Agora思想的公共广场

作品 · 德国唯心主义及其后继者

黑格尔哲学中的活东西和死东西

1907 · 作者: 贝内德托·克罗齐

保留黑格尔的对立面辩证法,但批评他把对立面与精神的不同形式相混淆,并批评他的自然哲学和历史哲学。

在星图中打开

简介

The study appeared in 1907; Douglas Ainslie’s English translation followed in 1915. Croce sets out to separate what remains valid in Hegel from what does not. Alive, for him, is the dialectic of opposites: the insight that reality is the synthesis of opposites such as being and nothing, or good and evil, and that the concept is at once concrete and universal. Dead is Hegel’s confusion of this dialectic with the relation between distinct concepts – art and philosophy, the useful and the good – which are not opposites to be overcome but degrees of spirit. From this confusion, Croce argues, follow the arbitrary constructions of Hegel’s philosophy of nature and philosophy of history and the attempt to deduce empirical facts. The essay became a key text of the Italian revision of Hegel; Gentile answered it with his own reform of the dialectic (1913).

联系

批评了

  • 逻辑学1812 · 格奥尔格·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔

贝内德托·克罗齐 的更多作品

截至 2026年11月 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开