جيامباتيستا فيكو
لا نستطيع أن نفهم فهمًا حقيقيًا إلا ما صنعناه نحن بأنفسنا – فالتاريخ البشري والثقافة، لا الطبيعة، هما ما نستطيع حقًّا معرفته.
التموضع
أستاذ بلاغة نابوليتاني: لا نعرف معرفة حقة إلا ما صنعناه (verum factum) – ومن ثم فالتاريخ لا الطبيعة.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- الحق هو المصنوع (Verum ipsum factum)
- مسار الأمم وعودتها
- الحكمة الشعرية
التأثير
تأثّر بـ 3
أفلاطون
تأثّر بـ
Vico’s autobiography (1725–28) names Plato among his ‘four authors’: Plato contemplates man as he should be, Tacitus as he is, and Vico sought to join both. G. Vico, Vita di Giambattista Vico scritta da se medesimo (1725–28); SEP “Giambattista Vico”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
أفلاطون › 428–348 ق.م
فرانسيس بيكون
تأثّر بـ
Vico counted Bacon among his ‘four authors’ and modelled his oration On the Study Methods of Our Time (1709) on Bacon’s survey of the advancement of learning. G. Vico, De nostri temporis studiorum ratione (1709); Vita scritta da se medesimo (1725–28); SEP “Giambattista Vico”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
فرانسيس بيكون › 1561–1626
هوغو غروتيوس
تأثّر بـ
Vico counted Grotius among his ‘four authors’ and in the New Science (1725/1744) named him a ‘prince’ of natural-law theory, faulting his neglect of providence. G. Vico, Vita scritta da se medesimo (1725–28); Scienza nuova (1725, 1744); SEP “Giambattista Vico”
التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO
هوغو غروتيوس › 1583–1645
أثّر في 4
بينيدتو كروتشه
أثّر في ✓
In The Philosophy of Giambattista Vico (1911) Croce made Vico a precursor of his historicism, having presented him in the Aesthetic (1902) as the discoverer of aesthetics. B. Croce, Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale (1902); La filosofia di Giambattista Vico (1911); SEP “Benedetto Croce”
بينيدتو كروتشه › 1866–1952
أشعيا برلين
أثّر في
Berlin read Vico as the discoverer of a distinct kind of historical understanding: knowing from within what humans themselves have made (Vico and Herder, 1976). I. Berlin, Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas (1976); G. Vico, Scienza nuova (1725; 1744)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
أشعيا برلين › 1909–1997
هايدن وايت
أثّر في
White took Vico’s four master tropes – metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, irony – as the deep structure of historical consciousness (Metahistory, 1973; ‘The Tropics of History’, 1976). H. White, Metahistory (1973); “The Tropics of History: The Deep Structure of the New Science”, in G. Tagliacozzo and D. P. Verene (eds.), Giambattista Vico’s Science of Humanity (1976); G. Tagliacozzo and H. White (eds.), Giambattista Vico: An International Symposium (1969)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
هايدن وايت › 1928–2018
إدوارد سعيد
أثّر في
Said took from Vico, discussed in Beginnings (1975), the principle that humans know what they have made, treating the Orient as a human construction (Orientalism, 1978). E. W. Said, Beginnings: Intention and Method (1975); Orientalism (1978), introduction; SEP “Giambattista Vico”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
إدوارد سعيد › 1935–2003
النقد
ينتقد 1
رينيه ديكارت
انتقد
Vico objected that Descartes’ cogito gives consciousness, not knowledge, of being, for we know truly only what we make (De antiquissima Italorum sapientia, 1710). G. Vico, De antiquissima Italorum sapientia (1710), ch. I; De nostri temporis studiorum ratione (1709); SEP “Giambattista Vico”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
رينيه ديكارت › 1596–1650
الأعمال
عصور الآلهة والأبطال والبشر: علم للطبيعة المشتركة للأمم.
الموقف
Against Descartes, Vico held that the true and the made are convertible (verum factum): we can fully know only what we ourselves have made. Nature was made by God and remains partly opaque to us, but the human world of languages, laws and institutions was made by humans and can be understood from within. His New Science traces how every nation passes through an age of gods, an age of heroes and an age of men, and may fall back into barbarism and begin again. Rediscovered in the nineteenth century, he became a founder of the philosophy of history and the human sciences.
الحياة والسياق
Giambattista Vico was born in Naples in 1668, the son of a poor bookseller, and was largely self-taught. For nine years he worked as a family tutor in the Cilento, south of Salerno, and in 1699 became professor of rhetoric at the University of Naples, a modestly paid post he held for four decades. His bid for a chair in law failed in 1723. He died in Naples in 1744.
أعمال رئيسة أخرى
- On the Study Methods of Our Time (1709)
- On the Most Ancient Wisdom of the Italians (1710)
- The New Science (1725, 3rd ed. 1744)
- Autobiography (1728)
يرد في
- رحلة «كيف خرج علم الاجتماع من الفلسفة» · المحطة 2 من 12
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora