AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Talcott Parsons

1902–1979

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Społeczeństwo trzyma się razem, bo ludzie dzielą wartości, a każdy system społeczny musi rozwiązywać te same podstawowe zadania, by przetrwać.

Umiejscowienie

Socjologia i teoria społeczna · Ameryka Północna · Społeczeństwo i historia

Socjolog z Harvardu, którego teoria zdominowała amerykańską socjologię w latach 50.: połączył Webera, Durkheima i Freuda w ogólną teorię działania i systemów społecznych – i stał się głównym celem następnego pokolenia.

Kluczowe idee

  • Woluntarystyczna teoria działania
  • Funkcjonalizm strukturalny
  • Schemat AGIL
  • Problem porządku społecznego

Uczniowie: Robert K. Merton, Harold Garfinkel, Niklas Luhmann

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 6

  • Thomas Hobbes

    pod wpływem

    Parsons made the ‘Hobbesian problem of order’, why society does not dissolve into a war of all against all, the starting point of his action theory (1937). T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937); T. Hobbes, Leviathan (1651); SEP “Thomas Hobbes”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Thomas Hobbes › 1588–1679

  • Vilfredo Pareto

    pod wpływem

    Parsons devoted part of The Structure of Social Action (1937) to Pareto, reading his theory of non-logical action and residues as converging on a voluntaristic theory of action. T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937), part II; V. Pareto, Trattato di sociologia generale (1916)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Vilfredo Pareto › 1848–1923

  • Sigmund Freud

    pod wpływem

    Parsons used Freud’s superego to explain how cultural values are internalised in socialisation, linking personality to the social system (‘The Superego and the Theory of Social Systems’, 1952). T. Parsons, “The Superego and the Theory of Social Systems”, Psychiatry 15 (1952), in Social Structure and Personality (1964)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Sigmund Freud › 1856–1939

  • Émile Durkheim

    pod wpływem

    Parsons read Durkheim as moving from positivism to a voluntaristic theory of action in which internalised shared norms constitute social order (The Structure of Social Action, 1937). T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937), part II; H. Joas and W. Knöbl, Sozialtheorie (2004)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Émile Durkheim › 1858–1917

  • Max Weber

    pod wpływem

    Parsons translated The Protestant Ethic (1930) and made Weber, with Durkheim, Pareto and Marshall, a source of his voluntaristic theory of action (The Structure of Social Action, 1937). M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. T. Parsons (1930); T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937); SEP “Max Weber”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Max Weber › 1864–1920

  • Bronisław Malinowski

    pod wpływem ✓

    Parsons heard Malinowski at the LSE (1924–25) and later read his functionalism as a step towards social systems theory (‘Malinowski and the Theory of Social Systems’, 1957). T. Parsons, “Malinowski and the Theory of Social Systems”, in R. Firth (ed.), Man and Culture (1957)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Bronisław Malinowski › 1884–1942

Wpływ na 5

  • Robert K. Merton uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica

    Merton took Parsons’s first courses in sociological theory as a graduate student at Harvard in the early 1930s; his dissertation on science in seventeenth-century England (1938) was supervised by Pitirim Sorokin and guided by the historian of science George Sarton. R. K. Merton, “Remembering the Young Talcott Parsons”, The American Sociologist 15 (1980)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Robert K. Merton › 1910–2003

  • Harold Garfinkel uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica ✓

    Garfinkel took his PhD at Harvard in 1952 under Parsons with The Perception of the Other: A Study in Social Order; ethnomethodology grew out of his questions to Parsons’s theory of action. H. Garfinkel, The Perception of the Other (diss. Harvard 1952); J. Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1984)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Harold Garfinkel › 1917–2011

  • Clifford Geertz

    wpływ na ✓

    Trained in Harvard’s Department of Social Relations, Geertz used Parsons’s distinction between cultural and social system to explain a failed Javanese funeral (‘Ritual and Social Change’, 1957). C. Geertz, “Ritual and Social Change: A Javanese Example”, American Anthropologist 59 (1957), in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973); “Passage and Accident” (2000)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Clifford Geertz › 1926–2006

  • Niklas Luhmann uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica

    Luhmann, then an administrative official, spent 1960–61 at Harvard on a scholarship and attended Parsons’s seminars; a one-year stay. He took his doctorate and Habilitation later, both in Münster in 1966. N. Luhmann, Archimedes und wir. Interviews (1987)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Niklas Luhmann › 1927–1998

  • Jürgen Habermas

    wpływ na ✓

    Habermas took over Parsons’s account of money and power as steering media to conceive economy and state as systems, distinct from the lifeworld (Theory of Communicative Action, 1981). J. Habermas, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (1981), vol. II, “Talcott Parsons: Konstruktionsprobleme der Gesellschaftstheorie”; T. Parsons, “On the Concept of Political Power” (1963)

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Jürgen Habermas › 1929–2026

Krytyka

Krytyka ze strony 4

  • Herbert Blumer

    krytyka ze strony

    Blumer objected that Parsons and the functionalists treat actors as passive media of social forces, neglecting how people interpret their situations (Symbolic Interactionism, 1969). H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (1969), ch. 1; N. J. Smelser, “Remembering Herbert Blumer”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Herbert Blumer › 1900–1987

  • Charles Wright Mills

    krytyka ze strony

    In The Sociological Imagination (1959) Mills attacked Parsons’s ‘grand theory’, translating passages of The Social System into a few plain sentences and faulting its neglect of power. C. W. Mills, The Sociological Imagination (1959), ch. 2

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Charles Wright Mills › 1916–1962

  • Anthony Giddens

    krytyka ze strony

    Giddens objected that Parsons’s normative functionalism turns actors into ‘cultural dopes’ and attributes needs to social systems, countering with structuration theory (New Rules of Sociological Method, 1976). A. Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method (1976); Central Problems in Social Theory (1979)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Anthony Giddens › ur. 1938

  • Raewyn Connell

    krytyka ze strony

    Connell rejected the sex-role theory Parsons built on instrumental and expressive family roles, arguing that it naturalises gender and leaves power and change unexplained (Gender and Power, 1987). R. W. Connell, Gender and Power (1987), ch. 3; T. Parsons & R. F. Bales, Family, Socialization and Interaction Process (1955)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Raewyn Connell › ur. 1944

Krytykuje 1

  • Herbert Spencer

    krytykuje

    Parsons opened The Structure of Social Action (1937) with Brinton’s question ‘Who now reads Spencer?’, declaring Spencer’s positivist, utilitarian evolutionism dead. T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937), ch. 1; C. Brinton, English Political Thought in the Nineteenth Century (1933)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Herbert Spencer › 1820–1903

Dzieła

  • Odczytuje Marshalla, Pareta, Durkheima i Webera jako zbiegających się w jednej „woluntarystycznej” teorii działania: aktorzy wybierają swoje cele, ale w obrębie wspólnych norm.

  • Funkcjonalizm strukturalny w pełnym wydaniu: jak system społeczny utrzymuje porządek dzięki wspólnym wartościom, rolom i socjalizacji – główny cel krytyków „wielkiej teorii”.

Stanowisko

The Structure of Social Action (1937) read Alfred Marshall, Vilfredo Pareto, Durkheim and Weber as converging on a single “voluntaristic” theory of action: people pursue ends, but choose their goals and means within norms and values they share. This, Parsons argued, answers the “Hobbesian problem of order” – why society does not collapse into a war of all against all. From The Social System (1951) on he built a vast conceptual architecture. Every action system must fulfil four functions – adaptation, goal attainment, integration and latent pattern maintenance (the AGIL scheme) – which in society are served by the economy, the polity, the “societal community” of law and norms, and the institutions of family, education and culture. “Pattern variables” describe the choices between traditional and modern orientations. With Freud he explained how values are internalised in socialisation, and his concept of the “sick role” helped found medical sociology. From the late 1950s critics such as C. Wright Mills, Ralf Dahrendorf and Alvin Gouldner charged that his structural functionalism was abstract, conservative and blind to conflict and power. Yet his systems thinking lived on, transformed, in Niklas Luhmann and Jürgen Habermas.

Życie i kontekst

Talcott Parsons was born in 1902 in Colorado Springs, the son of a Congregationalist minister who later became a college president. He studied biology and then economics at Amherst College, spent 1924–25 at the London School of Economics, where he heard the anthropologist Bronisław Malinowski, and then went to Heidelberg, where he took his doctorate with a thesis on the concept of capitalism in Werner Sombart and Max Weber. In 1930 he published the first English translation of Weber’s Protestant Ethic. He taught at Harvard from 1927 until 1973 and in 1946 founded its interdisciplinary Department of Social Relations. For two decades he was the leading figure of American sociology. He died in Munich in 1979, during a visit to Germany that had taken him back to Heidelberg.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • The Structure of Social Action (1937)
  • The Social System (1951)
  • Toward a General Theory of Action (with Edward Shils and others, 1951)
  • Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives (1966)
  • The System of Modern Societies (1971)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd