenced by ✓
In What Is Living and What Is Dead of Hegel’s Philosophy (1907) Croce limited the dialectic of opposites, adding a ‘nexus of distincts’ among the forms of spirit. B. Croce, Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel (1907); SEP “Benedetto Croce”
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831
Antonio Labriola studied with
studied with ✓
As a young man in Rome, living with his uncle Silvio Spaventa, Croce attended Labriola’s lectures on moral philosophy from 1884; in 1895 Labriola’s essays on historical materialism drew him into a study of Marx. B. Croce, Contributo alla critica di me stesso (written 1915)
Evidence: AI draft
Antonio Labriola › 1843–1904
Influenced 2
José Carlos Mariátegui
influenced
In Defence of Marxism (1928–29, ch. IV and VI) Mariátegui invoked Croce’s essays on historical materialism – the link between Hegel and Marx merely psychological, socialism grounded in a historical conception – against readings of Marxism as determinism and as a doctrine without ethics. J. C. Mariátegui, Defensa del marxismo (1928–29; book 1934), ch. IV “La filosofía moderna y el marxismo” and VI “Ética y socialismo”
Evidence: AI draft
José Carlos Mariátegui › 1894–1930
Hayden White
influenced
White, who came to Croce in Rome, wrote ‘The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History’ (1963) and read him as a philosopher of history in Metahistory (1973). H. White, “The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History”, Journal of Modern History 35 (1963); Metahistory (1973); H. Paul, Hayden White: The Historical Imagination (2011)
Evidence: AI draft
Hayden White › 1928–2018
Criticism
Criticized by 1
Antonio Gramsci influenced
influenced ✓
For Gramsci the philosophy of praxis had to do to Croce what Marx had done to Hegel, recasting Croce’s ethico-political history as a theory of hegemony (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Notebook 10 (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); letter to T. Schucht (1932)
criticised by
Gramsci called for an ‘Anti-Croce’: Croce’s ethico-political history is speculative and leaves out force and struggle, his Storia d’Europa (1932) starting only after 1815 (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Q. 10, part I (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975)
Evidence: AI draft
Antonio Gramsci › 1891–1937
Criticizes 3
Karl Marx
criticised
Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1
Evidence: AI draft
Karl Marx › 1818–1883
John Dewey
criticised
Croce found Dewey’s Art as Experience (1934) so close to his own idealist aesthetics that he suspected borrowing; Dewey denied this (Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1948). B. Croce, “Intorno all’estetica del Dewey”, La Critica 38 (1940) 348–353; Eng. “On the Aesthetics of Dewey”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (1948) 203–207; SEP “Dewey’s Aesthetics”
Evidence: AI draft
John Dewey › 1859–1952
Giovanni Gentile
criticised
In the anti-fascist intellectuals’ counter-manifesto (1925) Croce rejected Gentile’s fascist manifesto, its confusion of politics with scholarship and its claim that fascism was a new faith. B. Croce, “Una risposta di scrittori, professori e pubblicisti italiani al manifesto degli intellettuali del fascismo”, Il Mondo, 1 May 1925; G. Gentile, Manifesto degli intellettuali fascisti (21 Apr. 1925)
Evidence: AI draft
Giovanni Gentile › 1875–1944
Works
Defines art as intuition, which is the same as expression, separates it from concepts, utility and morality, and adds a history of aesthetics in which Vico appears as its discoverer.
Keeps Hegel’s dialectic of opposites but criticises his confusion of opposites with distinct forms of spirit and his philosophy of nature and of history.
Presents historical knowledge as the thought of the present about the past and liberty as the moral ideal that gives history its meaning.
Position
Croce is on the map as the central figure of Italian neo-idealism and, for half a century, of Italian culture. His philosophy of spirit distinguishes two theoretical forms, intuition and concept, and two practical ones, economic and ethical will; against Hegel he held that these are “distinct” forms, related as degrees, not opposites to be overcome in a dialectical synthesis. The “Aesthetic” of 1902 defined art as intuition identical with expression, independent of concepts, utility and morality, and presented Vico as the discoverer of aesthetics; it influenced R. G. Collingwood and literary criticism in Italy and beyond, and in 1948 Croce argued that Dewey’s aesthetics rested on idealist premises, which Dewey denied. In his theory of history Croce held that all true history is contemporary history, the thought of the present about the past, and later presented liberty as the moral ideal of history. Gramsci devoted a notebook to an “Anti-Croce” and criticised the speculative and politically moderate traits of this historicism. Croce interpreted fascism as a moral illness and an interruption of Italy’s liberal history; Piero Gobetti had seen it instead as the “autobiography of the nation”, and later historians have debated how far Croce’s reading spared the liberal elites who had helped fascism to power.
Life & context
Benedetto Croce was born on 25 February 1866 in Pescasseroli in the Abruzzi into a wealthy landowning family and grew up in Naples. In 1883 he lost his parents and his sister in the earthquake of Casamicciola on Ischia and was himself buried under the rubble for hours. He then lived in Rome with his uncle, the politician Silvio Spaventa, enrolled in law without taking a degree and attended Antonio Labriola’s lectures. Back in Naples from 1886, he lived as a private scholar on his own means and wrote first on the history and literature of Naples. In 1903 he founded the journal “La Critica”, in which Giovanni Gentile collaborated until 1922, and edited it until 1944. He became a senator in 1910 and was minister of public education in Giovanni Giolitti’s last government in 1920–21. In June 1924, after the murder of Giacomo Matteotti, he voted in the Senate for confidence in Mussolini’s government; on 1 May 1925 he published the manifesto of antifascist intellectuals in reply to Gentile and thereafter remained an opponent of the regime in Italy, watched by the police but tolerated. After 1943 he led the refounded Liberal Party, was a minister without portfolio in 1944 and sat in the Constituent Assembly. In 1946 he founded the Italian Institute for Historical Studies in Naples. He died in Naples on 20 November 1952.
Further main works
- Logic as the Science of the Pure Concept (Logica come scienza del concetto puro, 1909)
- Philosophy of the Practical (Filosofia della pratica. Economica ed etica, 1909)
- Theory and History of Historiography (Teoria e storia della storiografia, 1917)
As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made