伊莎贝尔·斯唐热
科学不是中立的法庭，而是富于创造的实践：当一个实验使某一现象能够回答向它提出的问题时，实验就成功了；任何单一实践都不应代表“自然”说话，而宇宙政治要放慢决策，使所有受影响者都能被听到。
定位
布鲁塞尔的比利时科学哲学家，受过化学训练：科学是有其自身要求的创造性实践，而不是中立的裁判；她的“宇宙政治”要求专家、行动者以及所有与某个问题相关的人都算数，使任何单一的知识都不能独自作出决定。
核心思想
- 宇宙政治
- 实践的生态学
- 与怀特海一起思考
- 抵抗即将到来的野蛮
影响
受影响于 2
阿尔弗雷德·诺思·怀特海
受其影响
Stengers read Whitehead’s cosmology as ‘a free and wild creation of concepts’ and took up his refusal of the bifurcation of nature (Penser avec Whitehead, 2002). I. Stengers, Penser avec Whitehead: Une libre et sauvage création de concepts (2002; Eng. Thinking with Whitehead, 2011)
依据: AI 草稿
阿尔弗雷德·诺思·怀特海 › 1861–1947
吉尔·德勒兹
受其影响
Stengers borrowed from Deleuze the conceptual figure of the ‘idiot’, who slows down a consensus, to frame her cosmopolitical proposal (‘The Cosmopolitical Proposal’, 2005). I. Stengers, “The Cosmopolitical Proposal”, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public (2005); G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? (1991)
依据: AI 草稿
吉尔·德勒兹 › 1925–1995
影响了 2
唐娜·哈拉维
影响了
Haraway took up Stengers’s cosmopolitics and her practice of ‘thinking with’ others for her multispecies storytelling (Staying with the Trouble, 2016). D. Haraway, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (2016); I. Stengers, Cosmopolitiques (1997)
依据: AI 草稿
唐娜·哈拉维 › 1944年生
布鲁诺·拉图尔
影响了
Latour took over Stengers’s term ‘cosmopolitics’ for a common world of humans and nonhumans to be composed politically (Politiques de la nature, 1999). B. Latour, Politiques de la nature (1999); I. Stengers, Cosmopolitiques (1997)
依据: AI 草稿
布鲁诺·拉图尔 › 1947–2022
作品
- 1979从混沌到有序（新联盟）
与化学家伊利亚·普里戈金合著：不可逆过程的物理学和远离平衡态的自组织推翻了无时间的、决定论的古典自然图景，呼吁科学与文化之间建立新的联盟。
- 1997宇宙政治
七卷本，论“实践的生态学”：每门科学都有自己的要求和义务；知识的政治应当让所有与问题相关者发出声音，而不是让某一个权威代表“自然”说话。
立场
Stengers is on the map as a philosopher of science who asks what makes scientific practices succeed and how they should live alongside other practices. With Prigogine she argued in “La Nouvelle Alliance” that the physics of irreversible processes and self-organisation undoes the classical image of a timeless, deterministic nature, so that science can rejoin a world of history and becoming. In “The Invention of Modern Science” (1993) and the seven volumes of “Cosmopolitiques” (1997) she described the sciences as inventive practices: an experiment succeeds when it makes a phenomenon able to answer the question put to it, and each practice has its own requirements and obligations. Her “ecology of practices” rejects any single authority that speaks in the name of nature or reason; “cosmopolitics” names a politics in which those affected by a question – experts, activists, practitioners, and beings that cannot speak for themselves – must be able to make a difference, slowing down decisions taken in their name. She has written at length on Whitehead (“Thinking with Whitehead”, 2002) and draws on Deleuze. In “In Catastrophic Times” (2009) she called for resistance to what she calls “the coming barbarism”, a climate crisis that in her view is driven by capitalism. Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway both describe her work as a major influence on their own.
生平与背景
Isabelle Stengers was born in 1949 in Brussels. She studied chemistry at the Free University of Brussels (ULB) and then worked with the physical chemist and Nobel laureate Ilya Prigogine on the history and philosophy of science; their joint book “La Nouvelle Alliance” appeared in 1979. She taught philosophy of science at the ULB, where she became professor. Her books have been translated into many languages, and she has taken part in public debates on drug policy, psychotherapy, genetically modified organisms and climate change.
其他主要作品
- La Nouvelle Alliance. Métamorphose de la science (with I. Prigogine, 1979; Order out of Chaos, 1984)
- L’invention des sciences modernes (1993)
- Cosmopolitiques (7 vols., 1997)
- Penser avec Whitehead (2002)
- La sorcellerie capitaliste (with P. Pignarre, 2005)
- Au temps des catastrophes. Résister à la barbarie qui vient (2009)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的