ليف شيستوف
يخضع العقل للضرورة ويسميها حقيقة، لكن كل شيء ممكن عند الله؛ وعلى الفلسفة أن تنحاز إلى الفرد المتألم ضد البداهة، كما فعل أيوب وكيركغور.
التموضع
فيلسوف وُلد في كييف كتب بالروسية وعاش في باريس منذ 1921: في وجه حكم العقل والضرورة أقام «أورشليم»، إيمانًا لا يستحيل معه شيء – أثينا ضد أورشليم.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- أثينا ضد أورشليم
- التمرد على الضرورة والبداهة
- فلسفة المأساة
- كيركغور والفلسفة الوجودية
التأثير
تأثّر بـ 3
سورين كيركغور
تأثّر بـ ✓
Directed to Kierkegaard by Husserl in 1928, Shestov read him as an ally against speculative reason in Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (1936). L. Chestov, Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle (1936)
سورين كيركغور › 1813–1855
فيودور دوستويفسكي
تأثّر بـ ✓
In Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Philosophy of Tragedy (1903) Shestov read Notes from Underground as Dostoevsky’s break with idealism, the start of a ‘philosophy of tragedy’. L. Shestov, Dostoevskij i Nitshe. Filosofija tragedii (1903)
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في Wikidata · Wikidata
فيودور دوستويفسكي › 1821–1881
فريدريك نيتشه
تأثّر بـ ✓
In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov sided with Nietzsche’s revolt against morality, reading it as a search for God beyond the good. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)
فريدريك نيتشه › 1844–1900
أثّر في 1
إميل سيوران
أثّر في ✓
Cioran called Shestov the philosopher of his generation and took up his revolt against the self-evidences of reason in his early Romanian books. E. M. Cioran, Entretiens (1995); Pe culmile disperării (1934)
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في Wikidata · Wikidata
إميل سيوران › 1911–1995
النقد
انتقده 1
ألبير كامو
انتقده
Camus admired Shestov’s revolt against reason but judged that he too escapes the absurd by turning it into God, a ‘philosophical suicide’ (The Myth of Sisyphus, 1942). A. Camus, Le Mythe de Sisyphe (1942), “Les murs absurdes”, “Le suicide philosophique”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
ألبير كامو › 1913–1960
ينتقد 2
ليو تولستوي
انتقد
In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov argued that Tolstoy’s moral preaching made the good a substitute for God, a refuge from despair. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
ليو تولستوي › 1828–1910
إدموند هوسرل
انتقد
In ‘Memento mori’ (1917), Shestov attacked Husserl’s ideal of philosophy as rigorous science, objecting that his self-evident truths of reason silence the questions of human existence. L. Shestov, “Memento mori” (1917), in Potestas clavium (1923); “In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl” (1938)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
إدموند هوسرل › 1859–1938
الأعمال
يقرأ إنسان القبو ونيتشه شاهدين على مأساة لا تعزّيها أخلاق ولا عقل.
خلاصة شيستوف، نُشرت أول مرة بالفرنسية عام 1938: ضد التقليد الممتد من الفلسفة اليونانية إلى كانط وهيغل الذي يُخضع حتى الله للعقل والضرورة، يضع الإيمان الكتابي الذي يكون فيه كل شيء ممكنًا.
الموقف
Shestov is on the map as a philosopher who turned against the authority of reason itself. His early books read Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Nietzsche as witnesses of experiences – suffering, ugliness, despair – that no ethics or system can explain away. Later he formulated his opposition as “Athens and Jerusalem”: Greek philosophy and its heirs from Aristotle to Spinoza, Kant, Hegel and Husserl submit even God to necessity and self-evident truths, while biblical faith, as in Job, Abraham or Luther, demands the impossible and refuses to accept that what has happened cannot be undone. In his friendship and argument with Husserl he treated phenomenology as the purest form of the rationalism he opposed; it was Husserl who directed him to Kierkegaard, whom he then read as an ally. Albert Camus, in “The Myth of Sisyphus” (1942), counted him among the existential thinkers who escape the absurd by a leap into faith and so commit “philosophical suicide”. Fondane and Cioran took up his line of thought. Critics have asked whether a philosophy against reason can still argue; Shestov did not claim to offer a system and accepted the paradox. His work draws on the Hebrew Bible and on Christian authors alike and fits no single confession.
الحياة والسياق
Lev Shestov, born Yehuda Leib Schwarzmann, was born in Kyiv on 12 February 1866 (31 January Old Style), the son of a Jewish textile merchant. He studied mathematics and then law in Moscow and Kyiv and graduated in law in 1889; his dissertation on labour legislation was not accepted. For years he helped run his father’s business in Kyiv, while spending long periods abroad; in Rome he married Anna Berezovskaya, a marriage he long kept from his father. His first book, on Shakespeare and his critic Georg Brandes, appeared in 1898 under the pen name Shestov, followed by studies of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900), Dostoevsky and Nietzsche (1903) and “The Apotheosis of Groundlessness” (1905). He lived in Switzerland from 1908 to 1914, then in Moscow, and in 1918–19 lectured in Kyiv. In 1919–20 he left via Crimea and Constantinople, and from 1921 lived in Paris, where he lectured on Russian and Greek philosophy at the Russian courses attached to the Sorbonne and met Edmund Husserl in 1928. His friends included the poet Benjamin Fondane, Georges Bataille, who co-translated one of his books, and Nikolai Berdyaev. He died in Paris in November 1938.
أعمال رئيسة أخرى
- Shakespeare and His Critic Brandes (Shekspir i ego kritik Brandes, 1898)
- The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe, 1900)
- The Apotheosis of Groundlessness (Apofeoz bespochvennosti, 1905)
- Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle, 1936)
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora