Clifford Geertz
Za Weberem Geertz twierdził, że człowiek jest zawieszony w sieciach znaczeń, które sam utkał; ponieważ kultura jest publiczna, jej analiza jest interpretacyjnym poszukiwaniem sensu, które czyta rytuał taki jak balijska walka kogutów jako opowieść, jaką ludzie opowiadają sami sobie o sobie.
Umiejscowienie
Amerykański antropolog, który prowadził badania terenowe na Jawie, Bali i w Maroku: kultura, dowodził, jest publiczną siecią znaczeń do zinterpretowania, a nie zbiorem praw do odkrycia, a etnografia jest „opisem gęstym”, który czyta działanie społeczne jak tekst.
Kluczowe idee
- Opis gęsty
- Kultura jako sieci znaczeń
- Religia jako system kulturowy
- Wiedza lokalna
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 3
Max Weber
pod wpływem
Geertz founded his semiotic concept of culture on Weber: ‘man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun’, analysed by interpretation (‘Thick Description’, 1973). C. Geertz, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”, in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973); SEP “Max Weber”
Źródło: szkic AI
Max Weber › 1864–1920
Gilbert Ryle
pod wpływem
Geertz took Ryle’s distinction between ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ description – twitch, wink, parodied wink – as the model of ethnography as interpretation (‘Thick Description’, 1973). C. Geertz, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”, in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973); G. Ryle, “The Thinking of Thoughts: What is ‘Le Penseur’ Doing?” (1968); SEP “Gilbert Ryle”
Źródło: szkic AI
Gilbert Ryle › 1900–1976
Talcott Parsons
pod wpływem ✓
Trained in Harvard’s Department of Social Relations, Geertz used Parsons’s distinction between cultural and social system to explain a failed Javanese funeral (‘Ritual and Social Change’, 1957). C. Geertz, “Ritual and Social Change: A Javanese Example”, American Anthropologist 59 (1957), in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973); “Passage and Accident” (2000)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Talcott Parsons › 1902–1979
Wpływ na 1
Paul Ricoeur
wpływ na
In his Chicago lectures (1975; publ. 1986) Ricœur took up Geertz’s ‘Ideology as a Cultural System’ (1964): at its basic level ideology integrates a community symbolically. P. Ricœur, Lectures on Ideology and Utopia (ed. G. H. Taylor, 1986); C. Geertz, “Ideology as a Cultural System” (1964), in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973)
Źródło: szkic AI
Paul Ricoeur › 1913–2005
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 2
Richard Rorty
krytyka ze strony
Against Geertz’s warning, Rorty defended ethnocentrism: a liberal culture can only start from its own beliefs, but is distinguished by widening its sympathies (‘On Ethnocentrism’, 1986). R. Rorty, “On Ethnocentrism: A Reply to Clifford Geertz”, Michigan Quarterly Review 25 (1986); in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (1991), 203–210; C. Geertz, “The Uses of Diversity” (1986)
Źródło: szkic AI
Richard Rorty › 1931–2007
Talal Asad
krytyka ze strony
Asad argued against Geertz’s definition of religion as a system of symbols that a universal definition of religion is itself a product of post-Reformation Christian history, which separated belief from power and discipline. T. Asad, “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz”, Man 18 (1983); Genealogies of Religion (1993), ch. 1
Źródło: szkic AI
Talal Asad › ur. 1932
Krytykuje 1
Claude Lévi-Strauss
krytykuje
In ‘The Cerebral Savage’ (1967) Geertz objected that Lévi-Strauss dissolves particular cultures into the universal operations of an abstract mind, losing their local meaning. C. Geertz, “The Cerebral Savage: On the Work of Claude Lévi-Strauss”, Encounter 28 (1967); in The Interpretation of Cultures (1973)
Źródło: szkic AI
Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009
Dzieła
Piętnaście esejów z lat 1957–72, otwartych nowym, programowym esejem „Opis gęsty”: kultura jest publicznym systemem symboli, który antropologia interpretuje; tom zawiera „Religię jako system kulturowy”, „Ideologię jako system kulturowy” i „Głęboką grę” o balijskiej walce kogutów.
Eseje o interpretacji w różnych dyscyplinach: „Zamazane gatunki” opisują, jak nauki społeczne zwracają się ku analogiom gry, dramatu i tekstu; inne traktują zdrowy rozsądek, sztukę i prawo jako systemy kulturowe i pytają, co znaczy uchwycić „punkt widzenia tubylca”.
Stanowisko
Geertz is on the map as a bridge between anthropology and the philosophy of the social sciences. In “Thick Description” (1973), the programmatic opening of “The Interpretation of Cultures”, he called his concept of culture semiotic: “believing, with Max Weber, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun”, he took culture to be those webs and its analysis to be “an interpretive one in search of meaning”. From Gilbert Ryle he took the distinction between a “thin” description of a movement – the contraction of an eyelid – and a “thick” one that says whether it is a twitch, a wink or the parody of a wink. The ethnographer, he wrote, “inscribes” social discourse, and for this he referred to Paul Ricœur’s model of the text. Essays such as “Ideology as a Cultural System” (1964), “Religion as a Cultural System” (1966) and “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” (1972) applied the approach; Ricœur discussed Geertz’s concept of ideology in his Chicago lectures of 1975. In the 1980s Geertz defended what he called “anti anti-relativism” and argued with Richard Rorty about ethnocentrism. Talal Asad and the authors of “Writing Culture” (1986) questioned a universal concept of religion as a system of symbols and the authority of the interpreting ethnographer; these debates are set out under “Context & critique”.
Życie i kontekst
Clifford Geertz was born in San Francisco on 23 August 1926. After serving in the US Navy from 1943 to 1945 he studied philosophy at Antioch College in Ohio (BA 1950) and then anthropology in Harvard’s interdisciplinary Department of Social Relations, where he worked with Clyde Kluckhohn and Talcott Parsons. As a member of the Modjokuto Project he did fieldwork with Hildred Geertz in eastern Java in 1952–54 and received his doctorate in 1956 with a thesis on Javanese religion. Fieldwork in Bali followed in 1957–58 and, from 1963, repeated stays in Sefrou, Morocco. He taught at Berkeley (1958–60) and at the University of Chicago (1960–70), where he worked in the Committee for the Comparative Study of New Nations. From 1970 he was professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, emeritus from 2000. “Works and Lives” received the National Book Critics Circle prize in criticism in 1988. He died in Philadelphia on 30 October 2006.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- The Religion of Java (1960)
- Islam Observed (1968)
- The Interpretation of Cultures (1973)
- Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali (1980)
- Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author (1988)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora