AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Georges Canguilhem

1904–1995

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Być zdrowym nie znaczy być przeciętnym; znaczy umieć radzić sobie ze zmianą i ustanawiać nowe normy – choroba jest węższym sposobem życia, a nie tylko odchyleniem co do stopnia.

Umiejscowienie

Nauki przyrodnicze i nauki o człowieku · Europa Zachodnia · Nauka, Epistemologia, Etyka

Filozof i lekarz, uczestnik Ruchu Oporu i od 1955 roku następca Bachelarda na Sorbonie: w „Normalne i patologiczne” (1943) zdrowie nie jest średnią statystyczną, lecz zdolnością istoty żywej do ustanawiania nowych norm; jako historyk nauk o życiu śledził pojęcia, nie odkrycia, i był recenzentem (rapporteur) rozprawy Foucaulta o szaleństwie.

Kluczowe idee

  • Zdrowie jako normatywność
  • Patologia to inna norma, a nie odchylenie ilościowe
  • Historia pojęć w naukach o życiu
  • Istota żywa i środowisko

Uczniowie: Michel Foucault, Paulin Hountondji

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 1

  • Gaston Bachelard

    pod wpływem ✓

    Canguilhem took over Bachelard’s historical epistemology, writing the history of concepts rather than discoveries, and succeeded him at the Sorbonne (La Formation du concept de réflexe, 1955). G. Canguilhem, La Formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (1955); Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences (1968); Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie (1977)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Gaston Bachelard › 1884–1962

Wpływ na 4

  • Louis Althusser

    wpływ na ✓

    Althusser cited Canguilhem, with Bachelard and Cavaillès, as a model for reading Marx’s science through its concepts and problematics rather than as a continuous progress (Reading Capital, 1965). L. Althusser et al., Lire le Capital (1965); SEP “Louis Althusser”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Louis Althusser › 1918–1990

  • Michel Foucault uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica ✓

    Canguilhem, proposed by Jean Hyppolite, was the rapporteur of Foucault’s thèse d’État Folie et déraison, defended at the Sorbonne in 1961, and remained one of his most important supporters; a sponsor rather than a teacher in the narrower sense. SEP “Michel Foucault”; D. Eribon, Michel Foucault (1989)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Michel Foucault › 1926–1984

  • Pierre Bourdieu

    wpływ na ✓

    Bourdieu registered a thesis on the temporal structures of affective life with Canguilhem, never completed, and drew on his historical epistemology (Esquisse pour une auto-analyse, 2004). P. Bourdieu, Esquisse pour une auto-analyse (2004); P. Bourdieu, J.-C. Chamboredon and J.-C. Passeron, Le métier de sociologue (1968)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata · InPhO

    Pierre Bourdieu › 1930–2002

  • Paulin Hountondji uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica

    After the agrégation of 1966, whose jury Canguilhem chaired, Hountondji agreed with him on a thesis on social structure and the genesis of the scientific spirit, never completed, and attended his seminar, where he presented his paper on Anton Wilhelm Amo (printed 1970). P. J. Hountondji, “My Experience with Paul Ricœur”, Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies 12:1 (2021), 50–59

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Paulin Hountondji › 1942–2024

Krytyka

Krytykuje 1

  • Auguste Comte

    krytykuje

    Canguilhem rejected the thesis Comte took from Broussais that disease differs from health only in degree, holding that norms are set by the living being itself (1943). G. Canguilhem, Essai sur quelques problèmes concernant le normal et le pathologique (1943), part I, ch. 2

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Auguste Comte › 1798–1857

Dzieła

  • Jego rozprawa medyczna, rozszerzona w 1966 roku: choroba nie jest zwykłym ilościowym odchyleniem od normy, jak twierdzili Comte i Claude Bernard, lecz inną, bardziej ograniczoną normą życia; zdrowie to zdolność do ustanawiania nowych norm.

  • Eseje o eksperymentowaniu w biologii, teorii komórkowej, witalizmie, maszynie i organizmie oraz istocie żywej i jej środowisku: biologia musi wychodzić od istoty żywej jako centrum wartości, a nie od maszyny.

Stanowisko

Canguilhem’s starting question was medical: is disease merely a quantitative variation of the normal state, as Broussais, Comte and Claude Bernard had taught? In The Normal and the Pathological he answered no. For a living being, “normal” is not a statistical average but a norm it institutes itself. Health, in his phrase, is “une marge de tolérance des infidélités du milieu”, a margin of tolerance for the inconstancies of the environment: the capacity to fall ill and recover, and to set new norms in new situations. Disease is also a norm of life, but a narrower one that can no longer adapt. Medicine therefore rests on the experience of the sick person before it rests on physiology. In the essays of Knowledge of Life he defended the autonomy of biology against mechanism without returning to a metaphysical vitalism, traced the history of the concept of milieu and argued that machines should be understood as extensions of organisms rather than organisms as machines. As a historian of science he followed Bachelard in writing the history of concepts rather than of great men or discoveries, and introduced the notion of a “scientific ideology” that precedes a science; his study of the reflex argued that the concept was formed by Thomas Willis rather than by Descartes. His lecture “What Is Psychology?” (1956) attacked psychology as a technique of adjustment without a clear object. Through his students François Dagognet and Dominique Lecourt, through Foucault and through readers such as Althusser and Bourdieu, his history of norms and concepts shaped much of French philosophy after 1960.

Życie i kontekst

Georges Canguilhem was born on 4 June 1904 in Castelnaudary in the Aude. At the Lycée Henri-IV in Paris he was taught by Alain, whose pacifism he shared in his early years, and in 1924 he entered the École normale supérieure, in the same year as Jean-Paul Sartre, Raymond Aron, Paul Nizan and Daniel Lagache. He passed the agrégation in philosophy in 1927 and taught at lycées in Charleville, Douai, Valenciennes, Béziers and Toulouse, where from 1936 he also studied medicine. In 1940 he refused to teach under the Vichy regime. In 1941 he took over Jean Cavaillès’s post at the University of Strasbourg, which had withdrawn to Clermont-Ferrand, and joined the Resistance movement Libération-Sud; under the name “Lafont” he served as a doctor in the fighting at Mont Mouchet in 1944. His medical thesis on the normal and the pathological appeared in 1943. After the war he taught at Strasbourg again, was inspector general of philosophy from 1948, and in 1955 received his doctorate in philosophy with a study of the formation of the concept of reflex. In the same year he succeeded Bachelard at the Sorbonne and as director of the Institut d’histoire des sciences et des techniques, which he led until 1971. He was the rapporteur for Michel Foucault’s thesis Folie et déraison (1961), and Pierre Bourdieu registered with him a thesis project on the temporal structures of affective life that he never completed. Canguilhem died on 11 September 1995.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • The Normal and the Pathological (Essai sur quelques problèmes concernant le normal et le pathologique, 1943; expanded 1966)
  • Knowledge of Life (1952)
  • The Formation of the Concept of Reflex in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (1955)
  • What Is Psychology? (lecture 1956, published 1958)
  • Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Sciences (Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 1968)
  • Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences (1977)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd