安托万·阿尔诺
清晰的思维需要一套关于观念、判断和推理的方法;观念不是介于心灵与世界之间的东西,而是心灵对其对象的知觉本身。
定位
索邦大学的神学家、波尔-罗亚尔修道院的领袖人物:他撰写了对笛卡尔《沉思集》的第四组反驳,与人合著《波尔-罗亚尔语法》和《波尔-罗亚尔逻辑》,在观念的本性问题上反对马勒伯朗士,并与莱布尼茨通信;作为詹森派信徒,他于1656年被逐出索邦大学,最终客死于布鲁塞尔的流亡之中。
核心思想
- 第四组反驳:笛卡尔循环
- 波尔-罗亚尔逻辑:观念的内涵与外延
- 观念是知觉,而不是在上帝之中被看见的实体
- 奥古斯丁式的恩典神学(詹森主义)
影响
受影响于 1
奥古斯丁
受其影响
Arnauld defended Jansenius’ Augustinian doctrine of grace and in the Fourth Objections (1641) noted that Augustine had anticipated Descartes’ cogito (On Free Choice of the Will). A. Arnauld, Fourth Objections to Descartes’ Meditationes (1641); Augustine, De libero arbitrio; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
奥古斯丁 › 354–430
影响了 1
布莱兹·帕斯卡
影响了
When the Sorbonne moved to censure Arnauld in 1656, Pascal took up his cause and the Jansenist doctrine of grace in the Provincial Letters (1656–57). B. Pascal, Les Provinciales (1656–57); SEP “Blaise Pascal”; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
布莱兹·帕斯卡 › 1623–1662
批评
相互批评 1
尼古拉·马勒伯朗士 ⇄ 相互
批评了
Arnauld argued against Malebranche’s vision in God that ideas are the mind’s own perceptions, not representative entities in God (On True and False Ideas, 1683). A. Arnauld, Des vraies et des fausses idées (1683); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
受其批评
Malebranche answered Arnauld’s attack in his Réponse (1684) and later letters, defending ideas as objects in God distinct from mental modifications, against Arnauld’s view of ideas as perceptions. N. Malebranche, Réponse au livre Des vraies et des fausses idées (1684); Trois lettres (1685); SEP “Nicolas Malebranche”
依据: AI 草稿
尼古拉·马勒伯朗士 › 1638–1715
批评了 2
勒内·笛卡尔 受其影响影响了
受其影响
Arnauld became a leading Cartesian: the Port-Royal Logic (1662, with Pierre Nicole) builds on Descartes’ clear and distinct ideas and his method. A. Arnauld and P. Nicole, La Logique ou l’art de penser (1662); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO
影响了
In the Fourth Replies (1641) Descartes accepted Arnauld’s advice and added to the Synopsis that the Fourth Meditation concerns error in judging truth, not sin. R. Descartes, Meditationes (1641), Synopsis and Fourth Replies; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
批评了
In the Fourth Objections (1641) Arnauld charged Descartes with circular reasoning about God and clear perception and questioned his denial of souls to animals. Descartes, Meditationes (1641), Fourth Objections (AT VII 197–218); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
勒内·笛卡尔 › 1596–1650
戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨 影响了
影响了
Answering Arnauld’s objections in their correspondence (1686–1690), Leibniz clarified his distinction between hypothetical and absolute necessity and his hypothesis of the concomitance of substances. The Leibniz–Arnauld Correspondence (1686–1690), ed. and tr. S. Voss (2016); SEP “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz”
依据: AI 草稿
批评了
Arnauld objected that Leibniz’s complete individual concept, containing all that will befall Adam, implies a ‘more than fatal’ necessity (letters on the Discourse on Metaphysics, 1686). Arnauld to Ernst von Hessen-Rheinfels, 13 Mar. 1686; Leibniz–Arnauld correspondence 1686–1690; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”
依据: AI 草稿
戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨 › 1646–1716
作品
与皮埃尔·尼科尔为波尔-罗亚尔学校合著:一部笛卡尔式的逻辑学,讲观念、判断、推理与方法,区分一个普遍观念的内涵与外延,直到十九世纪仍是标准教科书。
- 1683论真观念与假观念
针对马勒伯朗士:观念不是我们在上帝之中看见的表象性存在,而是知觉本身,是我们自己心灵的一种样态,直接以其对象为对象。
立场
Arnauld combined Augustine’s theology with Descartes’ philosophy. His Fourth Objections, which Descartes valued highly, raised among other points two problems that are still discussed: Descartes had shown only that he could doubt the existence of his body, not that mind and body are really distinct; and if clear and distinct perception is guaranteed by God’s existence, while God’s existence is known by clear and distinct perception, the argument seems to move in a circle – the “Cartesian circle”. He also asked how Descartes’ account of matter could be reconciled with the doctrine of the Eucharist. The Port-Royal Logic turns Cartesian method into a theory of thinking in four parts – conceiving, judging, reasoning and ordering – and distinguishes the comprehension of a general idea, the attributes it contains, from its extension, the things to which it applies. Against Malebranche he held that ideas are not representative entities that we see in God but our perceptions themselves, which are directly of their objects; historians of philosophy still debate how far this amounts to a direct realism. In his letters to Leibniz he objected that the notion of a complete individual concept, which contains everything that will ever happen to a person, seemed to make all events necessary. The Port-Royal Grammar treats language as the expression of thought; Noam Chomsky took it up in Cartesian Linguistics (1966).
生平与背景
Antoine Arnauld was born in Paris on 6 February 1612, the youngest of the twenty children of the lawyer Antoine Arnauld. Much of his family was bound up with the Cistercian abbey of Port-Royal: his sister Angélique was its reforming abbess, and his mother, several sisters and nieces became nuns there. He studied theology at the Sorbonne, came under the influence of the abbé de Saint-Cyran, and became a priest and doctor of theology in 1641. In the same year Mersenne passed him Descartes’ Meditations, to which he wrote the Fourth Objections. His book On Frequent Communion (1643) and his defence of Cornelius Jansen’s Augustinus made him the leading theologian of the Jansenists. After his Second Letter to a Duke and Peer the faculty of theology censured him and in February 1656 excluded him; Pascal wrote the Provincial Letters in his defence. At Port-Royal he wrote the General and Rational Grammar (1660) with Claude Lancelot and the Logic, or the Art of Thinking (1662) with Pierre Nicole. After the “Peace of the Church” of 1669 he could appear in public again, but in 1679 renewed pressure drove him into exile in the Spanish Netherlands. There he wrote against Malebranche, beginning with On True and False Ideas (1683), and corresponded with Leibniz (1686–1690). He died in Brussels on 8 August 1694.
其他主要作品
- Fourth Objections to Descartes’ Meditations (1641)
- On Frequent Communion (De la fréquente communion, 1643)
- General and Rational Grammar (Grammaire générale et raisonnée, with Claude Lancelot, 1660)
- Logic, or the Art of Thinking (with Pierre Nicole, 1662)
- On True and False Ideas (Des vraies et des fausses idées, 1683)
- Correspondence with Leibniz (1686–1690)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的