Gilles Deleuze
Rzeczywistość jest różnicą i nieustannym stawaniem się, a nie stałymi tożsamościami – myśl jak rozrastająca się sieć korzeni, a nie drzewo z jednym pniem.
Umiejscowienie
Filozofia różnicy i stawania się: kłącze zamiast drzewa, maszyny pragnące zamiast braku.
Kluczowe idee
- Kłącze
- Różnica i powtórzenie
- Immanencja
- Ciało bez organów
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 11
Baruch Spinoza
pod wpływem ✓
Deleuze read Spinoza as a philosopher of expression and immanence and asked with him what a body can do (Spinoza et le problème de l’expression, 1968). G. Deleuze, Spinoza et le problème de l’expression (1968); Spinoza. Philosophie pratique (1970; 1981); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “Baruch Spinoza”
Baruch Spinoza › 1632–1677
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
pod wpływem ✓
In The Fold (1988) Deleuze read Leibniz as the Baroque philosopher whose monads express the whole world from a point of view and whose matter is infinitely folded. G. Deleuze, Le pli. Leibniz et le baroque (1988); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz › 1646–1716
David Hume
pod wpływem ✓
In Empiricism and Subjectivity (1953) Deleuze read Hume as showing how a subject is constituted within the given through habit and association, and stressed his externality of relations. G. Deleuze, Empirisme et subjectivité (1953); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “David Hume”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
David Hume › 1711–1776
Immanuel Kant
pod wpływem ✓
Deleuze read Kant’s doctrine of the faculties and their discordant accord in the sublime (La philosophie critique de Kant, 1963) and recast transcendental philosophy as ‘transcendental empiricism’ (1968). G. Deleuze, La philosophie critique de Kant (1963); “L’idée de genèse dans l’esthétique de Kant” (1963); Différence et répétition (1968); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”
Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804
Friedrich Nietzsche
pod wpływem ✓
In Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962) Deleuze read Nietzsche against Hegel as a thinker of affirmation, of active and reactive forces and of eternal return as selection of difference. G. Deleuze, Nietzsche et la philosophie (1962); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “Friedrich Nietzsche”
Friedrich Nietzsche › 1844–1900
Henri Bergson
pod wpływem ✓
Deleuze read Bergson’s duration as a qualitative multiplicity and the virtual as real without being actual (Le bergsonisme, 1966), and built Cinema 1–2 (1983–85) on Matter and Memory. G. Deleuze, Le bergsonisme (1966); Cinéma 1. L’image-mouvement (1983); Cinéma 2. L’image-temps (1985); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “Henri Bergson”
Henri Bergson › 1859–1941
Pokaż wszystko (11)Pokaż mniej
Jan Duns Szkot
pod wpływem ✓
Deleuze took Duns Scotus’s univocity of being as the first moment of a philosophy of difference, followed by Spinoza and Nietzsche (Difference and Repetition, 1968). G. Deleuze, Différence et répétition (1968); Spinoza et le problème de l’expression (1968); SEP “Gilles Deleuze”; SEP “John Duns Scotus”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Jan Duns Szkot › ok. 1266–1308
Gabriel Tarde
pod wpływem
Deleuze read Tarde as a thinker of repetition and difference (Difference and Repetition, 1968) and, with Guattari, set his microsociology of imitation against Durkheim (A Thousand Plateaus, 1980). G. Deleuze, Différence et répétition (1968); G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Mille plateaux (1980)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gabriel Tarde › 1843–1904
Alfred North Whitehead
pod wpływem ✓
In The Fold (1988) Deleuze read Whitehead’s events and prehensions as a successor to Leibniz’s monadology, with chaos, extension and intensity as conditions of the event. G. Deleuze, Le pli. Leibniz et le baroque (1988); A. N. Whitehead, Process and Reality (1929); SEP “Alfred North Whitehead”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Alfred North Whitehead › 1861–1947
Jakob von Uexküll
pod wpływem ✓
Deleuze took Uexküll’s tick, defined by three affects, as a model of a body known by what it can do (A Thousand Plateaus, 1980; Spinoza. Philosophie pratique, 1981). G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Mille plateaux (1980); G. Deleuze, Spinoza. Philosophie pratique (1981)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Jakob von Uexküll › 1864–1944
Frantz Fanon
pod wpływem
In Anti-Oedipus (1972, with Félix Guattari) Deleuze cited a case from Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth – a persecution psychosis that seemed to concern the death of the patient’s mother, who had in fact been killed by a French soldier – to show that delusion invests the social and historical field, not only the family. G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, L’Anti-Œdipe (1972), ch. 2; F. Fanon, Les damnés de la terre (1961), ch. “Guerre coloniale et troubles mentaux”
Źródło: szkic AI
Frantz Fanon › 1925–1961
Wpływ na 3
Antonio Negri
wpływ na ✓
Negri took up Deleuze’s ‘societies of control’ (1990) and, with Michael Hardt, made it part of the account of biopolitical power in Empire (2000). M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire (2000); G. Deleuze, “Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle” (1990); preface to A. Negri, L’anomalie sauvage (1982)
Antonio Negri › 1933–2023
Isabelle Stengers
wpływ na
Stengers borrowed from Deleuze the conceptual figure of the ‘idiot’, who slows down a consensus, to frame her cosmopolitical proposal (‘The Cosmopolitical Proposal’, 2005). I. Stengers, “The Cosmopolitical Proposal”, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public (2005); G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? (1991)
Źródło: szkic AI
Isabelle Stengers › ur. 1949
Eduardo Viveiros de Castro
wpływ na
Viveiros de Castro used Deleuze and Guattari’s concepts of becoming and multiplicity to describe Amerindian perspectivism (‘Les pronoms cosmologiques’, 1998; Métaphysiques cannibales, 2009). E. Viveiros de Castro, “Les pronoms cosmologiques et le perspectivisme amérindien”, in É. Alliez (ed.), Gilles Deleuze. Une vie philosophique (1998); Métaphysiques cannibales (2009)
Źródło: szkic AI
Eduardo Viveiros de Castro › ur. 1951
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 2
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
krytyka ze strony
Spivak objected that Deleuze, with Foucault in ‘Intellectuals and Power’ (1972), conflates two senses of representation, speaking-for (vertreten) and portraying (darstellen) (‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, 1988). G. C. Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?”, in C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (1988); M. Foucault & G. Deleuze, “Les intellectuels et le pouvoir”, L’Arc 49 (1972)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak › ur. 1942
Slavoj Žižek
krytyka ze strony
Žižek preferred the Deleuze of The Logic of Sense to the Anti-Oedipus Deleuze, whose praise of desiring flows he saw as fitting late capitalism (Organs without Bodies, 2004). S. Žižek, Organs without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences (2004)
Źródło: szkic AI
Slavoj Žižek › ur. 1949
Krytykuje 3
Platon
krytykuje
Deleuze called for ‘reversing Platonism’: instead of ranking copies by their likeness to the Ideas, he affirmed the simulacrum and difference (The Logic of Sense, 1969, appendix). G. Deleuze, Logique du sens (1969), appendix I.1 “Platon et le simulacre”; Différence et répétition (1968)
Źródło: szkic AI
Platon › 428–348 p.n.e.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
krytykuje
Deleuze rejected Hegel’s dialectic for subordinating difference to identity and negation, opposing to it a Nietzschean affirmation of difference (Nietzsche and Philosophy, 1962; Difference and Repetition, 1968). G. Deleuze, Nietzsche et la philosophie (1962); Différence et répétition (1968), Introduction and ch. I; SEP “Gilles Deleuze”
Źródło: szkic AI
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831
Sigmund Freud
krytykuje
With Guattari, Deleuze attacked Freudian psychoanalysis for confining desire to the Oedipal family triangle and conceiving it as lack rather than production (Anti-Oedipus, 1972). G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, L’Anti-Œdipe. Capitalisme et schizophrénie (1972), ch. 2; SEP “Gilles Deleuze”
Źródło: szkic AI
Sigmund Freud › 1856–1939
Dzieła
Nietzsche jako anty-Hegel: afirmacja zamiast negacji.
Różnica sama w sobie, bez podporządkowania identyczności.
- 1972Anty-Edyp
Napisany z Félixem Guattarim: maszyny pragnące przeciw edypalnemu trójkątowi psychoanalizy.
- 1980Tysiąc plateau
Napisany z Félixem Guattarim: kłącze, nomadologia, przestrzeń gładka i rowkowana.
Stanowisko
Deleuze sought to think difference as primary rather than as a mere deviation from an identity. In Difference and Repetition he criticised the whole tradition of “representation,” which subordinates the different to the same, and developed a philosophy of becoming and immanence inspired by Spinoza, Nietzsche and Bergson. With Guattari, in Anti-Oedipus, he attacked psychoanalysis: desire is not lack but productive, a network of “desiring-machines” that capitalism both unleashes and recaptures. A Thousand Plateaus contrasted hierarchical, tree-like thinking with the “rhizome,” a network without centre in which every point can connect with every other. Philosophy, the two wrote, is the creation of concepts. Deleuze shaped art theory, political philosophy and media studies.
Życie i kontekst
Deleuze was born in Paris in 1925 and studied philosophy at the Sorbonne. He first wrote monographs on Hume, Nietzsche, Kant, Bergson and Spinoza. From 1969 he taught at the experimental University of Paris VIII (Vincennes), where his lectures attracted large audiences. With the psychoanalyst Félix Guattari he wrote a series of influential books. Severely ill, he took his own life in 1995.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962)
- Difference and Repetition (1968)
- The Logic of Sense (1969)
- Anti-Oedipus (with Félix Guattari) (1972)
- A Thousand Plateaus (with Félix Guattari) (1980)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora