AgoraAn open square of thought

Lev Shestov

1866–1938

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

Reason bows to necessity and calls it truth, but for God all things are possible; philosophy must take the side of the suffering individual against self-evidence, as Job and Kierkegaard did.

Placement

Life & Existential Philosophy · Eastern Europe · Existence & Self, Religion, Epistemology

Philosopher born in Kyiv who wrote in Russian and lived in Paris from 1921: against the rule of reason and necessity he set “Jerusalem”, a faith for which nothing is impossible – Athens against Jerusalem.

Key ideas

  • Athens against Jerusalem
  • Revolt against necessity and self-evidence
  • Philosophy of tragedy
  • Kierkegaard and existential philosophy

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced by 3

  • Søren Kierkegaard

    influenced by ✓

    Directed to Kierkegaard by Husserl in 1928, Shestov read him as an ally against speculative reason in Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (1936). L. Chestov, Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle (1936)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Søren Kierkegaard › 1813–1855

  • Fyodor Dostoevsky

    influenced by ✓

    In Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Philosophy of Tragedy (1903) Shestov read Notes from Underground as Dostoevsky’s break with idealism, the start of a ‘philosophy of tragedy’. L. Shestov, Dostoevskij i Nitshe. Filosofija tragedii (1903)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Fyodor Dostoevsky › 1821–1881

  • Friedrich Nietzsche

    influenced by ✓

    In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov sided with Nietzsche’s revolt against morality, reading it as a search for God beyond the good. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Friedrich Nietzsche › 1844–1900

Influenced 1

  • Emil Cioran

    influenced ✓

    Cioran called Shestov the philosopher of his generation and took up his revolt against the self-evidences of reason in his early Romanian books. E. M. Cioran, Entretiens (1995); Pe culmile disperării (1934)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Emil Cioran › 1911–1995

Criticism

Criticized by 1

  • Albert Camus

    criticised by

    Camus admired Shestov’s revolt against reason but judged that he too escapes the absurd by turning it into God, a ‘philosophical suicide’ (The Myth of Sisyphus, 1942). A. Camus, Le Mythe de Sisyphe (1942), “Les murs absurdes”, “Le suicide philosophique”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Albert Camus › 1913–1960

Criticizes 2

  • Leo Tolstoy

    criticised

    In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov argued that Tolstoy’s moral preaching made the good a substitute for God, a refuge from despair. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Leo Tolstoy › 1828–1910

  • Edmund Husserl

    criticised

    In ‘Memento mori’ (1917), Shestov attacked Husserl’s ideal of philosophy as rigorous science, objecting that his self-evident truths of reason silence the questions of human existence. L. Shestov, “Memento mori” (1917), in Potestas clavium (1923); “In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl” (1938)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Edmund Husserl › 1859–1938

Works

  • Reads the underground man and Nietzsche as witnesses of a tragedy that no ethics or reason can console.

  • Shestov’s summa, first published in French in 1938: against the tradition from Greek philosophy to Kant and Hegel, which submits even God to reason and necessity, it sets biblical faith, for which all things are possible.

Position

Shestov is on the map as a philosopher who turned against the authority of reason itself. His early books read Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Nietzsche as witnesses of experiences – suffering, ugliness, despair – that no ethics or system can explain away. Later he formulated his opposition as “Athens and Jerusalem”: Greek philosophy and its heirs from Aristotle to Spinoza, Kant, Hegel and Husserl submit even God to necessity and self-evident truths, while biblical faith, as in Job, Abraham or Luther, demands the impossible and refuses to accept that what has happened cannot be undone. In his friendship and argument with Husserl he treated phenomenology as the purest form of the rationalism he opposed; it was Husserl who directed him to Kierkegaard, whom he then read as an ally. Albert Camus, in “The Myth of Sisyphus” (1942), counted him among the existential thinkers who escape the absurd by a leap into faith and so commit “philosophical suicide”. Fondane and Cioran took up his line of thought. Critics have asked whether a philosophy against reason can still argue; Shestov did not claim to offer a system and accepted the paradox. His work draws on the Hebrew Bible and on Christian authors alike and fits no single confession.

Life & context

Lev Shestov, born Yehuda Leib Schwarzmann, was born in Kyiv on 12 February 1866 (31 January Old Style), the son of a Jewish textile merchant. He studied mathematics and then law in Moscow and Kyiv and graduated in law in 1889; his dissertation on labour legislation was not accepted. For years he helped run his father’s business in Kyiv, while spending long periods abroad; in Rome he married Anna Berezovskaya, a marriage he long kept from his father. His first book, on Shakespeare and his critic Georg Brandes, appeared in 1898 under the pen name Shestov, followed by studies of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900), Dostoevsky and Nietzsche (1903) and “The Apotheosis of Groundlessness” (1905). He lived in Switzerland from 1908 to 1914, then in Moscow, and in 1918–19 lectured in Kyiv. In 1919–20 he left via Crimea and Constantinople, and from 1921 lived in Paris, where he lectured on Russian and Greek philosophy at the Russian courses attached to the Sorbonne and met Edmund Husserl in 1928. His friends included the poet Benjamin Fondane, Georges Bataille, who co-translated one of his books, and Nikolai Berdyaev. He died in Paris in November 1938.

Further main works

  • Shakespeare and His Critic Brandes (Shekspir i ego kritik Brandes, 1898)
  • The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe, 1900)
  • The Apotheosis of Groundlessness (Apofeoz bespochvennosti, 1905)
  • Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle, 1936)

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map