बेनेदितो क्रोचे
यथार्थ चार भिन्न रूपों में आत्मा है – सुंदर, सत्य, उपयोगी और शुभ; कला वह अंतर्ज्ञान है जो पहले से अभिव्यक्ति है, और सारा सच्चा इतिहास समकालीन इतिहास है, स्वतंत्रता की कथा।
पृष्ठभूमि
नेपल्स के दार्शनिक, इतिहासकार और आलोचक जिन्होंने चार रूपों में “आत्मा का दर्शन” रचा – सुंदर, सत्य, उपयोगी और शुभ –, कला को अंतर्ज्ञान और अभिव्यक्ति के रूप में परिभाषित किया, और माना कि सारा सच्चा इतिहास समकालीन इतिहास है; अपनी पत्रिका “ला क्रिटिका” के ज़रिए उन्होंने दशकों तक इतालवी संस्कृति को आकार दिया।
मुख्य विचार
- अंतर्ज्ञान और अभिव्यक्ति के रूप में कला
- आत्मा के चार रूप
- सारा इतिहास समकालीन इतिहास है
- स्वतंत्रता की कथा के रूप में इतिहास
गुरु: अंतोनियो लाब्रिओला
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 3
जामबातिस्ता विको
जिनसे प्रभावित ✓
In The Philosophy of Giambattista Vico (1911) Croce made Vico a precursor of his historicism, having presented him in the Aesthetic (1902) as the discoverer of aesthetics. B. Croce, Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale (1902); La filosofia di Giambattista Vico (1911); SEP “Benedetto Croce”
जामबातिस्ता विको › 1668–1744
गेऑर्ग विल्हेल्म फ़्रीडरिश हेगल
जिनसे प्रभावित ✓
In What Is Living and What Is Dead of Hegel’s Philosophy (1907) Croce limited the dialectic of opposites, adding a ‘nexus of distincts’ among the forms of spirit. B. Croce, Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel (1907); SEP “Benedetto Croce”
गेऑर्ग विल्हेल्म फ़्रीडरिश हेगल › 1770–1831
अंतोनियो लाब्रिओला जिनसे पढ़ा
जिनसे पढ़ा ✓
As a young man in Rome, living with his uncle Silvio Spaventa, Croce attended Labriola’s lectures on moral philosophy from 1884; in 1895 Labriola’s essays on historical materialism drew him into a study of Marx. B. Croce, Contributo alla critica di me stesso (written 1915)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
अंतोनियो लाब्रिओला › 1843–1904
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 2
ख़ोसे कार्लोस मारियातेगी
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
In Defence of Marxism (1928–29, ch. IV and VI) Mariátegui invoked Croce’s essays on historical materialism – the link between Hegel and Marx merely psychological, socialism grounded in a historical conception – against readings of Marxism as determinism and as a doctrine without ethics. J. C. Mariátegui, Defensa del marxismo (1928–29; book 1934), ch. IV “La filosofía moderna y el marxismo” and VI “Ética y socialismo”
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
ख़ोसे कार्लोस मारियातेगी › 1894–1930
हेडन व्हाइट
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
White, who came to Croce in Rome, wrote ‘The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History’ (1963) and read him as a philosopher of history in Metahistory (1973). H. White, “The Abiding Relevance of Croce’s Idea of History”, Journal of Modern History 35 (1963); Metahistory (1973); H. Paul, Hayden White: The Historical Imagination (2011)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
हेडन व्हाइट › 1928–2018
आलोचना
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित 1
अंतोनियो ग्राम्शी जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया ✓
For Gramsci the philosophy of praxis had to do to Croce what Marx had done to Hegel, recasting Croce’s ethico-political history as a theory of hegemony (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Notebook 10 (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975); letter to T. Schucht (1932)
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित
Gramsci called for an ‘Anti-Croce’: Croce’s ethico-political history is speculative and leaves out force and struggle, his Storia d’Europa (1932) starting only after 1815 (Notebook 10). A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere, Q. 10, part I (1932–35), ed. V. Gerratana (1975)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
अंतोनियो ग्राम्शी › 1891–1937
जिनकी आलोचना की 3
कार्ल मार्क्स
जिनकी आलोचना की
Croce held that Marx’s historical materialism is no philosophy of history, only a canon of historical interpretation (Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica, 1900). B. Croce, Materialismo storico ed economia marxistica (1900), ch. 1
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
कार्ल मार्क्स › 1818–1883
जॉन डुई
जिनकी आलोचना की
Croce found Dewey’s Art as Experience (1934) so close to his own idealist aesthetics that he suspected borrowing; Dewey denied this (Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1948). B. Croce, “Intorno all’estetica del Dewey”, La Critica 38 (1940) 348–353; Eng. “On the Aesthetics of Dewey”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (1948) 203–207; SEP “Dewey’s Aesthetics”
