乔治·康吉莱姆
健康并不意味着合乎平均,而是意味着能够应对变化并确立新的规范——疾病是一种更狭窄的生活方式,而不只是程度上的偏离。
定位
哲学家兼医生,曾参加抵抗运动,1955年起接任巴什拉在索邦大学的教职:在《正常与病态》(1943年)中,健康不是统计学上的平均值,而是生命体确立新规范的能力;作为生命科学的史家,他追溯的是概念而非发现,并曾是福柯关于疯癫的博士论文的评审报告人(rapporteur)。
核心思想
- 健康即规范性
- 病态是另一种规范,而非量上的偏离
- 生命科学中的概念史
- 生命体与环境
影响
受影响于 1
加斯东·巴什拉
受其影响 ✓
Canguilhem took over Bachelard’s historical epistemology, writing the history of concepts rather than discoveries, and succeeded him at the Sorbonne (La Formation du concept de réflexe, 1955). G. Canguilhem, La Formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (1955); Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences (1968); Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie (1977)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
加斯东·巴什拉 › 1884–1962
影响了 4
路易·阿尔都塞
影响了 ✓
Althusser cited Canguilhem, with Bachelard and Cavaillès, as a model for reading Marx’s science through its concepts and problematics rather than as a continuous progress (Reading Capital, 1965). L. Althusser et al., Lire le Capital (1965); SEP “Louis Althusser”
路易·阿尔都塞 › 1918–1990
米歇尔·福柯 教过
教过 ✓
Canguilhem, proposed by Jean Hyppolite, was the rapporteur of Foucault’s thèse d’État Folie et déraison, defended at the Sorbonne in 1961, and remained one of his most important supporters; a sponsor rather than a teacher in the narrower sense. SEP “Michel Foucault”; D. Eribon, Michel Foucault (1989)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
米歇尔·福柯 › 1926–1984
皮埃尔·布迪厄
影响了 ✓
Bourdieu registered a thesis on the temporal structures of affective life with Canguilhem, never completed, and drew on his historical epistemology (Esquisse pour une auto-analyse, 2004). P. Bourdieu, Esquisse pour une auto-analyse (2004); P. Bourdieu, J.-C. Chamboredon and J.-C. Passeron, Le métier de sociologue (1968)
皮埃尔·布迪厄 › 1930–2002
保兰·洪通吉 教过
教过
After the agrégation of 1966, whose jury Canguilhem chaired, Hountondji agreed with him on a thesis on social structure and the genesis of the scientific spirit, never completed, and attended his seminar, where he presented his paper on Anton Wilhelm Amo (printed 1970). P. J. Hountondji, “My Experience with Paul Ricœur”, Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies 12:1 (2021), 50–59
依据: AI 草稿
保兰·洪通吉 › 1942–2024
批评
批评了 1
奥古斯特·孔德
批评了
Canguilhem rejected the thesis Comte took from Broussais that disease differs from health only in degree, holding that norms are set by the living being itself (1943). G. Canguilhem, Essai sur quelques problèmes concernant le normal et le pathologique (1943), part I, ch. 2
依据: AI 草稿
奥古斯特·孔德 › 1798–1857
作品
立场
Canguilhem’s starting question was medical: is disease merely a quantitative variation of the normal state, as Broussais, Comte and Claude Bernard had taught? In The Normal and the Pathological he answered no. For a living being, “normal” is not a statistical average but a norm it institutes itself. Health, in his phrase, is “une marge de tolérance des infidélités du milieu”, a margin of tolerance for the inconstancies of the environment: the capacity to fall ill and recover, and to set new norms in new situations. Disease is also a norm of life, but a narrower one that can no longer adapt. Medicine therefore rests on the experience of the sick person before it rests on physiology. In the essays of Knowledge of Life he defended the autonomy of biology against mechanism without returning to a metaphysical vitalism, traced the history of the concept of milieu and argued that machines should be understood as extensions of organisms rather than organisms as machines. As a historian of science he followed Bachelard in writing the history of concepts rather than of great men or discoveries, and introduced the notion of a “scientific ideology” that precedes a science; his study of the reflex argued that the concept was formed by Thomas Willis rather than by Descartes. His lecture “What Is Psychology?” (1956) attacked psychology as a technique of adjustment without a clear object. Through his students François Dagognet and Dominique Lecourt, through Foucault and through readers such as Althusser and Bourdieu, his history of norms and concepts shaped much of French philosophy after 1960.
生平与背景
Georges Canguilhem was born on 4 June 1904 in Castelnaudary in the Aude. At the Lycée Henri-IV in Paris he was taught by Alain, whose pacifism he shared in his early years, and in 1924 he entered the École normale supérieure, in the same year as Jean-Paul Sartre, Raymond Aron, Paul Nizan and Daniel Lagache. He passed the agrégation in philosophy in 1927 and taught at lycées in Charleville, Douai, Valenciennes, Béziers and Toulouse, where from 1936 he also studied medicine. In 1940 he refused to teach under the Vichy regime. In 1941 he took over Jean Cavaillès’s post at the University of Strasbourg, which had withdrawn to Clermont-Ferrand, and joined the Resistance movement Libération-Sud; under the name “Lafont” he served as a doctor in the fighting at Mont Mouchet in 1944. His medical thesis on the normal and the pathological appeared in 1943. After the war he taught at Strasbourg again, was inspector general of philosophy from 1948, and in 1955 received his doctorate in philosophy with a study of the formation of the concept of reflex. In the same year he succeeded Bachelard at the Sorbonne and as director of the Institut d’histoire des sciences et des techniques, which he led until 1971. He was the rapporteur for Michel Foucault’s thesis Folie et déraison (1961), and Pierre Bourdieu registered with him a thesis project on the temporal structures of affective life that he never completed. Canguilhem died on 11 September 1995.
其他主要作品
- The Normal and the Pathological (Essai sur quelques problèmes concernant le normal et le pathologique, 1943; expanded 1966)
- Knowledge of Life (1952)
- The Formation of the Concept of Reflex in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (1955)
- What Is Psychology? (lecture 1956, published 1958)
- Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Sciences (Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 1968)
- Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences (1977)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的