Reinhart Koselleck
For Koselleck, concepts do not only register history but help to shape it; in the modern age, which he dated to a “saddle period” around 1750–1850, expectations broke away from experience, so that history appeared as an open, accelerating process that could be made.
Placement
German historian in Bielefeld and a founder of conceptual history: he argued that in a “saddle period” around 1750–1850 concepts such as history, progress and revolution took on their modern meaning, as experience and expectation drew apart and history seemed to accelerate.
Key ideas
- Conceptual history (Begriffsgeschichte)
- The saddle period (Sattelzeit)
- Space of experience and horizon of expectation
- Layers of time
Influence
Influenced by 3
Carl Schmitt
influenced by ✓
Koselleck, who saw Schmitt as a mentor, took up Schmitt’s account of the absolutist state as ending civil war, which Enlightenment critique then undermined (Kritik und Krise, 1959). R. Koselleck, Kritik und Krise (diss. Heidelberg 1954; publ. 1959); C. Schmitt, Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes (1938); R. Koselleck and C. Schmitt, Der Briefwechsel 1953–1983, ed. J. E. Dunkhase (2019); SEP “Carl Schmitt”
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Carl Schmitt › 1888–1985
Martin Heidegger
influenced by ✓
Koselleck extended Heidegger’s being-towards-death into conditions of possible histories – having to die and being able to kill, friend and enemy (‘Historik und Hermeneutik’, 1987). R. Koselleck, “Historik und Hermeneutik” (1987), repr. in Zeitschichten (2000); M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (1927)
Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata
Martin Heidegger › 1889–1976
Hans-Georg Gadamer
influenced by
Koselleck, who heard Gadamer in Heidelberg from 1947, set a ‘Historik’ of pre-linguistic conditions of history beside Gadamer’s hermeneutics; Gadamer replied (‘Historik und Hermeneutik’, 1987). R. Koselleck, “Historik und Hermeneutik”, in R. Koselleck and H.-G. Gadamer, Hermeneutik und Historik (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1987); repr. in Zeitschichten (2000)
Evidence: AI draft
Hans-Georg Gadamer › 1900–2002
Influenced 2
Paul Ricœur
influenced
Ricœur took over Koselleck’s categories ‘space of experience’ and ‘horizon of expectation’ (Vergangene Zukunft, 1979) for his hermeneutics of historical consciousness (Time and Narrative III, 1985). P. Ricœur, Temps et récit III (1985); R. Koselleck, Vergangene Zukunft (1979)
Evidence: AI draft
Paul Ricœur › 1913–2005
Hayden White
influenced disputed
White wrote the foreword to Koselleck’s The Practice of Conceptual History (2002), Koselleck that to White’s Auch Klio dichtet (1986); a direct influence on White is uncertain. H. White, foreword to R. Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History (2002); R. Koselleck, foreword to H. White, Auch Klio dichtet oder Die Fiktion des Faktischen (1986)
Evidence: AI draft
Hayden White › 1928–2018
Criticism
Criticized by 1
Jürgen Habermas
criticised by
Habermas read Koselleck’s Kritik und Krise (1959) as a neo-conservative critique of the Enlightenment and of the philosophy of history (‘Verrufener Fortschritt – verkanntes Jahrhundert’, Merkur, 1960). J. Habermas, “Verrufener Fortschritt – verkanntes Jahrhundert”, Merkur 14 (1960); N. Olsen, History in the Plural (2012)
Evidence: AI draft
Jürgen Habermas › 1929–2026
Works
Dissertation of 1954: the absolutist state ended the religious civil wars by separating politics from private conscience; there the Enlightenment developed a moral criticism of the state that hid its political aim and issued in revolution and utopian philosophy of history.
Essays on the modern experience of time: history ceases to be the teacher of life, the future becomes open and plannable, “history” becomes a collective singular, and “space of experience” and “horizon of expectation” name the poles of historical time.
Position
Koselleck is on the map as a founder of conceptual history and as a theorist of historical time. His dissertation “Critique and Crisis” (1959) argued that the Enlightenment, sheltered in the private sphere of the absolutist state, developed a moral criticism that denied its own political character and ended in revolution and in utopian philosophies of history; he regarded Carl Schmitt as a mentor of the work, and Habermas criticised it in 1960. With Otto Brunner and Werner Conze he edited the “Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe” (1972–97), a lexicon of political and social language in Germany built on the hypothesis of a “saddle period” around 1750–1850, in which concepts were temporalised, democratised, ideologised and politicised. The essays of “Futures Past” (1979) describe the modern age by the growing distance between the “space of experience” and the “horizon of expectation”, categories that Ricœur took up in “Time and Narrative”. In “Historik und Hermeneutik” (1987) he started from Heidegger’s “Being and Time” to name pre-linguistic conditions of possible histories – having to die and being able to kill, friend and enemy, inside and outside – and Gadamer replied. Later essays (“Zeitschichten”, 2000) set out a theory of layers of time, and he wrote on war memorials and the politics of remembrance. How far Schmitt’s thought shapes “Critique and Crisis” is discussed under “Context & critique”.
Life & context
Reinhart Koselleck was born on 23 April 1923 in Görlitz; his father was a historian and educational reformer. A war volunteer, he served from 1941 as an artilleryman on the Eastern Front and later in a Luftwaffe signals unit; in April 1945 he was taken prisoner by the Red Army, held for some weeks in Auschwitz and then for about a year and a half in a camp near Karaganda in Kazakhstan. From 1947 he studied history, philosophy, sociology and constitutional law in Heidelberg, where he heard Jaspers, Alfred Weber, Gadamer and Löwith, and in 1954 took his doctorate under Johannes Kühn and Löwith. After teaching German at the University of Bristol (1953–55) he took his habilitation in Heidelberg in 1965 with a study of Prussia between reform and revolution. He held chairs in Bochum (1966), Heidelberg (1968) and, from 1973 to 1988, the new University of Bielefeld. In 1999 he received the Sigmund Freud Prize for scholarly prose. He died in Bad Oeynhausen on 3 February 2006.
Further main works
- Kritik und Krise (1959)
- Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution (1967)
- Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (ed. with O. Brunner and W. Conze, 1972–97)
- Vergangene Zukunft (1979)
- Zeitschichten (2000)
As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made