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
जॉन डुई › 1859–1952
जोवान्नी जेंतीले
जिनकी आलोचना की
In the anti-fascist intellectuals’ counter-manifesto (1925) Croce rejected Gentile’s fascist manifesto, its confusion of politics with scholarship and its claim that fascism was a new faith. B. Croce, “Una risposta di scrittori, professori e pubblicisti italiani al manifesto degli intellettuali del fascismo”, Il Mondo, 1 May 1925; G. Gentile, Manifesto degli intellettuali fascisti (21 Apr. 1925)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
जोवान्नी जेंतीले › 1875–1944
कृतियाँ
कला को अंतर्ज्ञान के रूप में परिभाषित करता है, जो अभिव्यक्ति के समान है, उसे अवधारणाओं, उपयोगिता और नैतिकता से अलग करता है, और सौंदर्यशास्त्र का एक इतिहास जोड़ता है जिसमें विको उसके आविष्कर्ता के रूप में आते हैं।
हेगल के विरोधों के द्वंद्ववाद को रखता है पर विरोधों और आत्मा के भिन्न रूपों के उनके गड्ड-मड्ड और उनके प्रकृति-दर्शन तथा इतिहास-दर्शन की आलोचना करता है।
ऐतिहासिक ज्ञान को अतीत के बारे में वर्तमान के चिंतन के रूप में और स्वतंत्रता को उस नैतिक आदर्श के रूप में प्रस्तुत करता है जो इतिहास को अर्थ देता है।
मत
Croce is on the map as the central figure of Italian neo-idealism and, for half a century, of Italian culture. His philosophy of spirit distinguishes two theoretical forms, intuition and concept, and two practical ones, economic and ethical will; against Hegel he held that these are “distinct” forms, related as degrees, not opposites to be overcome in a dialectical synthesis. The “Aesthetic” of 1902 defined art as intuition identical with expression, independent of concepts, utility and morality, and presented Vico as the discoverer of aesthetics; it influenced R. G. Collingwood and literary criticism in Italy and beyond, and in 1948 Croce argued that Dewey’s aesthetics rested on idealist premises, which Dewey denied. In his theory of history Croce held that all true history is contemporary history, the thought of the present about the past, and later presented liberty as the moral ideal of history. Gramsci devoted a notebook to an “Anti-Croce” and criticised the speculative and politically moderate traits of this historicism. Croce interpreted fascism as a moral illness and an interruption of Italy’s liberal history; Piero Gobetti had seen it instead as the “autobiography of the nation”, and later historians have debated how far Croce’s reading spared the liberal elites who had helped fascism to power.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Benedetto Croce was born on 25 February 1866 in Pescasseroli in the Abruzzi into a wealthy landowning family and grew up in Naples. In 1883 he lost his parents and his sister in the earthquake of Casamicciola on Ischia and was himself buried under the rubble for hours. He then lived in Rome with his uncle, the politician Silvio Spaventa, enrolled in law without taking a degree and attended Antonio Labriola’s lectures. Back in Naples from 1886, he lived as a private scholar on his own means and wrote first on the history and literature of Naples. In 1903 he founded the journal “La Critica”, in which Giovanni Gentile collaborated until 1922, and edited it until 1944. He became a senator in 1910 and was minister of public education in Giovanni Giolitti’s last government in 1920–21. In June 1924, after the murder of Giacomo Matteotti, he voted in the Senate for confidence in Mussolini’s government; on 1 May 1925 he published the manifesto of antifascist intellectuals in reply to Gentile and thereafter remained an opponent of the regime in Italy, watched by the police but tolerated. After 1943 he led the refounded Liberal Party, was a minister without portfolio in 1944 and sat in the Constituent Assembly. In 1946 he founded the Italian Institute for Historical Studies in Naples. He died in Naples on 20 November 1952.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic (Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale, 1902)
- What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel (Ciò che è vivo e ciò che è morto della filosofia di Hegel, 1907)
- Logic as the Science of the Pure Concept (Logica come scienza del concetto puro, 1909)
- Philosophy of the Practical (Filosofia della pratica. Economica ed etica, 1909)
- Theory and History of Historiography (Teoria e storia della storiografia, 1917)
- History as the Story of Liberty (La storia come pensiero e come azione, 1938)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है