格奥尔格·勃兰兑斯
一种文学只有在把问题——婚姻、宗教、财产、妇女的地位——提交讨论,而不是为传统服务时,才是有生命的;摆脱教会和习俗的自由是进步的尺度,而正如他从尼采那里读到的,伟大的个人是文化的承载者。
定位
“现代突破”时期的丹麦文学批评家:文学应当把问题提出来供人讨论;他把密尔、丹纳和激进的宗教批判带到斯堪的纳维亚,他1888年在哥本哈根的讲座介绍了尼采,并把其思想称为“贵族激进主义”。
核心思想
- 提出问题供人讨论的文学
- 现代突破
- 贵族激进主义
- 欧洲文学主流
影响
受影响于 2
约翰·斯图尔特·密尔
受其影响
Brandes translated Mill’s The Subjection of Women into Danish (1869), met him in London in 1870, and drew on his liberalism in Main Currents of Nineteenth-Century Literature (1872–90). J. S. Mill, Kvindernes Underkuelse, tr. G. Brandes (1869); G. Brandes, Hovedstrømninger i det 19de Aarhundredes Litteratur (1872–90)
依据: AI 草稿
约翰·斯图尔特·密尔 › 1806–1873
弗里德里希·尼采
受其影响
Brandes corresponded with Nietzsche from 1887, lectured on him in Copenhagen in 1888 and called his thought ‘aristocratic radicalism’, a formula Nietzsche welcomed (letters, 1887; essay, 1889). G. Brandes, “Aristokratisk Radikalisme”, Tilskueren (1889); Brandes to Nietzsche, 26 Nov. 1887, and Nietzsche’s reply, 2 Dec. 1887, in Brandes–Nietzsche correspondence (1887–89)
依据: AI 草稿
弗里德里希·尼采 › 1844–1900
批评
受批评于 1
哈拉尔德·霍夫丁
受其批评
Høffding’s ‘Democratic Radicalism’ (1889) answered Brandes’ ‘Aristocratic Radicalism’: culture must serve the welfare of the many, not only produce great individuals; Brandes replied in 1890. H. Høffding, “Demokratisk Radikalisme”, Tilskueren 1889; G. Brandes, “Aristokratisk Radikalisme”, Tilskueren 1889; W. Banks (ed.), The Great Debate (2024)
依据: AI 草稿
哈拉尔德·霍夫丁 › 1843–1931
批评了 1
索伦·克尔凯郭尔
批评了
Brandes’ critical study Søren Kierkegaard (1877) admired the polemicist and psychologist but rejected, as a freethinker, the ascetic Christianity Kierkegaard demanded. G. Brandes, Søren Kierkegaard. En kritisk Fremstilling i Grundrids (1877)
依据: AI 草稿
索伦·克尔凯郭尔 › 1813–1855
作品
立场
Brandes is on the map as the critic who defined the “Modern Breakthrough” in Scandinavian literature and as one of the first major interpreters of Nietzsche. In his opening lecture of 1871 he demanded that literature raise problems for discussion – marriage, religion, property, the position of women – instead of serving tradition and Romantic idealism. Drawing on Taine’s method and Mill’s liberalism, he read European literature from the émigrés of the French Revolution to Young Germany as a struggle between reaction and freedom. In 1887 he began a correspondence with Nietzsche, who welcomed his formula “aristocratic radicalism” as the cleverest thing he had read about himself; Brandes’s lectures in Copenhagen in 1888 and his essay of 1889 were among the first serious public discussions of Nietzsche and did much to make him known. Harald Høffding answered with “Democratic Radicalism”, and their debate set an ethics of great individuals against one of general welfare. Brandes also wrote critical monographs on Kierkegaard, Shakespeare, Goethe and Voltaire. In his later years he opposed the First World War and wrote in defence of small and oppressed nations; his Jewish origin made him a frequent target of antisemitic attacks in Denmark.
生平与背景
Georg Brandes was born on 4 February 1842 in Copenhagen into a Jewish merchant family. He studied aesthetics at the University of Copenhagen and took his doctorate in 1870 with a study of contemporary French aesthetics centred on Hippolyte Taine. Travels to France, England and Italy brought him into contact with Taine, Ernest Renan and John Stuart Mill, whose “The Subjection of Women” he translated in 1869. His lectures on the main currents of nineteenth-century literature, begun in Copenhagen in 1871, caused a public scandal; passed over for the chair of aesthetics, he lived in Berlin from 1877 to 1883. Back in Copenhagen he became the leading critic of Scandinavia and, through essays and correspondence, a link between Nietzsche, Ibsen, Strindberg and the European public. In 1902 he was granted a professor’s salary. He died in Copenhagen on 19 February 1927.
其他主要作品
- Hovedstrømninger i det 19de Aarhundredes Litteratur (6 vols., 1872–90)
- Søren Kierkegaard (1877)
- Det moderne Gjennembruds Mænd (1883)
- Aristokratisk Radikalisme (1889)
- William Shakespeare (1895–96)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的