Lew Szestow
Rozum kłania się konieczności i nazywa ją prawdą, ale dla Boga wszystko jest możliwe; filozofia musi stanąć po stronie cierpiącej jednostki wbrew oczywistości, jak uczynili Hiob i Kierkegaard.
Umiejscowienie
Filozof urodzony w Kijowie, pisał po rosyjsku i od 1921 roku mieszkał w Paryżu: przeciw panowaniu rozumu i konieczności przeciwstawiał „Jerozolimę”, wiarę, dla której nic nie jest niemożliwe – Ateny przeciw Jerozolimie.
Kluczowe idee
- Ateny przeciw Jerozolimie
- Bunt przeciw konieczności i oczywistości
- Filozofia tragedii
- Kierkegaard i filozofia egzystencji
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 3
Søren Kierkegaard
pod wpływem ✓
Directed to Kierkegaard by Husserl in 1928, Shestov read him as an ally against speculative reason in Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (1936). L. Chestov, Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle (1936)
Søren Kierkegaard › 1813–1855
Fiodor Dostojewski
pod wpływem ✓
In Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Philosophy of Tragedy (1903) Shestov read Notes from Underground as Dostoevsky’s break with idealism, the start of a ‘philosophy of tragedy’. L. Shestov, Dostoevskij i Nitshe. Filosofija tragedii (1903)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Fiodor Dostojewski › 1821–1881
Friedrich Nietzsche
pod wpływem ✓
In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov sided with Nietzsche’s revolt against morality, reading it as a search for God beyond the good. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)
Friedrich Nietzsche › 1844–1900
Wpływ na 1
Emil Cioran
wpływ na ✓
Cioran called Shestov the philosopher of his generation and took up his revolt against the self-evidences of reason in his early Romanian books. E. M. Cioran, Entretiens (1995); Pe culmile disperării (1934)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Emil Cioran › 1911–1995
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 1
Albert Camus
krytyka ze strony
Camus admired Shestov’s revolt against reason but judged that he too escapes the absurd by turning it into God, a ‘philosophical suicide’ (The Myth of Sisyphus, 1942). A. Camus, Le Mythe de Sisyphe (1942), “Les murs absurdes”, “Le suicide philosophique”
Źródło: szkic AI
Albert Camus › 1913–1960
Krytykuje 2
Lew Tołstoj
krytykuje
In The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900) Shestov argued that Tolstoy’s moral preaching made the good a substitute for God, a refuge from despair. L. Shestov, Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe (1900)
Źródło: szkic AI
Lew Tołstoj › 1828–1910
Edmund Husserl
krytykuje
In ‘Memento mori’ (1917), Shestov attacked Husserl’s ideal of philosophy as rigorous science, objecting that his self-evident truths of reason silence the questions of human existence. L. Shestov, “Memento mori” (1917), in Potestas clavium (1923); “In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl” (1938)
Źródło: szkic AI
Edmund Husserl › 1859–1938
Dzieła
Czyta człowieka z podziemia i Nietzschego jako świadków tragedii, której nie pocieszy żadna etyka ani rozum.
Summa Szestowa, po raz pierwszy opublikowana po francusku w 1938 roku: tradycji od filozofii greckiej po Kanta i Hegla, która podporządkowuje rozumowi i konieczności nawet Boga, przeciwstawia wiarę biblijną, dla której wszystko jest możliwe.
Stanowisko
Shestov is on the map as a philosopher who turned against the authority of reason itself. His early books read Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Nietzsche as witnesses of experiences – suffering, ugliness, despair – that no ethics or system can explain away. Later he formulated his opposition as “Athens and Jerusalem”: Greek philosophy and its heirs from Aristotle to Spinoza, Kant, Hegel and Husserl submit even God to necessity and self-evident truths, while biblical faith, as in Job, Abraham or Luther, demands the impossible and refuses to accept that what has happened cannot be undone. In his friendship and argument with Husserl he treated phenomenology as the purest form of the rationalism he opposed; it was Husserl who directed him to Kierkegaard, whom he then read as an ally. Albert Camus, in “The Myth of Sisyphus” (1942), counted him among the existential thinkers who escape the absurd by a leap into faith and so commit “philosophical suicide”. Fondane and Cioran took up his line of thought. Critics have asked whether a philosophy against reason can still argue; Shestov did not claim to offer a system and accepted the paradox. His work draws on the Hebrew Bible and on Christian authors alike and fits no single confession.
Życie i kontekst
Lev Shestov, born Yehuda Leib Schwarzmann, was born in Kyiv on 12 February 1866 (31 January Old Style), the son of a Jewish textile merchant. He studied mathematics and then law in Moscow and Kyiv and graduated in law in 1889; his dissertation on labour legislation was not accepted. For years he helped run his father’s business in Kyiv, while spending long periods abroad; in Rome he married Anna Berezovskaya, a marriage he long kept from his father. His first book, on Shakespeare and his critic Georg Brandes, appeared in 1898 under the pen name Shestov, followed by studies of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (1900), Dostoevsky and Nietzsche (1903) and “The Apotheosis of Groundlessness” (1905). He lived in Switzerland from 1908 to 1914, then in Moscow, and in 1918–19 lectured in Kyiv. In 1919–20 he left via Crimea and Constantinople, and from 1921 lived in Paris, where he lectured on Russian and Greek philosophy at the Russian courses attached to the Sorbonne and met Edmund Husserl in 1928. His friends included the poet Benjamin Fondane, Georges Bataille, who co-translated one of his books, and Nikolai Berdyaev. He died in Paris in November 1938.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Shakespeare and His Critic Brandes (Shekspir i ego kritik Brandes, 1898)
- The Good in the Teaching of Tolstoy and Nietzsche (Dobro v uchenii gr. Tolstogo i F. Nitshe, 1900)
- Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Philosophy of Tragedy (Dostoevskii i Nitshe. Filosofiia tragedii, 1903)
- The Apotheosis of Groundlessness (Apofeoz bespochvennosti, 1905)
- Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (Kierkegaard et la philosophie existentielle, 1936)
- Athens and Jerusalem (Afiny i Ierusalim, 1938)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora