莱因哈特·科塞雷克
在科塞雷克看来,概念不仅记录历史,也参与塑造历史;在他定位于约1750—1850年“鞍型期”的近代,期待脱离了经验,于是历史显现为一个开放的、不断加速的、可以被人创造的过程。
定位
比勒费尔德的德国历史学家,概念史的奠基人之一:他认为,在约1750—1850年的“鞍型期”,历史、进步和革命等概念获得了现代含义,因为经验与期待彼此分离,历史似乎在加速。
核心思想
- 概念史
- 鞍型期
- 经验空间与期待视域
- 时间层
影响
受影响于 3
卡尔·施米特
受其影响 ✓
Koselleck, who saw Schmitt as a mentor, took up Schmitt’s account of the absolutist state as ending civil war, which Enlightenment critique then undermined (Kritik und Krise, 1959). R. Koselleck, Kritik und Krise (diss. Heidelberg 1954; publ. 1959); C. Schmitt, Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes (1938); R. Koselleck and C. Schmitt, Der Briefwechsel 1953–1983, ed. J. E. Dunkhase (2019); SEP “Carl Schmitt”
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
卡尔·施米特 › 1888–1985
马丁·海德格尔
受其影响 ✓
Koselleck extended Heidegger’s being-towards-death into conditions of possible histories – having to die and being able to kill, friend and enemy (‘Historik und Hermeneutik’, 1987). R. Koselleck, “Historik und Hermeneutik” (1987), repr. in Zeitschichten (2000); M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (1927)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
马丁·海德格尔 › 1889–1976
汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔
受其影响
Koselleck, who heard Gadamer in Heidelberg from 1947, set a ‘Historik’ of pre-linguistic conditions of history beside Gadamer’s hermeneutics; Gadamer replied (‘Historik und Hermeneutik’, 1987). R. Koselleck, “Historik und Hermeneutik”, in R. Koselleck and H.-G. Gadamer, Hermeneutik und Historik (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1987); repr. in Zeitschichten (2000)
依据: AI 草稿
汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔 › 1900–2002
影响了 2
保罗·利科
影响了
Ricœur took over Koselleck’s categories ‘space of experience’ and ‘horizon of expectation’ (Vergangene Zukunft, 1979) for his hermeneutics of historical consciousness (Time and Narrative III, 1985). P. Ricœur, Temps et récit III (1985); R. Koselleck, Vergangene Zukunft (1979)
依据: AI 草稿
保罗·利科 › 1913–2005
海登·怀特
影响了 存在争议
White wrote the foreword to Koselleck’s The Practice of Conceptual History (2002), Koselleck that to White’s Auch Klio dichtet (1986); a direct influence on White is uncertain. H. White, foreword to R. Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History (2002); R. Koselleck, foreword to H. White, Auch Klio dichtet oder Die Fiktion des Faktischen (1986)
依据: AI 草稿
海登·怀特 › 1928–2018
批评
受批评于 1
尤尔根·哈贝马斯
受其批评
Habermas read Koselleck’s Kritik und Krise (1959) as a neo-conservative critique of the Enlightenment and of the philosophy of history (‘Verrufener Fortschritt – verkanntes Jahrhundert’, Merkur, 1960). J. Habermas, “Verrufener Fortschritt – verkanntes Jahrhundert”, Merkur 14 (1960); N. Olsen, History in the Plural (2012)
依据: AI 草稿
尤尔根·哈贝马斯 › 1929–2026
作品
- 1959批判与危机
1954年的博士论文:专制国家通过把政治与私人良知分开,结束了宗教内战;启蒙运动在这一私人空间中发展出对国家的道德批判,这种批判掩盖了自身的政治目的,最终导向革命和乌托邦式的历史哲学。
- 1979过去的未来:论历史时间的语义学
关于近代时间经验的论文集:历史不再是生活的导师,未来变得开放并可以规划,“历史”本身成为一个集合单数名词,而“经验空间”与“期待视域”则标示出历史时间的两极。
立场
Koselleck is on the map as a founder of conceptual history and as a theorist of historical time. His dissertation “Critique and Crisis” (1959) argued that the Enlightenment, sheltered in the private sphere of the absolutist state, developed a moral criticism that denied its own political character and ended in revolution and in utopian philosophies of history; he regarded Carl Schmitt as a mentor of the work, and Habermas criticised it in 1960. With Otto Brunner and Werner Conze he edited the “Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe” (1972–97), a lexicon of political and social language in Germany built on the hypothesis of a “saddle period” around 1750–1850, in which concepts were temporalised, democratised, ideologised and politicised. The essays of “Futures Past” (1979) describe the modern age by the growing distance between the “space of experience” and the “horizon of expectation”, categories that Ricœur took up in “Time and Narrative”. In “Historik und Hermeneutik” (1987) he started from Heidegger’s “Being and Time” to name pre-linguistic conditions of possible histories – having to die and being able to kill, friend and enemy, inside and outside – and Gadamer replied. Later essays (“Zeitschichten”, 2000) set out a theory of layers of time, and he wrote on war memorials and the politics of remembrance. How far Schmitt’s thought shapes “Critique and Crisis” is discussed under “Context & critique”.
生平与背景
Reinhart Koselleck was born on 23 April 1923 in Görlitz; his father was a historian and educational reformer. A war volunteer, he served from 1941 as an artilleryman on the Eastern Front and later in a Luftwaffe signals unit; in April 1945 he was taken prisoner by the Red Army, held for some weeks in Auschwitz and then for about a year and a half in a camp near Karaganda in Kazakhstan. From 1947 he studied history, philosophy, sociology and constitutional law in Heidelberg, where he heard Jaspers, Alfred Weber, Gadamer and Löwith, and in 1954 took his doctorate under Johannes Kühn and Löwith. After teaching German at the University of Bristol (1953–55) he took his habilitation in Heidelberg in 1965 with a study of Prussia between reform and revolution. He held chairs in Bochum (1966), Heidelberg (1968) and, from 1973 to 1988, the new University of Bielefeld. In 1999 he received the Sigmund Freud Prize for scholarly prose. He died in Bad Oeynhausen on 3 February 2006.
其他主要作品
- Kritik und Krise (1959)
- Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution (1967)
- Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (ed. with O. Brunner and W. Conze, 1972–97)
- Vergangene Zukunft (1979)
- Zeitschichten (2000)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的