列夫·维果茨基
每一种高级心理机能都出现两次:先是在人与人之间,然后才在儿童内部;语言和其他符号是使社会世界变成个体心灵的工具,好的教学走在发展的前面。
定位
苏联心理学家,在戈梅利(白俄罗斯)长大,认为高级心理机能是通过社会交往和文化工具发展起来的,首先是通过语言:内部言语是内化了的对话。
核心思想
- 文化历史心理学
- 最近发展区
- 内部言语
- 符号作为心理工具
影响
受影响于 2
巴鲁赫·斯宾诺莎
受其影响 ✓
Vygotsky turned to Spinoza’s monism against Descartes’ dualism of passions to seek a unified theory of emotions (Učenie ob emocijach, written 1931–33, publ. 1984). L. S. Vygotsky, Učenie ob emocijach (written 1931–33; publ. 1984), Eng. “The Teaching about Emotions” (1999); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
巴鲁赫·斯宾诺莎 › 1632–1677
卡尔·马克思
受其影响
Vygotsky held that psychology needed its own ‘Capital’, a methodology built on Marx’s method rather than on quotations (Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa, written 1927, publ. 1982). L. S. Vygotsky, Istoričeskij smysl psichologičeskogo krizisa (written 1927; publ. 1982), Eng. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology” (1997); R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, Understanding Vygotsky (1991)
依据: AI 草稿
卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883
影响了 1
安迪·克拉克
影响了
Clark took up Vygotsky’s view of speech as a tool that guides thought, treating public language as external scaffolding for cognition (Being There, 1997). A. Clark, Being There (1997); L. S. Vygotsky, Myshlenie i rech’ (1934; Engl. Thought and Language, 1962)
依据: AI 草稿
安迪·克拉克 › 1957年生
批评
批评了 1
让·皮亚杰
批评了
Vygotsky argued against Piaget that children’s egocentric speech does not fade away but turns into inner speech, so development runs from the social to the individual (1934). L. S. Vygotsky, Myshlenie i rech’ (Thinking and Speech, 1934), ch. 2; J. Piaget, Comments on Vygotsky’s Critical Remarks, 1962
依据: AI 草稿
让·皮亚杰 › 1896–1980
作品
- 1927心理学危机的历史意义
对相互竞争的心理学流派所作的方法论研究,呼吁建立一门以马克思的方法而非引文为基础的普通心理学。
- 1934思维与言语
思维与语言有不同的根源,但在童年时期汇合;内部言语源于社会言语,概念通过教学而发展。
立场
Vygotsky held that the higher mental functions – voluntary attention, logical memory, conceptual thinking – are not simply given by nature but arise from social life: every such function appears first between people and then within the individual. Signs, above all language, serve as psychological tools that reshape the mind as technical tools reshape labour. In “Thinking and Speech” he argued against Jean Piaget that the child’s egocentric speech does not die away but turns into inner speech. His concept of the zone of proximal development – what a child can do with help today and alone tomorrow – grounds the claim that instruction leads development. Luria and Leontiev developed his approach into neuropsychology and activity theory; from the 1960s Jerome Bruner, Michael Cole and James Wertsch made him a central figure of Western educational psychology, and Andy Clark took up language as a scaffold of cognition. Objections concern the texts and their use: “revisionist” research (Anton Yasnitsky, René van der Veer) points to altered Soviet editions and to a popular image that simplifies his work, and the expedition to Uzbekistan that Luria led in 1931–32 within Vygotsky’s programme has been criticised for treating cultural difference as a developmental lag.
生平与背景
Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky was born on 17 November 1896 in Orsha into a Jewish family and grew up in Gomel, both in today’s Belarus. From 1913 he studied law at Moscow University and at the same time history and philosophy at the Shanyavsky People’s University. Back in Gomel from 1917, he taught literature and psychology at schools and a teacher-training college and wrote “The Psychology of Art”. His lecture at the Second All-Russian Psychoneurological Congress in Leningrad in January 1924 led to a post at the Institute of Experimental Psychology in Moscow. There he worked with Alexander Luria and Alexei Leontiev, built up a laboratory for the psychology of children with disabilities, from which the Experimental Defectological Institute emerged in 1929, and also lectured in Leningrad and Kharkiv. He had suffered from tuberculosis since 1920 and died in Moscow on 11 June 1934, aged 37; “Thinking and Speech” appeared later that year. After a party decree of 1936 against “pedology” his works were hardly reprinted until 1956; the Russian collected works followed in 1982–84.
其他主要作品
- The Psychology of Art (Psikhologiia iskusstva, written 1925, published 1965)
- The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology (Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa, written 1927, published 1982)
- The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions (Istoriia razvitiia vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii, written 1931, published in part 1960)
- Thinking and Speech (Myshlenie i rech’, 1934)
- The Teaching about Emotions (Uchenie ob emotsiiakh, written 1931–33, published 1984)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的