AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Antoine Arnauld

1612–1694

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Jasne myślenie wymaga metody dla idei, sądów i wnioskowań; idea nie jest rzeczą między umysłem a światem, lecz własną percepcją przedmiotu przez umysł.

Umiejscowienie

Racjonalizm · Europa Zachodnia · Logika, Język, Epistemologia, Religia, Metafizyka

Teolog Sorbony i czołowy umysł Port-Royal: autor Czwartych zarzutów do „Medytacji” Kartezjusza, współautor „Gramatyki i Logiki z Port-Royal”, przeciwnik Malebranche’a w sprawie natury idei i korespondent Leibniza; jako janseniście wykluczono go z Sorbony w 1656 roku i zmarł na wygnaniu w Brukseli.

Kluczowe idee

  • Czwarte zarzuty: błędne koło kartezjańskie
  • Logika z Port-Royal: treść i zakres idei
  • Idee są percepcjami, a nie bytami widzianymi w Bogu
  • Augustyńska teologia łaski (jansenizm)

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 1

  • Augustyn z Hippony

    pod wpływem

    Arnauld defended Jansenius’ Augustinian doctrine of grace and in the Fourth Objections (1641) noted that Augustine had anticipated Descartes’ cogito (On Free Choice of the Will). A. Arnauld, Fourth Objections to Descartes’ Meditationes (1641); Augustine, De libero arbitrio; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Augustyn z Hippony › 354–430

Wpływ na 1

  • Blaise Pascal

    wpływ na

    When the Sorbonne moved to censure Arnauld in 1656, Pascal took up his cause and the Jansenist doctrine of grace in the Provincial Letters (1656–57). B. Pascal, Les Provinciales (1656–57); SEP “Blaise Pascal”; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Blaise Pascal › 1623–1662

Krytyka

Wzajemna krytyka 1

  • Nicolas Malebranche ⇄ wzajemnie

    krytykuje

    Arnauld argued against Malebranche’s vision in God that ideas are the mind’s own perceptions, not representative entities in God (On True and False Ideas, 1683). A. Arnauld, Des vraies et des fausses idées (1683); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytyka ze strony

    Malebranche answered Arnauld’s attack in his Réponse (1684) and later letters, defending ideas as objects in God distinct from mental modifications, against Arnauld’s view of ideas as perceptions. N. Malebranche, Réponse au livre Des vraies et des fausses idées (1684); Trois lettres (1685); SEP “Nicolas Malebranche”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Nicolas Malebranche › 1638–1715

Krytykuje 2

  • Kartezjusz pod wpływemwpływ na

    pod wpływem

    Arnauld became a leading Cartesian: the Port-Royal Logic (1662, with Pierre Nicole) builds on Descartes’ clear and distinct ideas and his method. A. Arnauld and P. Nicole, La Logique ou l’art de penser (1662); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    wpływ na

    In the Fourth Replies (1641) Descartes accepted Arnauld’s advice and added to the Synopsis that the Fourth Meditation concerns error in judging truth, not sin. R. Descartes, Meditationes (1641), Synopsis and Fourth Replies; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytykuje

    In the Fourth Objections (1641) Arnauld charged Descartes with circular reasoning about God and clear perception and questioned his denial of souls to animals. Descartes, Meditationes (1641), Fourth Objections (AT VII 197–218); SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Kartezjusz › 1596–1650

  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz wpływ na

    wpływ na

    Answering Arnauld’s objections in their correspondence (1686–1690), Leibniz clarified his distinction between hypothetical and absolute necessity and his hypothesis of the concomitance of substances. The Leibniz–Arnauld Correspondence (1686–1690), ed. and tr. S. Voss (2016); SEP “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    krytykuje

    Arnauld objected that Leibniz’s complete individual concept, containing all that will befall Adam, implies a ‘more than fatal’ necessity (letters on the Discourse on Metaphysics, 1686). Arnauld to Ernst von Hessen-Rheinfels, 13 Mar. 1686; Leibniz–Arnauld correspondence 1686–1690; SEP “Antoine Arnauld”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz › 1646–1716

Dzieła

  • Napisana z Pierre’em Nicole’em dla szkół Port-Royal: kartezjańska logika idei, sądów, rozumowania i metody, która odróżnia treść idei ogólnej od jej zakresu i pozostała standardowym podręcznikiem aż do XIX wieku.

  • Przeciw Malebranche’owi: idea nie jest bytem przedstawiającym, który widzimy w Bogu, lecz samą percepcją, modyfikacją własnego umysłu, która bezpośrednio dotyczy swojego przedmiotu.

Stanowisko

Arnauld combined Augustine’s theology with Descartes’ philosophy. His Fourth Objections, which Descartes valued highly, raised among other points two problems that are still discussed: Descartes had shown only that he could doubt the existence of his body, not that mind and body are really distinct; and if clear and distinct perception is guaranteed by God’s existence, while God’s existence is known by clear and distinct perception, the argument seems to move in a circle – the “Cartesian circle”. He also asked how Descartes’ account of matter could be reconciled with the doctrine of the Eucharist. The Port-Royal Logic turns Cartesian method into a theory of thinking in four parts – conceiving, judging, reasoning and ordering – and distinguishes the comprehension of a general idea, the attributes it contains, from its extension, the things to which it applies. Against Malebranche he held that ideas are not representative entities that we see in God but our perceptions themselves, which are directly of their objects; historians of philosophy still debate how far this amounts to a direct realism. In his letters to Leibniz he objected that the notion of a complete individual concept, which contains everything that will ever happen to a person, seemed to make all events necessary. The Port-Royal Grammar treats language as the expression of thought; Noam Chomsky took it up in Cartesian Linguistics (1966).

Życie i kontekst

Antoine Arnauld was born in Paris on 6 February 1612, the youngest of the twenty children of the lawyer Antoine Arnauld. Much of his family was bound up with the Cistercian abbey of Port-Royal: his sister Angélique was its reforming abbess, and his mother, several sisters and nieces became nuns there. He studied theology at the Sorbonne, came under the influence of the abbé de Saint-Cyran, and became a priest and doctor of theology in 1641. In the same year Mersenne passed him Descartes’ Meditations, to which he wrote the Fourth Objections. His book On Frequent Communion (1643) and his defence of Cornelius Jansen’s Augustinus made him the leading theologian of the Jansenists. After his Second Letter to a Duke and Peer the faculty of theology censured him and in February 1656 excluded him; Pascal wrote the Provincial Letters in his defence. At Port-Royal he wrote the General and Rational Grammar (1660) with Claude Lancelot and the Logic, or the Art of Thinking (1662) with Pierre Nicole. After the “Peace of the Church” of 1669 he could appear in public again, but in 1679 renewed pressure drove him into exile in the Spanish Netherlands. There he wrote against Malebranche, beginning with On True and False Ideas (1683), and corresponded with Leibniz (1686–1690). He died in Brussels on 8 August 1694.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Fourth Objections to Descartes’ Meditations (1641)
  • On Frequent Communion (De la fréquente communion, 1643)
  • General and Rational Grammar (Grammaire générale et raisonnée, with Claude Lancelot, 1660)
  • Logic, or the Art of Thinking (with Pierre Nicole, 1662)
  • On True and False Ideas (Des vraies et des fausses idées, 1683)
  • Correspondence with Leibniz (1686–1690)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd