Journey · 10 stops
The Linguistic Turn
When philosophy discovered that its problems lie in language.
Stops
Stop 1 of 10: Begriffsschrift
What if philosophy’s problems are really problems of language? The journey starts in 1879 with Frege’s Begriffsschrift, a “concept-script” for pure thought. Breaking with Aristotle’s syllogisms, he introduces quantifiers and the logic of functions – the core of modern logic. Beside it, ordinary language looks imprecise, and that suspicion drives everything that follows.
Stop 2 of 10: On Denoting
Russell, who had found a paradox in Frege’s system, also takes up Frege’s theory of meaning and corrects it. In “On Denoting” he argues that a sentence like “The present King of France is bald” only seems to be about a thing: its logical form contains a hidden claim of existence. Grammar can mislead; analysis reveals what is really said. His student will make this the task of philosophy.
Stop 3 of 10: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Wittgenstein, who came to Cambridge to study with Russell, builds on Frege and Russell to ask what language can do at all. Sentences picture facts; what cannot be pictured – ethics, the mystical, the meaning of life – cannot be said, only shown. “The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” The book ends in silence, and others will read it as a weapon.
Stop 4 of 10: The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language
The Vienna Circle reads the Tractatus as a program, and Carnap draws the sharpest conclusion: metaphysical sentences are not false but meaningless. His example is Heidegger’s lecture What Is Metaphysics? and its phrase “the nothing nothings” – grammatically fine, logically empty. Analysis becomes a tool for clearing away philosophy itself, until Wittgenstein turns against his own early picture.
Stop 5 of 10: Philosophical Investigations
In the Philosophical Investigations, published after his death, Wittgenstein criticizes his own Tractatus. Language does not mirror the world through a single logical form; it is a multitude of language games woven into forms of life, and for a large class of cases the meaning of a word is its use in the language. Philosophy now attends to ordinary language, and at Oxford this becomes a method.
Stop 6 of 10: On Referring
At Oxford, P. F. Strawson turns that attention against Russell. In “On Referring” (1950) he argues that “The present King of France is bald” does not assert that a king exists but presupposes it; if there is none, the question of its truth or falsity does not arise. Referring is something speakers do with expressions, not something expressions do on their own. His Oxford colleague J. L. Austin looks just as closely at what speaking does.
Stop 7 of 10: How to Do Things with Words
Austin notices that some utterances describe nothing at all: saying “I promise”, or “I do” at a wedding, is performing the act. From these performatives he develops a theory of speech acts, in which every utterance is also a deed. But he sets aside “non-serious” cases – words spoken on stage, quoted or in jest – and that exclusion will be challenged.
Stop 8 of 10: Signature Event Context
Derrida seizes on precisely that exclusion. In “Signature Event Context” he argues that every sign can be repeated and quoted in new contexts – this iterability is not a parasite on language but its very condition. A promise only works because it could also be cited on stage. Austin’s clean distinctions begin to blur, and the analytic side responds.
Stop 9 of 10: Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida
Searle, Austin’s student and the systematizer of speech-act theory, replies sharply: Derrida has misread Austin, and the exclusion was a sensible methodological choice, not a metaphysical one. The exchange grows bitter on both sides. It becomes the emblem of the gulf between analytic and continental philosophy – two ways of reading the same text that barely understand each other.
Stop 10 of 10: Gender Trouble
Butler weaves the two strands together. From Austin comes the performative, from Derrida its iterability, from Foucault the power of norms: gender is not an inner essence but an identity produced by repeated acts – and repetition always leaves room for variation. The journey shows how the turn to language began as logic and arrived at the question of who we are and how we might live otherwise.
As of November 2026 · Improve this page · How Agora is made