AgoraAn open square of thought

John Searle

1932–2025

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

A computer manipulating symbols no more understands them than a person following rules in a Chinese room – minds are more than programs.

Placement

Analytic Philosophy · North America · Language, Mind & Consciousness, Society & History

The Chinese room: syntax is not semantics – an argument against strong artificial intelligence.

Key ideas

  • Chinese room
  • Intentionality
  • Social ontology

Teachers: J. L. Austin, P. F. Strawson

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced by 5

  • Gottlob Frege

    influenced by

    Searle developed Frege’s view that proper names have a sense into a cluster theory of names (‘Proper Names’, 1958) and defended a Fregean account of reference (Intentionality, 1983). J. R. Searle, “Proper Names”, Mind 67 (1958); Speech Acts (1969); Intentionality (1983)

    Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO

    Gottlob Frege › 1848–1925

  • Ludwig Wittgenstein

    influenced by ✓

    Searle acknowledged the later Wittgenstein, especially On Certainty, as a source of his thesis that intentional states work only against a non-representational Background (Intentionality, 1983). J. R. Searle, Intentionality (1983); The Construction of Social Reality (1995); L. Wittgenstein, Über Gewißheit (publ. 1969)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Ludwig Wittgenstein › 1889–1951

  • J. L. Austin studied with

    studied with

    At Oxford, where he studied from 1952 as a Rhodes Scholar, Searle was taught by Austin as well as by Strawson, Berlin and Hampshire; his Speech Acts (1969) developed Austin’s theory, although he said Austin’s attention to linguistic minutiae left him unmoved. J. R. Searle, interview with T. Crane, CRASSH, University of Cambridge (9 June 2014)

    Evidence: AI draft

    J. L. Austin › 1911–1960

  • H. P. Grice

    influenced by

    Searle adopted Grice’s analysis of meaning through the intended recognition of intentions but held that it must include linguistic conventions (Speech Acts, 1969). J. R. Searle, Speech Acts (1969); H. P. Grice, “Meaning”, Philosophical Review 66 (1957); SEP “Paul Grice”

    Evidence: AI draft

    H. P. Grice › 1913–1988

  • P. F. Strawson studied with

    studied with

    Strawson was Searle’s tutor at Oxford; Searle credited him without hesitation with having truly taught him how to do philosophy, recalled tutorials for which his essay was due a day in advance, and the two became close friends. J. R. Searle, interview with T. Crane, CRASSH, University of Cambridge (9 June 2014)

    Evidence: AI draft

    P. F. Strawson › 1919–2006

Criticism

Criticized by 3

  • Saul Kripke

    criticised by

    Kripke rejected Searle’s cluster theory of names: no weighted set of descriptions fixes reference, since the bearer might satisfy none of them (Naming and Necessity, 1972/1980). S. Kripke, Naming and Necessity (1972; 1980), Lecture I; J. R. Searle, “Proper Names”, Mind 67 (1958)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Saul Kripke › 1940–2022

  • Daniel Dennett

    criticised by

    Dennett called Searle’s Chinese Room an ‘intuition pump’ that directs attention to the rule-following man instead of the whole system (‘The Milk of Human Intentionality’, 1980). D. C. Dennett, “The Milk of Human Intentionality”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980); Consciousness Explained (1991), ch. 14

    Evidence: AI draft

    Daniel Dennett › 1942–2024

  • David Chalmers

    criticised by

    Chalmers rejected Searle’s Chinese Room argument: by the principle of organisational invariance, a system with the right functional organisation would be conscious (The Conscious Mind, 1996, ch. 9). D. J. Chalmers, The Conscious Mind (1996), chs. 7, 9; J. R. Searle, “Consciousness and the Philosophers”, New York Review of Books, 6 March 1997, and the ensuing exchange

    Evidence: AI draft

    David Chalmers › b. 1966

Criticizes 2

  • Alan Turing

    criticised

    Searle’s Chinese Room targeted the Turing test as a criterion of understanding: a program passing it by symbol manipulation need not understand anything (‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’, 1980). J. R. Searle, “Minds, Brains, and Programs”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980), 417–457; A. M. Turing, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Mind 59 (1950)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Alan Turing › 1912–1954

  • Jacques Derrida

    criticised

    Searle replied that Derrida’s ‘Signature Event Context’ misreads Austin: iterability does not undermine intention, and setting aside parasitic speech is a research strategy (‘Reiterating the Differences’, 1977). J. R. Searle, “Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida”, Glyph 1 (1977), 198–208; J. Derrida, “Limited Inc a b c …”, Glyph 2 (1977)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004

Works

Position

Searle systematised Austin’s speech act theory, showing how promises, assertions and orders follow constitutive rules. He then turned to the mind: intentionality – the directedness of thoughts toward the world – is a biological feature of brains, as real as digestion. His most famous argument is the Chinese Room: a person who follows rules for manipulating Chinese symbols without understanding Chinese could produce perfect answers, yet would understand nothing. Hence computers that only process syntax do not thereby possess semantics, and “strong AI” is false. Searle did not deny that a machine could think – brains, he said, are machines – only that running a program could ever be enough; critics answer that the whole system, not the person in the room, might understand. Later he explained how social reality – money, marriages, states – arises from collective acceptance of the form “X counts as Y in context C.”

Life & context

Searle was born in Denver in 1932 and studied at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar, where he was influenced by J. L. Austin and Peter Strawson. From 1959 he taught at the University of California, Berkeley, for most of his career. He became widely known beyond philosophy through public debates on artificial intelligence and his controversy with Jacques Derrida. In 2019 the university revoked his emeritus status after finding that he had violated its policies on sexual harassment and retaliation. He died in 2025.

Further main works

  • Intentionality (1983)
  • The Rediscovery of the Mind (1992)
  • The Construction of Social Reality (1995)

Appears in

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map