लिव वाइगोत्सकी
हर उच्चतर मानसिक कार्य दो बार प्रकट होता है: पहले लोगों के बीच, फिर बच्चे के भीतर; भाषा और अन्य चिह्न वे उपकरण हैं जिनसे सामाजिक संसार वैयक्तिक मन बनता है, और अच्छी शिक्षा विकास से आगे चलती है।
पृष्ठभूमि
गोमेल (बेलारूस) में पले सोवियत मनोवैज्ञानिक जिन्होंने माना कि उच्चतर मानसिक कार्य सामाजिक अंतःक्रिया और सांस्कृतिक उपकरणों, सबसे बढ़कर भाषा, से विकसित होते हैं: आंतरिक वाणी आत्मसात की गई बातचीत है।
मुख्य विचार
- सांस्कृतिक-ऐतिहासिक मनोविज्ञान
- निकटस्थ विकास का क्षेत्र
- आंतरिक वाणी
- मनोवैज्ञानिक उपकरणों के रूप में चिह्न
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 2
बारुख़ स्पिनोज़ा
जिनसे प्रभावित ✓
Vygotsky turned to Spinoza’s monism against Descartes’ dualism of passions to seek a unified theory of emotions (Učenie ob emocijach, written 1931–33, publ. 1984). L. S. Vygotsky, Učenie ob emocijach (written 1931–33; publ. 1984), Eng. “The Teaching about Emotions” (1999); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
साक्ष्य: Wikidata में भी · Wikidata
बारुख़ स्पिनोज़ा › 1632–1677
कार्ल मार्क्स
जिनसे प्रभावित
Vygotsky held that psychology needed its own ‘Capital’, a methodology built on Marx’s method rather than on quotations (Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa, written 1927, publ. 1982). L. S. Vygotsky, Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa (written 1927; publ. 1982), Eng. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology” (1997); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
कार्ल मार्क्स › 1818–1883
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 1
एंडी क्लार्क
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
Clark took up Vygotsky’s view of speech as a tool that guides thought, treating public language as external scaffolding for cognition (Being There, 1997). A. Clark, Being There (1997); L. S. Vygotsky, Myshlenie i rech’ (1934; Engl. Thought and Language, 1962)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
एंडी क्लार्क › जन्म 1957
आलोचना
जिनकी आलोचना की 1
ज़ाँ प्याज़े
जिनकी आलोचना की
Vygotsky argued against Piaget that children’s egocentric speech does not fade away but turns into inner speech, so development runs from the social to the individual (1934). L. S. Vygotsky, Myshlenie i rech’ (Thinking and Speech, 1934), ch. 2; J. Piaget, Comments on Vygotsky’s Critical Remarks, 1962
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
ज़ाँ प्याज़े › 1896–1980
कृतियाँ
मनोविज्ञान के प्रतिस्पर्धी संप्रदायों का पद्धतिगत अध्ययन, जो उद्धरणों के बजाय मार्क्स की पद्धति पर बने सामान्य मनोविज्ञान का आह्वान करता है।
- 1934चिंतन और वाणी
चिंतन और भाषा की जड़ें भिन्न हैं पर बचपन में वे मिल जाती हैं; आंतरिक वाणी सामाजिक वाणी से उठती है, और अवधारणाएँ शिक्षण से विकसित होती हैं।
मत
Vygotsky held that the higher mental functions – voluntary attention, logical memory, conceptual thinking – are not simply given by nature but arise from social life: every such function appears first between people and then within the individual. Signs, above all language, serve as psychological tools that reshape the mind as technical tools reshape labour. In “Thinking and Speech” he argued against Jean Piaget that the child’s egocentric speech does not die away but turns into inner speech. His concept of the zone of proximal development – what a child can do with help today and alone tomorrow – grounds the claim that instruction leads development. Luria and Leontiev developed his approach into neuropsychology and activity theory; from the 1960s Jerome Bruner, Michael Cole and James Wertsch made him a central figure of Western educational psychology, and Andy Clark took up language as a scaffold of cognition. Objections concern the texts and their use: “revisionist” research (Anton Yasnitsky, René van der Veer) points to altered Soviet editions and to a popular image that simplifies his work, and the expedition to Uzbekistan that Luria led in 1931–32 within Vygotsky’s programme has been criticised for treating cultural difference as a developmental lag.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky was born on 17 November 1896 in Orsha into a Jewish family and grew up in Gomel, both in today’s Belarus. From 1913 he studied law at Moscow University and at the same time history and philosophy at the Shanyavsky People’s University. Back in Gomel from 1917, he taught literature and psychology at schools and a teacher-training college and wrote “The Psychology of Art”. His lecture at the Second All-Russian Psychoneurological Congress in Leningrad in January 1924 led to a post at the Institute of Experimental Psychology in Moscow. There he worked with Alexander Luria and Alexei Leontiev, built up a laboratory for the psychology of children with disabilities, from which the Experimental Defectological Institute emerged in 1929, and also lectured in Leningrad and Kharkiv. He had suffered from tuberculosis since 1920 and died in Moscow on 11 June 1934, aged 37; “Thinking and Speech” appeared later that year. After a party decree of 1936 against “pedology” his works were hardly reprinted until 1956; the Russian collected works followed in 1982–84.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- The Psychology of Art (Psikhologiia iskusstva, written 1925, published 1965)
- The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology (Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa, written 1927, published 1982)
- The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions (Istoriia razvitiia vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii, written 1931, published in part 1960)
- Thinking and Speech (Myshlenie i rech’, 1934)
- The Teaching about Emotions (Uchenie ob emotsiiakh, written 1931–33, published 1984)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है