Herbert Spencer
Wszystko – natura, umysł i społeczeństwo – ewoluuje od prostego do złożonego, a społeczeństwo działa najlepiej, gdy państwo ingeruje jak najmniej.
Umiejscowienie
Wiktoriański budowniczy systemów, który jeszcze przed „O powstawaniu gatunków” Darwina (1859) uczynił ewolucję prawem wszystkiego, od kosmosu po społeczeństwo; po lekturze Darwina ukuł „przetrwanie najlepiej przystosowanych” (1864). Jego nazwisko przypisano później „darwinizmowi społecznemu” – etykiecie używanej do uzasadniania nierówności i imperium, bardziej prymitywnej niż jego własne poglądy, choć nie bez podstaw w nich.
Kluczowe idee
- Ewolucja od prostego do złożonego
- Społeczeństwo jako organizm
- Społeczeństwa wojownicze a przemysłowe
- Państwo minimalne i leseferyzm
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 1
Karol Darwin
pod wpływem
Spencer had formulated his evolutionism before Darwin, but after reading the Origin of Species he coined ‘survival of the fittest’ for natural selection (Principles of Biology, 1864). H. Spencer, The Principles of Biology, vol. I (1864); C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species (1859), 5th ed. (1869); SEP “Herbert Spencer”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Karol Darwin › 1809–1882
Wpływ na 3
Muhammad Abduh
wpływ na
Abduh admired Spencer, whom he visited in Brighton in 1903, and is reported to have translated his book on education into Arabic from French; the exact passage has not been checked. A. Kateman, “Tellings of an Encounter: A Meeting between Muḥammad ʿAbduh, Herbert Spencer and Wilfrid Blunt (1903)”, Philological Encounters 3 (2018); A. Hourani, Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age (1962)
Źródło: szkic AI
Muhammad Abduh › 1849–1905
Ellen Key
wpływ na
In The Century of the Child (1900) Key held that Spencer’s thoughts ‘contain a great truth’ and based education on the child’s own natural development. E. Key, Barnets århundrade (1900); Eng. The Century of the Child (1909); H. Spencer, Education: Intellectual, Moral, and Physical (1861)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ellen Key › 1849–1926
Yan Fu
wpływ na
In the commentaries to his Tianyanlun (1898) Yan Fu sided with Spencer against Huxley, treating evolution as progress and applying the struggle for survival to nations. Yan Fu, Tianyanlun (1898), commentaries; B. Schwartz, In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West (1964)
Źródło: szkic AI
Yan Fu › 1854–1921
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 4
José Martí
krytyka ze strony
Reviewing Spencer’s “The Coming Slavery” (La América, 1884), Martí granted that state socialism might create a new servitude but objected that Spencer passed over the misery of the poor and the abuses of concentrated wealth that drive people towards it. J. Martí, “Herbert Spencer. La futura esclavitud”, La América (New York), April 1884; Obras completas XV
Źródło: szkic AI
José Martí › 1853–1895
Émile Durkheim
krytyka ze strony
Durkheim argued against Spencer that industrial society cannot rest on free contracts alone, since every contract presupposes non-contractual social rules (The Division of Labour in Society, 1893, I.7). É. Durkheim, De la division du travail social (1893), Book I, ch. 7
Źródło: szkic AI
Émile Durkheim › 1858–1917
Henri Bergson
krytyka ze strony
Bergson, once drawn to Spencer, charged his ‘false evolutionism’ with rebuilding evolution out of fragments of the already evolved, missing real duration (Creative Evolution, 1907, ch. 4). H. Bergson, L’Évolution créatrice (1907), ch. IV; SEP “Henri Bergson”
Źródło: szkic AI
Henri Bergson › 1859–1941
Talcott Parsons
krytyka ze strony
Parsons opened The Structure of Social Action (1937) with Brinton’s question ‘Who now reads Spencer?’, declaring Spencer’s positivist, utilitarian evolutionism dead. T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (1937), ch. 1; C. Brinton, English Political Thought in the Nineteenth Century (1933)
Źródło: szkic AI
Talcott Parsons › 1902–1979
Krytykuje 2
Jeremy Bentham
krytykuje
Spencer objected that Bentham’s greatest-happiness principle gives no guidance, since happiness is undefinable, and put the law of equal freedom in its place (Social Statics, 1851). H. Spencer, Social Statics (1851), Introduction (“The Doctrine of Expediency”), ch. 4
Źródło: szkic AI
Jeremy Bentham › 1748–1832
Auguste Comte
krytykuje
In ‘Reasons for Dissenting from the Philosophy of M. Comte’ (1864) Spencer rejected Comte’s linear classification of the sciences and denied being his follower. H. Spencer, “Reasons for Dissenting from the Philosophy of M. Comte” (1864), appended to The Classification of the Sciences (1864)
Źródło: szkic AI
Auguste Comte › 1798–1857
Dzieła
Społeczeństwo jako rosnący organizm – od idei „człowieka pierwotnego” i instytucji domowych po przeciwstawienie społeczeństw wojowniczych i przemysłowych.
Stanowisko
Spencer believed that one law governs the whole of reality: evolution, the movement from simple, uniform states to complex, differentiated and integrated ones. He formulated it before Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) and understood it largely in Lamarck’s terms, through the inheritance of acquired characteristics; after reading Darwin he coined the phrase “survival of the fittest” (1864). Society, for Spencer, is an organism whose parts become ever more specialised and interdependent. He contrasted “militant” societies, held together by force and command, with “industrial” societies based on voluntary cooperation and contract, and he defended a strictly limited state: poor relief and state welfare would only hinder adaptation. The label “Social Darwinism”, used mostly by critics and made current by Richard Hofstadter’s study of 1944, cast him as its chief theorist. His ideas were indeed cited to justify laissez-faire capitalism, racial hierarchy and empire, and he shared the Victorian ranking of “primitive” and “civilised” peoples; yet he also opposed militarism and the Boer War. Durkheim answered his theory of contract, and Parsons opened his book of 1937 by borrowing the question “Who now reads Spencer?”
Życie i kontekst
Herbert Spencer was born in 1820 in Derby, the son of a Dissenting schoolteacher, and was educated at home and by an uncle; he never attended university. He worked as a railway engineer and, from 1848 to 1853, as sub-editor of The Economist, during which time he published his first book, Social Statics (1851). An inheritance allowed him to live as an independent writer. From 1860 he spent almost four decades on his System of Synthetic Philosophy, which ran from First Principles (1862) through biology, psychology and sociology to ethics. He was one of the most widely read thinkers of the Victorian age, especially in the United States. In poor health for much of his life, he never married and died in Brighton in 1903.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Social Statics (1851)
- First Principles (1862)
- The Principles of Biology (1864–67)
- The Study of Sociology (1873)
- The Principles of Sociology (1876–96)
- The Man versus the State (1884)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora